
The Trump-Harvard showdown is the latest front in a long conservative war against academia
It's a fight by conservatives that dates back to Ronald Reagan, the hitherto spiritual leader of the Republican party, all the way to McCarthyism and beyond, experts say, as the rightwing scraps to seize more control in a manner that is 'part of a standard playbook of authoritarianism'.
Trump reacted furiously this week after the president of Harvard University, the US's oldest, richest and most prestigious college, refused to acquiesce to demands that would have given the government control over whom it hired and admitted, and what it taught.
But the anger wasn't just that Harvard had refused to roll over. It was that the move represented, for the time being, a step back for the Trump administration in what some believe is part of a wider attempt to overhaul US democracy at large.
'It's as dangerous as anything I've ever experienced in my lifetime,' said Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors.
'They're attempting to undermine and destabilize and ultimately control higher education. And at one level, it's an assault on higher education, at another level, it could be seen as prevalent to a full-on assault on democracy. So I think this is a threat to the future of the United States of America, and because of this country's role in the world, a threat to the entirety of the globe at this moment.'
The government said on Monday it planned to freeze $2.2bn in grants and $60m in multi-year contract value to Harvard, hours after Alan Garber, the university president, said Harvard would not accept a series of demands made by the Trump administration. The demands included appointing a White House-approved external body to 'to audit the student body, faculty, staff, and leadership for viewpoint diversity', and that Harvard 'immediately shutter all diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs'.
Garber said the government's edicts 'represent direct governmental regulation' of the school's independence and constitutional rights.
'No government – regardless of which party is in power – should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue,' Garber wrote in an open letter, which was hailed by the left and by college professors concerned at the capitulation of other schools.
Yet, as evidenced by Trump's emotional post on Wednesday, the government's assault on universities is unlikely to stop anytime soon, particularly if he is to emulate the kind of strongman leaders, such as the Hungarian prime minister, Viktor Orbán, he has praised in the past.
'[People in the Trump administration] have read their history, and they know that authoritarian regimes often target higher education as an independent sector and society, and aim to undermine it because of its role in creating an educated populace that could stand up to all forms of authoritarian rule,' Wolfson said.
'And so this is part of a standard playbook of authoritarianism: to attack and to attempt to control or destroy higher education.'
The move against universities has echoes of the efforts by the Wisconsin senator Joseph McCarthy in the middle of the 20th century to root out people he accused of being communists and Marxists. And like McCarthy, Trump's efforts – led by a group of loyalists including the White House deputy chief of staff and head of policy, Stephen Miller – go beyond just universities. Trump has targeted some of the biggest law firms in the US with executive orders, prompting many to cave and pledge hundreds of millions of dollars of pro bono work to causes backed by the Trump administration.
'The Trump administration is following the playbook of totalitarian dictatorships elsewhere in the world. It is trying to use the force of law to intimidate independent civic society organizations, so that opposition to its policies is impossible,' said Steven Pinker, a psychology professor at Harvard and co-chair of the university's Council on Academic Freedom.
'This new incarnation of the American right wing, with complete fealty to a single man, and an unprecedented attempt to disable civic society institutions like law firms and universities, is quite extraordinary.'
The Trump administration has framed its move on Harvard and other colleges as an effort to crackdown on antisemitism, following protests against Israel's war on Gaza, and as a move against alleged civil rights violations on campus. Few outside of the rightwing sphere see that as a good faith argument.
'As a Jewish faculty member, I'm sensitive to antisemitism on campus, and it does exist and it should be combated. But the claim that Harvard is a bastion of antisemitism is just wild hyperbole. Three of our last four presidents who've served longer than a year have been Jewish. The fourth was married to a Jewish professor,' Pinker said.
Harvard has found itself in the Trump administration's crosshairs because of its status as the best known of America's universities, one of the eight esteemed Ivy League schools. Thousands of influential figures across politics, media and business attended Harvard's grand campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts; many of those who didn't go to Harvard still tend to take an interest in its affairs.
'We've got between 4,000 and 5,000 higher education institutions in the US. The Ivys always make headlines. The major cultural commentators in this country are obsessed with the Ivys, and have been for a long time. These are things that sell papers, they get a lot of clicks and a lot of attention,' said Lauren Lassabe Shepherd, a historian of US colleges and universities and author of Resistance from the Right: Conservatives and the Campus Wars.
'The other thing, too, is what happens at your regional state public flagship university often follows from the trends that are set at the Ivys. Not only do they generate a lot of headlines, they are influential in that way.'
Just as Harvard's existence predates the founding of the US, rightwing antipathy towards universities has been brewing for a long time. When Ronald Reagan was running for governor of California in 1966, he used anger towards anti-Vietnam student protesters for political gain: one of his main campaign strands was a promise to 'clean up the mess at Berkeley' – the state's flagship university.
Reagan's tactics bear echoes of Trump's. Ray Colvig, UC Berkeley's chief public information officer at the time, told the university's news service years later that Reagan 'wanted to establish a special process to select faculty in several disciplines'.
'In other words, he wanted to set a political standard for appointing faculty members. This idea was widely opposed, and it went away,' Colvig said.
Reagan wasn't the first to take on the universities. Shepherd said efforts to set up rival, conservative universities, date back to the 1920s, while McCarthy's war on higher education came later. Ellen Schrecker, a historian and author of No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities, wrote in the Nation recently that the Trump administration's efforts were 'worse than McCarthy', and Shepherd said Trump's attacks were 'much more accelerated' than the communist-paranoid senator's tactics.
'McCarthyism, in the 1940s and 50s, the idea was to identify specific professors, hardly ever students, always faculty, and have them fired. Today, we're seeing much worse than that. These are attacks on entire programs and departments. So entire departments like Black studies or DEI initiatives. It's also not just relegated to the professors. We're seeing students with their visas revoked being literally plucked off the streets,' Shepherd said.
Trump hasn't just targeted Harvard. Columbia caved to a series of demands from the Trump administration in March, as a pre-condition for restoring $400m in federal funding, while the White House has announced funding freezes to other schools including Brown, Northwestern, Princeton and Cornell.
Harvard taking a stand is one of the first signs of a fight back – even if it came after it was reported in March that the leaders of the university's center for Middle Eastern studies were forced out, a move seen by critics as an attempt to appease Trump – and academics and others hope it could begin a resistance. It is likely to require a group effort to avoid the right wing's goal for higher education in the US: universities that are in effect government-controlled, and where freedom of speech and thought is restricted.
'The right don't want students to hear about the legacy to slavery. They don't want them to hear about structural inequalities,' Shepherd said.
'They don't want to hear why billionaires are bad. They don't want to hear, from the sciences, about climate change. They want a nice, friendly experience where the most students ever get to debate is the differences in Aristotle and Plato.
'They don't want the actual debates that we see unfolding on campuses today.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
4 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Bill Clinton reportedly sent Jeffrey Epstein note for birthday album
Donald Trump apparently isn't the only president that sent a birthday letter to Jeffrey Epstein. 'The biggest name in the album' was Bill Clinton, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday. The ex-president's letter appeared alongside nearly 50 others, including other prominent celebrities and executives. Last week, the Journal reported that Trump had authored a 'bawdy' letter to Epstein, who died in jail in 2019 after he was arrested on federal sex-trafficking charges. The letter was included in an album Epstein's former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell compiled on the occasion of his 50th birthday in 2003. Trump has sued Rupert Murdoch, two Wall Street Journal newspaper reporters and the newspaper's publisher Dow Jones for libel and slander over the reporting. In Thursday's article, the Wall Street Journal provided additional details on the album, including names of some of the nearly 50 people who wrote to Epstein. They reportedly include billionaire investor Leon Black, fashion designer Vera Wang, billionaire media owner Mortimer Zuckerman, billionaire former Victoria's Secret owner Les Wexner, attorney Alan Dershowitz, model scout Jean-Luc Brunel and billionaire former Microsoft executive Nathan Myhrvold. It also includes the British ambassador to the United States and Labour party politician Peter Mandelson in a section titled 'friends'. Epstein's former co-workers, Alan 'Ace' Greenberg and James 'Jimmy' Cayne, who he worked with at the investment firm Bear Stearns in the 1970s, also sent letters. The New York Times confirmed the Wall Street Journal's reporting on Thursday evening. 'The professionally bound birthday book had multiple volumes and included a table of contents,' the Journal reported. According to the newspaper, Clinton's note to Epstein read: 'It's reassuring isn't it, to have lasted as long, across all the years of learning and knowing, adventures and [illegible word], and also to have your childlike curiosity, the drive to make a difference and the solace of friends.' A Clinton spokesperson declined to comment to the Journal, instead referring the paper to a previous statement from the ex-president, saying he had cut ties with Epstein more than a decade before his arrest and was not aware of Epstein's crimes. Trump's letter to Epstein was far from the only note that was sexual in nature, according to documents the Journal reviewed. It describes a poem signed by Black that read 'Blonde, Red or Brunette, spread out geographically / With this net of fish, Jeff's now 'The Old Man and The Sea'', and a note from Wexner that included 'a line drawing of what appeared to be a woman's breasts'. Spokespersons for Black and Wexner declined the Journal's request for comment. A letter from Wang suggested Epstein star on The Bachelor. Wang did not respond to the Journal's requests for comment. And a note from Myhrvold promised photographs from a recent trip to Africa: 'They seemed more appropriate than anything I could put in words.' The images included 'a monkey screaming, lions and zebras mating, and a zebra with its penis visible', the Journal reported. A spokesperson for Myhrvold told the Journal the former Microsoft executive did not recall the submission, only knew Epstein as a donor to scientific research, and that he 'regularly shares photos of and writes about animal behavior'. The letter from Mandelson 'included photos of whiskey and a tropical island', the Journal reported. Mandelson referred to Epstein as 'my best pal' in the note. A spokesperson for Mandelson declined to comment to the Journal. As for the relationship between Trump and Epstein, the Times found that at least once before, Trump had written Epstein an admiring note. 'To Jeff — You are the greatest!' reads an inscription in a copy of Trump's book Trump: the Art of the Comeback, which belonged to Epstein. The message, reviewed by the Times, is signed 'Donald' and dated 'Oct 97' – the month the book came out. The Times also reviewed a previously undisclosed photo of Trump and Epstein with the singer James Brown. It is not clear where the photo was taken. Brown frequently performed in Atlantic City, New Jersey, where Trump owned the Taj Mahal casino.


Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's FCC approves $8 billion Paramount merger with Skydance after CBS cancels Colbert
President Donald Trump 's Federal Communications Commission has approved a merger between Paramount and Skydance after CBS capitulated and canceled The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. The merger clears the way for an $8.4 billion sale of some of the most prominent names in entertainment, including the CBS broadcast television network, Paramount Pictures, and the Nickelodeon cable channel. The agreement comes after Paramount paid $16 million to settle a lawsuit filed by Trump over a '60 Minutes' interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris that aired in October. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has said the agency's review of the proposed merger was not connected to the lawsuit. But it is also just days after Paramount wielded the axe against Colbert, sparking uproar within the entertainment industry and questions over whether Trump was involved in the decision. Last Thursday, CBS announced that the comedian's decade-long run as the host of CBS' late night flagship will end next May. The cancellation was revealed two days after Colbert used the term 'big fat bribe' to describe Paramount's $16million settlement with President Trump. Colbert gained a reputation as one of Trump's fiercest critics, departing from the traditional late-night in favor of a more overtly partisan approach. Following the announcement of The Late Show's cancellation, Trump took to Truth Social on Friday to gloat over the news in a celebratory post. 'I absolutely love that Colbert got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings,' he wrote. Approval for the merger came after Skydance and its investment partner, RedBird Capital, assured the FCC of their commitment to unbiased journalism that represents diverse viewpoints. Skydance said it would appoint an ombudsman to evaluate complaints of editorial bias or other concerns about CBS in an effort to promote transparency and increased accountability. Paramount also eliminated its diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives to align with the new administration's view that such affirmative action policies are discriminatory. Carr said he welcomed 'Skydance's commitment to make significant changes at the once storied CBS broadcast network. 'In particular, Skydance has made written commitments to ensure that the new company's programming embodies a diversity of viewpoints from across the political and ideological spectrum.' Carr also hailed what he called a victory in 'the FCC's efforts to eliminate invidious forms of DEI discrimination.' The FCC voted 2-1 to approve the deal, with Democratic FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez dissenting. 'After months of cowardly capitulation to this Administration, Paramount finally got what it wanted. Unfortunately, it is the American public who will ultimately pay the price for its actions,' she said. She added 'in an unprecedented move, this once-independent FCC used its vast power to pressure Paramount to broker a private legal settlement and further erode press freedom. 'Even more alarming, it is now imposing never-before-seen controls over newsroom decisions and editorial judgment, in direct violation of the First Amendment and the law.' Skydance CEO David Ellison, son of Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, is poised to become chairman and chief executive of the new Paramount. Jeff Shell, former chief executive of Comcast's NBCUniversal, will be its new president.


The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Japanese First': breakthrough by right-wing populists sparks fears of anti-foreigner backlash in Japan
The emergence of a right-wing populist party in Japan's upper house election on Sunday running on a Trump-style 'Japanese First' slogan has raised concerns of a backlash against the growing foreign presence in the country. The party, Sanseito, has successfully tapped into unease around an expanding immigrant population and a huge influx of tourists after the pandemic. But many see the underlying cause as economic insecurity among a population that both understands the need for overseas labour and visitors, and feels anxiety at the changes they bring and symbolise. Sanseito's new contingent of 14 upper house lawmakers, up from a single seat in the previous election, is undoubtedly a breakthrough, but still leaves it a minor force in the 248-seat chamber. Its success comes against the backdrop of a record 3.8 million foreign residents as of 2024, tourist visits surpassing 20 million in the first quarter of this year, and Tokyo property prices rapidly rising due to wealthy foreign buyers. 'To put it simply, I feel like the Japanese are starting to lose confidence,' says Masafumi Usui, a social psychology professor at Niigata Seiryo University. 'When you're living a comfortable life and are respected by others, then you feel secure, and you're more open. But when people feel that their survival is under threat or in crisis, they start wanting to protect their existing culture. I think that leads to things like patriotism and xenophobia.' Usui notes there was little anti-foreign sentiment during Japan's bubble economy in the 1980s, when it was seen as a powerhouse to be looked up to and learned from. But as its GDP growth stagnated and neighbours such as China and South Korea began to leave it behind in sectors from electronics to shipbuilding, he suggests Japan has struggled to adjust to its new reality. 'I do think people who openly engage in hate speech like 'get out of Japan' are still a minority,' says Usui. 'But more and more people have started saying, 'Why are we spending money on foreigners? Spend it on Japanese people instead.' And I think that's what Sanseito's 'Japanese First' slogan in the election really tapped into. It struck a chord with people who feel like they need to protect Japanese culture and way of life.' Japan's foreign-born population only accounts for about 3% of its residents. One of the contradictions is that to grow its economy Japan needs to increase that figure. Sanseito's answer to the chronic labour shortage is automation and AI, but even those wary of immigrants acknowledge that for the immediate future, more foreign workers are essential. There are around a dozen Vietnamese at the company where Akio Ono installs air conditioners, 'I get on well with them, most of the guys do. But when they go to customers' homes, they still have to go with a Japanese colleague as there is still prejudice, as well as language issues.' Reports of crimes by foreigners, often circulated on social media, have also raised shackles, even though police statistics show immigrants commit proportionally fewer offences than the native population. Ono believes news stories about Vietnamese and Chinese theft rings are 'a big part of what is driving the concerns about immigration.' 'I like the guys I work with but if I see a group of Vietnamese or Chinese walking around, I find them a bit scary. I think a lot of Japanese people feel that way,' adds Ono, who nevertheless voted for the left-wing Reiwa party. Toyonori Sugita, who runs a metalworking factory just south of Tokyo, leans right but also rejected Sanseito. He sees the electorate's main concerns as the economy and the sales tax, which Sanseito promised to cut. 'What can they actually do to realise 'Japanese First,' make the Chinese people who bought land return it?' questions Sugita. 'I've had Vietnamese working here under the government's Technical Intern Training Program for about three years,' he says. 'They mostly work hard and are earnest; unlike some Japanese, who complain a lot.' The tourist boom has also aroused conflicting emotions. While the money spent by visitors on luxury accommodation and high-end dining that now seem cheap by global standards boosts the economy, it is a stark reminder of Japan's decline from its glory days. Usui points out that Japanese people hadn't really been conscious of the gradual fall in relative prices over the last few decades until recent media coverage of big spending foreign tourists drove the point home. 'The reality is that Japan has become a cheap country. You can't deny that wages are higher overseas or that there are 10,000-yen [£50] sea urchin lunches aimed at foreigners. So, in order to protect their emotional wellbeing and maintain their sense of self-worth, people cling to the idea that Japanese culture is the best.'