Wall Street Predicts 160% Gain for this Under-$20 AI Stock
Zeta Global (ZETA), an AI-powered cloud platform offering consumer intelligence and marketing automation software, has had a rocky start to 2025. While its stock is down over 10% year-to-date and trading under $20, Wall Street predicts a significant rebound over the next 12 months. Analysts' average price target of $24.77 implies about 40% upside potential for Zeta stock. Its Street-high price target of $44 implies shares could gain as much as 160%.
Zeta's fundamentals remain healthy. Moreover, strong demand, its growing customer base, and management's focus on lowering share dilution augur well for growth, suggesting that this under-$20 stock could witness a solid recovery.
Robotaxis, Powell and Other Key Things to Watch this Week
The 7 Signs Your Stock Is A Buyout Target
Looking to Gamble on Hard-Hit Solar Stocks? This Is the Top-Rated Ticker Now.
Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now!
The momentum in Zeta's business has sustained despite macro uncertainty. The company kicked off 2025 with impressive revenue of $264 million, up 36% year-over-year. Moreover, its adjusted EBITDA jumped 53% year-over-year to $47 million. Its Q1 marked the 15th consecutive quarter where Zeta exceeded management's guidance and raised its outlook. This shows the growing demand for its services and solid execution.
Zeta's well-diversified customer mix is a key strength. It serves large enterprises, which tend to have more stable marketing budgets than small businesses. These enterprise clients are sticky, with over 90% of Zeta's annual revenue coming from customers who have been with the company for more than a year. And the numbers continue to grow.
At the end of the first quarter, Zeta had 548 'scaled customers'—those generating at least $100,000 in annual revenue for Zeta — an increase of 19% year-over-year. The company also reported 159 'super scaled' customers, who each bring in more than $1 million annually. That's up 10% year-over-year. These customers are spending more and staying longer on its platform, driving solid recurring revenue.
Average revenue per scaled customer reached $467,000, up 12% year-over-year, while super scaled customers brought in $1.4 million on average, a 23% increase. These trends indicate that Zeta is acquiring new clients and increasing its wallet share within existing accounts.
Zeta recently launched AI Agent Studio, a new suite of generative AI tools, reflecting the company's focus on innovation to accelerate growth. By providing marketers with tools that enhance productivity and effectiveness, Zeta strengthens its value proposition and deepens customer engagement.
Zeta's focus on significantly reducing dilution and enhancing its cash flow is positive. In 2024, Zeta's total dilution stood at 15%. For 2025, the company expects dilution to decrease to 4%–6% and, in 2026, to further improve to 3%–4%. This significant reduction should bolster investor confidence and support the recovery of Zeta stock.
Additionally, Zeta is putting more emphasis on free cash flow generation, with Q1 results showing substantial improvements in both free cash flow growth and conversion rates. This shift toward cash efficiency adds an extra layer of financial stability as the company continues to scale.
Zeta is not immune to macro headwinds. However, its value proposition adds resilience. Most of the marketing spend Zeta supports is tied to lower-funnel, performance-based key performance indicators (KPIs). This type of spending is typically less discretionary, even during economic slowdowns, because it directly impacts sales and return on investment (ROI). Furthermore, Zeta's limited exposure to China and the federal government helps insulate it from unpredictable policy shocks.
Given a strong Q1 performance and a healthy pipeline, Zeta now expects 2025 revenue in the range of $1.237 billion to $1.247 billion, up from its earlier guidance of $1.235 billion to $1.245 billion. Moreover, Zeta expects its revenue to increase at an organic CAGR of 20% through 2028 and reach at least $2.1 billion.
Despite a challenging start to 2025, Zeta Global's fundamentals and long-term outlook remain highly compelling. With consistent revenue growth, a sticky and expanding enterprise customer base, strong free cash flow trends, and significant progress in reducing share dilution, Zeta is positioning itself for a robust rebound.
Furthermore, its continued innovation, as reflected in the launch of AI Agent Studio and resilience to macroeconomic pressures, further support Wall Street's projection of 160% upside potential.
While Wall Street has a 'Moderate Buy' consensus rating on Zeta stock, this AI-driven under-$20 stock has solid fundamentals and significant growth potential, making it an attractive long-term pick.
On the date of publication, Amit Singh did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com
擷取數據時發生錯誤
登入存取你的投資組合
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
擷取數據時發生錯誤
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
Senate braces for first big vote on Trump agenda – with support still unclear
Senate Republicans are about to face a major test of loyalty to President Donald Trump, as the chamber braces for its first vote on whether to advance the president's giant tax cuts and spending bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune and his team have been fiercely lobbying their members to get in line behind the measure, with Trump and White House officials also leaning heavily on the remaining GOP holdouts. Trump met with two key holdouts — Sen. Rick Scott of Florida and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin — on Saturday, just hours before GOP leaders hoped to hold the vote, according to those senators' close colleague, Sen. Mike Lee of Utah. He has also spoken to other critical votes, like Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who earlier Saturday declared his support for the bill. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, another critic of the bill, golfed with the president on Saturday morning, according to Sen. Lindsay Graham. But it's not yet clear whether Thune will be able to limit defections on a procedural vote, to start centrists like Sen. Thom Tillis and a small group of GOP hardliners — Lee, Scott and Johnson — still pushing for changes to the bill. But GOP leadership believe they will ultimately succeed, thanks, in part, to immense pressure from Trump. Already two Republicans, Tillis and Johnson, have said they would block the bill from moving ahead. That leaves Thune just one more vote to lose. It all amounts to an intense Saturday scramble for Trump and GOP leaders, who are intent on passing the president's agenda as quickly as possible. Trump has told GOP leaders he wants to sign the bill at the White House on July 4 – but that would still require approval from the narrowly divided GOP-controlled House, which is also no guarantee. This story is breaking and will be updated.
CNN
9 minutes ago
- CNN
Senate braces for first big vote on Trump agenda – with support still unclear
Senate Republicans are about to face a major test of loyalty to President Donald Trump, as the chamber braces for its first vote on whether to advance the president's giant tax cuts and spending bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune and his team have been fiercely lobbying their members to get in line behind the measure, with Trump and White House officials also leaning heavily on the remaining GOP holdouts. Trump met with two key holdouts — Sen. Rick Scott of Florida and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin — on Saturday, just hours before GOP leaders hoped to hold the vote, according to those senators' close colleague, Sen. Mike Lee of Utah. He has also spoken to other critical votes, like Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who earlier Saturday declared his support for the bill. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, another critic of the bill, golfed with the president on Saturday morning, according to Sen. Lindsay Graham. But it's not yet clear whether Thune will be able to limit defections on a procedural vote, to start centrists like Sen. Thom Tillis and a small group of GOP hardliners — Lee, Scott and Johnson — still pushing for changes to the bill. But GOP leadership believe they will ultimately succeed, thanks, in part, to immense pressure from Trump. Already two Republicans, Tillis and Johnson, have said they would block the bill from moving ahead. That leaves Thune just one more vote to lose. It all amounts to an intense Saturday scramble for Trump and GOP leaders, who are intent on passing the president's agenda as quickly as possible. Trump has told GOP leaders he wants to sign the bill at the White House on July 4 – but that would still require approval from the narrowly divided GOP-controlled House, which is also no guarantee. This story is breaking and will be updated.
Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why The Washington Post Is Drowning In Bad Headlines
The Washington Post Building at One Franklin Square Building in Washington, DC. (Photo by Andrew ...) I didn't think I'd be back writing about the troubles at The Washington Post so soon, following my last piece from just a few days ago, but here we are. That earlier piece, which you can read here, focused on the Post having lost tens of thousands of subscribers over the last several years, with the paper's current average daily paid subscriptions now at a new low. Despite the financial backing of owner Jeff Bezos, the reality is that Post hasn't been able to convert fleeting interest from readers into long-term loyalty; worse still, internal dysfunction and shifting editorial strategies continue to cloud the Post's identity and future. And, unfortunately, two new developments suggest the challenges aren't letting up anytime soon. Another misstep at The Washington Post Let's start with a newsroom experiment that executive editor Matt Murray detailed in a company memo. It's a new initiative that will allow individuals mentioned in the Post's stories to annotate those articles directly on the site. The movie is being framed as a way to 'deepen the conversation' and keep reader engagement on the Post's platform, rather than that discussion migrating away to X, Reddit, or elsewhere. But, come on: It's an absolute certainty that this is going to end up backfiring in spectacular fashion. This initiative is the kind of idea that looks fantastic on a whiteboard: Start letting some of the sources who are quoted in articles add annotations to the articles they're mentioned in. More engagement = everybody wins. Or something like that. In reality, the idea of real-time rebuttals next to reported journalism opens up an unnecessary Pandora's box. What happens when a powerful figure – or anyone, really – uses the feature in bad faith to undermine verified facts? Or tries to insert spin into the conversation? Will readers trust the original reporting, or will the very presence of a sidebar reply create the illusion of 'two sides' to a matter of fact? Reporters will technically be able to respond, but as I see it this risks adding 'debate monitor' to their job description. That the paper's management decided to embark on such an initiative at all, meanwhile, should also put this next bit of negative news into context. A rebuke of The Washington Post's Bezos era Pamela Alma Weymouth, granddaughter of the late Post publisher Katharine Graham, has written a personal and extremely scathing commentary in The Nation about the situation at the Post — among other things, accusing Bezos of systematically dismantling the institution her grandmother once protected. She lays the blame for much of the Post's woes at the feet of the Amazon founder. 'In the face of a more tyrannical Trump,' she writes, 'Bezos has retreated. He's muzzled his editorial page. Exceptional writers, editors, cartoonists have fled. Eight days before the election, the Post canceled a scheduled endorsement of Kamala Harris — breaking with decades of precedent. Four hundred Post journalists signed a protest letter. Two hundred and fifty thousand readers canceled their subscriptions.' Things got worse earlier this year, she continued, when Bezos dictated that Opinion writers would be expected to align with 'personal liberties and free markets,' leaving little or even no room for dissenting views. Editor David Shipley and others resigned, and another wave of subscription cancellations followed. Weymouth continues: 'If the free press can be manipulated by politicians, if truth is viewed as optional, if The Washington Post goes dark under Bezos, then we lose more than a legend. We lose the very thing that makes America a democracy.' Weymouth's commentary is particularly damning in light of recent revelations about Bezos' companies engaging with Trumpworld while the Post, at the same time, shifted its own editorial voice. It's the kind of rebuke that ought to cut deep, given that it's rooted in the legacy of the family that once owned The Washington Post — their ownership now relegated to a bygone era of journalism. To be sure, none of this means the Post is finished. There are still plenty of talented reporters who fill its newsroom, but decisions from the leadership have nonetheless put the paper in a precarious spot. Legacy isn't a business model. Without a clear editorial mission and a bold plan to rebuild reader loyalty, the fact of the matter is that even a paper as storied as The Washington Post won't be able to successfully right the ship — and avoid the inevitable.
