Kent plane skids off runway and crosses road - as pilot, 79, comes out unharmed
The Piper PA-28-181, built in 1977, was damaged beyond economic repair in the incident at Rochester Airport on August 14, 2024.
The pilot, who had 155 hours of flying experience, was conducting a private flight from Lydd to Rochester Airport and was the only person on board.
An Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) investigation revealed that the pilot experienced a high workload after executing a go-around manoeuvre and receiving a runway change.
This led to the plane landing long and at an excessive speed, causing it to overrun the runway.
The aircraft's wings struck trees during the incident, detaching from the fuselage and resulting in a fuel leak.
The pilot initially attempted to land on runway 02 but felt uncomfortable with the approach and executed a go-around.
The wind direction then changed, and he was advised to switch to runway 20.
On touchdown, the aircraft bounced multiple times.
The pilot applied hard braking, but the aircraft skidded and did not slow down effectively.
As the aircraft neared the airfield boundary, the pilot pulled back on the yoke, causing it to become momentarily airborne.
The plane then cleared the airport boundary fence and a local road before coming to rest in a wooded embankment.
Flight data showed that the aircraft's ground speed was 91 knots at the flare, much higher than the recommended final approach speed of 66 knots.
Touchdown occurred 190 metres from the runway threshold, and the aircraft was still at 45 knots when it reached the airfield boundary.
The landing distance available on the grass runway was 830 metres, which was sufficient under ideal conditions but insufficient at 91 knots.
The pilot later acknowledged that he had landed faster than normal.
The AAIB report highlighted that managing a go-around increases pilot workload, and the runway change further increased the workload and reduced time to stabilise speed.
The primary cause of the accident was identified as the aircraft landing too fast and too far along the runway.
Key contributing factors included high workload from the go-around and runway change, insufficient speed reduction before landing, and the grass runway surface affecting braking effectiveness.
The AAIB issued several safety recommendations following the incident.
It advised pilots to assess the impact of surface conditions on landing performance and manage workload and distractions effectively.
It also reminded pilots that information from the Flight Information Services Officer (FISO) is not mandatory, and they can delay responses or request alternatives.
Rochester Airport uses Aerodrome Flight Information Service (AFIS), which means the FISO's information is advisory and not an instruction.
The AAIB report also noted that the pilot could have requested more time to adjust workload, declined the suggested runway change, or left the airfield circuit and repositioned for a stable approach.
The report stated: "The aircraft landed at 91 knots instead of the recommended 66 knots.
"Given the touchdown point (190m from the threshold), the aircraft was unlikely to stop within the available runway length."
The report concluded: "The primary cause of the accident was the aircraft landing too fast and too far along the runway.
"The pilot recognised post-accident that he had landed faster than normal."
No passengers were on board during the incident, and the pilot was uninjured.
The investigation was conducted by the Air Accidents Investigation Branch and the full report can be found in AAIB Bulletin 3/2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
5 days ago
- New York Post
Air India crash probe focuses on actions of plane's captain Sumeet Sabharwal: report
A cockpit recording of dialogue between the two pilots of the Air India flight that crashed last month indicates the captain cut the flow of fuel to the plane's engines, the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday. The newspaper cited people familiar with US officials' early assessment of evidence uncovered in the investigation into the June 12 crash in Ahmedabad, India, that killed 260 people. The first officer, who was flying the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, asked the more experienced captain why he moved the fuel switches to the 'cutoff' position seconds after lifting off the runway, the report said. The two pilots involved were Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and First Officer Clive Kunder, who had total flying experience of 15,638 hours and 3,403 hours, respectively. India's AAIB, Directorate General of Civil Aviation, Ministry of Civil Aviation, Air India and two unions representing Indian pilots did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment on the Wall Street Journal report. Boeing declined to comment. 6 Captain Sumeet Sabharwal was asked by his first officer why he moved the fuel switches to the 'cutoff' position seconds after lifting off the runway, the report said. Family handout A preliminary report into the crash released by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Saturday said the fuel switches had switched from run to cutoff a second apart just after takeoff, but it did not say how they were flipped. Almost immediately after the plane lifted off the ground, closed-circuit TV footage showed a backup energy source called a ram air turbine had deployed, indicating a loss of power from the engines. One pilot was then heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel. 'The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' the report said. 6 A preliminary report into the deadly crash did not say how the fuel switches were flipped. CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE (CISF)/AFP via Getty Images Without fuel flowing to the engines, the London-bound plane began to lose thrust. After reaching a height of 650 feet, the plane began to sink. The fuel switches for both engines were turned back to run, and the airplane automatically tried restarting the engines, the report said. But the plane was too low and too slow to be able to recover, aviation safety expert John Nance told Reuters. The plane clipped some trees and a chimney before crashing in a fireball into a building on a nearby medical college campus, the report said, killing 19 people on the ground and 241 of the 242 on board the 787. 6 A firefighter stands next to the crashed Air India Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner aircraft in Ahmedabad, India, June 13, 2025. REUTERS NO SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS In an internal memo on Monday, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance faults and that all required maintenance had been carried out. The AAIB's preliminary report had no safety recommendations for Boeing or engine manufacturer GE. After the report was released, the US Federal Aviation Administration and Boeing privately issued notifications that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes are safe, a document seen by Reuters showed and four sources with knowledge of the matter said. The circumstantial evidence increasingly indicates that a crew member flipped the engine fuel switches, Nance said, given there was 'no other rationale explanation' that was consistent with the information released to date. 6 Air India CEO Campbell Wilson said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance faults. AFP via Getty Images Nonetheless, investigators 'still have to dig into all the factors' and rule out other possible contributing factors which would take time, he said. Most air crashes are caused by multiple factors, and under international rules, a final report is expected within a year of an accident. The Air India crash has rekindled debate over adding flight deck cameras, known as cockpit image recorders, on airliners. Nance said investigators likely would have benefited greatly from having video footage of the cockpit during the Air India flight. 6 Rescue team members work as smoke rises at the crash site where an Air India plane crashed in Ahmedabad, India, June 12, 2025. REUTERS 6 The Air India crash killed 260 people aboard the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. REUTERS Air India has faced additional scrutiny on other fronts after the crash. The European Union Aviation Safety Agency said this month it plans to investigate its budget airline, Air India Express, after Reuters reported the carrier did not follow a directive to change engine parts of an Airbus A320 in a timely manner and falsified records to show compliance.
Yahoo
14-07-2025
- Yahoo
Air India CEO says investigation into Ahmedabad crash raises new questions
By Aditya Kalra and Chandini Monnappa NEW DELHI (Reuters) -A preliminary investigation into the crash of an Air India passenger jet last month that killed 260 people raises additional questions about the incident and the investigation is far from over, Air India's CEO said in a memo on Monday. The preliminary investigation released by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau on Saturday depicted confusion in the cockpit shortly before the crash of the Boeing Dreamliner. In a staff memo reviewed by Reuters, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson said the report had "triggered a new round of speculation in the media ... Unsurprisingly, it provided both greater clarity and opened additional questions." He added: "The preliminary report identified no cause nor made any recommendations, so I urge everyone to avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation is far from over." The memo said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance faults and that all required maintenance had been carried out. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner bound for London from the Indian city of Ahmedabad began to lose thrust and sink shortly after takeoff. All but one of the 242 people on board and 19 others on the ground were killed. According to the AAIB report, in the flight's final moments one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel. "The other pilot responded that he did not do so," the report said. It added that the plane's engine two fuel cutoff switches flipped almost simultaneously, but did not say how. The preliminary report suggested no immediate action for Boeing or GE, whose engines were fitted on the aircraft. ALPA India, which represents Indian pilots at the Montreal-based International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations, has rejected any presumption of pilot error and called for a "fair, fact-based inquiry". "The pilots had passed their mandatory pre-flight breathalyser and there were no observations pertaining to their medical status," Campbell said in his memo. The commanding pilot of the Air India plane was Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, who had a total flying experience of 15,638 hours and, according to the Indian government, was also an Air India instructor. His co-pilot was Clive Kunder, 32, who had 3,403 hours of total experience. Air India has come under heightened scrutiny on multiple fronts following the crash. On July 4, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency said it would investigate budget unit Air India Express, after a Reuters report revealed the airline failed to promptly replace engine parts on an Airbus A320 as mandated, and falsified records to indicate compliance.
Yahoo
14-07-2025
- Yahoo
Air India CEO says investigation into Ahmedabad crash raises new questions
By Aditya Kalra and Chandini Monnappa NEW DELHI (Reuters) -A preliminary investigation into the crash of an Air India passenger jet last month that killed 260 people raises additional questions about the incident and the investigation is far from over, Air India's CEO said in a memo on Monday. The preliminary investigation released by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Saturday depicted confusion in the cockpit shortly before the crash of the Boeing Dreamliner. In a staff memo reviewed by Reuters, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson said the report had "triggered a new round of speculation in the media ... Unsurprisingly, it provided both greater clarity and opened additional questions." He added: "The preliminary report identified no cause nor made any recommendations, so I urge everyone to avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation is far from over." The memo said the preliminary report found no mechanical or maintenance faults and that all required maintenance had been carried out. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner bound for London from the Indian city of Ahmedabad began to lose thrust and sink shortly after takeoff. All but one of the 242 people on board and 19 others on the ground were killed. According to the AAIB report, in the flight's final moments one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel. "The other pilot responded that he did not do so," the report said. It added that the plane's engine two fuel cutoff switches flipped almost simultaneously, but did not say how. The preliminary report suggested no immediate action for Boeing or GE, whose engines were fitted on the aircraft. ALPA India, which represents Indian pilots at the Montreal-based International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations, has rejected any presumption of pilot error and called for a "fair, fact-based inquiry". "The pilots had passed their mandatory pre-flight breathalyser and there were no observations pertaining to their medical status," Campbell said in his memo. The commanding pilot of the Air India plane was Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, who had a total flying experience of 15,638 hours and, according to the Indian government, was also an Air India instructor. His co-pilot was Clive Kunder, 32, who had 3,403 hours of total experience. Air India has come under heightened scrutiny on multiple fronts following the crash. On July 4, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency said it would investigate budget unit Air India Express, after a Reuters report revealed the airline failed to promptly replace engine parts on an Airbus A320 as mandated, and falsified records to indicate compliance. Sign in to access your portfolio