Media Watch Dog laments loss of comedy gold after Q+A axing, while Nine praises Niki Savva despite foreshadowing Albanese election defeat
Odd, don't you think? After all, the former NSW Liberal Party treasurer is no longer an MP – so how to explain his X username? Rather, his part-time job is chair of the Climate Change Authority, to which he was appointed by the Albanese Government in June 2024. And his full-time position is with Wollemi Capital, a specialist climate investor which advocates that 'the need to advance decarbonisation is most critical and the prospective returns are greatest'.
The purpose of your man Kean's post was to draw attention to his article in The Canberra Times on 19 June titled 'National hazards are becoming unnatural risks. Climate is not static, nor should we be'.
Now your man Kean has a degree in business – not in science or engineering. His article was that of an eco-catastrophist warning about cyclones, bushfires, floods, rising sea levels and so on.
The Climate Change Authority/Wollemi Capital guy eventually got around to saying this:
The Australian government can lead on a national adaptation agenda which coordinates and amplifies necessary efforts by all levels of government, businesses and communities. And there are real benefits to taking adaptation seriously. Every dollar invested in reducing climate risks pays for itself 10 times over in reduced recovery costs, according to the CSIRO.
It makes sense – and always has – for Australia to adapt to changing weather. But what was missing from Mr Kean's article is a recognition that Australia produces just over one per cent of global emissions and cannot change the world's climate. CAN YOU BEAR IT?
As avid Media Watch Dog readers will recall, when former BBC journalist Nick Bryant presented his inaugural ABC Radio National Saturday Extra program on Saturday 25 January 2025 he had this to say:
We're committing to bringing you a diversity of voices, some of whom you'll agree with, some of whom you won't, but hopefully all of them will be insightful and make more sense of our world. And we will try to abide by one of the first rules in journalism, never be boring. I hope you'll enjoy the new Saturday Extra .
Alas, it hasn't worked out this way. After a promising start, Saturday Extra has become a bit like RN's Late Night Live aka 'Late Night Left'. With occasional exceptions, the left-of-centre Nick Bryant interviews left-of-centre talent. In short, there is an evident lack of viewpoint diversity. Moreover, judging by listener feedback on text and so on – Saturday Extra's audience consists primarily of inner-city leftist luvvies who only want to hear individuals with whom they agree.
On Saturday 14 June, this is how the ABC referred to the segment titled 'Trump's militarisation of America' which topped the program.
A military parade in Washington this week will mark the 250th anniversary of the US army, and it will coincide with President Trump's 79th birthday. The fanfare follows a week of civil unrest, with President Trump deploying US Marines and the National Guard in Los Angeles, against the wishes of California's Governor Newsom. Are President Trump's moves to send the National Guard into Los Angeles an act of authoritarian overreach or a political winner?
Guest: Professor Jason Stanley, Yale University, and author of Erasing History: How Fascists Rewrite the Past to Control the Future . Credits: Siobhan Moylan, Producer.
Now, MWD believes that Professor Jason Stanley is entitled to be heard on Radio National – and elsewhere. But Comrade Stanley is on record as saying that the United States may become a 'fascist dictatorship'. This is an extremist view – especially for someone who is on record as saying that his grandparents fled Berlin with his father in 1939 – see The Guardian 26 March 2025. With a couple of exceptions, Comrade Bryant essentially fed Comrade Stanley with soft questions – as the transcript demonstrates:
Nick Bryant: Now presidents can federalise State National Guard units although it does normally happen with the cooperation of the state governor. The last time it happened without that was 1965, when Lyndon Johnson federalised the National Guard in Alabama to protect civil rights protesters there – in Selma. Presidents can also deploy troops to quell civil unrest in extremis if they invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act . Donald Trump has not invoked that act yet – so has anything he's done so far breached the law or violated the Constitution?
Jason Stanley: He has – so you're absolutely right. The facts you've laid out are exactly right. He has not invoked the Insurrection Act, so I'm not clear what legal authority he has to send Marines into Los Angeles. He is always threatening to invoke the Insurrection Act. If he does threaten – invoke the Insurrection Act. Then we have a kind of, Hitler, Nazi Enabling Act, kind of, moment – where – after the Reichstag fire, that's what we authoritarianism scholars have always been looking for that, you know, declared emergency that will allow sort of military power – the president to take military powers.
Nick Bryant: Yeah….
What a load of absolute tosh – which Nick Bryant did not challenge. Can you believe that the learned professor saw fit to compare Donald J. Trump using federal power to send the National Guard to protect federal property and federal employees in Los Angeles with Adolf Hitler and the 1933 Reichstag Fire? This was followed by the Enabling Act which, in time, led to the murder of six million Jews. Apart from asking whether you believe this rant – the more relevant question is: Can You Bear It?
[No. Not at all. And thanks for asking. I note that in his rant against (alleged) authoritarianism Comrade Stanley described President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln as 'great American presidents'.
Stanley did not mention that in his 12 years in office, FDR issued some 3,721 executive orders – that is about 310 per year. Which makes President Trump's tendency to issue executive orders as, well, wimpish. Nor did the learned professor mention that over 100,000 Japanese Americans were interned in the United States following an executive order issued by President Roosevelt in February 1942. Their only 'crime' was that they were of Japanese heritage. Sounds somewhat authoritarian, don't you think? – MWD Editor.]
At Hangover Time from Mondays to Fridays, Ellie's (male) co-owner invariably glances at Nine Newspapers' CBD section. Not that it focuses on anything of much importance in the Central Business District of Melbourne or Sydney of interest to, respectively, readers of The Age and Sydney Morning Herald .
It's just that he just loves to find out just what is going on in high fee Sydney private schools – which seems something of an obsession with the Sydney end of CBD. This is invariably written by Kishor Napier-Raman (he of what Paul Keating used to call the Hyphenated-Name-Set). Moreover, Stephen Brook (at the Melbourne end of CBD) is a MWD fave from his days at The Australian.
But MWD digresses – not for the first time. On Monday 16 June, CBD led with this:
The events of May 3 hit Australia like an earthquake and the Coalition is still picking through the rubble of its election disaster for a glimmer of hope.
But another earthquake is set to hit the political establishment later this year. We're talking about the publication of a tell-all book on the 2025 poll penned by formidable political commentator Niki Savva, rather appropriately titled Earthquake: Signposts to the election that shook Australia .
CBD can reveal Savva has been beavering away on the book, which will be on shelves in late November – just in time to line the Christmas stockings of politicos, hacks, flacks and Insiders tragics across the country.
Well, at least the title for Comrade Savva's latest tome is locked in. Unlike 2019 where the book's draft titled 'Highway to Hell: The Coup that Destroyed Malcolm Turnbull and Left the Liberals in Ruins' had to have a new cover. It was retitled Plots and Prayers: Malcolm Turnbull's Demise and Scott Morrison's Ascension . It was drafted, you see, on the assumption that the Coalition would lose the May 2019 election since it had dumped Liberal Party leader Malcolm Turnbull for Scott Morrison.
Ms Savva is one of those Canberra media types who believes it is okay for the Liberal Party to govern for a while – provided it is led by someone like Malcolm Turnbull. But not anyone like Tony Abbott or Scott Morrison or Peter Dutton. This despite the fact that Turnbull lost 14 seats in the 2016 election – his first, and only, election as prime minister. From which the Liberal Party has never recovered.
These days Comrade Savva writes an occasional column for The Age and Sydney Morning Herald . This is what CBD had to say about this:
Savva's regular columns for this masthead have a touch of the seismic about them, sending aftershocks reverberating through the Canberra bubble. Her upcoming book on the election, published by Scribe, which combines those highly prescient columns with a series of new reported chapters, will doubtless be hotly anticipated…. 'I'm doing my best to try and explain why Labor did so well, how they came to do so well, and why the Liberal Party was taken to the brink of extinction,' she said, adding that it was a question many Liberals were also seeking answers to.
Well, fancy that. Which leads Ellie's (male) co-owner to wonder whether Comrade Savva will acknowledge that 'why Labor did so well' might turn on the fact that Labor MPs did not take much notice of her 'prescient columns'.
MWD has in mind Comrade Savva's oh-so-prescient column of 5 December 2024 where the following comment about Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was made:
If Anthony Albanese wins the next election to govern either in majority or minority, he should, after a decent interval, retire so Labor can regenerate.
Albanese succeeded brilliantly, certainly beyond his wildest imaginings and that of his friends, to become leader then prime minister. He should count his blessings, then gracefully relinquish the job. This is a benign view. The more drastic, which has been bubbling away inside the wider Labor family, is that he has lost his mojo, his judgment has deserted him and if he can't summon the discipline to shape up, he should ship out before the election to allow someone else to take on a rampant Peter Dutton.
How prescient was this advice? On 4 December 2024 Comrade Savva was foreshadowing Prime Minister Albanese's political demise. However, on 3 May 2025 Anthony Albanese led the Labor Party to one of its greatest election victories. And Comrade Savva is presenting herself to CBD readers as a mastermind of the Canberra (Media) Bubble. Can You Bear It?
While on the topic of the Sydney Morning Herald, this is how it reported the decision of the Liberal Party's federal executive meeting on 17 June. The executive revamped the membership of its inquiry into the party's NSW branch. It extended the committee's membership from 3 to 7 and dropped two members of the committee. On 18 June Alexandra Smith and Natassia Chrysanthos wrote a story about the meeting which commenced as follows:
Federal Liberal Leader Sussan Ley and her NSW counterpart Mark Speakman have secured a major win in determining who will run the beleaguered state party, appointing a new committee headed by former premier Nick Greiner and ending the term of two octogenarian men from Victoria.
That was the first paragraph. The 'two octogenarian men from Victoria' were not named until the sixth (Alan Stockdale) and ninth paragraphs (Richard Alston).
So, it was in with the youth (Greiner) and out with the 'very old men' (Stockdale and Alston). The only problem here, which the comrades at the SMH failed to pick up, is the respective birth dates. Alston was born in 1941, Stockdale in 1945 and Greiner – wait for it – in 1947.
And there is another point here. Do the SMH's editors believe it is clever to run a discourteous 'very old men' heading – in view of the fact that some 'very old men' – and 'very old women' – pay $4.80 each day to purchase a copy of the Sydney Morning Herald newspaper in print form? Can You Bear It?
The SMH's 'Very old men ousted from NSW' headline over its story about 'two octogenarian men from Victoria' – May not appeal to readers of a certain age (as the saying goes)
On 19 June CNN's Christiane Amanpour was interviewed by Sally Sara on RN Breakfast . Amanpour declared in her The Ex Files podcast on 4 June that she recently travelled to the US 'as if I was going to North Korea'. Ms Sara did not raise this with Ms Amanpour when they spoke on RN Breakfast. Let's go to the transcript:
Sally Sara: It's been a deadly 12 months for journalists. Scores of journalists have been killed in Gaza. And we also saw that Iranian state television came under attack. How do you reflect on this time for your profession, and how do you see that attack in Iran?....
Christiane Amanpour: Well, that's correct. Generally, these are civilian targets, whether it's state or not. Many, you know, authoritarian regimes have increasingly tried to kill the messenger.
The fact is that the Iranian media is dominated by the Iranian theocracy. It's only a 'messenger' for the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. What's more, Amanpour made no reference to civilian victims of Iran's missile attacks on Israel. Can You Bear It? A BRAND NEW CAMPAIGN MWD CALLS FOR THE RETURN OF Q+A WHICH ALWAYS PROVIDED GREAT MATERIAL
It is Media Watch Dog's melancholy duty to acknowledge that our various campaigns initiated by the canine Nancy and followed by the canine Jackie have been failures. Total failures. However, as G.K. Chesterton is alleged to have said, anything worth doing is worth doing badly. So MWD is initiating a new campaign this time fronted by canine Ellie.
Ellie's (male) co-owner was devastated to read The Diary section in The Australian's 'Media' segment last Monday. Steve Jackson had this to say concerning ABC's decision to junk the Q+A program, effective immediately:
Diary hears the show was scrapped because the new double-act running things in at Aunty, chair Kim Williams and managing director 'Hollywood' Hugh Marks, want to put the 'broad' back in broadcasting and ensure the ABC's content appeals to all Australians, not just the inner-city set. Finally! Somebody gets it!
Gerard Henderson met former ABC managing director and editor-in-chief David Anderson only once. In 2019. Hendo wished Ando all the very best in reforming the taxpayer funded public broadcaster. But asked him not to do too much reform too soon – since the ABC provided lotsa copy for Media Watch Dog . For instance, how could MWD bang on about the ABC as a Conservative Free Zone if it employed some conservatives? Likewise, how could MWD condemn the ABC as lacking viewpoint diversity if it started to hear the views of other than inner-city leftist types? Hence this campaign – fronted by Ellie.
Avid MWD readers are urged to 'Occupy Ultimo! (circa the ABC Headquarters) Restore Q+A !'. The aim of the demonstration is to ensure the return of Q+A – which over the years has provided lotsa material for MWD.
What will MWD do without Q+A's left-of-centre presenters, panels stacked with leftists and the occasional appearance of Malcolm Turnbull in a leather jacket? Q+A always welcomed Liberals like Turnbull. That is, current and former Liberal Party members who are into criticising the current Liberal Party. The likes of the late Malcolm Fraser, Malcolm Turnbull and Matt Kean come immediately to mind.
And then there were the stacked panels. As MWD reported ad nauseam – an easy way to be part of a Q+A audience at Ultimo was to discard your Che Guevara tee-shirt along with roman sandals in exchange for a shirt and sensible shoes. Then enter the ABC studio posing as a conservative and throw a shoe at panellist John Howard. Bad for the ABC – but great for MWD.
So MWD says: 'Occupy Ultimo!. Give the Inner-City Left a (Second) Chance!' and so on.
Avid readers are asked to assemble outside the ABC's Ultimo H.Q. at Gin & Tonic Time on the feast day of St Cyril of Alexandria. See you there.
[Here's hoping this campaign works. I note that in a previous campaign you failed to get Amy Remeikis a pay increase when she was one of The Guardian Australia's wage slaves. I see that Comrade Remeikis has moved to the avowedly leftist The Australia Institute. It would be great for MWD is she continues as one of the panellists on ABC TV Insiders . – MWD Editor.]
Ellie Waiting for Fellow MWD Readers to Join the 'Occupy Ultimo! Restore Q+A!' campaign on the (forthcoming) Feast Day of St Cyril of Alexandria circa Gin & Tonic Time. THE ABC/AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE ENTENTE
As Media Watch Dog readers know, this blog has been monitoring the ABC/Guardian Axis and the ABC/Australia Institute Entente. That is, the ready access that journalists from the left-wing The Guardian Australia and political operatives from the avowedly leftist Australia Institute (which is based in the Canberra Bubble) get on the ABC. Meanwhile, political operatives from the conservative Institute of Public Affairs in Melbourne, Robert Menzies Institute in Melbourne and the Menzies Centre in Sydney have been de-platformed by the taxpayer funded public broadcaster. [Don't you mean censored? MWD Editor.]
THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE'S DEPUTY DIRECTOR GETS A SOFT RUN ON ABC TV NEWS BREAKFAST
Wasn't it great to see the entente between the taxpayer funded public broadcaster and the avowedly leftist The Australia Institute back in action on Thursday 19 June? It took the form of Ebony Bennett, The Australia Institute's deputy director doing the 'Newspapers' segment on ABC News Breakfast .
First up, Comrade Bennett defended the Albanese government's decision to tax unrealised profits from superannuation funds. Let's go to the transcript:
Ebony Bennett: And it [the Treasurer's talk] comes, of course, on the back of tax reforms that the Labor government is already trying to implement, including its plans to reduce the generosity of superannuation tax concessions for the very wealthy. For those with super balances over $3,000,000, earnings of $3,000,000. And of course, Australia Institute research shows that those reforms are proving quite popular, with almost twice as many Australians supporting those changes as opposed them.
Clever, eh? The Australia Institute's deputy director got in a plug for The Australia Institute. And then Comrade Bennett had this to say about the Middle East, in response to a soft question:
James Glenday: One of our top stories, Ebony, unsurprisingly, is of course, what's happening in the Middle East and what is happening in Washington as Donald Trump weighs whether or not he is going to get involved in that conflict and actually bomb Iran. It's a bit of an interesting one because he obviously ran as a president who was gonna get out of Middle East wars and there's a lot of people in his camp are horrified at this idea that he might wade in.
Ebony Bennett: Yeah, that's right. So, Donald Trump has warned Iran that he wants an unconditional surrender. And a lot of news reports today and overnight about those tensions within his own administration between essentially MAGA Republicans – people who really support Donald Trump above the party or ideology, who really think it should be Donald Trump staying out of this conflict and not getting America into the middle of another war in the Middle East – who are in direct conflict with, I guess, the more traditional Republicans, the hawkish types who are really encouraging the president to get America engaged in this conflict that Israel began with a pre-emptive strike against Iran and to use some of its massive ordnance, its bunker busters deployed in Iran against its nuclear weapons program. So, who knows where this will end up. But it's a very perilous moment, obviously, for world security and prompting a lot of concerns about the safety of the civilians in Iran.
Emma Rebellato: Ebony a question without notice before you go just quickly. We've been talking about how to beat the winter blues. I reckon wearing colour is one way of doing it. How do you do it in Canberra?
What a load of absolute tosh. Before Israel attacked Iran on 12 June targeting Iran's nuclear program, the Iranian theocracy had sent hundreds of missiles into Israel aimed randomly at civilian targets.
Newsbreak presenter Emma Rebellato did not challenge this assertion. But rather asked Comrade Bennett about whether she chose colourful clothing to cope with the Canberra winter. Really. A NORMAN SWAN MOMENT IN WHICH DOCTOR SWAN TALKS ABOUT PRACTISING MEDICINE IN THE GOOD OLD DAYS
Avid Media Watch Dog readers have been asking this question of late – Where's Dr Swan these days? Good question – as the saying goes. Well, this is what the ABC says:
Dr Norman Swan is a multi-award-winning producer and broadcaster who created Radio National's long-running Health Report and also co-hosts the popular podcast, What's That Rash? During the pandemic, he co-hosted Coronacast, a daily podcast which at its peak had millions of downloads each month. On ABC Television he is a reporter on 7.30 and a guest reporter on 4 Corners .
And then there is more. As a glance at the back issues of Media Watch Dog will reveal, your man Swan made a number of false predictions about Covid during the pandemic of recent memory.
Those were the days when, on the taxpayer funded public broadcaster, Swan was commonly referred to as 'Australia's most trusted doctor'. As avid readers will recall, MWD pointed out ad nauseam that he had not practised medicine for, er, decades.
It so happened that Ellie's (male) co-owner turned on RN at around Hangover Time on Saturday 14 June – it was 9.06 am in fact – and happened to tune into RN's Health Report which the learned (medical) doctor co-presents with Preeya Alexander – and heard this exchange:
Norman Swan: So, Preeya, you know, a long time since I've practised, there was no such thing as Telehealth in those ancient days.
Preeya Alexander: Back in the day. Were there telephones? Just joking.
This did not surprise MWD – which had been banging on about this since Moses was in short pants. During this time, MWD noticed that the description of your man Swan was undergoing changes.
The cover of Swan's 2021 book What's Good for You referred to the author as 'Australia's most trusted doctor'. Likewise in his 2022 tome Live Younger Longer. However, by the publication of his 2024 work What's Good for your Kids , the description of the doctor in the ABC's house had been changed. He was now described as 'one of Australia's most trusted doctors'.
And now Dr Norman Swan has told listeners of The Health Report (if listeners there are) that it is 'a long time' since he 'practised' medicine. Well, you learnt this first in MWD due to the (obsessive) reporting of Ellie's (male) co-owner.
Verily, A Dr Swan Moment. THE ABC's DR NORMAN SWAN WHO TRANSITIONED FROM AUSTRALIA'S MOST TRUSTED DOCTOR TO ONE OF AUSTRALIA'S MOST TRUSTED DOCTORS – TOLD ABC RN LISTENERS THAT IT IS A LONG TIME SINCE HE'S PRACTISED
Photo credit: ABC Online
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Man of Many
44 minutes ago
- Man of Many
Kanye West Denied Entry to Australia, Here's Everything You Need to Know
By Ben McKimm - News Published: 3 Jul 2025 Share Copy Link Readtime: 2 min Every product is carefully selected by our editors and experts. If you buy from a link, we may earn a commission. Learn more. For more information on how we test products, click here. Kanye West has had his visa cancelled by officials due to his antisemitic song titled 'Heil Hitler,' which has been removed from streaming platforms such as Apple Music, Spotify, and YouTube. The rapper and fashion designer is married to architectural designer Bianca Censori, who was born in Australia and holds a bachelor's and master's degree in architecture from the University of Melbourne. The pair, which tied the knot under a confidential marriage license in December 2022, were likely visiting for a holiday. Speaking to ABC's Afternoon Briefing, Immigration Minister Tony Burke said the musician, who was not coming to Australia for advocacy purposes, would not be welcome after releasing the song. 'I'm not taking away the way the act operates, but even for the lowest level of visa, when my officials looked at it, they cancelled that following the announcement of that song,' he said. 'We have enough problems in this country already without deliberately importing bigotry.' Ye and Australian wife Biance Censori | Image: Supplied This is the first time that a low-level visa application like Ye's has been cancelled for these reasons, according to Burke. He said that typically, a 'stricter line' applies to those who want to visit Australia for the purposes of public advocacy, but that was not the intention of West. Still, his office saw enough reason to cancel the visa after the release of the antisemitic song 'Heil Hitler,' which was released on May 8, 2025, as the third single from his upcoming album, In a Perfect World. The rapper recently announced that he was 'done with antisemitism', releasing a song titled 'Hallelujah' on May 31 as an alternate version of 'Heil Hitler' that replaces its references to Nazism with lyrics relating to Christianity. 'He's made a lot of offensive comments that my officials looked at again once he released song,' Burke continued. 'He's got family here … It wasn't a visa for the purpose of concerts. It was a lower-level and the officials still looked at the law and said if you're going to have a song and promote that sort of Nazism, we don't need that in Australia.' The rapper has recently announced concerts in Korea, Shanghai, and Slovakia for July 2025 and a one-night performance in Brazil in November 2025. His last performance was a Vultures Listening Experience in September last year at the Wuyuan River Sports Stadium in Haikou, China.

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
'I'm looking forward to that': Efforts underway to arrange a meeting between Trump and Albanese
Foreign Minister Penny Wong has confirmed that Washington is keen to reschedule a face-to-face meeting between Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and President Donald Trump, after the President abruptly cancelled their planned talks during last month's G7 summit. Wong, speaking exclusively to Sky News Australia in Washington DC during a diplomatic visit, said she received assurances from US Secretary of State Marco Rubio that the administration regrets the cancellation and is committed to making the meeting happen. 'I had a really good meeting yesterday with Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, and he obviously expressed regret for the meeting having to be rescheduled between the President and the Prime Minister,' Senator Wong said. 'We agreed to work together on rescheduling the meeting, so I'm looking forward to that happening.' The Albanese-Trump meeting was initially meant to take place on the sidelines of the G7 but President Trump cut his attendance short, returning to Washington amid surging conflict in the Middle East - a move that left several bilateral discussions on ice. Despite concerns about the optics of the cancellation, Wong emphasised that Australia remains flexible. 'As the Prime Minister has said, you know, we're obviously very flexible about those arrangements but the President is a very, very busy man,' she said. 'But I was pleased that Secretary Rubio made clear that… they want to reschedule it. It was disappointing, as he said, that they had to reschedule because the President had to return as a consequence of what was occurring in the Middle East.' The Foreign Minister is in Washington for high-level talks with US officials and to attend the latest Quad Meeting alongside counterparts from India and Japan. Discussions have focused on Indo-Pacific security, critical minerals, defence capability and the future of the AUKUS pact. Wong also addressed strategic cooperation on critical minerals, indicating that Australia's resource wealth is increasingly vital to its relationship with Washington. 'Australia has a great many of the world's critical minerals. We have a capacity not just to mine them but also process them. We're already doing that, and we can do more,' she said. 'We see the strategic benefit in critical minerals… assuring those supply chains is important for Australia, it's important for the US, its allies and partners.' She downplayed speculation that the alliance between Canberra and Washington has cooled under the Trump presidency and the relationship is the most distant it has ever been. 'This is my second time in Washington in six months. We've had two Quad meetings here. Richard (Marles) has been here. Jim Chalmers, the Treasurer, has been here. The Prime Minister's had three very constructive conversations with the President,' Wong said. 'I don't agree with your characterisation (that the alliance is distant).' Nonetheless, she acknowledged that President Trump has a markedly different foreign policy outlook. 'There's no doubt that President Trump envisages a very different role for America in the world. I've been upfront about that and we respect that. That's what the American people voted for,' she said. With the AUKUS pact due for a major review in 2025 - and Australia not expected to receive its first Virginia-class submarine until the 2030s - Wong said it was reasonable for future US administrations to revisit aspects of the deal. 'It's quite rational that a new administration would review this arrangement just as the British did,' she said. 'This is a multi-decade task… governments, foreign ministers, defence ministers, prime ministers, presidents… of all colours over many decades will have to deliver this, and we're going to have to work together.'


The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Protest laws questioned after 'indefensible' injuries
Pro-democracy groups say controversial laws granting police powers to move protesters on from places of worship have emboldened the force to "act with impunity". Days after the violent arrest of one-time federal Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, advocates have written an open letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns with concerns about a "criminalisation and police powers creep". Ms Thomas, who was among five people arrested in Sydney on Friday outside an Australian firm reportedly linked to the manufacture of components for Israeli Defence Force fighter jets, was hospitalised and could suffer permanent vision loss. The arrests will be investigated by police officers from another command, with internal review by professional standards and external oversight from police watchdog the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Australian Democracy Network protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said the incident showed the 'places of worship' laws had given police extra impetus to violently shut down protests. The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the country, with the stated intention of protecting people being targeted by disruptive protesters when entering or leaving a place of worship. "The passage of the places of worship anti-protest legislation has emboldened the NSW Police to act with impunity in shutting down protests when they're merely occurring near a place of worship," Ms Radievska said. "The place of worship move-on powers are not fit for purpose, and they must be immediately repealed before more protesters are subject to reckless police action … participating in protest cannot be an invitation to assault and serious injury from police." Friday's protest in Belmore was opposite a mosque but it was not the target of demonstrators. Police have denied the laws were relied upon in the arrest. Doctor Mitch Hickson said Ms Thomas' injuries were "medically significant" and "ethically indefensible". "Facial trauma of the kind she has experienced - requiring surgery and with the potential for permanent vision loss - should never be the outcome of lawful protest activity and reveals a disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police," he said. ""A democracy cannot function where lawful protest is met with force, where questions are answered with violence, and where power is exercised without accountability." The open letter calls for an independent investigation into the policing of the Belmore protest and urgent amendments to the places of worship protest laws. Signatories include Amnesty International Australia, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights and the Jewish Council of Australia. Pro-democracy groups say controversial laws granting police powers to move protesters on from places of worship have emboldened the force to "act with impunity". Days after the violent arrest of one-time federal Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, advocates have written an open letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns with concerns about a "criminalisation and police powers creep". Ms Thomas, who was among five people arrested in Sydney on Friday outside an Australian firm reportedly linked to the manufacture of components for Israeli Defence Force fighter jets, was hospitalised and could suffer permanent vision loss. The arrests will be investigated by police officers from another command, with internal review by professional standards and external oversight from police watchdog the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Australian Democracy Network protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said the incident showed the 'places of worship' laws had given police extra impetus to violently shut down protests. The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the country, with the stated intention of protecting people being targeted by disruptive protesters when entering or leaving a place of worship. "The passage of the places of worship anti-protest legislation has emboldened the NSW Police to act with impunity in shutting down protests when they're merely occurring near a place of worship," Ms Radievska said. "The place of worship move-on powers are not fit for purpose, and they must be immediately repealed before more protesters are subject to reckless police action … participating in protest cannot be an invitation to assault and serious injury from police." Friday's protest in Belmore was opposite a mosque but it was not the target of demonstrators. Police have denied the laws were relied upon in the arrest. Doctor Mitch Hickson said Ms Thomas' injuries were "medically significant" and "ethically indefensible". "Facial trauma of the kind she has experienced - requiring surgery and with the potential for permanent vision loss - should never be the outcome of lawful protest activity and reveals a disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police," he said. ""A democracy cannot function where lawful protest is met with force, where questions are answered with violence, and where power is exercised without accountability." The open letter calls for an independent investigation into the policing of the Belmore protest and urgent amendments to the places of worship protest laws. Signatories include Amnesty International Australia, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights and the Jewish Council of Australia. Pro-democracy groups say controversial laws granting police powers to move protesters on from places of worship have emboldened the force to "act with impunity". Days after the violent arrest of one-time federal Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, advocates have written an open letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns with concerns about a "criminalisation and police powers creep". Ms Thomas, who was among five people arrested in Sydney on Friday outside an Australian firm reportedly linked to the manufacture of components for Israeli Defence Force fighter jets, was hospitalised and could suffer permanent vision loss. The arrests will be investigated by police officers from another command, with internal review by professional standards and external oversight from police watchdog the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Australian Democracy Network protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said the incident showed the 'places of worship' laws had given police extra impetus to violently shut down protests. The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the country, with the stated intention of protecting people being targeted by disruptive protesters when entering or leaving a place of worship. "The passage of the places of worship anti-protest legislation has emboldened the NSW Police to act with impunity in shutting down protests when they're merely occurring near a place of worship," Ms Radievska said. "The place of worship move-on powers are not fit for purpose, and they must be immediately repealed before more protesters are subject to reckless police action … participating in protest cannot be an invitation to assault and serious injury from police." Friday's protest in Belmore was opposite a mosque but it was not the target of demonstrators. Police have denied the laws were relied upon in the arrest. Doctor Mitch Hickson said Ms Thomas' injuries were "medically significant" and "ethically indefensible". "Facial trauma of the kind she has experienced - requiring surgery and with the potential for permanent vision loss - should never be the outcome of lawful protest activity and reveals a disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police," he said. ""A democracy cannot function where lawful protest is met with force, where questions are answered with violence, and where power is exercised without accountability." The open letter calls for an independent investigation into the policing of the Belmore protest and urgent amendments to the places of worship protest laws. Signatories include Amnesty International Australia, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights and the Jewish Council of Australia. Pro-democracy groups say controversial laws granting police powers to move protesters on from places of worship have emboldened the force to "act with impunity". Days after the violent arrest of one-time federal Greens candidate Hannah Thomas, advocates have written an open letter to NSW Premier Chris Minns with concerns about a "criminalisation and police powers creep". Ms Thomas, who was among five people arrested in Sydney on Friday outside an Australian firm reportedly linked to the manufacture of components for Israeli Defence Force fighter jets, was hospitalised and could suffer permanent vision loss. The arrests will be investigated by police officers from another command, with internal review by professional standards and external oversight from police watchdog the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. Australian Democracy Network protest rights campaigner Anastasia Radievska said the incident showed the 'places of worship' laws had given police extra impetus to violently shut down protests. The laws were introduced by the state Labor government after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks across the country, with the stated intention of protecting people being targeted by disruptive protesters when entering or leaving a place of worship. "The passage of the places of worship anti-protest legislation has emboldened the NSW Police to act with impunity in shutting down protests when they're merely occurring near a place of worship," Ms Radievska said. "The place of worship move-on powers are not fit for purpose, and they must be immediately repealed before more protesters are subject to reckless police action … participating in protest cannot be an invitation to assault and serious injury from police." Friday's protest in Belmore was opposite a mosque but it was not the target of demonstrators. Police have denied the laws were relied upon in the arrest. Doctor Mitch Hickson said Ms Thomas' injuries were "medically significant" and "ethically indefensible". "Facial trauma of the kind she has experienced - requiring surgery and with the potential for permanent vision loss - should never be the outcome of lawful protest activity and reveals a disproportionate and excessive use of force by the police," he said. ""A democracy cannot function where lawful protest is met with force, where questions are answered with violence, and where power is exercised without accountability." The open letter calls for an independent investigation into the policing of the Belmore protest and urgent amendments to the places of worship protest laws. Signatories include Amnesty International Australia, Australian Lawyers for Human Rights and the Jewish Council of Australia.