
Analysis: Both targets of Trump's tariffs, the EU and China still can't get along
But a summit between the two sides in Beijing on Thursday is instead expected to showcase the deep-seated frictions and mistrust that are widening a rift between the two heavyweights.
European Council President Antonio Costa and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen are set to meet Chinese leader Xi Jinping and hold summit talks with Chinese Premier Li Qiang in Beijing.
The meeting comes as both countries have faced heightened tariffs on their exports to the US – with uncertainties in US trade relations driving Beijing to look to tighten ties with the EU and other major economies.
But a list of grievances between the two sides are setting that goal out of reach.
The EU was far from shy about its concerns in the lead up to the summit. Officials in recent weeks have reiterated their long-standing concerns over what they say are inexpensive Chinese goods 'flooding' European markets, raised alarms about Beijing's move to squeeze the rare earths supply chain, and decried its ongoing backing for Russia as it wages war in Ukraine.
Beijing has lashed out against those concerns, including the 27-member bloc's move last year to raise tariffs on its electric vehicles, launching a range of its own trade probes in apparent retaliation.
After the EU last month announced it was barring Chinese companies from participating in public tenders for medical devices over a certain value, Beijing hit back with its own curbs on government purchases of Europe-made devices.
On Monday, China's Ministry of Commerce slammed the EU decision to include two Chinese banks and a handful of other firms in its latest sanctions against Russia over its invasion of Ukraine. It claimed the move would have a 'severely negative impact on China-EU economic and trade relations.'
All this sets the stage for a contentious summit, ostensibly meant to celebrate 50 years of relations, that's already been whittled from a planned two days to a single-day event.
'We should expect a very difficult moment and not a deal making moment,' said Abigaël Vasselier, head of the Foreign Relations team at MERICS think tank in Germany, during a media briefing this week.
And in some ways that mirrors frictions between the China and the US, she added: 'China has created leverage over Europe, has gone into a tit-for-tat escalation with Europe, and has linked all issues. You could almost say this looks like a Trump playbook used by China on Europe.'
Trump's trade war – and his negotiations with both major economies – is also casting a long shadow over the summit.
There were signs earlier this year that Beijing hoped shared adversity in the face of tariff threats from the US could push China and Europe together. And earlier this month, Beijing granted a reprieve for Europe's major cognac makers following an anti-dumping probe widely seen as retaliation for the bloc's imposition of up to 45% tariffs on its electric vehicles last year.
But in separate addresses to G7 leaders and European lawmakers in recent weeks, von der Leyen made clear the bloc's deep concerns about Beijing had been unresolved.
'China is using this quasi-monopoly (on rare earths) not only as a bargaining chip, but also weaponizing it to undermine competitors in key industries,' she said to G7 leaders meeting in Canada in June.
Beijing has extensive control over supply chains for these critical minerals key in everything from EV batteries and cell phones to fighter jets and roiled global manufacturing after placing export controls on some such minerals amid its trade spat with the US. China agreed during a truce with the US in June to ease these controls.
Von der Leyen also called for unified G7 action to pressure Beijing as it 'floods global markets with subsidized overcapacity that its own market cannot absorb.'
While von der Leyen has long been hawkish on Beijing, voices in China have seen her as pandering to the US to ease trade frictions – and are watching closely for signs that a potential US-EU trade deal could target their economy.
But China's leaders are also joining this week's summit in what they see as a relatively strong position relative to the EU when it comes the US talks.
Beijing sees its decision to play hardball with the US, by raising tit-for-tat levies and then showing the power of its rare earths leverage, as paying off – bringing the US to the negotiating table twice and resulting with an agreement for a trade framework.
Even as frictions remain - including China's purchases of Russian oil and Washington's elevated tariffs on Chinese goods - Beijing has already chalked wins, like the announced resumption of sales of Nvidia's H20 AI chips to China, in a reversal of an April US export ban.
The EU, meanwhile, is scrambling ahead of an August 1 deadline to cut a deal with the US to avert heavy tariffs – and may see more at stake than their Chinese counterparts.
'The worst-case scenario would be for Europe to find itself in a two-front trade war with the US and China at a time when Trump is pressing for some sort of Faustian bargain with Beijing,' said Noah Barkin, a Berlin-based visiting senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States think tank.
With this backdrop, chances for any concrete outcomes appear low to observers on both sides, who instead stress that dialogue can be a form of progress in itself.
Europe has been clear that it doesn't want to cut ties with China, but rather 'rebalance' its economic relationship, which saw a more than 300 billion Euro deficit last year. It also aims to 'derisk' its supply chains, and work together with China on shared global issues like climate change – a potential area of agreement this week.
But experts say a key hold-up for Europe has been a sense that Beijing is unmoved by Brussels' core concerns.
'We haven't had an EU-China summit that produced real deliverables for many years and this one won't be any different. That is a reflection of Beijing's refusal to address the EU's two biggest concerns: an increasingly imbalanced economic relationship that poses a growing threat to European industry and China's ongoing support for Russia,' said Barkin.
China has rejected Europe's concerns about industrial overcapacity leading to a flood of exports as baseless, with one state media outlet recently saying that instead of 'rebalancing trade,' Europe to 'needs to recalibrate its mentality.'
Instead, Beijing is expected to continue to push for setting minimum prices of Chinese-made EVs in Europe instead of tariffs, as well as unfettered access to European technology and markets. And even as Russia ramps up its assault on Kyiv, Beijing is unlikely to give any sign of a shift in that position on Moscow, its close partner.
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi reportedly told the European Union's top diplomat earlier this month that Beijing can't accept Russia losing its war against Ukraine as this could allow the United States to turn its full attention to China.
China has long claimed neutrality in the war and defended its 'normal trade' with Russia, while ramping up purchases of its oil and shipping goods Western leaders say power Russia's defense industry.
But observers in China still feel there's room for collaboration as the two sides sit down on Thursday.
'To solve challenges from climate change to AI and global conflicts, the European Union needs China, and China needs the European Union,' according to Wang Yiwei, director of the Institute of International Affairs at Renmin University in Beijing.
Alluding to the view that the EU can be a counterweight for China against US frictions and a partner in promoting globalization, he added: 'If China and the European Union seek win-win cooperation, the so-called new Cold War cannot prevail.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The 35% tariff kicked in today on Canadian goods. How big of an impact will it have?
With the signing of an executive order, U.S. President Donald Trump upped Canada's tariff rate to 35 per cent, effective at 12:01 a.m. today. That's a 10 per cent increase on the 25 per cent rate that has been in effect on Canadian goods headed south of the border since March, and is a blanket tariff that will apply to Canadian products across the board. However, that doesn't paint the whole picture. A very small number of Canadian products will be subjected to the 35 per cent tariff. That's because the tariffs don't apply to all goods that are subject to the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), the existing free trade deal governing trade between the three countries. Those products can keep going across the border free of tariffs. Most of the goods Canada exports to the U.S. are covered by CUSMA. The Bank of Canada said in its monetary policy report released Wednesday that an estimated 95 per cent of stuff sent south of the border qualifies under that agreement. That means the new, higher 35 per cent rate will be felt by a small fraction of exports that are not CUSMA-compliant, which likely includes a broad array of products across all sectors, according to experts. "[CUSMA] is the one thing that is ensuring normalcy in trade flows in much of the economy," said Eric Miller, president and CEO of Rideau Potomac Strategy Group. "And so the maintenance of that exemption was absolutely crucial." WATCH | Trump increases tariff on Canada to 35%, White House says: There's no simple list of items that are CUSMA-compliant, because products are certified on a case-by-case basis, based on a number of complicated factors. In order to get the exemption, a certain amount of the product needs to be made in Canada, with Canadian inputs. Take the example of a steak versus that of a screwdriver. If a cow is born, raised, slaughtered and prepared in Alberta, then the steak — the end product — is clearly Canadian and would be shielded under CUSMA, says Miller. But a typical screwdriver is made of metal, along with plastic or rubber for the handle. The manufacturer would have to make sure that enough of the materials come from Canada, Mexico or the U.S. That amount is usually about 60 per cent, according to lawyer Daniel Kiselbach, a managing partner at Miller Thompson LLP. WATCH | What we know — and what's still unclear — after tariffs hiked on Canadian goods: Then, you have to make sure you're adding value to those parts and converting them to a finished product before shipping it out. In the case of the screwdriver, you're taking the raw materials and making them into a new, finished item, so that would meet the bar. Overall, anything harvested or mined is usually CUSMA-compliant, Kiselbach said. Anything manufactured or produced in Canada gets more complicated. Electronics and machinery, in particular, are product types that tend to have a harder time getting CUSMA certification. On top of that, the certification process can be challenging, requiring records showing where all a product's components come from, and it is costly. "[Businesses] don't necessarily understand what the rules are telling them," Miller said. "It's almost like cryptography or something." For that reason, Miller says some businesses have simply not acquired CUSMA certification in the past — something that's changing now that the rates are so much higher. WATCH | Is Canada-U.S. free trade dead?: While the fraction of companies that don't qualify for the free trade exemption might be small, Miller says the impact of the new rate should not be overlooked. Many of those who will be hit by the Saturday tariff increase will be small- to medium-sized businesses that rely on components that are made in countries outside of Canada — and can't easily replace them with materials sourced elsewhere. "If you are used to sourcing a particular input from China for the last 10 years, it's not so easy to go and say, 'Now I'm going to buy that good somewhere else,'" Miller said. "They can't easily change and they can't meet the rules, so they have to pay 35 per cent. And for them, going from 25 per cent to 35 per cent is pretty devastating," Miller. Kiselbach says 35 per cent tariffs might be higher than some companies' profit margins, meaning they'd be losing money on each item they sell at the current rate. Sectoral tariffs still in play The 35 per cent rate also has no bearing on the rates Trump has set for specific sectors. Those include a 50 per cent tariff on steel and aluminum, as well as 25 per cent on cars and auto parts, both of which had already been in effect. A new, 50 per cent tariff on some copper products, including copper pipes and wiring, also went into effect today. The Trump administration made carveouts for copper input materials such as ores, concentrates and cathodes, which is providing the industry some relief. And while the sector-specific rates are largely not new, the impact of these steep rates on important sectors cannot be ignored, said Alan Arcand, chief economist with the trade association Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters. "These are very important industries for Canada," Arcand said. "These are tariff rates that are just not … sustainable for these industries. So that's really the rub of the issue right now." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lamborghini's new $380K hybrid supercar redefines luxury tech
Lamborghini's new hybrid supercar, the Temerario, blends electrification with extreme performance — all for just $380,000. Yahoo Finance Senior Reporter Pras Subramanian joins Asking for a Trend to share insights from his interview with Lamborghini president and CEO Stephan Winkelman. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend. Ultra luxury car maker Lamborghini is out with its new hybrid vehicle with a price tag of $380,000. And our senior Autos reporter Pras Subramanian spoke with the company's president and got to drive the car. Pras, welcome. Yes, yes. The new Lamborghini Tamburario is out, the hybrid supercar. Now, so they've now fully electrified their line with hybrids. You know, Lamborghini was supposed to actually put out an EV pretty soon, but they've sort of had to dial that back a little bit. And, you know, before we got a chance to drive the car, I spoke to CEO Stephan Winkelmann about their EV plans. We've seen a number of companies, including yours, kind of push back the full EV timeline. What's the latest on that? Well, we decided two things after looking into the acceptance curve of battery electric vehicles, which is flattening in comparison to the previous, you know, thoughts of the global automotive industry. And therefore, also for us, it's lowering the expectation in terms of growth rate. So we decided that the follow-up of the Urus PHEV will be again a plug-in hybrid car. And then we postponed our first model a bit to understand when is the right time to come with it. So it still makes some sense for BEV in the luxury world, potentially? Potentially, but we have to see as we said here, we have to come not when the technology is ready, but when the time is ready and when it's going to be successful and when the customers are accepting it. And this is paramount for a company like ours, because we are delivering dreams and not mobility. Yeah, so delivering dreams versus mobility. They're not a mobility company. They're, you know, they're an emotional performance company. So actually, that combined with, you know, the EV story, combined with tariffs, that's been a thing that's been coming up for really expensive cars, you know, how do you handle that? What they've been doing is they've been absorbing a lot of that cost and passing on some of that to their customers. They think it's unfair to pass the whole cost down. So that's part of the sort of business decision there with the company. Then we have the new trade deal, so that's going to help them out. Uh, you know, secondly, I kind of asked about sort of the future of the company and where they kind of see this luxury EV maker, I'm sorry, luxury automaker, where they see themselves. And here's what he had to say. What do you see the next 20 years bring to Lamborghini? Lamborghini is not about volumes, no. It's about how much you earn that you can reinvest in a newest technology for the future. Because the world is more complex, life cycles are shortening, investments are getting higher, technology is evolving faster. So you have to keep up with it and so we have to grow in terms of awareness, image, and to have a solid customer base, which is appreciating our cars also in 20 years from now. And this depends a lot on us if we keep up with the newest technology, but if we continue also to be trendsetters. You know, despite some of these issues with electrification, tariffs, some sort of global uncertainty here with higher rates, things like that, Lamborghini still had first half sales a little bit higher compared to last year, which is more than you can say about a lot of luxury automakers who have been suffering recently. What about the new car? You test drove it. How did it feel? Uh, the new car is simply, I guess, pretty astounding. The predecessor was called the Huracán. This new Tamburario is 1,000, I mean 900 horsepower, almost 1,000 horsepower, right? A V8 that goes to 10,000 RPM, right? But what's really interesting about this car is that it has, it's electrified. So it has two motors in the front, right? That drive each front wheel. So basically when you kind of go around turns, it'll spin the outside wheel faster, kind of move the car around. So you almost feel like you can do anything in this car, right? Like you can go 200 miles an hour, hit the brakes, turn right really hard, and the car will do it. It's kind of like almost like magic, trickery, alien technology, whatever you want to call it. Uh, this car sort of has it all and it's super fast. I will say that because of the turbo technology and the electric motors, it's not as loud as the predecessor was, the V10, howling V10. This engine can get pretty loud, but if you're driving 10,000 RPM at that speed, you shouldn't be on any local roads. Who is, who do they take it on? Who's the rival for this new car? So Lamborghini and Ferrari have been locked in battle for a while now. Ferrari would say we're one of one Lamborghini, they're just, they're not our competition, but in reality, they really are. Uh, you have Aston Martin, right? You have McLaren. You have cars up this level, up this price, performance-wise. I've not driven the Ferrari 296, but I've heard that that car is sort of the pinnacle, and the Tamburario is probably there, if not, maybe surpasses it, I'm not sure. I've got to drive it. Yeah. Next assignment, that's what it is. Thank you, Pras. Related Videos Ford posts Q2 beat, but warns of tariff impact Boeing Q2 earnings preview: Tariffs & Air India crash in focus Labor data: Jobs report preview & immigration policy's impact Trump Gives Mexico 90-Day Reprieve from Tariffs Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A Fed governor is resigning, opening a spot for a Trump appointee
A member of the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors announced Friday that she is resigning several months before the end of her term, handing President Donald Trump an early opportunity to fill a key vacancy. Fed Governor Adriana Kugler is stepping down from her role, effective August 8. She was appointed by former President Joe Biden in 2023 and her term was slated to end in January 2026. The Fed did not cite a reason for her departure. 'It has been an honor of a lifetime to serve on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,' Kugler said in a statement. 'I am especially honored to have served during a critical time in achieving our dual mandate of bringing down prices and keeping a strong and resilient labor market.' Trump claimed to reporters on Friday that Kugler was resigning because of the Fed's stance on interest rates. 'I understand it was over the fact that she disagreed with somebody from her party …she disagreed with 'Too Late' on the interest rate,' he said. Trump has taken to calling Fed Chair Jerome Powell 'Too Late' because the president wants Powell to cut interest rates. Fed officials have held interest rates steady so far this year. Trump did not offer any evidence to back his claim. But, he said, he was 'very happy' about having an open spot on the Fed Board. Kugler was absent from the Fed's latest meeting, in which officials voted to hold borrowing costs steady for the fifth consecutive time. Trump has bashed the Fed for months because the central bank hasn't lowered interest rates this year, and Kugler's resignation means he will soon be able to install a new voice at a time when policymakers are unusually divided. And whoever Trump picks will then be eligible to be the next Fed chair, if they're confirmed by the Senate to serve on the Fed's board. According to Fed rules, the chair can be chosen only among the current members of the Fed's board. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said the administration is already actively searching for Powell's successor. Contenders for the top job at the central bank include Bessent himself; Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor; Christopher Waller, a current Fed governor; and Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House's National Economic Council. But even when Powell's term as chair ends next year, he could still stay on the board, meaning Trump's choices for Fed chair will be limited to the current members of the board. Fed chairs technically have three jobs: member of the Fed's Board, chair of the Board of Governors and chair of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). The FOMC is the Fed group that sets interest rates, and the chair is voted into their position by committee members. It's legally unclear if Trump has the power to demote Powell and elevate another governor as chair. Powell's term as a Fed governor ends in 2028. In a news conference Wednesday after the Fed announced its latest decision, Powell refused to say if he intends to remain on the board after his term as chair ends.