US supreme court to weigh transgender student sports bans in key rights case
The decision means the court is prepared to take up another civil rights challenge to Republican-backed restrictions on transgender people.
The justices took up the state appeals of lower court decisions siding with a transgender students who sued.
The students argued that the laws discriminate based on sex and transgender status in violation of the US constitution's 14th amendment guarantee of equal protection under the law as well as the Title IX civil rights law that bars sex-based discrimination in education.
The supreme court is expected to hear arguments in the matter during its next term, which begins in October.
A total of 27 states, most of them Republican-governed, have passed laws in recent years restricting participation in sports by transgender people.
The Idaho and West Virginia laws designate sports teams at public schools according to 'biological sex' and bar 'students of the male sex' from female athletic teams.
The issue of transgender rights is a flashpoint in what has become a culture war in the US.
Donald Trump, upon taking back the White House, has signed executive orders declaring that the federal government will officially recognize only two sexes: male and female, as well as attempting to exclude transgender girls and women from female sports.
Trump also rescinded orders by his predecessor, Joe Biden, combating discrimination against gay and transgender people.
The supreme court in a major ruling in June upheld a Republican-backed ban in Tennessee on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors.
The 6-3 ruling powered by the court's conservative majority found that the ban does not violate the US constitution's 14th amendment promise of equal protection, as challengers to the law had argued. The challengers had argued that the measure unlawfully discriminated against these adolescents based on their sex or transgender status. The supreme court's three liberal justices dissented.
The supreme court in May also allowed Trump's ban on transgender people serving in the military to take effect.
The challenge to the West Virginia law was brought by Becky Pepper-Jackson and the student's mother in 2021 after Jackson's middle school barred Pepper-Jackson from joining the girls' cross country and track teams due to the state's ban.
A federal judge ruled in Jackson's favor at an early stage of the case, but later reversed course and sided with the state. The supreme court in 2023 refused the state's bid to enforce the law as litigation proceeded.
The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th US circuit court of appeals in April threw out the judge's decision, ruling that the law's exclusion of Jackson from girls' teams violates the Title IX law. The state law treats transgender girls differently from other girls, 'which is - literally - the definition of gender identity discrimination,' the 4th circuit ruling stated, adding that this is also discrimination on the basis of sex under Title IX.
The Idaho challenge was brought by Lindsay Hecox, a transgender Boise State University student who had sought to join the women's track and cross-country teams, but failed to qualify. Hecox has instead participated in sports clubs, including soccer and running, at the public university.
A federal judge blocked Idaho's law in 2020, finding that Idaho's law likely violates the constitutional equal protection guarantee. The San Francisco-based 9th US circuit court of appeals upheld the judge's action in 2023 and, in an amended ruling, in 2024.
The measure unlawfully discriminates based on sex and transgender status, the 9th circuit concluded.
Reuters contributed reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Almost half of Americans disapprove of Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz', new poll shows
A new poll has found that almost half of Americans disapprove of the new 'Alligator Alcatraz' set up in the Florida Everglades to house undocumented migrants detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In all, 48 percent of the 2,983 people who responded to the YouGov survey on Thursday said they were not in favor of the facility while just 33 percent said they supported it, with another 18 percent unsure. While Republicans and Democrats were largely split along party lines, just 26 percent of respondents who identified themselves as independent voters said they backed the idea while 53 percent were against it. Another noteworthy finding from YouGov's poll was the revelation that 47 percent of Americans believe detainees are being treated too severely by ICE while 23 percent said they were being treated appropriately, 10 percent they were not being treated harshly enough, with the remainder unsure. The 'Alligator Alcatraz' was announced last month by Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier, who explained in a social media video that it was being built over 39 square miles on the site of the disused Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, which lies west of Miami. The facility consists largely of tents, will have the capacity to house up to 5,000 people and cost $450m a year to run. Uthmeier gloated in the video that it would require minimal additional security due to its remote location, which is home to such dangerous wildlife as alligators and pythons. 'Nowhere to go, nowhere to hide,' he beamed. He has since appeared on Newsmax to boast that Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and other 'communist members of Congress' would not be able to protest outside the center because they would not be able to find it. Trump himself visited it in person on Tuesday, accompanied by Homeland Security Kristi Noem and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, and seemed particularly taken with the threat the local wildlife posed. 'You don't always have land so beautiful and so secure,' he observed. 'We have a lot of bodyguards and a lot of cops in the form of alligators... I wouldn't want to run through the Everglades for long.' He recalled joking about running a moat populated by vicious creatures along the base of his U.S.-Mexico border wall during his first term. 'It was meant more as a joke, but the more I thought of it, the more I liked it,' he said. Trump also used the trip to threaten to arrest New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani and Noem's predecessor Alejandro Mayorkas, call his own predecessor Joe Biden 'a son of a b***h', suggest deporting American citizens who commit crimes and hint, even more darkly, that the 'Alligator Alcatraz' could be the first of many more detention centres. 'We'd like to see them in many states,' the president mused. 'And at some point, they might morph into a system.' The detention center has been equally well received by conservatives on Fox News, with Laura Ingraham telling DeSantis during a recent interview that she 'loved' the idea and panellists discussing it on the same network's Gutfeld! chat show saying they too relished the prospect. Comedian Joe Devito was particularly enthusiastic, telling guest host Tyrus, an ex-wrestler, that it amounted to ' The Shawshank Redemption meets Jurassic Park ' and going on to suggest that the government go further and staff it with grizzly bears and an 'evil squid' to frisk inmates with its tentacles. The figure appeared to be a reference to the total number of Latinos in the United States, chiming with U.S. Census data for the demographic, inviting an angry response from commentators on X.
The Sun
28 minutes ago
- The Sun
Trump reveals plan to host UFC title fight at WHITE HOUSE in front of 20,000 fans to celebrate America's 250th birthday
DONALD Trump has revealed plans to host the UFC title fight at the White House next year to celebrate America's 250th birthday. The"championship" punch up could take place on the presidential lawn and draw over 20,000 fans. 5 5 Trump, 79, who is pally with UFC president Dana White and a big UFC fan, announced his ambitious plan at an event in Des Moines, Iowa on Thursday. It comes just weeks after the president was pictured at the UFC 316 in New Jersey. Speaking emphatically to the crowd, he called on White to help organise the fight, which he said could take place at the White House because there is "a lot of land". He said: "Does anybody watch UFC? The great Dana White? "We're going to have a UFC fight. We're going to have a UFC fight - think of this - on the grounds of the White House. "We have a lot of land there, we're going to build a little — we're not, Dana is going to do it. "Dana is great, one of a kind — going to be UFC fight, championship fight, full fight, like 20,000 to 25,000 people, and we're going to do that as part of '250.'" White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later confirmed the plans on X, adding that the president is "dead serious". The announcement marks the start of a whole year's worth of festivities to celebrate 250 years since American gained independence from the British. Trump's connections with the UFC date back over two decades, while his relationship with White has always been strong. The UFC boss backed the president's political career from the start, calling Trump a "fighter" and endorsing his presidential bid in 2016. Donald Trump plots shock UFC title fight at the White House as Dana White 'confirms' plan for 2026 When Trump survived a failed assassination attempt the White declared the president a "tough guy". He later called the 79-year-old "the legitimate, ultimate, American badass of all time". Later, in an interview with Tucker Carlson at Fox News, he touched on the pair's strong relationship, calling Trump "great" and a "good friend". He said: "This guy has been so good to me it's unexplainable. "He's been a very good friend to me since the day I met him. "When we bought this company it had such a bad stigma attached to it and the sport that we couldn't even get into venues, they didn't want us. "Donald Trump saw that this thing could possibly be big. "Plus he's a sports guy who loves sports, and he offered us to come do the event at the Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City. "He cut us a very fair deal and we went down there and did two events with him where he showed up for the first fight and stayed until the last fight. "Imagine back then; Trump brand is way up, UFC brand is way down, but he took us in and he was great." 5 5
Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
Divided US appeals court blocks enforcement of Texas state immigration law
July 4 (Reuters) - Texas authorities may not enforce a Republican-backed state law that would let them arrest and prosecute people suspected of illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, a divided federal appeals court ruled late Thursday. A 2-1 panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld, opens new tab an injunction that blocked enforcement of the disputed law, which former Democratic President Joe Biden's administration had gone to court to challenge. Republican President Donald Trump's administration dropped the federal government's case, but Texas's law known as SB4 had continued to be challenged by, among others, the immigrant rights group Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center, which argued federal law preempted the state's. The law, which Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed in December 2023, would make it a state crime to illegally enter or re-enter Texas from a foreign country and would empower state judges to order that violators leave the United States, with prison sentences up to 20 years for those who refuse to comply. U.S. Circuit Judge Priscilla Richman, writing for the New Orleans-based court's majority, said that for nearly 150 years, the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that the power to control immigration was exclusively a federal power. Relying on a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that struck down parts of an Arizona immigration law, she said the Texas law, if allowed to be enforced by the Texas Department of Public Safety, would interfere with the federal government's ability to enforce complex U.S. immigration laws. The state did not respond to requests for comment. The ruling upheld a lower-court judge's February 2024 preliminary injunction. The U.S. Supreme Court a month later briefly allowed the law to take effect, but the 5th Circuit within hours halted it pending further review. The opinion by Richman, an appointee of Republican President George W. Bush, was joined by U.S. Circuit Judge Irma Carrillo Ramirez, a Biden appointee. U.S. Circuit Judge Andrew Oldham, a Trump appointee, dissented. He said the majority treated as irrelevant that Trump has been encouraging states to aid his administration's efforts to ramp up immigration enforcement. "It is a sad day for the millions of Americans who are concerned about illegal immigration and who voiced those concerns at ballot boxes across Texas and the Nation," Oldham wrote. Cody Wofsy, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at the American Civil Liberties Union, in a statement welcomed the ruling, saying state immigration laws like the one Texas adopted have been repeatedly rejected by courts and "are deeply harmful to our communities.'
