Russell Brand pleads not guilty to rape and assault charges, trial set for 2026
ALBAWABA - Russell Brand pleads not guilty in London court amid rape allegations
Actor, comedian, and conspiracy-theorizing YouTuber Russell Brand entered a not guilty plea to several rape and sexual assault allegations on Friday in a London courtroom.
The presiding judge, Tony Baumgartner, stated after a brief hearing that Mr. Brand will be put on trial on June 3, 2026, for four to five weeks. Due to the backlog of cases in the British legal system, defendants frequently have to wait between tendering a plea and going to trial.
Mr. Brand, 49, is charged with two charges of sexual assault, one crime of oral rape, one count of rape, and one act of indecent assault.
Four ladies are involved in those five charges. The episodes, according to the prosecution, took place between 1999 and 2005. One of them involves Mr. Brand allegedly raping a lady in a hotel room when she was attending a Labour Party political meeting.
British comedian and actor Russell Brand (Photo by HENRY NICHOLLS / AFP)
Wearing a dark gray suit and a striped shirt that opened to display his chest, Mr. Brand stood in a Plexiglas box at the back of the courtroom throughout the 10-minute session, which was attended by tens of journalists. He answered, "Not guilty," as each of the allegations was read out.
News organizations are prohibited by British law from identifying anyone who accuses someone of sexual assault unless the accuser agrees to give up their right to anonymity. Strict regulations also prohibit the publishing of case-related material that can sway a jury during a trial once criminal procedures have begun.
Mr. Brand had vehemently refuted every claim before Friday's hearing. He claimed to have been a "drug addict, a sex addict, and an imbecile" in a video he uploaded to social media in April, but he had "never engaged in nonconsensual activity."
Mr. Brand has been a British celebrity for decades. He rose to stardom as a stand-up comedian and as a BBC and MTV radio and television host. He also became well-known in the US after the criminal trials ended because of his roles in popular films like 2008's "Forgetting Sarah Marshall." Additionally, he was temporarily wed to pop sensation Katy Perry.
Mr. Brand's most well-known role these days is that of a politically charged YouTuber. With more than 11 million followers on X and more than 6.7 million subscribers to his channel, he frequently discusses religion, conspiracy theories, and conservative talking points in his videos.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Roya News
a day ago
- Roya News
UK police reviews acts by Kneecap, Bob Vylan after Palestine support
Avon and Somerset Police are assessing footage from Glastonbury Festival after controversial comments made during performances by Irish rap trio Kneecap and British punk-rap duo Bob Vylan sparked backlash and political scrutiny. The controversy began when the BBC abruptly cut the livestream of Kneecap's scheduled performance on the West Holts Stage, despite earlier announcements that it would be available on iPlayer. Fans voiced frustration online, accusing the broadcaster of censorship. The situation escalated further following Bob Vylan's earlier set, which was streamed live on BBC platforms. During the performance, rapper Bobby Vylan led the crowd in chants of 'Free, free Palestine' and 'Death, death to the IDF', remarks that triggered criticism on one hand and support on the other. The BBC later removed the set from its streaming services, citing 'deeply offensive' content and confirming it would not be made available on demand. A warning about strong language was also displayed during the live broadcast. In a social media statement, Avon and Somerset Police said they are reviewing video evidence to determine whether any criminal offences were committed on stage. Kneecap, known for their politically charged performances and support for the Palestinian cause, also drew attention after band member Moglai Bap referenced the upcoming court appearance of fellow member Mo Chara, who faces terror-related charges in the UK. On stage, Bap told the crowd they would 'start a riot outside the courts,' before clarifying: 'No riots, just love and support, and support for Palestine.' Despite the BBC blackout, Kneecap's set went ahead to a packed audience waving Irish and Palestinian flags. The trio led chants of 'Free Palestine' and mocked the BBC's decision to pull their livestream, with one member joking, 'The BBC editor is gonna have some job.' The performances come amid ongoing political pressure on both artists. Mo Chara, whose real name is Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, was recently charged under the UK Terrorism Act for allegedly supporting proscribed groups during a performance last year. His next court date is set for August 20. Ahead of the festival, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer had said it would be 'inappropriate' for Kneecap to perform, while Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has since contacted the BBC director general for an explanation regarding Bob Vylan's set. The BBC responded by reaffirming its editorial guidelines and denying it bans artists, while also emphasizing that not all acts from Glastonbury are streamed live.
Roya News
2 days ago
- Roya News
Supreme Court allows Trump to limit birthright citizenship in some states
US Supreme Court on Friday allowed a controversial executive order by US President Donald Trump to temporarily take effect in 28 states, permitting a partial halt to automatic birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants, even as legal challenges continue. The 6–3 decision, split along ideological lines, does not address the constitutionality of the order itself but lifts nationwide injunctions that had blocked it from being implemented anywhere. The ruling was framed as a procedural matter concerning the power of individual federal judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which the Court has increasingly questioned. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, emphasized that such broad judicial blocks should be used sparingly, allowing Trump's directive to proceed in states that are not currently involved in active lawsuits against it. The order will not go into effect for another 30 days, allowing further appeals. President Trump hailed the decision as a 'historic win' during remarks at the White House on Friday, saying it reasserts the power of the executive branch and limits judicial overreach. He also praised a separate ruling issued the same day allowing parents to opt their children out of LGBTQ-themed books in elementary schools. Critics argue that Trump's January executive order, issued on the first day of his second term, strikes at the heart of the 14th Amendment, which has guaranteed birthright citizenship in the US for over 150 years. Legal challenges led by 22 Democratic states had quickly blocked the order, with federal judges in Seattle, Maryland, and Massachusetts ruling against it and extending those rulings nationwide. The ruling does not settle the broader constitutional debate. The practice of granting citizenship to anyone born on US soil has been upheld by courts for over a century, most notably in the 1898 Wong Kim Ark decision. That precedent remains intact, for now. The Trump administration has argued that undocumented immigrants are not 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States under the 14th Amendment, a legal interpretation widely disputed by constitutional scholars. As litigation continues, the future of the order remains uncertain. The Court's decision is likely to renew fierce legal and political battles over immigration, the limits of executive power, and the role of the judiciary.
Roya News
4 days ago
- Roya News
Trump claims win as NATO agrees massive spending hike
NATO countries agreed Wednesday to massively ramp up their defence spending to satisfy US President Donald Trump, who hailed it as a "monumental win" for America -- and reaffirmed his country's commitment to protect its European allies. Trump cut a jubilant figure after NATO's 32 countries agreed to his headline target of five percent of GDP on defence spending following two days of talks in The Hague. Taking credit for a "fantastic" outcome that "no one really thought possible", Trump described the spending hike as "a monumental win for the United States". Trump also signed off on a final declaration confirming an "ironclad commitment" to NATO's collective defence pledge that an attack on one is an attack on all -- a reassuring move for European countries worried about Russia. The US leader has repeatedly suggested Washington could withhold protection from European countries unwilling to spend more on defence. The compromise hatched by NATO sees countries promise to dedicate 3.5 percent of GDP to core military spending by 2035, and a further 1.5 to broader security-related areas such as infrastructure. Spain had been refusing to agree and while it signed the pledge it has said it thinks it can fulfil NATO's demands while spending less -- Trump threatening on Wednesday to hit its trade interests in response. But the pledge endorsed in The Hague allows Trump to claim triumph, while in practice providing wiggle room for cash-strapped governments in Europe. 'Couldn't have been nicer' Everything was choreographed at the gathering to keep the volatile US president on board: from chopping back the official part of the meeting, to putting him up overnight in the royal palace. Underpinning the leaders' discussions on defence was Moscow's war with Kyiv, with the summit's final statement referring to the "long-term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security". Though its language was watered down from previous years, the declaration also said allies would continue to support Ukraine, "whose security contributes to ours", and allies will be allowed to use money from the new pledge for military aid for Kyiv. Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky played a less central role than at previous summits -- with leaders wary of any embarrassment after an infamous row with Trump during a visit to the Oval Office. But the US president did meet the war-torn country's leader on the summit sidelines, declaring afterwards the encounter "couldn't have been nicer" and Zelensky hailing a "substantive" meeting. Trump also said he was talking to Russian President Vladimir Putin about the war, adding: "I think progress is being made." British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also met Zelensky along with a group of other European leaders, saying afterwards he hoped to "use the momentum from the summit to continue to step up support for Ukraine". NATO chief Mark Rutte, also present at the Starmer meeting, renewed a promise that Ukraine's bid for membership remained "irreversible", but the summit statement avoided any mention of Kyiv's push to join after Trump ruled it out. 'Not a rip-off' Trump had rattled allies on the summit's eve by appearing to cast some doubt on the validity of NATO's mutual defence clause -- known as Article Five of the alliance treaty. But the pledge was reaffirmed unequivocally in the summit's final statement -- and Trump drove the point home at his closing press conference. "I came here because it was something I'm supposed to be doing," Trump said in closing remarks to the press, when pressed on the mutual defence clause known as Article Five. "But I left here a little bit differently," said the US leader -- who was visibly delighted at the red carpet welcome and the praise lavished on him by NATO's Rutte among others.
