Live: FTSE 100, Pound Fall as Traders Weigh US Strikes on Iran
Advent's statements on the takeover hint at the value they think there is in Spectris, which hasn't been reflected in its share price.
It notes that Spectris respositioned back in 2018 and in the process became a 'more focused and higher quality business.' Since then, shares in Spectris have only risen by around 20%, including the jump seen this year.
Advent also has a track record of buying up UK industrial firms. It snapped up electronics firm Laird in 2018, aerospace company Cobham in 2020 and defence contractor Ultra Electronics in 2022.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Aston Martin sues Italian supplier for freezing deliveries
Aston Martin has sued a key supplier that halted deliveries fearing that the carmaker would not pay its bills. Warwickshire-based Aston Martin has been forced to take legal action against IMR Industries after the Italian manufacturer stopped deliveries of vital components. IMR, which also supplies the likes of Ferrari and Maserati, is understood to have ceased shipments because of concerns that Aston Martin's financial troubles would leave it unable to pay for the parts delivered. A source close to Aston Martin insisted the company always paid its suppliers on time. It comes as Aston Martin, which is overseen by billionaire Lawrence Stroll, battles to stem years of losses and get debts under control. Like other carmakers, the luxury marque has also been buffeted by Donald Trump's tariffs on vehicle imports, which prompted the company to temporarily suspend deliveries to the US this year. IMR is understood to have stopped delivering parts to Aston Martin around a fortnight ago. Production has so far been unaffected by the disruption thanks to sufficient stockpiles. However, Aston Martin has now taken legal action against IMR, filing a lawsuit for breach of contract in the UK's High Court on June 19. An initial hearing was held last Thursday, where the case was adjourned while IMR builds its defence. But a High Court judge issued a temporary injunction ordering IMR Industries to restart deliveries. Aston Martin has received supplies in the days since. The carmaker is now seeking a permanent injunction to force IMR Industries to continue making deliveries for the remaining period of the contract. Aston Martin has enlisted lawyers from City firm Gowling WLG to make its case. A spokesman for Aston Martin said: 'In keeping with Aston Martin policy, we do not comment on ongoing litigation.' IMR Industries and Gowling WLG were contacted for comment. IMR was founded 60 years ago and has two sites based near Milan and Pescara in southern Italy. The manufacturer, which employs around 1,300 staff across six plants, makes exterior parts used on luxury cars as well as interior leather trims. Clients include Bentley, Ferrari, Maserati, BMW and Porsche. Aston Martin has a multi-year contract with IMR to supply components, including both body and interior parts. The clash comes as Aston Martin struggles to find a firm footing for its business. Shares have lost more than 90pc of their value since the company first listed on the London Stock Exchange in 2018 and Aston Martin has been through a succession of chief executives, each of whom has struggled to find a path to profitability. Aston Martin issued back-to-back profits last year, blamed on issues with its supply chains and an economic slowdown in China. The company lost £289m last year and saw its debts jump by 43pc to £1.1bn. It has also been severely affected by Mr Trump's 25pc tariffs on all cars and car parts imported into the US. The levies caused Aston Martin to temporarily pause all shipments to America, a key market, for a month. In February, Aston Martin outlined plans to cut 170 jobs in a bid to reduce its costs by £25m a year. It has also outlined plans to sell its stake in the Aston Martin Aramco Formula One Team for £125m to help reduce its debts. The British carmaker, which was founded in 1913 and is known for its association with James Bond, is aiming to turn around its performance by ironing out issues with production that have dogged the business. Adrian Hallmark, the chief executive who formerly ran Bentley, said this year his focus was on 'operational execution and delivering financial sustainability'. Mr Hallmark was appointed last year by Mr Stroll, the Canadian tycoon who seized control of Aston Martin in 2020 through a bailout. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starmer says fixing welfare is a 'moral imperative'
Sir Keir Starmer has said the UK's benefits system is broken and fixing it is a "moral imperative", a day after a backbench Labour revolt saw him forced into a U-turn on welfare cuts. The prime minister told the Welsh Labour Party conference in Llandudno that the government would not take away the welfare "safety net that vulnerable people rely on". But he said he could not let benefits "become a snare for those who can and want to work". Despite the government's concession on its plans to reform welfare, some Labour MPs want further changes, while the Unite union has called for the proposal to be dropped altogether ahead of a vote on Tuesday. PM's benefit cuts U-turn leaves backbenchers feeling bruised We've got the right balance, says PM after benefits U-turn Faisal Islam: How much will U-turn on disability benefits cost? The BBC understands whips and cabinet ministers - including Wes Streeting, Angela Rayner and Rachel Reeves - have been phoning or texting Labour MPs over the weekend, going through the names of the initial rebels in a bid to get an accurate assessment of potential voting. Some MPs are saying they have yet to make their mind up on how to vote and are awaiting a statement on Monday from Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall that will spell out government concessions. Speaking at the conference in north Wales on Saturday, Sir Keir said fixing the "broken" benefits system needed to be done because it was "failing people every day", leaving "a generation of young people written off for good and the cost spiralling out of control". "Fixing it is a moral imperative, but we need to do it in a Labour way," he added. The government's initial plans, aimed at bringing down the welfare bill, would have made it harder for people to claim personal independence payment (Pip), a benefit paid to 3.7 million people with long-term physical or mental health conditions. But following a rebellion among Labour MPs and the likelihood the government would be defeated in the Commons, the government announced the stricter criteria would only apply to new claimants. It reversed its plans to freeze the health-related component of universal credit, and the payment will now rise in line with inflation for existing recipients. Ministers will also carry out a review of the Pip assessment process, with input from disability organisations. A £1bn support package to help people into work, originally scheduled for 2029, will be fast-tracked. A new "reasoned amendment" to the bill will be put down on Monday by rebel MPs, which will reflect government concessions but is expected to be similar to the now-withdrawn earlier amendment that sought to block changes to the benefits system. The BBC understands that around 50 Labour MPs currently back that new amendment. That number is likely to increase but the expectation is it will not reach the 80-plus needed to put the government in danger of defeat. However it would still represent a significant rebellion. Rebel MPs are also expected to hold a briefing on Monday night at Westminster with various disability charities. Labour MP Diane Abbott earlier told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that she thought the result of a vote on the new plans would be tight, partly because backbenchers are still "upset about the lack of consultation" and because of "the notion of a two-tier benefit system". But former Labour justice secretary Lord Falconer told the programme that "sensible" changes to the welfare reforms were "pretty significant", and that he believed opposition among Labour MPs was "shrinking and shrinking". Debbie Abrahams, the Labour MP who chairs the Work and Pensions Select Committee, told the BBC on Friday: "The concessions are a good start, they are very good concessions and they will protect existing claimants. "However there are still concerns about new claimants. It would not be right for me not to do anything just to spare the prime minister an inconvenience." Ahead of Sir Keir's conference speech, Unite called for the "entire welfare bill to be dropped and for the government to start again", with general secretary Sharon Graham accusing Labour of "attacking the most vulnerable in our society". "The government's latest plans for disabled benefits cuts are divisive and sinister," she said. "Creating a two-tier system where younger disabled people and those who become disabled in the future will be disadvantaged and denied access to work and education, is morally wrong."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ricegrowers Limited (ASX:SGLLV) Stock Goes Ex-Dividend In Just Two Days
Readers hoping to buy Ricegrowers Limited (ASX:SGLLV) for its dividend will need to make their move shortly, as the stock is about to trade ex-dividend. The ex-dividend date is commonly two business days before the record date, which is the cut-off date for shareholders to be present on the company's books to be eligible for a dividend payment. The ex-dividend date is important as the process of settlement involves at least two full business days. So if you miss that date, you would not show up on the company's books on the record date. Therefore, if you purchase Ricegrowers' shares on or after the 1st of July, you won't be eligible to receive the dividend, when it is paid on the 21st of July. The company's next dividend payment will be AU$0.50 per share, on the back of last year when the company paid a total of AU$0.65 to shareholders. Based on the last year's worth of payments, Ricegrowers stock has a trailing yield of around 5.8% on the current share price of AU$11.15. Dividends are a major contributor to investment returns for long term holders, but only if the dividend continues to be paid. So we need to investigate whether Ricegrowers can afford its dividend, and if the dividend could grow. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. If a company pays out more in dividends than it earned, then the dividend might become unsustainable - hardly an ideal situation. Ricegrowers paid out 63% of its earnings to investors last year, a normal payout level for most businesses. A useful secondary check can be to evaluate whether Ricegrowers generated enough free cash flow to afford its dividend. It paid out more than half (53%) of its free cash flow in the past year, which is within an average range for most companies. It's encouraging to see that the dividend is covered by both profit and cash flow. This generally suggests the dividend is sustainable, as long as earnings don't drop precipitously. See our latest analysis for Ricegrowers Click here to see the company's payout ratio, plus analyst estimates of its future dividends. Stocks in companies that generate sustainable earnings growth often make the best dividend prospects, as it is easier to lift the dividend when earnings are rising. If earnings decline and the company is forced to cut its dividend, investors could watch the value of their investment go up in smoke. For this reason, we're glad to see Ricegrowers's earnings per share have risen 18% per annum over the last five years. Ricegrowers is paying out a bit over half its earnings, which suggests the company is striking a balance between reinvesting in growth, and paying dividends. This is a reasonable combination that could hint at some further dividend increases in the future. Another key way to measure a company's dividend prospects is by measuring its historical rate of dividend growth. Since the start of our data, 10 years ago, Ricegrowers has lifted its dividend by approximately 9.6% a year on average. It's encouraging to see the company lifting dividends while earnings are growing, suggesting at least some corporate interest in rewarding shareholders. Has Ricegrowers got what it takes to maintain its dividend payments? It's good to see earnings are growing, since all of the best dividend stocks grow their earnings meaningfully over the long run. However, we'd also note that Ricegrowers is paying out more than half of its earnings and cash flow as profits, which could limit the dividend growth if earnings growth slows. In summary, while it has some positive characteristics, we're not inclined to race out and buy Ricegrowers today. On that note, you'll want to research what risks Ricegrowers is facing. For example, we've found 1 warning sign for Ricegrowers that we recommend you consider before investing in the business. If you're in the market for strong dividend payers, we recommend checking our selection of top dividend stocks. — Investing narratives with Fair Values A case for TSXV:USA to reach USD $5.00 - $9.00 (CAD $7.30–$12.29) by 2029. By Agricola – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: CA$12.29 · 0.9% Overvalued DLocal's Future Growth Fueled by 35% Revenue and Profit Margin Boosts By WynnLevi – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $195.39 · 0.9% Overvalued Historically Cheap, but the Margin of Safety Is Still Thin By Mandelman – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: SEK232.58 · 0.1% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
