Higher BMI, Bigger Gains: Tirzepatide's Effects on HFpEF
In patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), tirzepatide reduced the risk for worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death regardless of their baseline BMI or fat distribution, with larger gains observed among those with higher BMI. Those who lost more weight with tirzepatide showed greater improvements in exercise capacity and symptom severity.
METHODOLOGY:
The SUMMIT trial previously showed significant benefits of tirzepatide, a long-acting glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and GLP-1 receptor agonist, in patients with obesity-related HFpEF.
In this secondary analysis, researchers looked at whether the effects of tirzepatide varied with the severity and distribution of a patient's obesity or by the extent of weight loss achieved after treatment.
The trial included 731 patients aged 40 years or older (mean age, 65.2 years; 53.8% women) with obesity-related HFpEF (defined by the New York Heart Association's functional classes II-IV) and a BMI of 30 or higher.
Participants were randomly assigned to subcutaneously receive either 2.5 mg/wk of tirzepatide (n = 364) or a placebo (n = 367).
Patients were categorized into tertiles of their baseline BMI and waist to height ratio.
Primary endpoints were the time to first adjudicated cardiovascular death or an event of worsening HF and a change in the symptom status measured using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) at 52 weeks. Secondary endpoints included changes in exercise capacity (measured using the 6-minute walk distance), body weight, and blood pressure.
TAKEAWAY:
Patients in the highest tertile of BMI were younger and most likely to be women and had more severe HF, a greater volume overload, and more severe inflammation. Those with a higher waist to height ratio showed similar patterns, as well as shorter 6-minute walk distances and more severe kidney disease.
Use of tirzepatide vs placebo reduced the risk for cardiovascular death or worsening HF across all BMI ranges and waist to height ratios.
Tirzepatide was associated with greater improvement in the 6-minute walk distance in patients in the highest range for BMI (37.5 m) than in those in the middle (26.3 m) and lower (9.9 m) ranges (P for trend = .025); improvements in weight loss and systolic blood pressure followed similar patterns.
After 52 weeks on tirzepatide, those who lost more weight had bigger gains in their 6-minute walk distance and changes in the KCCQ-CSS (P < .0001 for both). The same benefits were seen in those with larger drops in waist circumference.
IN PRACTICE:
'These data provide further evidence supporting the importance of excess body fat, particularly visceral fat, as driving HF severity in patients with the obesity phenotype of HFpEF,' the researchers reported.
'While these findings reinforce the role of incretin therapies in HFpEF management, these data, perhaps more importantly, highlight the urgent need for precision strategies to define obesity and direct therapy to those who will benefit most,' experts wrote in an editorial accompanying the journal article.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Barry A. Borlaug, MD, of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. It was published online on July 21, 2025, in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology. The researchers presented the findings at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) Scientific Session 2025.
LIMITATIONS:
Categorizing patients into tertiles of their BMI or waist to height ratio may have masked some trends. The trial included a higher proportion of women and participants from Latin America, limiting generalizability. Imaging-based methods could possibly offer more precise measurements of obesity.
DISCLOSURES:
The original trial was funded by Eli Lilly and Company. The lead author reported receiving grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and US Department of Defense, receiving research grants from and consulting for several pharmaceutical companies, and being a named inventor for tools and approach for procedure to treat HF. Several other authors reported being employees of or consultants for Eli Lilly and Company and several other companies.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MEDIA ADVISORY: Baycrest Experts Available During AAIC® 2025 in Toronto
TORONTO, July 25, 2025 /CNW/ - From July 27 to 31, Toronto hosts the Alzheimer's Association International Conference® 2025 (AAIC®), the world's largest forum for dementia research. With Canada in the spotlight, Baycrest is recognized globally for its leadership in aging and brain health. Our scientists and experts are participating in the conference and available to support your coverage. This international gathering offers a timely opportunity to explore the growing impact of dementia on families, economies and health care systems, along with the latest advances in prevention, care, treatment and research. Dr. Howard ChertkowScientific Director, Baycrest's Kimel Family Centre for Brain Health & WellnessScientific Director, Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA)Dr. Chertkow is a member of the AAIC Scientific Program Committee and one of Canada's most respected dementia researchers. He is available to speak on topics including dementia detection, prevention, treatment and Canada's role in the global research landscape. More Baycrest Experts You Can Speak With Dr. Adriana Shnall, Program Director, Baycrest Koschitzky Centre for Innovations in Caregiving, can speak to innovative tools supporting dementia caregivers, including those in rural and underserved communities. At AAIC, she is co-presenting on the use of virtual reality, AI and other strategies to better support families in community and long-term care settings. Dr. Allison Sekuler, President & Chief Scientist, Baycrest Academy for Research and Education is available to speak on the rising prevalence of dementia in Canada and its impact on individuals, families and the healthcare system. Dr. Nicole Anderson, Associate Scientific Director, Baycrest's Kimel Family Centre for Brain Health & Wellness, can discuss the latest in dementia prevention research, including evidence that nearly half of all cases may be preventable. Baycrest combines world-class care with cutting-edge research to help shape the future of aging and brain health. If you are working on AAIC-related coverage or broader dementia stories, our experts are available for interviews throughout the conference. Throughout the week, we will share updates with media highlighting key topics, research developments and expert perspectives from Baycrest. Please contact Natasha Nacevski-Laird, Media Relations Specialist at Baycrest, to schedule an interview. About Baycrest At Baycrest, our vision is a world where every older person lives with purpose, fulfilment and dignity. Baycrest is a global leader in aging and brain health innovation, with over 105 years of expertise in seniors' care and cutting-edge research. Baycrest has been Designated with Exemplary Status by Accreditation Canada, and drives industry-leading care and safety outcomes. As the home of the Centre for Aging + Brain Health Innovation (CABHI) powered by Baycrest, the Baycrest Academy for Research and Education (BARE) and the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging, Baycrest is at the forefront of dementia research. Affiliated with the University of Toronto, Baycrest's training programs shape the future of care globally, while Baycrest Global Solutions extends its expertise to senior living and healthcare internationally. For more information, visit: SOURCE Baycrest View original content to download multimedia: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A science journal pulled a controversial study about a bizarre life form against the authors' wishes
NEW YORK (AP) — A microscopic discovery in a California lake sparked buzz and controversy more than a decade ago when it was first revealed. Scientists said they'd discovered bacteria that used the element arsenic — poisonous to life as we know it — to grow. If true, it expanded the possibilities for where life could exist on Earth — or on other worlds. Several research groups failed to replicate the results, and argue it's not possible for a living thing to use something so toxic to make DNA and proteins. Some scientists have suggested the results of the original experiments may have been skewed by undetected contaminants. On Thursday, the journal Science, which first published the research, retracted it, though not because of misconduct on the researchers' part. 'If the editors determine that a paper's reported experiments do not support its key conclusions, even if no fraud or manipulation occurred, a retraction is considered appropriate,' the journal's editor-in-chief Holden Thorp wrote in the statement announcing the retraction. The researchers disagree with the journal's decision and stand by their data. It's reasonable to pull a paper for major errors or suspected misconduct — but debates and disagreements over the findings are part of the scientific process, said study co-author Ariel Anbar of Arizona State University. 'One doesn't retract a paper because the interpretation is controversial, or even because most disagree with the interpretation,' wrote Anbar in an email. 'At least, that hasn't been the case until now.' Science has more frequently retracted papers for reasons beside fraud in recent years, said Thorp and Vada Vinson, Science's executive editor, wrote in a blog post. NASA helped fund the original work. The space agency's science mission chief Nicky Fox said in a statement that NASA does not support the retraction and encourages Science to reconsider. —- The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Solve the daily Crossword
Medscape
10 minutes ago
- Medscape
CATALYST: A Novel Approach to Treating Diabetes
This transcript has been edited for clarity. Akshay B. Jain, MD:Welcome, from the ADA 85th Annual Sessions in Chicago. I'm endocrinologist Akshay Jain, from University of British Columbia in Vancouver. With us today is Dr Vivian Fonseca, professor of medicine at Tulane. Welcome, Dr Fonseca. Vivian Fonseca, MD: Hi there. Thank you for asking me to join you. Jain: Dr Fonseca, you're presenting the results of the CATALYST study. Tell us a little bit more about the study. Fonseca: The CATALYST study is a very novel approach to treating diabetes. We took people with uncontrolled diabetes despite taking many medications, including insulin, GLP-1 receptor agonists, dual agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, and metformin. They also had many medications for hypertension. We asked the question as to whether cortisol was elevated and nonsuppressed in this population. We did a very simple overnight, 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test in a little over 1000 people. We were very surprised to find that 24% of them had a cortisol that did not fully suppress. They met the criteria for hypercortisolism as recommended by the European and the US endocrine societies today, at more than 1.8. Jain: That's a staggering number. Fonseca: That is a staggering number. It was quite a surprise to me and my colleagues. Jain: Once you identify these individuals, what's the next step for them? Fonseca: For the next steps, there is a range of things to do. If you identify hypercortisolism, you want to see whether there's an adrenal tumor or something like that. We did CT scans of the abdomen in that population, and one third of them had some abnormality. Not all of them had a tumor that was surgically resectable. Some had bilateral disease, and some just had thickening, which you would just wait and watch. Here, you have a population with hypercortisolemia at a higher rate than expected, with or without an abnormality on imaging. Some of them were surgically treatable, but for this particular study, we chose to take that group of people and treat them medically. There is a wide variety of medicines available for treating elevated cortisol, which have mainly been tested in Cushing syndrome. Mifepristone is a nonspecific steroid hormone receptor blocker that's known to block cortisol action and is approved for treating hyperglycemia in people with hypercortisolism. It was okay to actually test it in this population, so we did a randomized trial, randomizing those people with hypercortisolemia in a 2:1 ratio to mifepristone or placebo and following them for 24 weeks. Jain: What were the results? Fonseca: Again, another very surprising result. The A1c fell by 1.47%, almost 1.5% from the baseline of 8.5%. That is a very, very robust response. What I like about it is that this is not giving it to everybody with diabetes. You're using what I would call precision medicine. You find an abnormality, you treat that abnormality, and you get a very good result. There were a few other spinoff things. The weight fell significantly. The waist circumference declined significantly. There were also side effects that are consistent with the mifepristone side effect profile. The potassium fell. You get hypokalemia because the cortisol levels don't fall. They rise because you're blocking the receptor and you stimulate the mineralocorticoid receptor. The blood pressure went up a little bit, but it was still mostly at goal in most of the patients. You can treat that hypokalemia, so I won't go into that. We also had what we call glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome. People on steroids who just stop, when you treat Cushing syndrome, or any of the medications for hypercortisolemia will give you a feeling of withdrawal of the steroid that you're used to. Those are to be expected. The side effect profile shows expected side effects in many people. But still, we can get around it and get a very good result on diabetes treatment. Jain: This is fascinating. We are unmasking hypercortisolemia as an underlying reason for insulin resistance. Fonseca: I wouldn't say unmasking. We are recognizing it in a novel way for the first time, and are able to treat people who we were throwing many drugs at [the problem] — wasting those drugs, if you ask me — when we were not treating the fundamental problem. Jain: When should clinicians think about this as an underlying issue? Fonseca: The way I translate every clinical trial, you do it for what the trial was done for. You have people who are uncontrolled, or you may say difficult to control, uncontrolled or on many medications. Often, you find comorbidities. They have had this problem for a while. Many of them have complications of diabetes, and a significant number had heart disease. You treat them with a very specific treatment, and you get a good result. Now, in some people the treatment may be surgical. You could use this drug or other drugs, and there are some new ones. This has become an important target for therapy, so we will see this approach. That also leaves the question as to [the fact that] there were 24% with this abnormality. What's happening in the other 75%? Maybe there are other abnormalities that we haven't recognized. I think you and I still have a large amount of work to do. Jain: We do indeed. Your target population was individuals with type 2 diabetes. Fonseca: Type 2 diabetes that was not controlled. Jain: Do you think this could be an underlying problem in type 1 diabetes as well? Fonseca: Hypercortisolism can occur in anybody. If you're finding many challenges in type 1 diabetes, you could do it. Obviously, people who are not doing well in their general health without diabetes could have hypercortisolism. This is not what we recognize as the textbook Cushing syndrome. These people did not have those features. The obesity was mild and low central. They had little features, but not the full-blown textbook description, which comes after many years of having very severe hypercortisolism. Jain: For those individuals who, say, are on birth control, would you then recommend doing a urine test? Fonseca: That's a very important question. We excluded those people from the study because you get a false elevation due to raising cortisol-binding globulin with estrogen. We did it in people who had a probability based on some anecdotal things and studies in Europe that were done before, and also excluding people who would have a false positive or a false negative, such as [those with] estrogen use. We don't know how to really identify those people well, without stopping the therapy. Jain: Any final key pearls of wisdom from this trial? Fonseca: I think, like anything that's new, it's exciting. Many of these people were very glad that we found an abnormality. I mean, it sounds bad, but they were blaming themselves, they were being labeled as noncompliant, and they were very frustrated with this. Jain: And the medication burden that they were facing. Fonseca: We actually withdrew a number of medications on several people. Jain: Great. Those are the results of the CATALYST trial. Thank you so much, Dr Fonseca, for joining. Fonseca: Thank you. It's a pleasure to be here.
