logo
The Democrats' next test will feature these three Arizona candidates

The Democrats' next test will feature these three Arizona candidates

CNN15-07-2025
The next test of who Democratic voters want to see leading the party will take place Tuesday in southwest Arizona, where three leading candidates are offering competing visions in the primary to fill the late Rep. Raul Grijalva's seat.
The candidates have all painted themselves as fighters focused on protecting programs that would see cuts under Republicans' sweeping domestic policy and immigration law. But the primary has also highlighted questions about age, generational change and the power of a famous last name.
Adelita Grijalva, a former Pima County supervisor and the late congressman's daughter, is pitching herself as an experienced continuation of his progressive legacy. Former state Rep. Daniel Hernandez is running as a pragmatist who's managed to pass legislation under Republican majorities. And 25-year-old activist Deja Foxx argues her lived experience and youth make her the best suited to bring new urgency to Washington.
Hernandez has led fundraising, but Grijalva and Foxx have remained competitive. Two other Democratic primary candidates, businessman Patrick Harris Sr. and Indigenous scholar Jose Malvido Jr., have not submitted Federal Election Commission reports.
Arizona's 7th Congressional District, which includes parts of Tucson and most of the state's southern border with Mexico, has been without representation since March, when Rep. Grijalva died due to complications from cancer treatments. The late congressman and former Congressional Progressive Caucus chairman was first elected to the House in 2002.
Polls close at 7 p.m. Tuesday local time (10 p.m. ET).
Whoever wins the Democratic primary will be heavily favored to win the September 23 general election. Here's a closer look at the leading Democratic candidates:
The 54-year-old Grijalva entered the race as the front-runner and has garnered the lion's share of endorsements in the contest, including support from both of Arizona's US senators as well as Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She's also benefited from her family's longstanding recognition in the district, saying she would continue her father's legacy.
Like her father, Grijalva served on the Tucson Unified School District governing board and the Pima County Board of Supervisors before running for Congress.
She has pushed back on her opponents' efforts to frame her as the establishment candidate, saying that she applied for and earned her endorsements from various groups and has her own record of advocacy work, including running diversion programs while working at Pima County's Teen Court.
Foxx acknowledges this is her first political run. She has built her campaign around her backstory as a Tucson native who worked at a gas station as a teenager and was raised by a single mother who relied on Medicaid, food stamps and Section 8 housing. She points to those experiences to argue she has lived the policies lawmakers debate in Washington.
The 25-year-old has also highlighted her decade of experience as an activist. She is best known for confronting former Sen. Jeff Flake, an Arizona Republican, at a town hall over Planned Parenthood funding. Foxx has also worked as a reproductive rights activist and an influencer backing Vice President Kamala Harris' 2019 presidential campaign.
Hernandez has framed himself as a more centrist alternative to Foxx and Grijalva. While his more progressive opponents have backed 'Medicare for All,' he has said he would defend Medicare and Medicaid. He has also supported mining projects in the district that other candidates have opposed.
He's argued that while some Democrats use being in the political minority as an excuse to not get legislation passed, he was able to get policies enacted during his six years in the state House under a Republican Legislature and governor.
Hernandez previously ran in the 6th Congressional District in 2022 but lost the Democratic primary to Kirsten Engel. The 35-year-old has also done Latino outreach for Planned Parenthood, served as the Arizona state director for Everytown for Gun Safety and served on the Sunnyside Unified School District governing board.
In 2011, Hernandez was working as an intern for then-Rep. Gabby Giffords when she was shot at a constituent meeting in Tucson. He provided first aid to the congresswoman before emergency services arrived.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Interior gifts Navy land in the Arizona desert
Interior gifts Navy land in the Arizona desert

E&E News

time12 hours ago

  • E&E News

Interior gifts Navy land in the Arizona desert

The Interior Department announced Wednesday it will shift control of another 285 acres of public land to the military, this time handing over a parcel in southeastern Arizona to the Department of the Navy. The temporary transfer marks the second time Interior has granted the military administrative powers over land near the nation's border with Mexico. Earlier this year, Interior turned over control of nearly 110,000 acres of public land in New Mexico to speed construction of border barriers and increase federal patrols of the region. The Trump administration said the newest transfer, which will last for three years, is necessary to create a 'National Defense Area in direct support of border security operations.' Advertisement 'By making this land available for border infrastructure improvements and defense operations, we are closing critical security gaps, stopping illegal activity and protecting both our nation and its natural resources from the damage caused by unchecked illegal immigration,' Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement.

Big Ten commish makes it clear: When it comes to College Football Playoff expansion, his No. 1 priority is inventory
Big Ten commish makes it clear: When it comes to College Football Playoff expansion, his No. 1 priority is inventory

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Big Ten commish makes it clear: When it comes to College Football Playoff expansion, his No. 1 priority is inventory

Remember all the thrilling games of the 2024-25 College Football Playoff? Texas' two-overtime victory against Arizona State in the Peach Bowl! Notre Dame's walkoff field goal to defeat Penn State in the Orange Bowl! And … and … hey, how about that Peach Bowl? The sad truth about the debut of the expanded College Football Playoff was that from a competitive standpoint, it was pretty much a wet firework. Only two of the 11 games — those two above — finished with a one-possession margin of victory. Five of the games were decided by a margin of two touchdowns or more, and three were 20-plus-point blowouts. (Thanks for stopping by, SMU, Tennessee and Oregon.) More, in other words, didn't come anywhere near better. Yes, these were college football playoff games … but more importantly, they were inventory created to meet demand. And if people are going to buy as much of the product as you put on the shelves, what's the incentive to limit that product? Why worry about quality when quantity is your overall goal? College power conference leaders know this, which is why they're angling so hard for representation in the CFP's bracket — now at 12, almost certain to expand to 16. If — no, let's be honest, when — that expansion comes, most conferences favor a 5+11 bracket. That would comprise five conference champions, 11 at-large teams, and would seem to be as meritocratic as possible: Play well and you're in. (Win those winnable games, Alabama.) But meritocracy isn't the endgame here, aristocracy is. And so now you have Tony Petitti, Big Ten commissioner, backing a '4-4-2-2-1-3' idea, which would give the Big Ten and the SEC four automatic bids apiece, the Big 12 and the ACC two apiece, and the remaining conferences a single bid, with three more at-larges. (It's like one of those ridiculous old word problems — 'If the Big Ten gets four automatic berths in the playoffs, and the SEC gets four automatic berths … how can they screw the ACC and the Big 12 out of three more?') 'At the end of the day, I think there's been a lot of concern about how [the playoff selections] are made. I focus on that piece,' Petitti explained. 'How are we differentiating from teams that don't have head-to-head play, teams that don't play common schedules across leagues that do different things? I think that's a really hard, tall order.' It's quite the rhetorical trick Pettiti is playing there, saying that because his conference is so big, you can't adequately determine strength by head-to-head matchups alone. And whose fault is that? It wasn't the selection committee that expanded the Big 'Ten' to 18 teams. Petitti isn't interested in creating a more equitable playoff, or in creating the conditions for better competition. He wants to pack the bracket with his schools, damn the optics or the on-field results. (Worth noting: the talent dropped off fast in the Big Ten after the top four last year. Would Iowa or Illinois, with their 6-3 conference records, be more deserving of an at-large spot than a whole range of other options? No.) Petitti understands that there are spots that need to be filled — both now and in the 16-team playoff to come — and he wants those guaranteed for his conference, not subject to the whims of a playoff selection committee. But guaranteed bids are the very antithesis of 'settle it on the field,' and run counter to literally every 'you gotta earn it!' mantra preached by every coach from the beginning of time. It's no surprise why the ACC and Big 12 hate the idea, and it's also no surprise what's driving the Big Ten's push to claim as much inventory as possible. We're not exactly breaking news here to note that money trumps tradition at every single level of college sports now. Tradition only has value for universities, and especially for broadcast partners, to the extent it can be monetized. Yes, it's wonderful that you can hum along to your alma mater's fight song … but maybe you can kick in a few bucks to the ol' athletic capital campaign while you're at it? That rivalry you enjoyed your entire life … well, your rival just didn't have deep enough pockets to join a new conference. Shame to lose that, really, but how about a replacement conference game against a school from halfway across the country? That's almost as good, right? Tradition has no place in the College Football Playoff. This is about inventory, plain and simple, and every business wants to create enough inventory to meet demand. Except here, instead of cereal boxes on a grocery shelf or burgers on a restaurant warming tray, the inventory in question is college football playoff games. Broadcasters want more inventory because each playoff game is a highly monetizable asset. Universities want more inventory because each nationally televised game means more exposure, more alumni goodwill, more broadcast dollars. Fans might want more inventory because … well, more football is good football, right? Yeah, not so much. Sure, there's always the chance that a Cinderella will knock out a Goliath, to mix literary metaphors, but given the wide variance between college football haves and have-lesses, the more likely outcome is what we saw last year: the big dogs carving right through the happy-to-be-here teams. You know the best way to ensure competitive playoff games? Narrow the field down to the best four and let them have at it. Wild idea, right? We're never going back there, meaning college football fans are now living a truth that plagues everything from pizza to music to Marvel movies: As quantity goes up, quality goes down.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store