Are you cool? Take the test
A survey across 13 countries found that most respondents were in agreement that 'cool' people are 'bold, pleasure-seeking and self-directed' (Madonna and Kate Moss spring to mind) whereas 'good' people are 'agreeable, conscientious and calm'. Both cool and good people tend to be 'likeable and admirable' but cool types tend to be hedonistic too (see Charli XCX). Few people are both cool and good (step forward Dolly Parton, Barack Obama and Ryan Gosling).
'Cool' began as an accolade for jazz musicians who played with a certain aloofness, but is now so debased that it can also mean 'yes', 'no' and 'OK'. Yet in the digital age, its allure persists, seeping into modern life via social media memes and momentary hype.
What the scientists didn't do was attempt to pin down the precise signifiers of cool — that is the job of a fashion editor and it has been my lifelong quest.
Cool doesn't seem to change much, either. Last summer I asked my seven-year-old daughter and her friends what they thought a cool person looked like. They all basically described James Dean — 'sunglasses and a leather jacket' — despite the fact that none of them had ever heard of him, then said 'but a girl, obviously'.
• The only four things to buy to look cool this summer
It's fraught with unspoken rules too. When I asked the new head of French Vogue, Claire Thomson-Jonville (very cool), whether she'd been cool at school, she was horrified. 'There's no way to answer, because if you say you are, you're definitely not.' (It goes without saying that anybody who was cool at school is unlikely to remain so as a fully fledged adult, but also that many of the biggest nerds from school are now in charge of Silicon Valley, still aren't cool and still haven't got over it.)
So, are you cool? Take our quiz and find out — in the name of science, of course.
A: Oh, I don't really do 'labels'
B: Yes
C: No
D: You'd have to ask them
A: Whisky and Coke
B: Aperol spritz
C: A nice glass of red
D: Do you have a natural wine?
A: Clarks Wallabees
B: Designer trainers
C: Adidas Sambas
D: Nike Rifts or Keens
A: Sunglasses and a leather jacket
B: Tight tailoring with pointy shoes
C: Something smart that you are also comfortable in
D: Define 'work'
A: Whisky and Coke
B: Oat cappuccino
C: Tea or coffee with normal milk
D: Matcha
• Read more fashion advice and style inspiration from our experts
A: Sunglasses and a leather jacket
B: Jewellery and heels
C: Posh trackies and khaki jacket
D: Sweatshirt and joggers
A: Black-and-white selfies from unexpected angles
B: Fancy restaurants, holidays, very early gym classes
C: I scroll but rarely post
D: Not to do it
A: Extensive vocal admiration
B: Embarrassed silence
C: A few compliments from people you trust
D: Not much — but then they all do the same a week later
A: A motorbike
B: An SUV
C: An ebike
D: A fixie
A: Free spirit
B: Banter merchant
C: Centrist mum or dad
D: Vibes shaman
A: Is my uniform
B: Says 'good vibes only'
C: Often has a little stain on it
D: Is from the streetwear brand Aries
A: Rebel without a Cause
B: Forrest Gump
C: Trainspotting
D: The Matrix
A: Roll-ups
B: A strawberry ice Elfbar
C: Only on holiday when drunk
D: Psychedelic toad venom
A: Brooding
B: Cheeky
C: France
D: Brat
A: Just you and the open road
B: All 15 of your besties somewhere hot
C: A house, a pool, no emails
D: A silent breathwork retreat
Mostly A I'm afraid you're trying way too hard. Lose the leather jacket and dial down the intensity a bit
Mostly B You are not cool, sorry, but you also don't realise/care
Mostly C You are cool-ish, which is to say just getting on with it without worrying what other people think
Mostly D You are super-cool, congratulations — but are you any fun to hang out with?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Is ‘princess treatment' a harmless trend – or yet more fuel for misogyny?
Do you wish you were a princess? Do you crave being cosseted and showered with gifts, having every door opened and every chair pulled out? Perhaps you'd rather not pay for your clothes; maybe you're sick of deciding what to eat and where. Courtney Palmer can help. The self-proclaimed housewife princess has a series of TikTok videos on 'princess treatment' and how to get it. It's a matter of accepting compliments graciously, dressing the part, being unapologetically good to yourself (disappointingly, this seems to mean exercising and drinking water) but mostly ministering to your partner, who is treated as a weirdly needy and highly suggestible man-baby. Would-be princesses should create a calm, frictionless domestic paradise for their provider prince, 'speaking in a feminine way – we're not screaming, yelling; we're not cursing', thanking him for picking up his dirty underwear. Princess treatment is the reward and it comes in the form of diamond earrings, Chanel flats, flowers and old-school chivalry. It's emetic and, in a recent TikTok that catapulted Palmer into a more critical spotlight, disturbing. Explaining what princess treatment looks like at a restaurant, Palmer said: 'I do not interact with the waitress; I do not open any doors and I do not order my own food … You do not need to talk unless you are spoken to … You're not going to be laughing loudly, speaking loudly, demanding the attention of the restaurant.' Yikes. Palmer called it 'letting your husband lead and be masculine' and 'a fun princess treatment thing'. Commenters found it cult-like, concerning and bizarre. 'As a former waitress, I would have slipped you a note and asked if you're OK or if I should call the police,' one said. I do wonder how real any of this is. Does 'princess treatment' exist beyond its social-media shop window? Tradwives aren't tradwives, after all – they are content creators, and winding people up with jaw-droppingly regressive gender messaging generates revenue: outrage drives eyeballs and eyeballs mean dollars. Nara Smith, famed for wearing OTT dresses while making her own bubblegum and breakfast cereal, was recently reported by Cosmopolitan to be earning an estimated $200,000 a month on TikTok. Most relationships are nothing like what Palmer presents, or like other pearly-toothed, wholesome TikTok couples who jokily quiz each other on what constitutes princess treatment or a relationship 'bare minimum'. My own husband occasionally gives me 'goose treatment' – a careful wide berth – but our marriage is not a transactional game. Couples of all varieties mostly muddle through, trying to be decent to each other. But Palmer et al are servicing a real aspiration, or at least a relatable fantasy. I get it, kind of – it would be nice if every day were like my birthday (but not nice enough to spend my life cooking and cleaning while wearing broderie anglaise to achieve it). And I suppose that in a time of global turmoil, having a 'provider' can feel like security. But it's the opposite: relinquishing autonomy – bodily, financial, intellectual – leaves women dangerously vulnerable. And this stuff isn't anodyne: it confirms the manosphere's misogynistic assumptions about 'alphas' and 'high-value females', and empowers rollers-back of reproductive rights, reinforcing the idea that it's OK to take decisions on women's behalf (they don't even want to order a side of fries for themselves!). The 'princess' label is pretty accurate. Historically, princesses provided beauty and babies, and were largely powerless; royal marriages were transactional arrangements. And as Hilary Mantel was unfairly criticised for writing about the then-Duchess of Cambridge, princess life is still stultifying, mostly about projecting irreproachable, mute perfection. There's definitely no 'cursing'. Maybe some women enjoy imagining a life of calm, cared-for passivity – but could content at least get more creative? How about 'goddess treatment': demand offerings and sacrifices, keep people on their toes with the prospect of being turned into something nasty? If that's not passive enough, how about 'pet treatment'? Imagine being treated like a house cat: loved unconditionally and lavished with gifts for nothing more than napping, shedding hair, eating, demanding strokes and occasionally lashing out for no reason. If a TikToker could tell me how to get 'cat treatment', I'd definitely like and follow. Emma Beddington is a Guardian columnist
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE I used to make $12k a month from content creation... but now I am struggling to find work
A woman who used to rake in over $12,000 a month as an influencer but is now struggling to find work after being left with 'nothing' has lifted a lid on the harsh realities of content creation. Lisa Jean-Francois, who is in her 40s, from Massachusetts, has been a social media star for over a decade. She started off as a fashion influencer before switching her content to parenting after she became a mom. With over 100,000 followers, she once made upwards of $12,000 per month as sponsorships came pouring in. But in recent years, she has struggled to land brand deals and now, she is desperately looking for a job after realizing content creation is not something she can rely on forever. So what went wrong? Well, Lisa laid bare her rollercoaster-ride journey and opened up about the downsides to social media stardom that no one talks about exclusively with the Daily Mail. Lisa explained that she first found viral fame back in 2012 after she launched a blog that focused on 'showing women how to look good for less.' 'My first blog was called Beauty on the Cheap, where I focused on drugstore makeup,' she said. Lisa Jean-Francois, who is in her 40s, has been a social media star for over a decade. She started off as a fashion influencer before switching her content to parenting 'And I featured clothes from... affordable fast fashion brands. It was all about making beauty and style accessible.' By 2014 she was raking in money from ad revenue on her blog, and it dawned on her that she could make a full-time living from content creation. She quit her job and began to build her brand on Instagram, but it wasn't easy. She had to invest thousands of dollars, spending on cameras, editing tools, website designers, wardrobe, props, and more. 'I also paid photographers and video editors. People don't realize you have to spend real money to make your content look polished and professional. It all adds up fast,' she shared. By 2017, her hard work had paid off. She was a full fledged 'fashion influencer,' bringing in anywhere from $8,000 to $12,000 a month, and sometimes even more if a 'big campaign came through.' 'By around 2017, it started to feel like a real, full-time career,' she reflected. 'Brand partnerships and ad revenue from my blog really started to come in consistently, and I treated it like a business.' But while the pay was high, Lisa admitted that there were tons of downsides to the world of content creation. She said there was a 'constant pressure to stay relevant' and 'keep up with the trends,' which was 'exhausting.' Lisa also pointed out that you 'can't control how people perceive you,' which can be extremely difficult. 'It can feel inauthentic, too, trying to maintain a perfect image,' she added. And while she was making a lot, she was still spending a lot to keep her content fresh. 'I never repeated an outfit on Instagram. It always had to be fresh and bold to stop people from scrolling,' she explained. Lisa also recalled her followers leaving cruel comments about her body after she welcomed her son. 'Someone even suggested I should hide my belly pudge,' she said. In 2021, Lisa posted an intimate video to Instagram opening up about an incident she had with her then-toddler son. She explained that she had been angry with him and threw away one of his drawings, then felt terrible and apologized to the youngster. The video resonated with tons of other parents and gained almost a million views, and it made Lisa realize that she could post more mom content. At the time, she confessed that her mental health had been deteriorating and that as a new mom, it was becoming harder for her to keep up with her account. 'It was my first time showing my audience I was parenting differently, and the response made me feel people would be open to it,' she explained. 'At the same time, I was deep in my own healing journey. From 2019 to mid-2021, I was working as Head of Influencer Marketing & PR for a beauty brand, and I was treated horribly, my nervous system was shot. 'I had a new baby. I couldn't get on Instagram and talk about lipstick when my life felt like it was unraveling.' Soon, she switched her focus on social media from fashion to 'conscious parenting,' and boy, was it popular. Her videos exploded, leading to her having more viral fame than ever before. 'I never cracked more than 50,000 followers on Instagram [when I was a fashion influencer]. But the parenting content doubled that,' she said. But more attention also meant more hate, as Lisa added, 'The harshest comments came when I switched to conscious parenting. 'Parenting is a hot-button topic. I had to weed through comments from people describing how they harm their own kids, or wishing harm on mine. 'Some people literally told me they couldn't wait to see my children shot or locked up because I chose not to hit them. That was far more painful than any comment about my body.' In addition, Lisa explained that parenting isn't as much of a lucrative topic as fashion is, and she began to lose brand deals. 'I did a three-month partnership with in 2021, in 2020 I went on a brand trip with Sperry. I mean business was booming,' she dished. 'Now it's like I don't even exist to businesses. For example, I worked with Hood Ice Cream for a couple of years, but once I [switched to parenting content], that stopped. 'Even when a local Cape Cod resort enthusiastically invited me recently, they ghosted me when I asked for basic coverage like meals in exchange for content. 'So it feels like I'm shut out [from brand deals] for reasons I don't fully understand. It's different now.' But she said it 'feels more rewarding' and authentic posting about motherhood than fashion, so she has no regrets about making the switch. 'It's never too late to pivot. It's okay to outgrow something that once defined you,' she encouraged others. Even so, Lisa is now coming to grips with the realization that she's not making enough from content creation to make it her full-time career anymore. She recently launched her own jewelry line called The Consciously Lisa Collection. She also wrote a book on parenting and sells virtual styling consultations. But she is now looking for a steady job - and she admitted that things are 'tough' right now because 'nobody will hire her.' 'I can't live off of the jewelry income and what I take home in a month isn't what I used to take home,' she admitted. '[I get] one brand-sponsored Instagram post [per month]. 'Brands always chase what's new and fresh. If you don't build something you own, you're left with nothing when they move on.' While reflecting on her journey as an influencer, Lisa - who currently has 124,000 followers on her account @ConsciouslyLisa_ - admitted that she wished she had done things different. And she hopes that sharing her story will help teach others not to make the same mistakes that she did. 'After nearly 14 years [as an influencer], I know this space deeply, but I don't always feel respected in it,' she shared. 'I think every creator should diversify their income and build multiple streams at once. Brand money is great, I know creators who make $20,000 for a single post, but it's risky if you don't manage your money wisely. 'One reason I struggle now is because I didn't always spend wisely or keep good financial records. 'If I could do it again, I wouldn't have abandoned having a steady W-2 job entirely. I have a master's in writing, an undergraduate degree in English and journalism, I have experience teaching, marketing, and office management, but it all feels worthless now. 'No one will hire me. I wish I'd kept some steady income outside social media. It would have made these tough seasons easier.'
The Sun
10 hours ago
- The Sun
‘You should be arrested for public indecency' people gasp as woman shows off VERY skimpy dress she's wearing to dinner
A WOMAN has left people stunned after sharing a look at the incredibly skimpy dress she wore out to dinner. Marry took to Instagram to post a video of her " birthday dinner look", which left almost nothing to the imagination. 2 She began the clip facing forward, before turning to show off a generous amount of side boob. The strappy green sequinned dress was cut so low on the side that it barely covered her breasts. And the revealing nature of the dress continued as she turned around - with the back cut so low it almost displayed her derriere. While there was even a thigh-high split on one side of the dress, so Marry could flash a bit of leg. She teamed the ensemble with a chic updo and strappy gold sandals. Despite the fact that lots of people would feel uncomfortable wearing such a revealing outfit in public, Marry seemed unconcerned as she sashayed into the restaurant. The comments section of the Instagram Reel was instantly flooded with remarks from people insisting the ensemble was entirely inappropriate. "We need to start arresting people for public indecency again," one wrote. "Because no matter how fine she looks, this is totally inappropriate, and unacceptable…." "Birthday dinner with areola out is wild af," another sighed. I was dress-coded at Disney World & forced to cough up £33 to stay "Beautiful dress and beautiful lady, but it's not appropriate for that setting," a third commented. "If a man exposed his private parts in public he'd be arrested for indecent exposure. "You're seeking attention and validation in the wrong way... "You're too beautiful to be on display like that, respectfully." "Vulgar. You can still look sexy without going to the extreme," someone else wrote. "It's sad they didn't have it in her size," another added. Can you be dress coded for wearing crop tops in public? The concept of being "dress coded" typically applies to specific environments such as schools, workplaces, or certain establishments where dress codes are enforced to maintain a particular standard or atmosphere. In public spaces, however, the situation is generally more relaxed and governed by societal norms rather than strict rules. That said, whether or not you can be dress coded for wearing a crop top in public largely depends on the context and location: Public Spaces: In most public spaces, like parks, streets, and beaches, wearing a crop top is generally acceptable and unlikely to result in any formal repercussions. People have the freedom to dress as they choose, provided they adhere to basic standards of decency and local laws. Establishments and Venues: Some restaurants, shops, or clubs may have their own dress codes. It's possible that a crop top might not meet the dress requirements for more formal venues. In such cases, staff may politely request that you adhere to their dress code or deny entry. Schools and Workplaces: Educational institutions and workplaces often have dress codes in place. Crop tops may be considered inappropriate in these settings, and you could be asked to change into more suitable attire. Cultural and Regional Considerations: In certain cultures or regions, norms and expectations around acceptable clothing can vary widely. It's always a good idea to be aware of and respect local customs and dress codes when travelling. "Can't eat my pasta without looking at areolas!" someone else joked. "You might as well be naked," another wrote. As someone else agreed: "Just go naked - why the f**k do you even have anything on if you're gonna barely wear anything? "Just wear nothing go ahead and round it down." "You're beautiful. But that's not appropriate for a restaurant," another warned. "Please be aware some places have indecent exposure laws." However, others were quick to defend Marry, with one calling her look "iconic". "The front making me anxious but the back is gorgeous," another added. "I love the colour!" a third praised. "Ok I know what kinda of tape or glue did you use to keep the dress in place bc it is working! "I need that information please and thank you." "This is proof God has favourites," someone else said. "Wow, you're looking good sis," another added.
