
Dem Sen Elizabeth Warren is roasted on CNBC over apocalyptic economic warnings in face of surging markets
Kernen presented statistics demonstrating a strong gross domestic product reading for the second quarter and accused Democrats of partisanship on economic statistics.
He argued that people on the left and those who dislike President Donald Trump refuse to acknowledge positive economic trends.
'Senator Elizabeth Warren will come on and say " Inflation is out of control, and the economy is getting killed by what's happening by these tariffs,' Kernen said.
He added that inflation has been below 3 percent and the stock market was hitting new highs, refuting Warren's stance that the economy is in turmoil.
Santelli said that there was an 'important lesson' in Kernen's argument, joking that you shouldn't pick a Congress member to be your money manager.
The US economy returned to growth in the second quarter. US GDP, the value of all goods and services produced across the economy, rose at a 3 percent annual rate, according to the Commerce Department. It came after a first quarter where GDP shrank at 0.5 percent. The wild swings have been attributed by analysts to Trump's tariffs.
Santelli, the US editor for CNBC, argued that Congress members often have ulterior motives when pointing to certain measurements over others to illustrate economic growth.
'The Democrats don't want to see the current administration have some success, but there's no doubt that this is some success,' Santelli said.
He argued that inflation has stayed steady over the past year and cited recent rising equities.
Fears have loomed that Trump's aggressive tariff policy will raise prices, negatively impact inflation, and shock the market.
Warren has been a staunch critic of Trump's economic stances, arguing that tariffs will give companies free rein to increase prices and take advantage of consumers.
She introduced a bill titled the Price Gouging Prevention Act of 2025 alongside Democratic Senator Tammy Baldwin and representatives Jan Schakowsky and Chris Deluzio to prevent companies from increasing prices.
The bill would make price gouging illegal and give the Federal Trade Commission, along with state attorneys general the power to litigate potential abuses of power.
Warren argued that large-scale companies could use Trump's global trade war as an excuse to increase prices and gouge the consumer.
In an interview with Fortune, the senator doubled down on her prediction, arguing that her biggest concern with Trump's tariffs was the long-term effects.
'The impact of six months of Donald Trump will be felt for two generations, as more nations blink hard at what's happening in the US and conclude that we are simply not a reliable trading partner,' she told the publication.
'That hurts us now and it will hurt our children and our grandchildren.'
While the White House argued that tariffs are intended to create new export opportunities and level the playing field, Warren said Trump's economy is setting the market up for a crash.
She introduced a similar price-gouging bill last year and sparred with Kernen in a tense on-air interview at the time.
Kernen dismissed price gouging legislation as 'flawed' to which Warren replied, 'Where have you been for the last 30 years as three dozen states have price gouging laws and they use them effectively?'
'This is why you never lose an argument - because no one can ever say anything back to you, senator, and it's frustrating,' he replied.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump eats his own: President appears to relish flaying Republican senators in the public square amid Epstein pressure
'You always hurt the one you love.' A Brooklyn-born songwriter named Allan Roberts wrote those lyrics and (with music by Doris Fisher) the Mills Brothers were the first of a litany of performers who turned it into an American standard. Lately, it seems to be a Donald Trump standard as well. Take, for instance, the case of Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri. Few Republicans have been bigger allies to Trump — on Jan. 6, 2021, the Yale Law graduate-turned-populist warrior famously pumped his fist to Trump supporters as he objected to the election results. When the Capitol cleared out after the riot, Hawley continued his objection. But this week, Hawley learned a bitter truth: no matter how MAGA someone is, Trump demands absolute loyalty — and even a perceived slight can leave you on the outside looking in. Hawley's crime? Trying to pass a bill he sponsored that would ban lawmakers from trading stocks. It seemed like a great way to 'Own the Libs,' since Hawley named it the PELOSI Act, a riff off of the former House Speaker Nanacy Pelosi's stock trading outperforming the market. But he faced significant opposition in committee — and every other Republican opposed it. It only passed thanks to support from Democrats. Sure as shooting, Trump lashed out at Hawley on Truth Social, criticizing him for not supporting an effort to launch an official investigation of Pelosi's stock trading. Trump ended his rant by calling Hawley a 'second-tier' senator. When The Independent caught up with Hawley, he laughed it off and said that he and Trump had a 'nice visit.' He later told Business Insider that he walked Trump through the bill and that, contrary to what some of Hawley's enemies in the GOP had said, it would not force the president to sell Mar-a-Lago. Trump said, 'You're exonerated,' according to Hawley. On the surface, the whole affair is a bit of a laugh and shows how fickle Trump can be. But it also shows that as Trump faces increased scrutiny for his handling of the Israel-Gaza war, an inability to bring an end to the war in Ukraine despite promising he'd handle Vladimir Putin, a labor and stock market battered by his tariff news, and – perhaps most gratingly – the fallout from his and his White House's mismanagement of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal, the pressure is getting to him. And, six months into an administration that has control of both houses of Congress as well as a friendly majority on the Supreme Court, blaming Democrats simply won't serve as a release. Hawley is not the only Republican Trump has aimed his fire at. On Thursday evening, his ire turned to Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine). 'Republicans, when in doubt, vote the exact opposite of Senator Susan Collins. Generally speaking, you can't go wrong,' Trump posted. Of course, Trump being angry at Collins is not entirely implausible under the best of conditions. Despite liberals being angry about Collins constantly saying she's 'concerned' with the latest Trump shenanigan and then voting his way anyway, she did vote to convict him after January 6, endorsed Nikki Haley against Trump in 2024 and, most recently, voted against Trump's ' One Big, Beautiful Bill.' But as a senator from Maine, Collins is probably the only Republican who could win in New England. As The Independent wrote last month, that popularity has created a chilling effect where many promising young Democrats don't want to challenge her. And that makes her a kind of safe target for Trump rage. If anything, it's a surprise that Trump didn't turn his fire on her earlier. (Still, Trump's salvos could make life more difficult because of the fact she leads the Senate Appropriations Committee, which means she controls the federal budget.) Of course, Trump has already tamed Collins' partner in moderation, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). Murkowski famously agonized over the vote for the One Big, Beautiful Bill before deciding to support it in the hopes the House would change it. Which it didn't. Later, the Trump administration went behind her back and issued executive orders to curb renewable energy projects she wanted to preserve. She told The Anchorage Daily News she felt 'cheated.' But when The Independent asked her whether that made it harder to work with Trump, Murkowski said 'no.' Pressed why that is, she said 'because we have an understanding.' 'Just generally,' she said. 'He knows that I'm going to advocate for my interests. I know that he's going to advocate for his.' The only Republican senator who has seemed to learn there is no way to win with Trump is Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). Tillis came out in opposition to Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' in June, which caused Trump to attack him. This came despite the fact Tillis had voted for most of Trump's nominees and had consistently defended him. Shortly after, Tillis announced his decision not to seek re-election. 'I respect President Trump, I support the majority of his agenda, but I don't bow to anybody when the people of North Carolina are at risk and this bill puts them at risk,' Tillis told The Independent at the time. Now, Democrats have their dream candidate vying for his seat as former governor Roy Cooper, who won statewide the same year Trump won North Carolina in 2016 and again in 2020, announced his candidacy. Cooper is expected to raise gobs of money and have a decent advantage in the polls. Trump's decision to attack strategic allies shows that his increasing unpopularity has caused him to be more insular. And while it's unclear if Hawley's trading bill will become law, many Republican senators might cash out their stock in Trump.


Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Americans are uncovering long-lost relatives for just $29 thanks to this MyHeritage DNA deal: 'I discovered close family I didn't even know existed'
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more DNA tests have been all the rage over the last couple of years — even I eventually caved and had my ancestry checked! They're quite informative, and MyHeritage DNA is one of the best. Right now, you can get a DNA kit for just $29, originally priced at $89. That's a massive 67 percent off, but act fast, as this limited-time deal will expire soon. Bonus: you'll get a 30-day free trial to uncover and build your family tree, and access over 35 billion historical records. Using the test and getting results is really simple. All you need to do once you get your order delivered is do a simple cheek swab and mail it back in a closed envelope. It takes less than two minutes for the entire process, and your results will be available online within just four weeks. What you find may surprise you. Online, you'll be able to connect with long-lost relatives, and even find out how you're related to them. Maybe there's a cousin out there you don't know about? Your results will also include an ethnicity breakdown, which allows you to see where your ancestors hail from. I've had friends discover they had European or Persian roots, even though their entire lives (and their parents' lives) have been in the United States. It's a great way to discover more about yourself and learn more about your true ancestral roots. If you're worried about privacy, fret not. All your data is safe and encrypted, and none of your personal details will be shared outside the platform, according to the brand. MyHeritage DNA is also one of the most widely used services, so there's a higher chance you'll be matched with relatives who have used this service before — compared to its competitors. Tons of shoppers seem to love it too, with the site featuring many testimonials. 'Through MyHeritage, I've not only found my grandmother's family, but also was able to piece together who my grandfather was from DNA matches,' says one customer. 'MyHeritage helped me discover distant cousins all over the world,' says another. 'I can honestly say my DNA results from MyHeritage have been life-changing. I discovered close family I didn't even know existed on another continent. It was incredible,' adds a third. If you've ever been curious about your heritage, MyHeritage DNA is what you need. Plus, at 67 percent off for a limited time, now's a great time to invest in the secrets of your past.


Daily Mail
3 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Prince Andrew should testify to US lawmakers under oath over his ties to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, says top lawyer
A top lawyer representing Jeffrey Epstein 's victims has demanded Prince Andrew testifies about his links to the infamous paedophile socialite. Famed lawyer Gloria Allred, 84, said the Duke of York should volunteer to speak under oath before Congress. The 65-year-old has maintained his denial of ever sleeping with Virginia Giuffre, the Epstein victim Andrew was pictured with when she was 17, with the pair standing next to jailed predator Ghislaine Maxwell. Andrew's lawyers have denied that he has refused to cooperate with US Epstein investigators. Allred told The Daily Mirror: 'Now more than ever, he should come forward. He could volunteer to testify publicly. 'Is he willing to testify before Congress? Is he willing to give more information to the Justice Department? And if not, why not? 'His silence is a statement that he's not willing to help for some reason.' It came as a bombshell book called Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, by Andrew Lownie, revealed Jeffrey Epstein said of Prince Andrew: 'We are both serial sex addicts. He's the only person I have met who is more obsessed with p***y than me. 'From the reports I've got back from the women we've shared, he's the most perverted animal in the bedroom. He likes to engage in stuff that's even kinky to me – and I'm the king of kink!' The book, which the Duke and Duchess of York tried to ban, explores how the couple 'fell from grace because of the flaws in their own characters and how they were allowed to leverage their privileged position as royals for personal gain with the connivance of the institution itself.' The book also details claims of Prince Andrew's infidelity and bedroom antics - from sleeping with scores of women while on ambassador trips to making lewd comments to women he met during everyday life as the late Queen's favourite son. It said the nickname 'Randy Andy' was given to Prince Andrew while he was at Gordonstoun public school. He allegedly earned the name because he was already sexually experienced, good looking and girls were attracted to him. While he has never had trouble picking up women, a family friend said: 'He's not a hunter of women. He rather expects them to come to him. But when they do, he shows himself to be bone idle and not very socially adept at chatting them up.' The Duke of York has long faced criticism for his friendship with Epstein (pictured in 2011), which carried on even after the socialite's imprisonment for sex offences in 2008 One woman he propositioned said: 'He's about as subtle as a hand grenade. His favourite trick is to rub your knee under the table. It's pathetic.' At a wedding he was said to have asked a woman he'd not met before for a dance. When she declined, he responded, 'I suppose a b*** j** is out of the question, then?' Another of his lovers said: 'He is not a Casanova. In the bedroom department he is a bit of a let-down. He has been dumped by most of the girls linked to him because he is a bore.' Andrew is also said to have certain juvenile characteristics, such as taking advantage of his position to humiliate others who may not be able to respond. At a society event in 1992 he reportedly unzipped broadcaster Tania Bryer's evening dress the full length of her back. Then at a dinner party he allegedly sniffed the pâté served as a first course and turned to his right, saying, 'This pâté smells. What do you think?' His female companion leaned forward to smell it and he promptly pushed her face into the dish. One of his dates recalled how he always introduced himself to her friends as the Duke of York, 'even when we were dancing on tables at two in the morning at Momo.' After a house party in Dorset, one young woman complained: 'One minute you're having your bum pinched and the next minute he's reminding you he's Your Royal Highness.' The controversial prince even left an impression on former Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Andrew asked to have lunch with Johnson when he was Mayor of London, turning up with a list of things he wanted to talk about. He wanted to redesign traffic lights with 'fewer red lights', thought the whole of Battersea Power Station should be demolished, including the listed towers and felt the Queen Elizabeth II Centre was too small and not fit for purpose. Johnson responded: 'Well, if it's too small, it's your mum's fault.' Andrew reportedly stuck his tongue out. Afterwards, Boris said: 'I'm the last person to be a republican but, f***, if I ever have to spend another lunch like that, I soon will be.' Before her death by suicide in April, Virginia Giuffre said she was approached by Maxwell in 2000 and eventually was hired by her as a masseuse for Epstein, who took his own life in prison aged 66 in 2019. But the couple effectively made her a sexual servant, she said, pressuring her into gratifying not only Epstein but his friends and associates. Donald Trump and his then-girlfriend Melania Knauss with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at the Mar-a-Lago club, Palm Beach, Florida, on February 12, 2000 Giuffre said she was flown around the world for appointments with men including Prince Andrew while she was 17 and 18 years old. The men, including Andrew, denied that and questioned Giuffre's credibility. The prince settled with Giuffre in 2022 for an undisclosed sum, agreeing to make a 'substantial donation' to her survivors' organisation. While Andrew has long been criticised on both sides of the Atlantic, Allred, the attorney for some of Epstein's victims, also said she believes Andrew's name appears in files on Epstein held by the US government that many are asking to be made public. President Trump, who was close friends with Epstein for decades, suggested while campaigning for the last election that he would release the files. His campaign team wrote on X: 'President Trump says he will DECLASSIFY the 9/11 Files, JFK Files, and Epstein Files.' However, since his election he has backtracked. His former pal Elon Musk has criticised the Trump administration for not releasing the files. This year, Trump claimed the files were a 'hoax' and a 'scam' by Democrats who had peddled 'bulls***' to former MAGA supporters. Musk responded on X by saying: 'Wow, amazing that Epstein '' killed himself'' and Ghislaine is in federal prison for a hoax.' Then on July 15, Trump said: 'It's pretty boring stuff. It's sordid, but it's boring, and I don't understand why it keeps going. 'I think really only pretty bad people, including fake news, want to keep something like that going.' He later admitted the US attorney general had not told him the files were a hoax, but said he (Trump) 'knew' it was.