Australian woman Erin Patterson is convicted of 3 murders for poisoning her in-laws with mushrooms
The jury in the Supreme Court trial in Victoria state returned a verdict after six days of deliberations, following a nine-week trial that gripped Australia. Patterson faces life in prison and will be sentenced at a later date.
Patterson, who sat in the dock between two prison officers, showed no emotion but blinked rapidly as the verdicts were read.
Three of Patterson's four lunch guests — her parents-in-law Don and Gail Patterson, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson — died in the hospital after the 2023 meal at her home in Leongatha, at which she served individual beef Wellington pastries containing death cap mushrooms.
She was also found guilty of attempting to murder Ian Wilkinson, Heather's husband, who survived the meal.
It wasn't disputed that Patterson served the mushrooms or that the pastries killed her guests. The jury was required to decide whether she knew the lunch contained death caps, and if she intended for them to die.
The guilty verdicts, which were required to be unanimous, indicated that jurors rejected Patterson's defense that the presence of the poisonous fungi in the meal was a terrible accident, caused by the mistaken inclusion of foraged mushrooms that she didn't know were death caps. Prosecutors didn't offer a motive for the killings, but during the trial highlighted strained relations between Patterson and her estranged husband, and frustration that she had felt about his parents in the past.
The case turned on the question of whether Patterson meticulously planned a triple murder or accidentally killed three people she loved, including her children's only surviving grandparents. Her lawyers said she had no reason to do so — she had recently moved to a beautiful new home, was financially comfortable, had sole custody of her children and was due to begin studying for a degree in nursing and midwifery.
But prosecutors suggested Patterson had two faces — the woman who publicly appeared to have a good relationship with her parents-in-law, while her private feelings about them were kept hidden. Her relationship with her estranged husband, Simon Patterson, who was invited to the fatal lunch but didn't go, deteriorated in the year before the deaths, the prosecution said.
The simplest facts of what happened that day and immediately afterward were hardly disputed. But Patterson's motivations for what she did and why were pored over in detail during the lengthy trial, at which more than 50 witnesses were called.
The individual beef Wellington pastries Patterson served her guests was one point of friction, because the recipe she used contained directions for a single, family-sized portion. Prosecutors said that she reverted to individual servings, so she could lace the other diners' portions, but not her own, with the fatal fungi — but Patterson said that she was unable to find the correct ingredients to make the recipe as directed.
Nearly every other detail of the fateful day was scrutinized at length, including why Patterson sent her children out to a film before her guests arrived, why she added additional dried mushrooms to the recipe from her pantry, why she didn't become ill when the other diners did, and why she disposed of a food dehydrator after the deaths and told investigators that she didn't own one.
Patterson acknowledged some lies during her evidence — including that she'd never foraged mushrooms or owned a dehydrator. But she said that those claims were made in panic as she realized her meal had killed people.
She said she didn't become as ill as the other diners since she vomited after the meal because of an eating disorder. She denied that she told her guests she had cancer as a ruse to explain why she invited them to her home that day.
Before the verdict, Australian news outlets published photos of black privacy screens erected at the entrance to Patterson's home. The case has provoked fervor among the public and media, and the courtroom in the rural town of Morwell was packed throughout the trial.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Australian woman found guilty in ‘mushroom murder case'
The 'mushroom murder case,' as it is known in Australia, transfixed the country. Scores of people lined up each morning outside the courthouse in Morwell, another small town where the trial was held, for the chance to see the proceedings firsthand. Advertisement For everyone else, the court proceedings filled newspapers and dominated news websites, many of which ran daily live blogs tracking the case's every twist and turn. Four podcasts covered the trial and at least two documentaries are underway. The case drew comparisons to an Agatha Christie novel or TV murder mystery. But prosecutors told the jury not to expect a classic crime story narrative. 'Motive is not something that has to be proven by the prosecution,' lead prosecutor Nanette Rogers said during opening arguments. 'You do not have to be satisfied what the motive was or even that there was one.' Instead, the prosecution presented weeks of evidence that it said showed how Patterson carefully planned to poison her relatives and then tried to cover up the crime. Prosecutors said she searched a naturalist website for nearby death cap mushrooms, bought a dehydrator to hide them in food, lured her in-laws to her house under the pretense that she had cancer, and then served them the toxic meal before attempting to cover her tracks. Advertisement 'The sinister deception was to use a nourishing meal as the vehicle to deliver the deadly poison,' Rogers said during closing arguments. Patterson conceded during the trial she had served her guests death cap mushrooms, but said it was unintentional. Her parents-in-law, Don and Gail Patterson, died about a week after the lunch. Gail's sister, Heather Wilkinson, also died, while Heather's husband, Ian, survived after spending weeks in the hospital. Erin Patterson's estranged husband, Simon Patterson, was supposed to attend the ill-fated lunch but backed out. 'Had Simon changed his mind . . . he, too, would have been served the sixth poisoned beef Wellington,' Rogers told the jury. Early in the trial, Ian Wilkinson testified that Erin Patterson had eaten her meal from a different colored plate to those she gave to her guests. Prosecutors contended Patterson did this to ensure she didn't accidentally consume the poisoned pastry. Wilkinson also testified Patterson told her guests she was suffering from cancer, an 'elaborate lie' Patterson thought 'would die with them,' Rogers argued. The jury heard from more than three dozen other witnesses including multiple mycologists, or fungi experts; several hospital employees; and Erin's two children, ages 14 and 9, whose testimony at times contradicted their mother's. Patterson herself was the last to take the stand. She testified that she, too, got sick from the bad beef Wellington. But prosecutors questioned her claims — the court heard debates about diarrhea and CCTV analysis of a bathroom break — and hospital workers said Patterson didn't display the same signs of sickness as her guests. Advertisement Prosecutors also quizzed Patterson about her decision to leave the hospital without being treated, even after being told she might have ingested deadly mushrooms. Patterson left because 'she realized what she had done was going to be uncovered,' Rogers said, adding that the defendant's actions showed she knew she had 'not consumed death cap mushrooms even though her lunch guests had.' Prosecutors also highlighted Patterson's claim that she'd bought the mushrooms from an Asian grocer, a story they said had shifted several times and delayed efforts to help her relatives. 'For the sake of your very ill family members . . . you'd do everything you could to try and remember the store,' Rogers told the jury, 'but the accused sat on her hands while Don, Gail, Ian, and Heather were all in comas.' Patterson's disposal of the dehydrator at a local dump days after the lunch was evidence she was trying to cover her tracks, prosecutors claimed. But Patterson told the court she threw it away out of fear that she would be blamed for what she said was an accident. Her defense lawyer, Colin Mandy, called the prosecution's case 'flawed' and urged the jury to consider whether there was a reasonable possibility that the deadly mushrooms were put into the meal accidentally. 'We know these actions of Erin Patterson caused the deaths of these three people and the serious illness of another,' he said in his closing argument. But 'they have to prove that's what Erin Patterson meant to do.' Advertisement
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
15 police officers detained over alleged killings of cockfighting fans in the Philippines
MANILA, Philippines (AP) — Fifteen police officers have been taken into custody and are being investigated for their alleged role in the abductions and feared killings of at least 34 cockfighting fans, the Philippine police chief said Monday. The missing people were accused of cheating in the hugely popular sport, with their bodies reportedly dumped in a scenic lake with a restive volcano. The victims went missing around 2021 and 2022 mostly while on their way to or from cockfighting arenas dotting the main northern Philippine region of Luzon, including in the metropolitan Manila capital region. The unresolved disappearances again drew public attention after a key witness recently surfaced and accused his former employer, a gambling tycoon, of masterminding the killings, with bodies reportedly dumped in Taal Lake south of Manila or burned elsewhere. National police chief Gen. Nicolas Torre III said in a news conference that a key witness, who used the alias 'Totoy,' provided crucial details. The cockfighting aficionados and workers were strangled and mutilated before being dumped. Police investigators have corroborated the details and evidence provided by the witness which will be used in criminal complaints to be filed by the Department of Justice against the suspects, he said. The witness has told local TV networks that he decided to speak out because his former employer was allegedly threatening to have him killed. He said he wanted to help ease the agony of families of the victims who had been demanding justice for their missing kin. 'I was very shocked,' Torre said when asked how he felt over the disclosures made by the witness, who is under police guard. 'It firmed up our resolve to really solve this because what happened was savage and not acceptable by any standard.' Criminal complaints will be filed against the influential businessman, who owns cockfighting arenas and other gambling businesses, and other suspects, Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla said. The businessman has denied the allegations. Remulla said he would ask Japan to help provide technology to help look for traces of the remains of the victims, which could still be retrieved from the bottom of Taal Lake about four years after the killings. While banned in the United States and other Western countries largely due to animal cruelty concerns, cockfighting has been a popular pastime and gambling sport in many parts of Southeast Asia, including the Philippines, Latin America and some parts of Europe. Cockfighting arenas are found prominently in far-flung rural towns and major cities across the Philippines and draw large numbers of aficionados in an industry that has become a vibrant part of the local culture and a regulated gambling business that generates state revenues and thousands of jobs. The game involves pitting two roosters — with razor-sharp gaffs or steel blades attached to their legs — in a battle often to the death amid the roar of the crowd. The missing cockfighting aficionados and workers were accused of cheating by discreetly taking steps to weaken one rooster or diminishing its chances of winning, including by slightly injuring it, then betting on the other rooster.
Hamilton Spectator
3 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Judge recommends that case against Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan proceed
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A federal magistrate judge recommended Monday that the case proceed against a Wisconsin judge who was indicted on allegations that she helped a man who is in the country illegally evade U.S. immigration agents seeking to arrest him in her courthouse. Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested in April and indicted on federal charges in May. She pleaded not guilty . The case highlighted a clash between President Donald Trump's administration and local authorities over the Republican's sweeping immigration crackdown . Democrats have accused the Trump administration of trying to make a national example of Dugan to chill judicial opposition. Dugan filed a motion in May to dismiss the charges against her, saying she was acting in her official capacity as a judge and therefore is immune to prosecution. She argued that the federal government violated Wisconsin's sovereignty by disrupting a state courtroom and prosecuting a state judge. U.S. Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on Monday recommended against dropping the charges. The ultimate decision is up to U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman, who can accept the other judge's recommendation or reject it. 'We are disappointed in the magistrate judge's non-binding recommendation, and we will appeal it,' Dugan attorney Steven Biskupic, a former federal prosecutor, said in a statement. 'This is only one step in what we expect will be a long journey to preserve the independence and integrity of our courts.' Joseph wrote in her recommendation that while judges have immunity from civil lawsuits seeking monetary damages when engaging in judicial acts, that does not apply to criminal charges like those in this case. 'A judge's actions, even when done in her official capacity, does not bar criminal prosecution if the actions were done in violation of the criminal law,' Joseph wrote. Dugan also argued that the prosecution under federal law violated the U.S. Constitution's separation of powers because it overrides the state of Wisconsin's ability to administer its courts. Whether Dugan broke the law as alleged, or she was merely performing her judicial duties as Dugan contends, are questions for a jury to decide and can't be determined in a motion to dismiss, Joseph said. Joseph also noted that both sides disagree on facts related to the case, which also can't be resolved in a motion to dismiss. 'It is important to note that nothing said here speaks to the merits of the allegations against Dugan,' the judge said in the recommendation. 'Dugan is presumed innocent, and innocent she remains, unless and until the government proves the allegations against her beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury at trial.' No trial date has been set. Dugan is charged with concealing an individual to prevent arrest, a misdemeanor, and obstruction, which is a felony. Prosecutors say she escorted Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, 31, and his lawyer out of her courtroom through a back door on April 18 after learning that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were in the courthouse seeking to arrest him for being in the country without permanent legal status. Agents arrested Ruiz outside of the courthouse after a brief foot chase. Dugan could face up to six years in prison and a $350,000 fine if convicted on both counts. Her case is similar to one brought during the first Trump administration against a Massachusetts judge , who was accused of helping a man sneak out a courthouse back door to evade a waiting immigration enforcement agent. That case was eventually dismissed. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
