logo
Mediterranean migrant rescues suffer under lacking EU policy

Mediterranean migrant rescues suffer under lacking EU policy

Time of India08-05-2025
"We rescued 68 people from two unsuitable boats on the night of May 1st," Marie Michel, a crew member of the sea rescue organization
, reported at a press conference marking the group's 10th anniversary.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
"Both boats were in the Libyan search and rescue zone at the time, but the Libyan rescue coordination center did not coordinate any of these rescues but said that they are not responsible," she added.
In Michel's view, this sums up how the European Union has successively outsourced responsibility for rescuing people from drowning in the Mediterranean to civilian organizations for more than a decade.
According to the
, almost 32,000 refugees have drowned in the Mediterranean since 2014.
This year alone, 500 have drowned, so far.
Controversial migration deals
Agreements worth hundreds of millions of euros between the EU and Libya in 2017, and the EU and Tunisia in 2023, were designed to reduce migration, and the many deaths in the Mediterranean.
The deals stipulated that the coastguards of both countries would take over border protection. However, these agreements have been heavily criticized, and reports on serious human rights violations are unabated.
"Many of the survivors from Libya who have been on board with us in the last five days bear signs of torture on their bodies," Michel said.
She added that migrants had recounted how they had been humiliated, forced to strip their clothing, doused with ice-cold water, beaten with wooden sticks, metal rods and plastic hoses, shot with pistols and raped.
The rescue organization's most recent report on the situation in Libya, Tunisia and the Mediterranean also shares the harrowing stories of 64 survivors.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
"After being severely beaten, three young men jumped into the sea. The Libyan coastguard let them die in front of our eyes and even insulted them as they drowned. They said to each other: 'Let them die, it's easier for us and for them'," one migrant recalled.
European sea rescue program
On May 4, 2015, four families founded the search and rescue organization SOS Humanity in Berlin. Since then, they say they have rescued more than 38,000 refugees in distress at sea along the Mediterranean route from North Africa to Italy.
"The first rescue we carried out on March 7, 2016, rescued 74 exhausted, injured and desperate men and women in a small, unprotected rubber dinghy far off the coast of Libya," SOS Humanity founder Klaus Vogel told DW, adding that "our expectation of getting European governments to see refugees as fellow human beings, and to recognize the rescue of
as Europe's natural duty has not been fulfilled."
The organization calls for German politicians to push for a collective European sea rescue program, and to end its cooperation agreements with Libya and Tunisia.
Meanwhile, the aid organization criticizes that Germany's incoming government does not even mention the term "sea rescue" in its coalition agreement.
'The world's deadliest border'
"For more than 10 years now, we have had a situation in Europe in which European governments have held repeated crisis summits, but they have not been able to put an end to the dying," Gerald Knaus, an Austrian migration expert and co-founder and chairman of the think tank
, told DW.
"The deadliest border in the world remains the deadliest border in the world. And this continuous dying is an expression of a complete and systematic failure," he said.
Knaus is the architect of the 2016 refugee agreement between the European Union and Turkey.
At the time, the deal included €6 billion ($6.42 billion) worth of aid for Ankara in return for Turkey sealing off the migrant route across the Mediterranean and agreeing to take back refugees.
According to the social scientist, the number of deaths in the Aegean Sea has fallen from 1,100 in one year to 80 as a result.
Human dignity instead of populism
According to Knaus, a deal with African countries could include issuing five-year visas for citizens who enter legally, increasing the number of scholarships available, and investing several hundred million euros to combat poverty.
In return, the countries could agree to take back refugees who are obliged to leave the country.
"The political signal would be that Europe does not have to elect far-right parties to control migration," he told DW.
"The fatal message on the other side of the Atlantic is that Donald Trump has stopped irregular migration, the numbers have fallen dramatically. But he is doing this at the expense of human dignity and is demolishing the rule of law," Knaus said.
"So, it is now extremely important for Germany's centrist parties and this coalition to urgently develop a solution based on the rule of law, with the necessary seriousness and without populism," he argued, adding that "blaming sea rescuers is populism and has always been populism."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says Vietnam to face 20% tariff under 'great' deal
Trump says Vietnam to face 20% tariff under 'great' deal

New Indian Express

time36 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Trump says Vietnam to face 20% tariff under 'great' deal

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that he had struck a trade deal with Vietnam under which the country would face a minimum 20 percent tariff and open its market to US products. The deal comes a week ahead of Trump's self-imposed July 9 deadline for steeper tariffs on US trade partners to take effect if agreements had not been reached. Trump initially announced that the trade deal had been reached, without providing details. Shares in clothing companies and sport equipment manufacturers -- which have a large footprint in Vietnam -- rose on the news, but later declined sharply after the president released details including the continued tariffs. "It is my Great Honor to announce that I have just made a Trade Deal with the Socialist Republic of Vietnam after speaking with To Lam, the Highly Respected General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. He said that under the "Great Deal of Cooperation," imports of Vietnamese goods will face a 20 percent US tariff, while goods that pass through Vietnam from other countries -- so-called "transshipping" -- will see a steeper 40 percent tariff. "In return, Vietnam will do something that they have never done before, give the United States of America TOTAL ACCESS to their Markets for Trade," he said. "In other words, they will 'OPEN THEIR MARKET TO THE UNITED STATES,' meaning that we will be able to sell our product into Vietnam at ZERO Tariff," he added. The president said he believed US-made SUVs, "which do so well in the United States, will be a wonderful addition to the various product lines within Vietnam." Trump's announcement comes a week before the US has threatened to reimpose steep tariffs on dozens of economies, including the EU and Japan, many of which are still scrambling to reach deals that would protect them from the measures. Those higher tariffs are part of a package Trump initially imposed in April, citing a lack of "reciprocity" in trading relationships, before announcing a temporary lowering to 10 percent. Without a deal, Vietnam's "reciprocal tariff" would have risen from the baseline 10 percent to 46 percent. Since April, Washington had so far only announced a pact with Britain and a deal to temporarily lower retaliatory duties with China. Both involve the United States maintaining some of Trump's tariffs on the trading partners.

Quad launches new critical minerals initiative during Washington Summit
Quad launches new critical minerals initiative during Washington Summit

Hindustan Times

time3 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Quad launches new critical minerals initiative during Washington Summit

Washington DC: The four-nation Quad grouping announced a new Critical Minerals Initiative during a meeting of their Foreign Ministers in Washington on Tuesday. This comes just after China - which dominates the processing and supply of key critical minerals - imposed restrictions on the export of seven rare earth metals in April 2025. Rare earths are a subset of critical minerals, which are elements and substances that are crucial to national and economic security given their importance in manufacturing and defence sectors. External affairs minister S Jaishankar meets foreign minister of Australia, Penny Wong, on the sidelines of the Quad Foreign Ministers' meeting, in Washington DC on Wednesday. (@DrSJaishankar X) 'We are deeply concerned about the abrupt constriction and future reliability of key supply chains, specifically for critical minerals. This includes the use of non-market policies and practices for critical minerals, certain derivative products, and mineral processing technology,' the Quad Foreign Ministers said in a joint statement. Beijing's restrictions were imposed in response to President Donald Trump's tariffs on Chinese exports to the United States. These restrictions were expected to cause serious disruption to America's defence and automotives sectors, which rely heavily on China's supply. 'We underscore the importance of diversified and reliable global supply chains. Reliance on any one country for processing and refining critical minerals and derivative goods production exposes our industries to economic coercion, price manipulation, and supply chain disruptions, which further harms our economic and national security,' said the Quad Foreign Ministers in their joint statement. 'We are launching today the Quad Critical Minerals Initiative, an ambitious expansion of our partnership to strengthen economic security and collective resilience by collaborating to secure and diversify critical minerals supply chains,' they added. There have been efforts to tackle the critical minerals challenge in the past. In February 2025, India and the United States launched the Strategic Mineral Recovery Initiative, which aims to recover and process critical minerals like lithium, cobalt and rare earths from heavy industries like coal mining. During Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to America earlier this year, the two countries agreed to push research, development and investment across the entire critical minerals value chain. Washington and New Delhi are also key members of the Minerals Security Partnership, a multinational initiative launched in 2022 to develop new critical minerals supply chains amid concerns of China's dominance in this sector. 14 nations - including Australia, Canada, France and Germany - and the European Union are part of the MSP. The grouping has established a Finance Network to channel funding from national development finance institutions toward key critical minerals projects.

Deal Or No Deal: What Happens With Trump's July Tariff Deadline?
Deal Or No Deal: What Happens With Trump's July Tariff Deadline?

NDTV

time4 hours ago

  • NDTV

Deal Or No Deal: What Happens With Trump's July Tariff Deadline?

A week before US President Donald Trump reimposes steep tariffs on dozens of economies, including the EU and Japan, many are still scrambling to reach a deal that would protect them from the worst. The tariffs taking effect July 9 are part of a package Trump imposed in April citing a lack of "reciprocity" in trading ties. He slapped a 10 percent levy on most partners, with higher customized rates to kick in later in countries the United States has major trade deficits with. But these were halted until July to allow room for negotiations. Analysts expect countries will encounter one of three outcomes: They could reach a framework for an agreement; receive an extended pause on higher tariffs; or see levies surge. 'Framework' deals "There will be a group of deals that we will land before July 9," said Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent last Friday on CNBC. Policymakers have not named countries in this group, although Bessent maintains that Washington has been focused on striking deals with about 18 key partners. "Vietnam, India and Taiwan remain promising candidates for a deal," Asia Society Policy Institute (ASPI) vice president Wendy Cutler told AFP. Without a deal, Vietnam's "reciprocal tariff" rises from the baseline of 10 percent to 46 percent, India's to 26 percent and Taiwan's to 32 percent. Josh Lipsky, international economics chair at the Atlantic Council, cited Indian negotiators' extension of their US trip recently in noting that it "seems like a frontrunner." "Japan was in that category, but things have set back a little," Lipsky said, referring to Trump's criticism Monday over what the president called Japan's reluctance to accept US rice exports. The deals, however, will unlikely be full-fledged trade pacts, analysts said, citing complexities in negotiating such agreements. Since April, Washington has only announced a pact with Britain and a deal to temporarily lower tit-for-tat duties with China. Extended pause Bessent has also said that countries "negotiating in good faith" can have their tariffs remain at the 10 percent baseline. But extensions of the pause on higher rates would depend on Trump, he added. "With a new government, (South) Korea looks well positioned to secure an extension," Cutler of ASPI said. Lipsky expects many countries to fall into this bucket, receiving an extended halt on higher tariffs that could last until Labor Day, which falls on September 1. Bessent earlier said that Washington could wrap up its agenda for trade deals by Labor Day, a signal that more agreements could be concluded but with talks likely to extend past July. Tariff reimposition For countries that the United States finds "recalcitrant," however, tariffs could spring back to the higher levels Trump previously announced, Bessent has warned. These range from 11 percent to 50 percent. Cutler warned that "Japan's refusal to open its rice market, coupled with the US resistance to lowering automotive tariffs, may lead to the reimposition of Japan's 24 percent reciprocal tariff." Trump himself said Tuesday that a trade deal was unlikely with Japan and the country could pay a tariff of "30 percent, 35 percent, or whatever the number is that we determine." Lipsky believes the European Union is at risk of having tariffs snap back to steeper levels too -- to the 20 percent unveiled in April or the 50 percent Trump more recently threatened. An area of tension could be Europe's approach to digital regulation. Trump recently said he would terminate trade talks with Canada -- which is not impacted by the July 9 deadline -- in retaliation for the country's digital services tax, which Ottawa eventually said it would rescind. This week, EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic is in Washington in a push to seal a trade deal, with the EU commission having received early drafts of proposals that officials are working on.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store