logo
Recognising past injustices is no favour, it's a responsibility

Recognising past injustices is no favour, it's a responsibility

Express Tribune09-03-2025
Listen to article
As a Pakistani Bihari feminist, I am still drawing parallels between the targeted, brutal killings of poor Punjabis in present-day Pakistan and the targeted, ethnic cleansing of Biharis in former East Pakistan. The 2024 shift in Bangladesh, where the pro-Indian and anti-Pakistan government of Sheikh Hasina Wajid was ousted, appears to be a divine intervention, aligning with the students' movement.
As I reflect on media narratives and political puppeteering, I wonder: why does justice remain so blurry for Biharis? Why is there no one among the mighty ones to assert my community's case — for their repatriation to Pakistan, their equal citizenship rights in Bangladesh, the return of their properties, the restoration of their dignity, or at least some signs of remorse from the elites of both countries? We have been consistently dismissed as irrelevant stakeholders — whether in past agreements aimed at normalising relations or in the recent overenthusiasm to establish excellent camaraderie.
I have long lamented the media's cleverly shifted gaze and the politicians' impotence in this regard. But today, I genuinely want to know: why are our renowned and eminent scholars - experts in regional Studies - so utterly devoid of common sense and a human rights perspective? Many of them have traveled to foreign lands, including Bangladesh, on various fellowships and exchange programmes, and now they are once again promoting similar over-simplistic models for establishing "normal" ties with Bangladesh. Why do they fail to grasp the human melancholy of recent history?
Interventions such as carefully curated movies, music melas, military alliances, sudden sisterhood seasons and media engagement are not the magic mantra here. If this recipe had worked, India would have been our best friend. People cannot be fooled; they know their choices. Somehow, political leaders and their handlers treat people like pieces in a chess game. Most disgusting among them are those who masquerade as subject matter experts in such situations.
The audacity of many Pakistani IR and defence experts who shamelessly argue that acknowledging the Bihari issue would "complicate" relations with Dhaka is worth mourning. Is the propensity of many Pakistani experts in IR, defence studies and policy analysis to ignore the plight of stranded Biharis in Bangladesh while advocating for stronger Pakistan-Bangladesh bonds merely an oversight, or is it a deliberate destruction of an inconvenient truth?
I have stated my protests and discomfort through my writings and podcasts, highlighting the abrupt emergence of so-called experts on Bangladesh and their noticeable exclusion of the Biharis and other non-Bengali Urdu speakers, who continue to subsist in the ghettos of Bangladesh. As expected, my concerns were conveniently ignored. And, as always, I received my due share of contempt.
The messages I receive not only disrespect my entire community but celebrate our plight. These dispatches do not just come from unknown sources; they originate from intellectuals, reformists, liberals and feminists - people otherwise revered as promoters of peace, tolerance and coexistence. We are not only despised by nationalists but also omitted by well-settled Biharis and Urdu speakers, particularly in Karachi.
I do not wish to undermine the works of the few good people within Pakistan or in the diaspora, but the bitter truth remains: our own community did not play the role it could have. Maybe the burdens of trauma and survival struggles have compelled them to distance themselves from the miseries of those who are 1000 miles away from the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. All of this was enough to remind me - yet again - of what I have always known but still struggled to accept: the sustained, unholy and criminal elitist consensus and hypocrisy within these so-called champions of rightness.
The Pakistani Biharis of East Pakistan have been expunged from official histories, their struggle tempered in media reports and their fate forgotten in official discourse. But we exist. And we refuse to be silent. The art of selective amnesia defines the politics of South Asia. History, when narrated by the victors, effortlessly confiscates challenging truths.
Fifty-three years after 1971, my community remains a footnote in the majestic stories of Bangladesh, Pakistan and global bosses of human rights. Since August 5, 2024, I have read dozens of columns and blogs and followed social media discussions on 1971 and traumatic "past". For us trauma is still in the present. What I have gathered is a collection of exclusionary and inaccurate narratives.
Many think pieces have successfully snubbed the full historical context — particularly the human rights violations faced by pro-Pakistani Biharis and non-Bengali Urdu speakers, from the beginning of the language movement around 1948, to their enforced statelessness in Bangladesh since 1971. This obliviousness prevents a thorough understanding of the bilateral relationship. Such writings, along with numerous podcasts, expose a clear-cut bias — focusing solely on recent positive developments in Pakistan-Bangladesh contacts while limiting or entirely ditching unresolved injuries, especially the quandary of stateless populations. By failing to initiate an all-inclusive meaningful dialogue about the rights and citizenship status of stranded Biharis, these influencers deliberately evade an opportunity to resolve long standing humanitarian issues.
My plea to these professors and scholar-warriors is straightforward: revisit your intellectual honesty and re-evaluate your positions on this complex spectrum of issues. Empathy is a skill - it can be learned and integrated into your perspectives. As someone deeply connected to both her community and humanity at the grassroots level, I know one fundamental fact: any reconciliation without truth is illegitimate and hollow.
The continued erasure of the Bihari question by so-called experts will only jeopardise efforts to build a Pakistan-Bangladesh relationship on firm foundations. This disingenuous approach will crumble under the weight of unresolved historical injustices. Instead of chasing the illusion of "excellent friendship" and pleasing certain quarters by sidestepping embarrassing truths, it is time for an intellectually and morally daring approach - one that embraces the whole historical truth, no matter how painful it may be.
For powerless activists and advocates, the only hope lies in narratives that acknowledge both progress and persistence, pressing both governments to address historical wrongs and ensure equitable treatment for all communities affected by past atrocities.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cruel to be kind
Cruel to be kind

Express Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Express Tribune

Cruel to be kind

Listen to article As with any old animosity, the 'Tom & Jerry' show between Pakistan and India has continued since independence. Call it competition, identity clash or animosity, it has certainly inflicted severe damage, but often felt like a sibling rivalry in a sitcom. If I wrote something critical about India at a given moment, somebody on the other side would write a rebuttal, have a private laugh with me when we met personally, and be done with the whole episode. It was eleven years ago that it all changed. One oddity was the hate mail's nature. When you write something critical, you can expect a degree of pushback. Still, a part of the new normal was that even when you praised India, you received an inbox full of hate mail trying to put you in your place - a citizen of a badly broken nation, a beggar state, India was out of your league. You should not besmirch its name by getting it out of your filthy mouth. I would have heeded the advice, but you realise, since I have been writing almost my entire adult life, one runs out of things to write. It is not possible to ignore a nation of 1.45 billion. In my defence, every word I write is a product of care. If I talk to you, it's because I value your judgement. While others feel flattered by the attention, this was the first time one encountered people threatening to gouge your eyes out for just looking at them. So, what was behind this weapons-grade hubris? The realisation that India has finally arrived? If yes, why police Pakistani media's online assets then? If you are so powerful, successful and rich, why worry about what a Pakistani says about you? America is so rich and powerful, yet all sorts of things are published about it. Do you think such websites and email addresses are swamped by American trolls? Absolutely not. You attack and police when either you are unconvinced of your own success or want to create an environment of fear with a clear outcome in mind. You can see this from the methods that were employed. Nawaz Sharif was invited to Narendra Modi's swearing-in ceremony. Still, India's foreign office quickly clarified: he was just one of six SAARC leaders, and the visit should not be seen as bilateral. They also objected to his meeting with Hurriyat leaders. Let's decode that. Their message was clear: we are somebody, you are nobody. These ceremonial invitations to our "court" are acts of generosity; be grateful, obey protocol, and never presume equality. And what was the expectation? When we berate you, do not fight back. When we stare at you, make a point of being seen as cowering. And when we raise our hand, fall down and pretend to writhe in pain. This will please our people, and as long as we are in power, we will ensure you get some morsels off our table. You guessed it. The we in the above statement is royal we. And this imagery creates a global superstructure echoing India's caste system. Islam, according to this worldview, is synonymous with terrorism, and Pakistan is a Muslim country, so Pakistan gets a station lower than Dalits. This brings to mind the forgotten image of young BR Ambedkar sitting on a sack outside his classroom's door despite his brilliant mind, while his dull-witted classmates sat inside with standard desks and benches. Why? Because he was a Dalit and they were of the upper castes. He was not allowed to drink from the common water pot. Most teachers wouldn't even listen to him. America hasn't been able to shake off the ghost of Jim Crow Laws despite becoming one of the most tolerant societies today. A country which still sustains a fivefold Jim Crow system on acid as the present reality is unlikely to perpetuate anything different. Sadly, I would be remiss if I failed to acknowledge that many Pakistanis fell for this scheme. The Indian media needed a certain archetypal Pakistan to represent the country's caricature. Many individuals lined up to volunteer. Those who refused were told that they would have no role among the emerging media elite of the country. Many policymakers and notables showed readiness to pretend to speak from a position of weakness whenever they spoke of India. As Indian politicians publicly tried to paddle Pakistan, there was no dearth of those shouting, stop, their voices, "thank you, sir, may I have another"? An economy has flourished since then. People like me were duped by another phenomenon. Whenever dramatic developments occur, I imagine how it would impact me if I were there. So when I see suffering, I immediately empathise. We looked at Indian seculars and thought they must be going through hell. But we ignored that had it not been for the latent bigotry and active connivance of the secular elite, a party with so much history of bloodsport could not control a nation as diverse and populous for the past eleven years. Scratch an Indian secular, and a Nathuram Godse with a good accent comes out. They all want Akhand Bharat. Only they don't want the blame. Why not deal with the real deal then? Modi then wasn't the problem. He was India's elected leader. One should have put up or shut up. My bad. But a direct consequence of India's carefully manufactured self-image was the demand for incremental aggression towards Pakistan in 2016, 2019, and now. This time, they misjudged the situation and are still licking their wounds. For the first time in eleven years, they have encountered a reset. While I do not condone war or violence, sometimes you have to be cruel to be kind. Frankly, the mutual hostility of these nations has made them engines of poverty in this neck of the woods. There is no excuse for this to go on indefinitely. If this lesson does not sink in, more shocks may come. While the jury is still out on the future of peace in South Asia, the economy mentioned above, which emerged in the past eleven years in Pakistan, hasn't gone away. From the 2014 sit-in to destabilising the Sharif government in 2017, the reelection of Modi in 2019, and many others, it has left behind indelible fingerprints on every crisis. Sadly, politicians who became its victims blame others for their plight. But I kept all the receipts. About time you knew who did what. I have faced attempts to deplatform and financially ruin me before, like between 2019 and 2022. I didn't enjoy it, but I survived. What is the worst they can do now? Kill me?

FO calls out India for ‘patronising terrorism' from Afghan soil
FO calls out India for ‘patronising terrorism' from Afghan soil

Express Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Express Tribune

FO calls out India for ‘patronising terrorism' from Afghan soil

Listen to article Foreign Office Spokesperson Shafqat Ali Khan stated that cross-border terrorism remains the central challenge in its ties with Afghanistan, asserting that India is actively 'patronising terrorism ' in Afghan territory. In a weekly briefing on Friday, he said Pakistan has repeatedly raised concerns over terrorist sanctuaries in Afghanistan posing grave threats to regional stability. 'Counter‑terrorism remains a sticking point,' he noted, accusing India of 'patronising terrorism against Pakistan.' Khan also condemned the BJP government's demolition of over 500 shrines in Uttarakhand as evidence of rising Islamophobia. He described the act as 'another demonstration of the virulence with which the current dispensation in India is pursuing its anti‑Muslim agenda.' Responding to Indian aggression in the aftermath of the Pahalgam incident, Khan warned against unilateral militaristic aggression. 'No state can allow another to violate its sovereignty and territorial integrity at will,' he said, affirming Pakistan's preparedness to defend its sovereignty 'with full vigour.' Referring to remarks made by India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on alleged nuclear blackmail, Khan asserted that such talk exposes India's insecurity about Pakistan's defence capability. He stated that Pakistan's conventional forces are 'adequate to deter India without the self‑imposed nuclear blackmail that New Delhi suffers from.' On the Indus Waters Treaty, he welcomed an interim ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration that rebuked India's unilateral suspension of the treaty. Describing India's action as 'totally illegal,' he said the award 'vindicates Pakistan's position in a very clear fashion.' Moreover, Khan confirmed Pakistan and India exchanged prisoner lists on July 1 under the 2008 Consular Access Agreement — Pakistan shared 246 names of Indian or Indian-origin detainees, while India handed over a list of 463 Pakistani prisoners. He urged both nations to ensure the welfare of detainees. He also highlighted Pakistan's participation in regional diplomacy, saying Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif led the delegation at the 17th ECO Summit in Azerbaijan, where he held bilateral meetings and advanced Pakistan's policy agenda. Deputy PM Ishaq Dar also reached out to Turkey's leadership ahead of Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan's imminent visit. Responding to whether Pakistan would seek US mediation in its dialogue with India, the spokesperson said Islamabad prefers diplomacy over conflict. 'It is India's choice whether it treads the path of belligerence or takes steps for dialogue and reconciliation.' Meanwhile, he firmly reiterated Pakistan's unwavering support for Palestine. He called for a sovereign Palestinian state along pre-1967 borders with Al Quds Al Sharif as its capital, emphasising that any ceasefire in Gaza must end occupation and respect Palestinian rights. 'The road to peace lies not through normalisation under duress, but through justice, freedom and dignity for the Palestinian people,' he added.

India unveils $234m drone scheme in response to Pakistan conflict
India unveils $234m drone scheme in response to Pakistan conflict

Express Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

India unveils $234m drone scheme in response to Pakistan conflict

A view shows Falcon, a surveillance drone, on display at the drone exhibition at Bharat Drone Shakti 2023 organised by the Indian Air Force and Drone Federation of India at the Hindon Airbase in Ghaziabad, India, September 25, 2023. PHOTO: REUTERS Listen to article India will launch a $234 million incentive programme for civil and military drone makers to reduce their reliance on imported components and counter rival Pakistan's programme built on support from China and Turkey, three sources told Reuters. India's push to build more home-grown drones stems from its assessment of the four-day clash with Pakistan in May that marked the first time New Delhi and Islamabad utilized unmanned aerial vehicles at scale against each other. The nuclear-armed neighbours are now locked in a drones arms race. New Delhi will launch a 20 billion Indian rupees ($234 million) programme for three years that will cover manufacture of drones, components, software, counter drone systems, and services, two government and one industry source, who did not want to be named, told Reuters. Details of the programme have not been previously reported and its planned expenditure is higher than the modest 1.2 billion rupees production-linked incentive scheme New Delhi launched in 2021 to promote drone start-ups, which have struggled to raise capital and invest in research. India's civil aviation ministry, which is leading the incentives programme, and defence ministry did not immediately respond to e-mails seeking comment. Reuters previously reported that India plans to invest heavily in local industry and could spend as much as $470 million on unmanned aerial vehicles over the next 12 to 24 months, in what government and military officers said would be a staggered approach. In the past, India has mainly imported military drones from its third-largest arms supplier, Israel, but in recent years its nascent drone industry has scaled up its cost-effective offerings, including for the military, although reliance on China continues for certain components such as motors, sensors and imaging systems. Through the incentives, India is aiming to have at least 40% of key drone components made in the country by the end of fiscal year 2028 (April-March), the two government sources said. "During (the India-Pakistan) conflict there was quite a lot of use of drones, loitering munitions and kamikaze drones on both sides," Indian Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh said last week. "The lesson that we've learned is that we need to double down on our indigenisation efforts to ensure that we build a large, effective, military drone manufacturing ecosystem." India bans import of drones but not their components and the government has planned additional incentives for manufacturers that procure parts from within the country, the two government sources said. The state-run Small Industries Development Bank of India would also support the incentive programme by providing cheap loans for working capital, research and development needs for the firms, the government sources added. Currently, there are more than 600 drone manufacturing and associated companies in India, according to estimates shared by an industry source involved in the discussions for the incentives programme.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store