Patrick Dempsey celebrates his twin sons' high school graduation in RARE photo of the family
The boys attended Los Angeles ' private school Crossroads alongside other children of the famous.
The Grey's Anatomy alum posted a photo to his Instagram of he and his wife with their boys on graduation day.
'Graduation!!,' the proud father's caption began.
'So proud of you boys and cannot wait to see where the next chapter of your lives will take you!'
Patrick's fans and friends left congratulations in the comment section including his former Grey's Anatomy castmate Justin Chambers, who left a series of clapping hands emojis.
Darby also posted a selection of photos on Instagram, including one with his sister Talula 23.
'Couldn't have asked for a better senior year,' he captioned the post.
His mom commented, 'My bby B I am so proud of you ❤️❤️,' and his sister posted hang ten emojis in her comment on his post.
Patrick and Jillian have been married since 1999.
The couple met in 1994 when he was a customer in her Los Angeles hair salon, which she sold in 1998.
Patrick and Jillian were both in relationships when they first met, so things didn't turn romantic until 1997.
'She was always flirting,' Patrick told People.
Patrick made a homemade meal at his home for their first date, and Jillian moved in three months later.
The Can't Buy Me Love actor, wrote a sweet tribute to his wife and their marriage for their 25th wedding anniversary in July 2024.
Patrick's fans and friends left congratulations in the comment section including his former Grey's Anatomy cast made Justin Chambers, who left a series of clapping hands emojis
'Life would not be the same without you, your vision, your kindness, your compassion, your love, your sexiness, your intelligence, your warmth, your friendship, your wisdom,' McDreamy wrote on Instagram.
These days, the mom of three runs her own makeup and skincare line which she got started with the brand Delux Beauty.
She created a lip gloss just for the cast of Charlie's Angeles and her products gained cult-like status in the industry, per People.
Jillian started Jillian Dempsey Beauty in 2014.
'With my first brand Delux Beauty, I couldn't afford to do anything that was natural,' Jillian explained to Beauty Independent.
'The cost of goods would have been too high. I wanted to make my current brand cruelty-free and vegan, utilizing natural and organic materials where I could find ingredients and making it really easy to use.'
Jillian isn't afraid to turn to her family for help when she needs it.
'I will always try everything on my family members, and I absolutely welcome any and all feedback,' Jillian told the outlet in 2022.
'My big thing is to make sure the lipsticks taste good when you kiss. And, well, so far they taste pretty darn good,' Patrick once said.
In 2020, Jillian launched the FYFE Beauty app in which users have access to library of makeup and hair tutorial from experts.
Users can browse videos having to do with hair, makeup, nails, men's grooming and more.
Patrick appeared in a tutorial from Jillian's Shelter-in-Place series, where she demonstrated how to cover gray hair.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
27 minutes ago
- The Sun
Inside Brooklyn Beckham's $1m makeover of $16m LA mansion as they rip out Kim Kardashian's kitchen
BROOKLYN Beckham and Nicola Peltz are giving their $16m LA mansion a huge makeover. The world famous duo are spending upwards of a million dollars on the interior of the lavish home. 7 7 7 Brooklyn, 26, and actress Nicola, 30, previously spent tens of millions of dollars on a luxury Beverly Hills pad with custom Italian interiors. According to reports, the house was equipped with an ultra-luxe kitchen and bathrooms which were designed by renowned architect Vincent Van Duysen. He has gained a huge reputation within Hollywood for his incredible style in Elle Decor. The designer is known to be a close collaborator with A-list stars which include Oscar winner Julianne Moore. He also designed Kim Kardashian 's $60million mansion in Calabasas that has previously featured in the likes of Vogue and Architectural Digest. The acclaimed artist is also the creative brains behind the Zara Home collection. However, Brooklyn and Nicola reportedly want to put their own spin on the six-bedroom, seven-bathroom abode. According to The Mail, permits that have been filed to The City of Beverly Hills have revealed that the duo have ripped out all the lava rock countertops in the kitchen. Out of six bathroom vanities, the couple has ditched four as well as replacing the metal fire pit in the garden with a stone feature instead. According to the publication, experts estimate that costs of the renovations would be at least $1.025million. This would be split between $440,000 for installation of the counters and fire pit, $75,000 to remove them and another $510,000 for replacements. The duo are currently embroiled in a huge family feud with the rest of the Beckham clan, which The Sun understands started over money. Brooklyn and Nicola were both absent f rom his father David Beckham's 50th birthday celebrations in a huge snub. In recent days they reached out to sister Harper to mark her 14th birthday in an apparent move to end the feud. The Beckham Family Feud April 2022: Brooklyn marries Nicola Peltz. Wedding Dress Controversy: Rumours begin circulating that there's tension between Nicola and Victoria Beckham after Nicola chooses not to wear a Victoria Beckham-designed wedding gown. Nicola later clarifies in August 2022 (and again in March 2023) that Victoria's atelier couldn't make the dress in time, but reports in May 2025 suggest Victoria actually changed her mind about making the dress. Post-Wedding (2022 onwards): Minimal interaction between Nicola and Victoria on social media, and noticeable absence of Nicola at key Beckham family events. Alleged Wedding "Hijack": In May 2025, a source claimed Victoria "ruined" part of the wedding by allegedly hijacking a dance with Marc Anthony, which was meant for Brooklyn and Nicola. Nicola reportedly ran from the room crying. March 2025: A resurfaced TikTok of Romeo and Cruz mimicking a "baby voice" (which fans associate with Nicola) sparks speculation of sibling shade. April 2025: Brooklyn and Nicola are reportedly absent from Victoria Beckham's 51st birthday celebrations in Miami and her Paris Fashion Week show. May 2025: David Beckham's 50th Birthday Snub: Brooklyn and Nicola are notably absent from David Beckham's 50th birthday celebrations in London, despite being invited. Reports suggest their absence was due to Brooklyn not wanting to be in the same room as Kim Turnbull, the girlfriend of Romeo who had previously been reported to have been dating Brooklyn, who David allegedly opted to have at the party over Nicola. Rumours emerge of a falling out between Brooklyn and his younger brother Romeo, reportedly due to Romeo's new girlfriend, DJ Kim Turnbull, who allegedly had a past connection with Brooklyn. Reports surface that the Beckham parents are "hurt and disappointed" that Brooklyn is "playing no part in family life." Sources claim that tensions between Brooklyn and Nicola and his parents are "definitely not beyond repair." June 2025: Brooklyn and Nicola reportedly enlist a "crisis team" similar to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle for "reputation management" due to the growing media scrutiny. Cruz Beckham posts cryptic lyrics on Instagram that some interpret as a swipe at Brooklyn. July 2025: Reports indicate David and Victoria are "desperate" to reconcile with Brooklyn. Brooklyn publicly wishes his sister Harper a happy 14th birthday on Instagram, tagging Nicola, which is seen as a potential "olive branch" and a rare public message to his family amid the rumored rift. Brooklyn UNFOLLOWS his brothers Romeo and Cruz just 24 hours after his birthday message to Harper. Nicola quickly follows suit and also ditches the Beckham bros from her Instagram following. Romeo and Cruz are now also no longer following Brooklyn. But it was later revealed that Brooklyn is no longer following his own brothers, Romeo, 22 and Cruz, 20, just after the perceived olive branch. The siblings unfollowed him and Nicola in return before it was reported that they had blocked him. Model Brooklyn and wife Nicola are said to be 'blindsided' after learning of the latest snub when they saw reports online. A source explained: "Blocking or unfollowing someone on Instagram is like the Gen Z version of World War Three. It's a sad new low. "But the truth is, Brooklyn has cut out his parents David and Victoria from his life and it's the same with Romeo and Cruz. "Even when the family have reached out to Brooklyn they have been ignored. "He's not had contact for months and it feels clear to them that he doesn't want to make amends." 7 7 7 7
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Michelle Pfeiffer claims Bill Gates-backed coating means 'organic produce is no longer safe'
Michelle Pfeiffer has attacked a Bill Gates-backed food coating and suggested he's going to contaminate America's food supply. On Thursday the actress, 67, expressed concern on social media over the FDA 's approval of Apeel, a Gates-backed food coating meant to extend the shelf life of produce. 'Apeel (an edible, plant-based coating designed to extend the shelf life of fresh fruits and vegetables) was just approved and now "organic" produce is coated in something we cannot see or wash off,' Pfeiffer wrote. 'Ver concerning.' She shared a video that claimed 'organic produce is no longer safe' after 'Bill Gates' Apeel just approved for USDA-certified organic.' Apeel has long been mired in controversy over its ingredients and association with Gates. The company was founded in 2012 by entrepreneur James Rogers with the help of a $100,000 grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The Gates' are not currently involved in Apeel, which has received substantial backing from venture capitalist Andreessen Horowitz. Post: Despite Pfeiffer's comments, Apeel claims on its website that their coatings can be washed Apeel responded by saying it was 'both disappointing and concerning to see a public figure like Michelle Pfeiffer use her platform to spread disinformation about our company, our mission, and the work of our employees.' They added: 'To set the record straight: Bill Gates is not now, nor has he ever been, a shareholder in Apeel Sciences. 'Additionally, our products have been reviewed and allowed on the market in compliance with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. National Organic Program requirements for nearly eight years - not recently, as Ms. Pfeiffer's post suggests,' Jenny Du, co-founder of Apeel and senior vice president of operations, said in a statement. Also, the company claimed that their coatings can be washed by rinsing the produce with water and scrubbing it. 'Apeel uses plant lipids or plant oils naturally found in fruits and vegetables and creates a coating applied to the surface of fresh fruits and vegetables in order to retain moisture and reduce oxidation,' Du told the Associated Press. 'Our product is also intended to be edible.' The coating consists of purified monoglycerides and diglycerides, which Du pointed out are also found in products such as infant formula. The company has said their coating technology can help reduce post-harvest food waste in developing countries and is ultimately aimed at combatting famine and hunger.
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Superman is super woke? How politics play into the new man of steel
Superman Woke! Variations on that headline splashed across all manner of non-Daily Planet websites this week in advance of a new Superman movie reboot, specifically the comments of writer-director James Gunn, who casually characterized the character as an immigrant and, as such, telling the 'story of America' in an interview. This rankled rightwingers including the former TV Superman Dean Cain, who acknowledged Superman as an immigrant but blanched at the idea of actively associating that as an American value, noting that 'there have to be limits'. Meanwhile, the former Trump lackey Kellyanne Conway, now a Fox News host, characterized the movie she hasn't seen as an ideological lecture, and added her supposed anger that the movie's star, David Corenswet, elided the old 'truth, justice and the American way' Superman slogan in another interview (referring to 'truth, justice, all that good stuff'). For those attempting to keep track: people involved with a Superman movie shouldn't attempt to evoke America, except when they should. Actually, for those keeping even closer track, the 'American way' bit was a phrase added to the radio version of Superman during the second world war, and further popularized by the 1950s TV show. It lived on primarily in reruns of that show, didn't appear in the comics until 1991, and has never been particularly central to the character in his original medium (or any of the movies, even). This is all to say that the reading of Superman as an immigrant is so commonplace, so arguably a part of the plain old surface text of the character, that it's even harder to buy any ginned-up outrage than usual. At best, it's a byproduct of suppressed guilt over the cruel and unusual immigration policies favored by anyone dumb enough to complain that this a 'woke' version of a 90-year-old superhero. In fact, the phoney outrage and predictions of boycott from people who don't go to the movies anyway could be a gag straight from the movie itself. It's one of plenty of real-world parallels in Gunn's movie. Most of them fall into the blockbuster realm of vagueness that makes it hard to tell if it was inspired by real events or just unsuccessfully sidestepping from evoking one international crisis straight into evoking another. (More on that in a moment.) But the most obviously first-hand quasi-political experiences Gunn draws upon all have to do with social media: this is a Superman whose weaknesses include Kryptonite, Lex Luthor-engineered software that anticipates his every punch, and … reading the comments. During one argument, Lois Lane needles her superpowered boyfriend by telling him she's seen him looking through certain hashtags guaranteed to frustrate and enrage even the virtuous child of Kansas farms who still says 'golly!' on the regular. This makes sense: James Gunn does not have experience in geopolitics, but he sure has experience online. The film-maker was semi-canceled over edgelord-y tweets (unearthed, in perfect discourse fashion, by rightwingers infuriated by his left-leaning politics); fired from the third Guardians of the Galaxy movie; and eventually rehired when Disney realized that maybe cast and fan loyalty was worth more than manufactured outrage. But in his between-Guardians downtime, Gunn made a Suicide Squad sequel for the previous DC regime, essentially auditioning for his current job. In some ways, he owes his stewardship of Superman and DC in general to the vexations of life online. So if it's a little cringe-y to hear about Superman glancing through social media, or for Gunn to go out of his way to show Lex Luthor training an army of monkeys to flood the zone with mean tweets, it's also a funny, oddly whimsical way of acknowledging our contemporary world. (Plus, remember that Clark Kent works in media, even if his newspaper still publishes a print edition.) It's certainly more surefooted than the movie's actual politics, which go further than the likes of Captain America: Brave New World but still fall short of anything more complicated than the actual thrust of Gunn's interview. (Which was that kindness is, in fact, good.) The immigrant stuff, first of all, is in the movie but not especially prominent. A plot turn involving Superman's parents could even be read as accidentally xenophobic; after all, if you're trading on the message that it doesn't matter where an immigrant comes from once assimilated into our culture, doesn't that by definition cast aspersions on other countries (or in this case, planets) and elevate whatever 'our' culture is? That's obviously not Gunn's intent in positioning Superman as an immigrant figure; he wants to elicit the empathy for outsiders that we've all felt at one time or another. The logical stumble is more a sign of a metaphor that isn't fit for front-to-back, one-to-one interpretation; that's not a problem on its own. More interesting is the story's offscreen inciting incident, where Superman intervenes in the affairs of two fictional countries. When the movie begins, Superman has recently stopped Boravia, which is led by a blustery despot who comes across like an eastern European Trump, from invading neighboring Jarhanpur. The latter has struck some viewers as coded Middle Eastern, implying parallels between Israel and Palestine, though in the comic books (and based on the leader's accent, here too) the countries are actually somewhere in Europe. That is to say, it looks more akin to Russia invading Ukraine, though Gunn has said he didn't have any specific real-life turmoil in mind when he concocted the scenario. The issue is really more interventionism: should Superman have acted unilaterally in stopping Boravia (and, indeed, threatening its leader with reprisal if he tries it again)? Lois Lane isn't so sure, bringing up the repressive nature of past Jarhanpur governments (and in turn bringing to mind Israel's attacks on Iran, though that particular conflict was in the news well after this movie was written, shot and probably almost or entirely finished). One of the most heartening things about Superman is that Lois's objections inspire a full conversation between her and Superman, in the guise of an 'interview' to make up for the fact that most of Superman's press is self-directed through Clark Kent. For a little while, the movie seems ready to dig into the genuine strife faced by a mega-powerful being who therefore has the ability to shape the world. Stopping people in another country from dying seems ethical. But what about issuing de facto press releases disguised as a real journalism? Of course, all of these questions are in the realm of hypothetical, so the movie mostly just invents hypothetical solutions that turn on the fact that Superman is, in fact, inherently trustworthy and moral. Lucky for everyone, huh? Then again, getting too far into the issue of whether Superman 'should' help people starts to look a bit too much like the Zack Snyder version that audiences and critics had such mixed-at-best feelings toward. Gunn wants Superman to be a bigger-tent affair than that, and it's an understandable impulse. He's not the first superhero character, but he's arguably the first one to achieve something resembling global ubiquity. That's going to lead to some varying interpretations. Limiting him to specific politics makes no more sense than keeping a world-saving god within Metropolis city limits. Yet in a weird way, the buffoonish outrage over Superman's immigration status has only served to highlight a void in the movie's broader emotional resonance. It's a sweet-natured movie that ends on a genuinely emotional note – it might particularly resonate for those with adoptive parents, another Superman mainstay – but misses the opportunity to make a more explicit parallel in the way Superman has emigrated both to the United States in particular, but to Earth in general. His global citizenship is more of a feelgood given than a powerful duality, and a Superman that truly grappled with our ability to see beyond national boundaries might have felt like a true update of the character for a new century, rather than another tacit plea for kindness. We have Paddington for that. Shouldn't Superman be able to lift something a little heavier?
