Get All the Best AI Tools in One Place for $40
The following content is brought to you by PCMag partners. If you buy a product featured here, we may earn an affiliate commission or other compensation.
1min.AI brings together top-tier AI models and essential tools into one unified platform. Designed for content creators, marketers, freelancers, and small business owners, this all-in-one AI app eliminates the need for juggling multiple AI subscriptions.
For a one-time price of $39.99, users get access to chat assistants from OpenAI (GPT-4o, GPT-3.5, GPT-4 Turbo), Claude 3, Gemini Pro, Mistral, and Meta's Llama 3, among others. It's a powerful chat engine built for fast content creation, support tasks, and creative brainstorming.
You'll also get a full suite of writing tools: keyword research, blog post generation, content rewriting, summarizing, and social media commenting—complete with brand voice adaptation. On the visual side, the platform supports image generation, background removal, upscaling, and text or object deletion. Users can edit, convert, and interact with PDFs, including summarizing and translating documents.
1min.AI also offers robust AI tools for audio and video. Create text-to-speech narrations, transcribe audio, and even enhance or edit video content, all under one roof. It's a complete solution for creators and teams looking to streamline workflows.
Get access to 1min.AI for just $39.99 (reg. $234) while you can.
Prices subject to change. PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through StackSocial affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
You Only Have to Pay for AdGuard Once to Eliminate Ads, and Now It's Only $16
The following content is brought to you by PCMag partners. If you buy a product featured here, we may earn an affiliate commission or other compensation. Ever feel like ads are taking over the internet? Maybe it's the banners that recount your latest online shopping trip or the video ads interrupting your YouTube binges, but it's enough to frustrate anyone. This AdGuard subscription gives you a much-needed break. During this limited-time StackSocial price drop, you no longer have to pay $169.99 for this ad blocker—only $15.97 with code FAMPLAN. It works on Windows and Mac desktops and mobile devices, but only on browsers. Finally, you can read articles, scroll social media, and watch videos without being plagued by advertisements. At the same time, AdGuard also helps you avoid accidentally clicking on harmful ads, phishing attempts, and malware attacks. If you're a parent, you'll also enjoy the option for custom content controls. With them, you can set up filters that block inappropriate websites or types of content from the backend to protect your kids online. Get access to AdGuard and stop ads in their tracks, plus keep your data private for just $15.97 (reg. $169.99) when you enter coupon code FAMPLAN at checkout. Prices subject to change. PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through StackSocial affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
OpenAI and Microsoft are dueling over AGI. These real-world tests will prove when AI is really better than humans.
AGI is a pretty silly debate. It's only really important in one way: It governs how the world's most important AI partnership will change in the coming months. That's the deal between OpenAI and Microsoft. This is the situation right now: Until OpenAI achieves Artificial General Intelligence — where AI capabilities surpass those of humans — Microsoft gets a lot of valuable technological and financial benefits from the startup. For instance, OpenAI must share a significant portion of its revenue with Microsoft. That's billions of dollars. One could reasonably argue that this might be why Sam Altman bangs on about OpenAI getting close to AGI soon. Many other experts in the AI field don't talk about this much, or they think the AGI debate is off base in various ways, or just not that important. Even Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, one of the biggest AI boosters on the planet, doesn't like to talk about AGI. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella sees things very differently. Wouldn't you? If another company is contractually required to give you oodles of money if they don't reach AGI, then you're probably not going to think we're close to AGI! Nadella has called the push toward AGI "benchmark hacking," which is so delicious. This refers to AI researchers and labs designing AI models to perform well on wonky industry benchmarks, rather than in real life. Here's OpenAI's official definition of AGI: "highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work." Other experts have defined it slightly differently. But the main point is that AI machines and software must be better than humans at a wide variety of useful tasks. You can already train an AI model to be better at one or two specific things, but to get to artificial general intelligence, machines must be able to do many different things better than humans. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . My real-world AGI tests Over the past few months, I've devised several real-world tests to see if we've reached AGI. These are fun or annoying everyday things that should just work in a world of AGI, but they don't right now for me. I also canvassed input from readers of my Tech Memo newsletter and tapped my source network for fun suggestions. Here are my real-world tests that will prove we've reached AGI: The PR departments of OpenAI and Anthropic use their own AI technology to answer every journalist's question. Right now, these companies are hiring a ton of human journalists and other communications experts to handle a barrage of reporter questions about AI and the future. When I reach out to these companies, humans answer every time. Unacceptable! Unless this changes, we're not at AGI. This suggestion is from a hedge fund contact, and I love it: Please, please can my Microsoft Outlook email system stop burying important emails while still letting spam through? This one seems like something Microsoft and OpenAI could solve with their AI technology. I haven't seen a fix yet. In a similar vein, can someone please stop Cactus Warehouse from texting me every 2 days with offers for 20% off succulents? I only bought one cactus from you guys once! Come on, AI, this can surely be solved! My 2024 Tesla Model 3 Performance hits potholes in FSD. No wonder tires have to be replaced so often on these EVs. As a human, I can avoid potholes much better. Elon, the AGI gauntlet has been thrown down. Get on this now. Can AI models and chatbots make valuable predictions about the future, or do they mostly just regurgitate what's already known on the internet? I tested this recently, right after the US bombed Iran. ChatGPT's stock-picking ability was put to the test versus a single human analyst. Check out the results here. TL;DR: We are nowhere near AGI on this one. There's a great Google Gemini TV ad where a kid is helping his dad assemble a basketball net. The son is using an Android phone to ask Gemini for the instructions and pointing the camera at his poor father struggling with parts and tools. It's really impressive to watch as Gemini finds the instruction manual online just by "seeing" what's going on live with the product assembly. For AGI to be here, though, the AI needs to just build the damn net itself. I can sit there and read out instructions in an annoying way, while someone else toils with fiddly assembly tasks — we can all do that. Yes, I know these tests seem a bit silly — but AI benchmarks are not the real world, and they can be pretty easily gamed. That last basketball net test is particularly telling for me. Getting an AI system and software to actually assemble a basketball net — that might happen sometime soon. But, getting the same system to do a lot of other physical-world manipulation stuff better than humans, too? Very hard and probably not possible for a very long time. As OpenAI and Microsoft try to resolve their differences, the companies can tap experts to weigh in on whether the startup has reached AGI or not, per the terms of their existing contract, according to The Information. I'm happy to be an expert advisor here. Sam and Satya, let me know if you want help! For now, I'll leave the final words to a real AI expert. Konstantin Mishchenko, an AI research scientist at Meta, recently tweeted this, while citing a blog by another respected expert in the field, Sergey Levine: "While LLMs learned to mimic intelligence from internet data, they never had to actually live and acquire that intelligence directly. They lack the core algorithm for learning from experience. They need a human to do that work for them," Mishchenko wrote, referring to AI models known as large language models. "This suggests, at least to me, that the gap between LLMs and genuine intelligence might be wider than we think. Despite all the talk about AGI either being already here or coming next year, I can't shake off the feeling it's not possible until we come up with something better than a language model mimicking our own idea of how an AI should look," he concluded.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI boss accuses Meta of trying to poach staff with $100m sign-on bonuses
The boss of OpenAI has claimed that Mark Zuckerberg's Meta has tried to poach his top artificial intelligence experts with 'crazy' signing bonuses of $100m (£74m), as the scramble for talent in the booming sector intensifies. Sam Altman spoke about the offers in a podcast on Tuesday. They have not been confirmed by Meta. OpenAI, the company that developed ChatGPT, said it had nothing to add beyond its chief executive's comments. 'They started making these giant offers to a lot of people on our team – $100m signing bonuses, more than that comp [compensation] per year,' Altman told the Uncapped podcast, which is presented by his brother, Jack. 'It is crazy. I'm really happy that, at least so far, none of our best people have decided to take them up on that.' He said: 'I think the strategy of a tonne of upfront, guaranteed comp, and that being the reason you tell someone to join … the degree to which they're focusing on that, and not the work and not the mission – I don't think that's going to set up a great culture.' Meta last week launched a $15bn drive towards computerised 'super-intelligence' – a type of AI that can perform better than humans at all tasks. The company bought a large stake in the $29bn startup Scale AI, set up by the programmer Alexandr Wang, 28, who joined Meta as part of the deal. Last week, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist, Deedy Das, tweeted: 'The AI talent wars are absolutely ridiculous'. Das, a principal at Menlo Ventures, said Meta had been losing AI candidates to rivals despite offering $2m-a-year salaries. Another report last month found that Anthropic, an AI company backed by Amazon and Google and set up by engineers who left Altman's company was 'siphoning top talent from two of its biggest rivals: OpenAI and DeepMind'. The scramble to recruit the best developers comes amid rapid advances in AI technology and a race to achieve human-level AI capacity – known as artificial general intelligence. The spending on hardware is greater still, with recent estimates from the Carlyle Group, reported by Bloomberg, that $1.8tn could be spent on computing power by 2030. That is more than the annual gross domestic product of Australia. Some tech firms are buying whole companies to lock in top talent, as seen in part with Meta's Scale AI deal and Google spending $2.7bn last year on which was founded by the leading AI researcher Noam Shazeer. He co-wrote the 2017 research paper Attention is all you Need, which is considered a seminal contribution to the current wave of large language model AI systems. While Meta was founded as a social media company and OpenAI as non-profit – becoming a for-profit business last year – the two are now rivals. Altman told his brother's podcast that he did not feel Meta would succeed in it's AI push, adding: 'I don't think they're a company that's great at innovation.' He said he had once heard Zuckerberg say that it had seemed rational for Google to try to develop a social media function in the early days of Facebook, but 'it was clear to people at Facebook that that was not going to work'. 'I feel a little bit similar here,' Altman added. Despite the huge investments in the sector, Altman suggested the result could be 'we build legitimate super intelligence, and it doesn't make the world much better [and] doesn't change things as much as it sounds like it should'. 'The fact that you can have this thing do this amazing stuff for you, and you kind of live your life the same way you did two years ago,' he said. 'The thing that I think will be the most impactful in that five to 10-year timeframe is AI will actually discover new science. This is a crazy claim to make, but I think it is true, and if it is correct, then over time I think that will dwarf everything else [AI has achieved].'
