logo
This dieting approach may be more effective than intermittent fasting, scientists say

This dieting approach may be more effective than intermittent fasting, scientists say

Yahoo5 days ago

Alternate-day fasting works better at boosting metabolism compared to both calorie restriction and intermittent fasting, a new study suggests.
Nearly 2.5 billion adults, or about 43 per cent of the global adult population, are overweight, with around 890 million living with obesity, according to the World Health Organization.
Doctors recommend weight loss for this segment of the population to reduce metabolic risk factors like high blood pressure, elevated cholesterol and increased blood sugar levels, all of which contribute to diabetes and heart disease.
Intermittent fasting, which involves cycling between periods of eating and fasting on a regular schedule, is sometimes recommended as an alternative to traditional calorie-restricted diets for weight loss.
This may include time-restricted eating, typically involving a 16-hour fasting period followed by an eight-hour eating window.
Another form of fasting is alternate-day fasting, which involves a 24-hour fast every other day.
But the health benefits of various forms of fasting compared to continuous caloric restriction and an unrestricted diet have remained largely unclear so far.
In a new study, researchers analysed the results of 99 randomised clinical trials involving 6,582 adult men and women to compare the effects of intermittent fasting diets with continuous calorie restriction or unrestricted diets on body weight and metabolic risk factors.
The study participants had an average body mass index of 31, and nearly 90 per cent had pre-existing health conditions.
Researchers found that alternate-day fasting was the only dietary strategy which provided a modest benefit in reducing body weight compared to continuous calorie restriction.
This form of fasting was also associated with lower levels of total and LDL, or 'bad' cholesterol compared to time-restricted eating.
However, researchers noted that even alternate-day fasting did not meet the clinically significant threshold of at least 2kg of weight loss for individuals with obesity.
They cautioned that 'longer-duration trials are needed to further substantiate these findings'.
'Additional high quality randomised clinical trials, with extended durations beyond 52 weeks, are needed to elucidate the long-term effects of these dietary strategies,' they said in the study, 'with greater emphasis between intermittent fasting and its impact on cardiometabolic health across diverse populations.'
For now, they said, alternate-day fasting could be added to the therapeutic toolkit for managing weight and metabolic health.
'Intermittent fasting does not aim to replace other dietary strategies, but to integrate and complement them within a comprehensive, patient-centered nutritional care model,' they noted.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'She is the only person in the world compatible with herself' — scientists discover new blood type but it's unique to just one person from Guadeloupe
'She is the only person in the world compatible with herself' — scientists discover new blood type but it's unique to just one person from Guadeloupe

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'She is the only person in the world compatible with herself' — scientists discover new blood type but it's unique to just one person from Guadeloupe

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Scientists have discovered a new blood group that has so far only been identified in one woman, from the French overseas region of Guadeloupe. The 68-year-old is the only known person in the world to have this blood group, which has been named "Gwada negative," after a local name for her home islands. The researchers behind the discovery announced their work in a presentation at the International Society of Blood Transfusion's Congress in Milan, which concluded June 4. The research team first met the woman in 2011, when she was living in Paris and undergoing routine tests before a surgery. But the tests couldn't reveal her blood type or any matches for it. Analysis at the time wasn't advanced enough to detect the cause, and the case lay cold for eight years. In 2019, researchers utilized high-throughput gene sequencing analysis, which enables faster and more in-depth analysis of DNA, to re-examine the woman's blood. Two years of detailed research followed, in which the team sequenced her entire genome. Human blood group systems are more complex than you might think. These classifications refer to proteins and sugars found on the surface of red blood cells, called antigens, which are recognized by our immune system. Austrian-American biologist Dr. Karl Landsteiner identified the first and most familiar blood group system — ABO — in 1901, and this won him a Nobel in 1930. Related: How many blood types are there? The classic ABO blood typing system describes whether people have one, both or neither of the antigens known as "A" and "B" on their blood cells. The second most well-known blood group system is rhesus classification, which considers whether your cells are "positive" or "negative" for an antigen called Rh factor. Together, the combinations of the ABO and Rh systems give us the eight main blood groups — but there are dozens of lesser known blood group systems, 45 of which were recognized by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) as of 2024. Now, Gwada negative has been recognized as number 48. The woman's unusual lab test results eventually led to the discovery of a mutation in a gene called PIGZ, which alters how proteins anchor to the surface of blood cells. The woman's unique mutations mean "she is the only person in the world compatible with herself," Thierry Peyrard, a biologist at French blood research body Établissement français du sang (EFS), told AFP. Blood group systems are essential for blood transfusions, as our bodies reject blood group antigens that they perceive as foreign. If we go back to the ABO system, for example, people with both A and B antigens can receive blood from anyone else, as their body recognizes both antigens as familiar. People with the O blood type have neither A or B antigens, meaning they can only receive blood from other type O donors. RELATED STORIES —What's the rarest blood type? —Lab-made universal blood could revolutionize transfusions. Scientists just got one step closer to making it. —Why do we have different blood types? While the ABO and Rh systems are still considered the most critical for transfusions, rarer systems can still influence who an individual can receive blood from. The research team's next aim is to discover whether there are other people with this unique new blood group. As blood types are genetic and thus often shared by populations with similar ancestries, the team intends to start the search among blood donors in Guadeloupe. "Discovering new blood types means offering patients with rare blood a better level of care," the EFS statement says.

Researchers warn of catastrophic consequences from rapidly intensifying threat: 'As a species, we have never confronted anything like this'
Researchers warn of catastrophic consequences from rapidly intensifying threat: 'As a species, we have never confronted anything like this'

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Researchers warn of catastrophic consequences from rapidly intensifying threat: 'As a species, we have never confronted anything like this'

Sustained higher-than-average temperatures and warming seas are projected to severely disrupt agriculture, CNN reports, and scientists are concerned about how to "ensure future food security" in a changing climate. Americans born today could "live in a world where the U.S. can only produce half as much of its key food crops," CNN's recent headline read. The ensuing reporting focused on a groundbreaking study recently published in Nature — one of the most widely cited scientific journals globally — and the outlet described its findings as "stark." Study authors examined the impacts of rising temperatures through a universally understood and relevant lens: the global food supply. Put plainly, the researchers' calculations were grim: Every 1°C (1.8°F) increase in average global temperatures will result in a worldwide reduction in food production equivalent to 120 fewer calories per person, per day. Study author Solomon Hsiang of the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability broke it down further when discussing their findings. "If the climate warms by 3 degrees, that's basically like everyone on the planet giving up breakfast," Hsiang warned. It's well-documented that climate-related matters are routinely and misleadingly cast in doubt, framed as a matter of belief rather than settled science. Not everybody lives in a region routinely walloped by extreme weather — such as wildfires or increased coastal flooding — and the issue can seem abstract, localized elsewhere, or more of a problem for the distant future. However, food is a great equalizer, something all humans require to survive — farmers have long been ringing the alarm about the impacts of unpredictable weather and temperatures on crop yields. Professor and food policy expert Tim Lang told CNN that adaptations to fortify the global food supply are halting and insufficient. "The data pile up. The politicians turn a blind eye … Land use is not altering fast or radically enough," he lamented, addressing the speed at which agriculture is adapting to changes in the climate. Do you worry about how much food you throw away? Definitely Sometimes Not really Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. "This is a major problem. It's incredibly expensive. As a species, we have never confronted anything like this." Experts reiterated that "adaptation" and "mitigation" were critical steps to safeguard crops in an increasingly unpredictable climate, one in which the United States could lose half its crop yields. Growing your own food is one approach to guard against food supply instability at a personal level, whereas donating to climate-related causes is a good way to make a broader impact. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

Imperfect climate models can still help us immensely, Yale says
Imperfect climate models can still help us immensely, Yale says

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Imperfect climate models can still help us immensely, Yale says

If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. The fight against climate change is ongoing, and while we're still a long way from finding an actually sustainable solution, researchers at Yale say that imperfect climate models may actually be far more helpful than many think. While the UN has warned time and again that we're losing control of climate change, a lot of the research into how the world is changing and temperatures are rising has remained a bit of a mystery itself. That's because no matter how hard we work on it, we always seem to come up with models that don't quite line up. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 In fact, some have even said that what's happening on Earth right now can't be explained by climate models. So, where does that leave us? Well, according to scientists at Yale, those imperfect climate models are actually giving scientists very important information to work with. That's because when you have highly idealized models, they don't bother to take into account all of the information, like every gust of wind, ever drop of rain, etc. Instead, they take a broader look at everything. This broader look lets scientists focus on the more abstract aspects of climate change, instead of having to worry about the minute details all the time. Of course, there's still something to be said for those more detailed models, but even an imperfect model that is too broad can provide useful information for scientists to build on. The downside here is that if we always have imperfect models, how much progress are we actually making overall? The answer, the Yale scientists say, is that models must be built for a purpose. Without a purpose, we aren't going to be able to hone in on the issues. The challenge, though, is making a model that is actually fit for purpose. Without that purpose, we're just consistently creating imperfect models that eventually will cease to teach us anything. You can read more about the scientist's arguments in a post shared to Yale Climate Connections. It's an eye-opening read for anyone trying to keep up with the latest in our fight against climate change. More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store