Key admission in social media ban update
The preliminary findings of the Age Assurance Technology Trial (AATT) were released on Friday just six months before the ban was set to come into force.
Project chief Tony Allen said his team found 'there isn't a one solution fits all' but rather a range of options that parties could use. The brains tasked with finding a way to enforce Labor's social media ban for under 16s say it's possible. NewsWire / Aaron Francis Credit: News Corp Australia
'There isn't like a silver bullet that will solve everything,' Mr Allen told Sky News.
'And different providers of social media services, for instance, will need to explore exactly what will work for them and their users, and that's really for them to assess their risk and to consider what they might want to implement.'
In terms of what it might look like in practice, he suggested 'successive validated' – a series of tests designed to firm up a user's age.
Mr Allen said it could start with 'something which is fairly simple, like holding your hand up or showing your face or talking'.
'And then that might not give you sufficient level of confidence, so then move on to maybe age inference techniques, or ultimately, they may need to move on to age verification where you need some sort of record or document,' he said.
The trial uncovered some challenges.
It found parental control and consent systems could be effective when first rolled out but could not 'cope with the evolving capacity of children' or properly protect a 'child's digital footprint'. Communications Minister Anika Wells is likely to receive the full trial findings later this month. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
It also warned that 'service providers were over-anticipating the eventual needs of regulators' and over-collecting user data.
This consequently 'increased risk of privacy breaches', according to the findings.
But Mr Allen said the 'clear conclusion' was that enforcing age limits could be enforced safely.
He held back on putting a figure on the efficacy, noting the measurers were not 'foolproof'.
'There are ways that they (children) can get around them,' Mr Allen said.
'But then we've had tobacco laws for 100 years to stop children accessing tobacco, and it doesn't stop them from accessing some children from tobacco.
'So you have to try and work on how you reduce the risk and reduce the instance.
'You'll never completely eliminate it.'
NewsWire understands the full findings will be handed to the government later this month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
24 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Fast-track laws for AFL stadium appear punted
Plans to fast-track the approval process for a new $945 million stadium in Tasmania appear dead in the water because of delays caused by the state's snap election. Both the incumbent Liberals and Labor opposition are courting crossbench support after falling short of the 18-seats required for majority at Saturday's election. Four independents who hold the balance of power have said they won't be rushed on negotiations, with the final make-up of parliament likely not settled until August 2. The poll, which was called in June when Premier Jeremy Rockliff lost a vote of no-confidence, delayed legislation designed to fast-track the stadium's approval. Building a 23,000-seat roofed venue at Macquarie Point in Hobart is a condition of the Devils' AFL side entering the league in 2028. Tasmania faces financial penalties if the project doesn't meet construction timelines and if the stadium isn't ready for the club's second season in 2029. The incumbent Liberal government wanted to bring forward legislation to fast-track its approval, overriding the existing project of state significance (POSS) assessment process. The POSS process, which has held public hearings in recent weeks, has continued and will provide a final report on September 17. Mr Rockliff has indicated the fast-track legislation won't be pursued, given parliament may not return until September. "We put the enabling legislation forward because of particular timeframes," he told ABC radio on Thursday. "But expectations are the timelines are now roughly the same in terms of enabling legislation and the POSS process." Labor leader Dean Winter, whose party supports the stadium and said it would vote for the fast-track legislation, said he now wanted to see the project go through the POSS process. "It's clear there is no advantage, in terms of timeline, of the direct legislation," he told reporters. "The POSS has more certainty and is more likely to be supported in the Legislative Council." The stadium must pass a parliamentary vote under the POSS process to be approved. The stadium is supported by the Liberals - who have so far won 14 of 35 lower-house seats after the election - as well as Labor, who have claimed 10. But it faces a trickier passage through the Legislative Council where the major parties don't hold the numbers. Counting to determine the final two undecided election seats continues, with preference distribution expected to begin on Tuesday. Mr Rockliff and Mr Winter, who must obtain the support of the Greens to govern, are negotiating with a crossbench which is mostly opposed to the stadium. The Greens, who hold five seats, are against, as are independents Kristie Johnston, Craig Garland and Peter George. Independent David O'Byrne backs the stadium. Mr Rockliff and Mr Winter have said the stadium is not up for negotiation. Mr Winter reiterated Mr Rockliff would get "first crack" at governing, but Labor didn't want Tasmania forced back to another election if the Liberals couldn't. "In the event he can't secure 18 votes on the floor of the house there is going to need to be people working across the parliament together," Mr Winter said. Mr O'Byrne said the raw numbers on the floor would dictate how easy it would be for either major party to form government. He also said he was open to a Liberal or Labor government. Ms Johnston, Mr Garland and Mr George said formal negotiations won't begin until after the final election results have been decided, saying neither major party has a mandate to govern. "For that reason, like other cross bench members, we will be speaking to both major parties about confidence and supply," the trio said in a statement.
Perth Now
24 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Push to delay penalty rates ban
The Coalition has indicated it will delay Labor's proposed laws to ban the reduction of penalty and overtime rates in modern awards, with Liberal MP Tim Wilson stating more information was needed on the impact on small businesses. A new Bill, which was introduced by Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth on Thursday, will also override the Fair Work Commission (FWC) from substituting the entitlements if it reduces the overall take-home pay of even a single worker on a modern award. However, Mr Wilson, the Coalition's small business and industrial relations spokesman, accused Labor of trying to 'ram' the legislation through parliament and signalled the opposition was likely to push the Bill to an inquiry. While he confirmed he'd reviewed the legislation, Mr Wilson said Ms Rishworth was still unable to answer how the Bill would affect small businesses. 'There is a simple reality. There are no penalty rates on jobs that do not exist,' he said. Tim Wilson said small businesses needed to be consulted on the proposed Bill. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'The Coalition supports penalty rates. We support higher wages … but that isn't what we're getting from this government with their approach, where their focus is how they do their pay-offs as part of their legislative victory lap, rather than focusing on how to improve the economic conditions that list the standards of living and the wages of Australians.' While Mr Wilson said the Coalition would 'obviously talk to parties from across the parliament', the opposition had yet to take a firm stance on the Bill. Ms Rishworth urged the Coalition and Greens to support the legislation and said it was a 'key commitment' Labor took to the election. 'My message to the opposition is that they need to listen to the decision of the Australian people,' she said. 'The Australian people clearly back this government to get on with the job of getting wages moving and ensuring that Australians can earn more and keep more of what they earn.' In response, Mr Wilson said it was proper and 'standard' process to get an 'assessment of the impact of legislation'. 'This is standard, so they can make the claims about what their mandate may be, it doesn't mean it gives them a right to override the standard processes of legislative passage,' he said. As it stands, Labor will need either support of the Greens or the Coalition if it is to pass the legislation in the Senate. Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth introduced the Bill on Thursday. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia While the Greens have confirmed the party has reviewed the legislation, it has yet to reach a position. Greens workplace relations spokeswoman Barbara Pocock said the party was having a 'close look' at the Bill and would make a decision 'in the coming days'. She also pushed for stronger workers' rights like a four-day work week without a reduction in pay. Responding to whether the Greens would support pushing the legislation to an inquiry, she said the party would consider all options. 'This is a no-cost bill for small business, as I read it, but as I said earlier, I've just received the Bill,' she said. 'We're having a close look, and we will want to make sure that there are no unintended consequences and that we get the best possible Bill that we can for some of Australia's most vulnerable workers.' The election promise was prompted by a FWC review prompted by the Australian Retailers Association to allow senior management to take a 25 per cent wage increase above minimum award entitlements in exchange for overtime, weekend and public holiday penalty rates and rest breaks. The submission has been backed by the supermarket giants, plus beauty giant Mecca, as well as Kmart, Costco and 7-Eleven.
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Labor secrecy 'worse than under five-ministry Morrison'
The Albanese government has been branded more secretive than the administration led by Scott Morrison, who infamously hid his five ministries. Labor came to power on the back of a promise to be a more accountable and transparent government. But fewer Freedom of Information applications, through which people can request access to documents held by ministers and departments, are being fully granted and refusals have doubled. "The Albanese government is more secretive than a government where the prime minister had five secret ministries," independent senator David Pocock told reporters in Canberra on Thursday. Only a quarter of requests were fully granted in 2023/24, down significantly from 59 per cent in 2011/12, and refusals jumped from 12 to 23 per cent during the same time frame, research by the Centre for Public Transparency showed. The average processing time for Office of the Australian Information Commissioner reviews nearly tripled from six months in 2016/17 to 15.5 months in 2023/24. "We don't have a pro-disclosure culture within the federal parliament, within the federal government, and that overall is what we really need to see happen," the centre's research director Catherine Williams said. Independent MP Helen Haines branded more secrecy "deeply suspicious", while her crossbench colleague Monique Ryan questioned why a request for one brief to government on health and disability was redacted. "This is what the government wants us to know about its reform agenda for a really important issue like health, we are struggling to understand what the government is planning," Dr Ryan said, holding up blank pages of redactions. "We're looking for transparency, we're looking for integrity in government, it shouldn't be too much to ask." The Albanese government complied with less than a third of orders to produce documents, compared to nearly half under the Morrison government, the centre found. That represents the second-worst rate of compliance with Senate orders since 1993, and contrasts starkly with a 92 per cent compliance rate in the 1993-96 period. Greens senator Steph Hodgins-May said the production orders weren't a political stunt but a key tool for accountability to understand why decisions were made, who impacted decisions and how public money was spent. The centre recommended improving transparency by establishing independent oversight of Senate rejections to contest when governments make a public interest immunity claim. It also called for an emphasis on transparency from departments and reduced processing times. A spokesperson for Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said more than $100 million has been put towards resourcing the information commissioner. There had been a more than 200 per cent increase in Freedom of Information complaints finalised by the commissioner and a 15 per cent increase in review finalisations in 2023/24, the spokesperson said. They also pointed to a change in how Freedom of Information requests were reported, with applications that contained irrelevant material that was redacted to be counted as "granted in part" rather than in full. But Dr Williams said this excuse didn't justify the higher refusal rate. The Albanese government has been branded more secretive than the administration led by Scott Morrison, who infamously hid his five ministries. Labor came to power on the back of a promise to be a more accountable and transparent government. But fewer Freedom of Information applications, through which people can request access to documents held by ministers and departments, are being fully granted and refusals have doubled. "The Albanese government is more secretive than a government where the prime minister had five secret ministries," independent senator David Pocock told reporters in Canberra on Thursday. Only a quarter of requests were fully granted in 2023/24, down significantly from 59 per cent in 2011/12, and refusals jumped from 12 to 23 per cent during the same time frame, research by the Centre for Public Transparency showed. The average processing time for Office of the Australian Information Commissioner reviews nearly tripled from six months in 2016/17 to 15.5 months in 2023/24. "We don't have a pro-disclosure culture within the federal parliament, within the federal government, and that overall is what we really need to see happen," the centre's research director Catherine Williams said. Independent MP Helen Haines branded more secrecy "deeply suspicious", while her crossbench colleague Monique Ryan questioned why a request for one brief to government on health and disability was redacted. "This is what the government wants us to know about its reform agenda for a really important issue like health, we are struggling to understand what the government is planning," Dr Ryan said, holding up blank pages of redactions. "We're looking for transparency, we're looking for integrity in government, it shouldn't be too much to ask." The Albanese government complied with less than a third of orders to produce documents, compared to nearly half under the Morrison government, the centre found. That represents the second-worst rate of compliance with Senate orders since 1993, and contrasts starkly with a 92 per cent compliance rate in the 1993-96 period. Greens senator Steph Hodgins-May said the production orders weren't a political stunt but a key tool for accountability to understand why decisions were made, who impacted decisions and how public money was spent. The centre recommended improving transparency by establishing independent oversight of Senate rejections to contest when governments make a public interest immunity claim. It also called for an emphasis on transparency from departments and reduced processing times. A spokesperson for Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said more than $100 million has been put towards resourcing the information commissioner. There had been a more than 200 per cent increase in Freedom of Information complaints finalised by the commissioner and a 15 per cent increase in review finalisations in 2023/24, the spokesperson said. They also pointed to a change in how Freedom of Information requests were reported, with applications that contained irrelevant material that was redacted to be counted as "granted in part" rather than in full. But Dr Williams said this excuse didn't justify the higher refusal rate. The Albanese government has been branded more secretive than the administration led by Scott Morrison, who infamously hid his five ministries. Labor came to power on the back of a promise to be a more accountable and transparent government. But fewer Freedom of Information applications, through which people can request access to documents held by ministers and departments, are being fully granted and refusals have doubled. "The Albanese government is more secretive than a government where the prime minister had five secret ministries," independent senator David Pocock told reporters in Canberra on Thursday. Only a quarter of requests were fully granted in 2023/24, down significantly from 59 per cent in 2011/12, and refusals jumped from 12 to 23 per cent during the same time frame, research by the Centre for Public Transparency showed. The average processing time for Office of the Australian Information Commissioner reviews nearly tripled from six months in 2016/17 to 15.5 months in 2023/24. "We don't have a pro-disclosure culture within the federal parliament, within the federal government, and that overall is what we really need to see happen," the centre's research director Catherine Williams said. Independent MP Helen Haines branded more secrecy "deeply suspicious", while her crossbench colleague Monique Ryan questioned why a request for one brief to government on health and disability was redacted. "This is what the government wants us to know about its reform agenda for a really important issue like health, we are struggling to understand what the government is planning," Dr Ryan said, holding up blank pages of redactions. "We're looking for transparency, we're looking for integrity in government, it shouldn't be too much to ask." The Albanese government complied with less than a third of orders to produce documents, compared to nearly half under the Morrison government, the centre found. That represents the second-worst rate of compliance with Senate orders since 1993, and contrasts starkly with a 92 per cent compliance rate in the 1993-96 period. Greens senator Steph Hodgins-May said the production orders weren't a political stunt but a key tool for accountability to understand why decisions were made, who impacted decisions and how public money was spent. The centre recommended improving transparency by establishing independent oversight of Senate rejections to contest when governments make a public interest immunity claim. It also called for an emphasis on transparency from departments and reduced processing times. A spokesperson for Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said more than $100 million has been put towards resourcing the information commissioner. There had been a more than 200 per cent increase in Freedom of Information complaints finalised by the commissioner and a 15 per cent increase in review finalisations in 2023/24, the spokesperson said. They also pointed to a change in how Freedom of Information requests were reported, with applications that contained irrelevant material that was redacted to be counted as "granted in part" rather than in full. But Dr Williams said this excuse didn't justify the higher refusal rate. The Albanese government has been branded more secretive than the administration led by Scott Morrison, who infamously hid his five ministries. Labor came to power on the back of a promise to be a more accountable and transparent government. But fewer Freedom of Information applications, through which people can request access to documents held by ministers and departments, are being fully granted and refusals have doubled. "The Albanese government is more secretive than a government where the prime minister had five secret ministries," independent senator David Pocock told reporters in Canberra on Thursday. Only a quarter of requests were fully granted in 2023/24, down significantly from 59 per cent in 2011/12, and refusals jumped from 12 to 23 per cent during the same time frame, research by the Centre for Public Transparency showed. The average processing time for Office of the Australian Information Commissioner reviews nearly tripled from six months in 2016/17 to 15.5 months in 2023/24. "We don't have a pro-disclosure culture within the federal parliament, within the federal government, and that overall is what we really need to see happen," the centre's research director Catherine Williams said. Independent MP Helen Haines branded more secrecy "deeply suspicious", while her crossbench colleague Monique Ryan questioned why a request for one brief to government on health and disability was redacted. "This is what the government wants us to know about its reform agenda for a really important issue like health, we are struggling to understand what the government is planning," Dr Ryan said, holding up blank pages of redactions. "We're looking for transparency, we're looking for integrity in government, it shouldn't be too much to ask." The Albanese government complied with less than a third of orders to produce documents, compared to nearly half under the Morrison government, the centre found. That represents the second-worst rate of compliance with Senate orders since 1993, and contrasts starkly with a 92 per cent compliance rate in the 1993-96 period. Greens senator Steph Hodgins-May said the production orders weren't a political stunt but a key tool for accountability to understand why decisions were made, who impacted decisions and how public money was spent. The centre recommended improving transparency by establishing independent oversight of Senate rejections to contest when governments make a public interest immunity claim. It also called for an emphasis on transparency from departments and reduced processing times. A spokesperson for Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said more than $100 million has been put towards resourcing the information commissioner. There had been a more than 200 per cent increase in Freedom of Information complaints finalised by the commissioner and a 15 per cent increase in review finalisations in 2023/24, the spokesperson said. They also pointed to a change in how Freedom of Information requests were reported, with applications that contained irrelevant material that was redacted to be counted as "granted in part" rather than in full. But Dr Williams said this excuse didn't justify the higher refusal rate.
