NSW suburbs that outperform top super fund
NSW homeowners in over 200 suburbs could be building retirement wealth faster than their super fund, new research reveals.
Comparison site Finder has revealed how Australia's super funds compared to that of property price growth over the past ten years.
The research found that a shocking 23 per cent – equivalent to around 4.6 million people – said they didn't have enough money in their super fund or other investments to get by in retirement.
Australian Retirement Trust's super savings high growth fund had the highest returns, with a 8.79 per cent annual 10 year return, yet there were over 200 suburbs in NSW that out performed that.
Houses in Millfield, Lockhart, Brunswick Heads and Clareville were among the top performers, growing by an average of 11-16 per cent annually over the past 10 years.
MORE: 'They're off': $962m king's look into real estate woes
The average 10-year performance across all super funds is 5.7 per cent a year, according to Finder, while Sydney's 10 year annual compound property growth rate was 6.4 per cent.
Finders money expert Richard Whitten said the more attention you give your superannuation now, the better off you'll be.
'It's truly a shame to reach retirement age only to find you have 'too little too late.' You can avoid this by taking proactive steps to engage with your super as soon as possible,' he said.
He added that to have a comfortable retirement, a single person might need around $595,000 in their super by 67.
'Many Australians are still well below the amounts suggested for a comfortable retirement, making proactive engagement even more critical.'
Ben Kingsley, managing director of Empower Wealth Advisory and co-author of 'How to retire on $3,000 a week,' said your return on investment could be higher with property, but warned there were always risks involved.
'If you're going to invest in property you don't want to be speculating, you want to be investing for the decades, not the short period of time,' he said.
MORE: Singles face impossible property reality
'One of the advantages of investing in property is it isn't locked away until you're in your 60s. It gives you the ability to leverage from those returns, to accelerate some growth in further returns – use the proceeds or equity to add to your initial property portfolio, which is something to consider.'
'(Super) is a sort of set and forget for most Australians, with property when you do have ownership you have control, you can tinker with the property itself you can add value to the property,' he added.
He noted it was important to diversify when it came to setting up for retirement.
'You can't save your way to retirement, you need to put your money to work, whether that's additional contributions to super, or investing in shares or property, you're better off starting to think about it in your 30s,' he said.
Canstar's director of data insights, Sally Tindall, said Aussie's shouldn't be choosing between a healthy super amount and a property, but should aim to invest in both.
'It comes down to personal preference, but open your mind to achieving both. Don't put all your eggs in one basket,' she said.
'It's not a simple comparison and there's a multitude of factors, there's tax implications on both sides, and whether you're purchasing as an investor or an owner-occupier,' she said.
Recent Labor government tax changes, which apply an additional 15 per cent tax on earnings for super balances exceeding $3 million, would affect an estimated 80,000 Australians (0.5% of super account holders).
MORE: Rare backyard find that can kill you
'It will be interesting to see how that plays out over time, as the government has said that $3m won't be indexed, which could then start to impact many more people in many years to come as the number of people with that sum starts to increase, so that's another factor in the equation.'
With the super guarantee increasing to 12 per cent on July 1, Ms Tindall said this may encourage some people to take the property route, knowing their employee is contributing more to their super.
'It's also not just the super vs. mortgage, there are plenty of other things like shares people could be putting their money into. It's important to understand what the mix is and understand the pros and cons and the sacrifice you might have to make, as well as the benefits you can get from each one.'
TOP 20 NSW GROWTH SUBURBS OVER 10 YEAR AVERAGE
SUBURB REGION PROPERTY TYPE Annual Change in Median Price 10 years
Thurgoona Murray Unit 19.2
Millfield Hunter Valley exc Newcastle House 16.1
Lockhart Riverina House 14.2
Casuarina Richmond – Tweed Unit 13.7
Jindabyne Capital Region Unit 13.1
South Kempsey Mid North Coast House 13
Brunswick Heads Richmond – Tweed House 12.6
Murwillumbah Richmond – Tweed Unit 12.1
Denhams Beach Capital Region House 12
Bombala Capital Region House 11.9
Fishermans Paradise Southern Highlands and Shoalhaven House 11.8
Harden Capital Region House 11.7
Clareville Sydney – Northern Beaches House 11.7
Jindabyne Capital Region House 11.6
Bogangar Richmond – Tweed House 11.6
Horsley Park Sydney – South West House 11.6
Berridale Capital Region House 11.5
Coal Point Newcastle and Lake Macquarie House 11.5
Kandos Central West House 11.5
Gundagai Riverina House 11.4
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Australian
43 minutes ago
- The Australian
South Australia puts pause on plastic fruit sticker ban after concerns over cost concerns
South Australia has delayed the rollout of a nation-leading ban on plastic fruit stickers over fears the cost will be too much for farmers. The state was set to become the first jurisdiction in the country to make the environmentally-friendly move in September, with NSW looking at a similar ban. But the South Australian State Government has paused their rollout and now says both states will work together to save money, following concerns fruit and vegetable producers were doing it tough and the cost of new stickers would make it more difficult for them to continue to provide to SA markets. Any fruit being imported into South Australia will need an eco-friendly sticker when the ban eventually comes into force. 'NSW already had a commitment that they would get rid of these plastic fruit stickers and move to compostable by 2030 — our discussion will be how much sooner than that can we go,' SA Environment Minister Susan Close said. 'We will be able to get rid of these (stickers) which, admittedly, everybody hates … but I didn't want to cause disruption in supermarkets for people wanting to buy products and I didn't want to cause too much harm to our local producers either.' Laser etching is one way to display varietal and barcode information in an environmentally friendly way. Picture: NewsWire The alternative to plastic fruit stickers are either compostable labels, uncoated paper stickers or laser etchings. SA taking the lead to cut out plastic stickers meant farmers would be squeezed; compostable stickers are about twice the price, and any fruit sold in the state would need to adhere, regardless if it was grown interstate. But the eco-friendly September 1 deadline will still bring anti-plastic changes. From September in SA, plastic fish-shaped soy sauce bottles are banned, as are plastic cutlery and straws which come attached to food and drinks, such as straws on juice boxes. South Australia was the first state to ban light weight plastic shopping bags, which came into effect in 2009; Victoria and then NSW were the last to follow suit, more than a decade later. Read related topics: Adelaide Blair Jackson Reporter Blair's journalism career has taken him from Perth, to New Zealand, Queensland and now Melbourne. Blair Jackson
ABC News
43 minutes ago
- ABC News
Driveway service still exists at some independent petrol stations but is 'very unusual'
Historically, petrol stations across Australia provided personalised service, with attendants to look after you, wash your windscreen and check your car's water, oil and air. But by the 1990s bespoke customer service was on the decline. So, what happened? The turning point largely came about when fuel pumps went from mechanical to computerised, according to historian and author Colin Dennett. "The cause for the change slowly began as a combination of new pumps, fewer outlets and the era of high-volume company-operated sites developed," Mr Dennett said. Retail service stations in Australia have reduced from 22,000 sites in 1966 to approximately 8,000, generating roughly $38 billion annually. "The retail scene is basically dominated by multinationals but there's a few independents that break away from that, which is truly unique, and keeps the market competitive," Mr Dennett said. The NRMA's report Making Cents of Fuel says the presence of independent operators can influence market competition, being at least 7 to 10 cents cheaper per litre in some regional towns, with lower overhead costs. However, refiners and wholesalers still hold over 80 per cent of the market and Ampol is the biggest wholesaler. Today, driveway service it not offered by major petrol stations across Australia; however, it is possible to find small, independent operators who still provide it. On a 12-kilometre stretch between Shellharbour and Warrawong on the New South Wales south coast there are 12 petrol stations. Jimmy Pavlevski's independent station in Windang is one of them. When he purchased the business in 1998, the adjacent caravan park had a stream of people with vans and boats needing fuel. Mr Pavelvski said back then, people worked Monday to Friday and Sunday was family day. "They'd fill up, get some snacks and go for a family drive; that doesn't happen anymore," he said. "Sunday used to be the busiest day, now it's the slowest. "All people do now is sit on their phones." So, for the past few years his station has been running on the smell of an oily rag and even personalised service is dwindling due to lack of interest. And Mr Pavleski can no longer afford staff. "I can't provide that service full-time, only when customers require help," he said. As well as competing with other fuel stations, Mr Pavlevski is juggling the loss of tobacco sales, increasing fuel costs, EVs, large fridges to power and monthly card fees; he says it's a common story for independent service stations. "I'm never going to be competing with major service stations, I'm quite happy with what I have, what I've built up and the community I provide for," Mr Pavlevski said. In his book An Illustrated History of Ampol (2022), Colin Dennett weaves together the history of the company and other fuel suppliers across Australia from the 1930s. "Generally they didn't buy expensive sites and located wherever they could. "Driveway service was a way of competing because these stations were tucked away often in both back and side streets. "Today, multinationals dominate the highways and freeways and the suburban stations, which were once everywhere, have essentially disappeared. "So I would think there were very few independents left offering driveway service." At a century-old independent service station in Thirroul, NSW, window washing, below-the-bonnet work and air checks were once freely applied by attendants. For now, fuel top-ups are provided and other services exist on request. Owner-operator Graeme Rutledge works six days a week and started serving fuel at 21 when his father bought the business in 1946. To make ends meet, Mr Rutledge offers motor mechanic repairs for vintage cars. "Generally, we work on late-model cars early in the day and the others later in the day," he said. Driveway attendant Avery Vail says they enjoy serving customers and being the friendly face at the front of the petrol station. "We do driveway service, it's very pleasant to go out, serve customers and have a little chat," they said. Mr Dennett said providing driveway service was very unusual and should be encouraged. "Driveway service costs to have an attendant checking tyres et cetera, but I think it's pretty attractive, particularly for older motorists," he said.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Spotify's CEO invests $1 billion into an AI military start-up — and musicians are fuming
Spotify's billionaire CEO Daniel Ek is under heavy fire from artists and industry advocates after announcing a €600 million (A$1.07 bn AUD) investment into Helsing, a military tech start-up developing AI tech for war. Helsing, now valued at around €12 billion (A$19.5bn), builds AI-driven drones, submarines and aircraft and claims to 'develop and deploy these technologies' to 'protect fragile democracies'. Ek's investment, made via his firm Prima Materia, saw him aggressively double down on an earlier €100 million (A$162 million) pledge in 2021. He now chairs the company. But while Ek frames the move as a response to modern geopolitical challenges, many in the music world see it as a betrayal. For an industry largely built around the idea of community and counterculture, the optics are damning. 'This is one of the many reasons I'm not releasing music on Spotify anymore,' said Charlie Waldren, the Sydney artist behind Poolroom. 'People talk about 'no war' while paying $13.99 a month to a company whose boss is doing this, so they can listen to Royel Otis. 'I don't want to fund war with my subscription.' While one subscriber ditching the platform is inconsequential to the Spotify profit machine, Waldren hopes more of his peers get hip to the realities of the world's biggest music streamer. He has returned to releasing on Bandcamp, a website set up specifically with the artist in mind, where users can purchase music and merchandise directly from the uploader. German electronic music producer Skee Mask also made headlines when he scrapped his entire discography from the platform, following Ek's initial investment into Helsing. 'It's done, all my s**t is gone from Spotify,' he wrote. 'My music will be available there again as soon as this company starts (somehow) becoming honest and respectful towards music makers. But the United Musicians and Allied Workers (UMAW) organisation, a group advocating for artist rights, went even harder, claiming on X it looked like 'warmongering' while artists are paid 'poverty wages'. 'To build a fair and just music industry, we also must dismantle imperialism in all its forms.' 'We stand against genocide and against the war machine, and encourage artists to build solidarity across the world.' 'Evil Music CEO': Video Popular music reviewer Anthony Fantano, known online as 'The Needle Drop', joined the chorus with a video published this week titled: ' Evil Music CEO.' 'If you are at all familiar with the history of capitalism, you understand that the entertainment industry being mixed in, in some form or fashion, with some of the worst sectors of our economy. It's nothing new. But it's somehow worsening, thanks to Daniel Ek, CEO over at Spotify,' Fantano told his 2 million subscribers. 'Was music ever really a passion or a driver for him in any way whatsoever?' he asks in the video, while claiming he would now be involved in 'tech designed to kill people'. 'This dude runs his company in a way where he's paying artists poverty wages.' Fantano said that anybody who truly cared about music as a cultural necessity would use at least some of the fortune they made from countless artists to inject some much-needed stimulus into areas that needed it most. 'Now, if that were me, and I had that much money in my pocket — sure, this doesn't make me Jesus or anything — but you know, I would at least put some of that cash back into the music economy to maybe support the artists that are making my livelihood possible, consistently,' he said. Composer Pete Carroll echoed those sentiments on X, urging artists to boycott the platform. 'Take your human creative works off Spotify people. You're supporting a (MAN) now involved with military AI,' he said. Ek has been contacted for comment via Spotify. Streaming is 'poverty' for artists It's all part of a broader pushback against major power brokers in the music industry. Spotify has a chequered history and dubious reputation among grassroots musicians around the globe. The platform, which launched in 2008, has long faced criticism for what many say are razor-thin artist royalties. Spotify's convenience has won over millions of users around the globe. Because of its gargantuan user count, the appeal for artists is 'exposure'. But even if you listened to your favourite band on repeat all day, you'd barely be generating a dollar. In 2024, Spotify's average payout per stream ranged between $0.003 and $0.005 USD, which converts to approximately $0.0045 to $0.0075 AUD per stream. That rate can vary based on factors such as listener location, subscription type (free or premium), and the artist's distribution agreement. For a band of five to make the average wage in Australia purely off streaming payouts, they would need approximately 88.7 million hits annually, or about 7.4 million streams per month. That's roughly the entire population of NSW playing your song at least once a month. And that's all before tax, of course. Because then comes the ATO and the industry's obligatory deductions. Distributors, record labels and all manner of 'necessary middlemen' often take a percentage of an artist's revenue, which can significantly reduce the amount that reaches each musician. For a pop star who does not write their own songs and builds wealth from exterior sponsorships, this is not a big deal. But for small acts that self-produce, the divvying up of meagre payouts is seen as criminal. For example, an independent garage band must pay approximately $20 to a 'distributor' before uploading their song to Spotify. It would then take that song around 10,000 streams a year to 'pay' for itself. Relying solely on Spotify streaming revenue to earn a crust has become a fruitless strategy for start-up projects, which has inevitably led some bands to flip the table. Diversifying income streams through live performances, merchandise sales, and other platforms can provide more financial stability. But a quick glance at Australia's collapsing festival circuit will tell you just how optimistic that sounds for working bands attempting to break through.
