Multi-millionaire brands four-day work week the ‘stupidest idea I've ever heard'
Kevin O'Leary, known for his role as one of the investors on the program Shark Tank, didn't hold back when sharing his thoughts during a recent appearance on Fox News.
'There is a big push now for a four day work week, do you think we will become like the French?' one of the presenters asked.
The four-day work week is becoming increasingly popular in France, with the country launching it's first official pilot of the program in 2024.
In 2000, the country also legally mandated a 35-hour work week, with any hours worked beyond this considered overtime.
In 2023, the France's Labor Ministry announced that around 10,000 employees were already working under a four-day model.
France isn't the only country where the four-day movement is growing, with pilots taking place all over the world in recent years, including Australia.
However, Mr O'Leary is not convinced by the working model's increased popularity.
'That's the stupidest idea I have ever heard,' he said.
'I think we should let the French go to a two-day work week and then kick their arse internationally.'
The outspoken businessman claimed that in our post-pandemic world and new digital economy, there is 'no such thing as a work week' anymore.
But this isn't to say Mr O'Leary thinks a traditional five-day work week is the answer either, with the multi-millionaire taking a more outcome focused approach.
'Look at my staff, 40 per cent of them work remotely all around the world,' he said.
For example, if a project is due by June 15, then he doesn't care how many days a week his staff work, so long as the work is done on time.
The businessman's brutal assessment sparked a heated debate, with many defending the four-day work model.
One person claimed the 'best job' they ever had operated on a four-day work week, claiming their quality of life went up and they had time to study and upskill.
'I have a four-day work week. I can't express the difference in how much better my work week is given one extra day to decompress,' another said.
One added: 'I have been running my company on a four-day work week for a few years now. I can't imagine going back to a five-day week.'
However, there were others who agreed with Mr O'Leary's point of view.
'I couldn't agree more with you! I think that is so stupid!' one said.
'The people who want a four-day work week should start their own company,' another claimed.
Another agreed, saying the focus should be on getting the work done by specific deadlines, with less focus on how many days a week it may take to complete.
One of the common ways that companies implement a four-day week is by using the 100:80:100 model, in which staff keep 100 per cent of their pay but have their work hours reduced to 80 per cent.
However, they must maintain 100 per cent of their productivity in order for the change to work.
Other options include allowing staff to work a shorter week but for less pay, or offering standard 40 hour weeks condensed over four days.
This isn't the first time Mr O'Leary has shared his opinion on divisive workplace topics.
In August last year he raged at the Australian government following the introduction of the Right To Disconnect law.
The law gives employees the right to refuse contact outside of their working hours. Staff are not required to monitor, read, or respond to contact from an employer or third party – within reason.
The change left Mr O'Leary baffled.
'What happens if you have an event in the office and it is closed? Or you have an emergency room somewhere and you have to get of hold of them at 2am in the morning because it affects the job they are on,' he told Fox News at the time.
'This kind of stuff just makes me crazy. It is so dumb. Who dreams this crap up? Why would anyone propose such a stupid idea?'
He added that he would 'fire' an employee if they ignored his calls and didn't get back to him.
Doubling down in a lengthy post to X, Mr O'Leary wrote: 'If you can't be reached when the job depends on it, you're out.'
'Who dreams up these ridiculous ideas? If someone tells me they're in 'silent mode,' they're fired,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
2 hours ago
- News.com.au
Yes, condemn the anti-IDF rappers. But then you don't get to ignore it when others do the same thing
Before we deal with more complicated matters let's acknowledge, without caveat, the numbskullery of a British rap duo called 'Bob Vylan'. First of all, on a note that carries no substance but bugs me nonetheless: Bob Vylan? Really? Is that ... is that allowed? We're just stealing the names of other musicians, now, and changing one letter? By that logic I could go around calling myself Chakira, and indulging in a little bum wiggle here and there, and committing tax fraud, and label it art. (That's a touch too harsh on Shakira. She did give us the second-catchiest World Cup anthem of my lifetime, and the raciest Super Bowl half time show since Janet Jackson, both of which warrant no small dividend of respect. Pay your taxes though, babe.) As for the real Vylans of the piece here. While performing at the Glastonbury music festival in Britain, the pair led chants of 'death, death to the IDF', referring to Israel's military, which were broadcast live by the BBC, and thus beamed around the world. As a general rule, surely we can agree that any sentence starting with 'death, death to' is heading in a very poor direction. 'Restraint, restraint from the IDF' may lack punch, but it also lacks any conceivable justification for, or incitement to, violence. Which is to say much of the indignation this week has been warranted. British police opened an investigation into the group, which is roughly in line with their treatment of other extreme rhetoric. Prime Minister Keir Starmer condemned them. Their agent ditched them. Shows across Europe were cancelled. The US government revoked their visas, stressing that 'foreigners who glorify violence and hatred are not welcome visitors'. (No word on whether hatred glorified by American citizens - say, members of Congress, or senior administration officials - deserves similar condemnation, but that's a whole other kettle of scalding hot water, and we shan't touch it today.) I'm not here to argue any of the backlash described above was wrong. It all ties into a broader question about how liberal societies should calibrate their restrictions on free speech, and across 34 years of life I have never yet encountered a perfect answer. You're fumbling around for the least objectionable border between irreconcilable rights. Not easy. You can sense the looming 'but'. I am here to wonder why these loathsome words, from a pair of formerly quasi-famous rappers - (I'm not quite deficient enough in self-awareness to call them nobodies) - are being treated as more outrageous, and worthier of action, than the daily, continuing tide of actual violence, and actual death, in Gaza. You don't go to any music festival in search of sophisticated views on foreign policy. There's a rawer form of humanity on display. So why is it that we seem, collectively, to care so much more, to be so more readily angry, about a chant at Glastonbury than the opinions, and decisions, of those privileged individuals who actually hold the power to shape what will happen in Gaza and Israel? The future tense there is deliberate. We all know what happened, past tense, on October 7 of 2023. We know of the innocent lives stolen, and the indelible trauma those horrors have inflicted on thousands of Israelis. We know civilians were dragged into the tunnels as hostages, where some remain all these months later. We know about the litany of other atrocities committed by Hamas, not just on that day, but for many years before it. We know it's a terrorist group whose existence hinges on an objective of genocide. We know it cynically uses Palestinian civilians as human shields, hiding in hospitals and neighbourhoods. And we recognise the cruel irony that follows, when Hamas condemns the deaths it goaded Israel into causing. So to banish any lack of clarity: a person who supports Hamas in Australia, or Britain, or America, or any other liberal nation, is insulting their own intelligence. We also know that, in this age of social media, the terrors of war are more easily witnessed and documented than ever before. Which makes the images from Gaza uniquely affecting. All these things we know. And not one of them gives Israel a carte blanche to do absolutely anything it likes in response. Not one renders all collateral damage acceptable. Not one frees Israel from the obligations of international law, or of basic morality. Not one strips all the women, children and innocent men in Gaza of their dignity and right to life. The responsibility of those with power is to consider what comes next; to build the best possible future they can. Not to seek vengeance for what came before. And this war ... what has it become, exactly? It started as a crime against Israeli civilians. Then it became a retaliatory mission, one of self-defence, whose stated aim was to root out Hamas. What is it now? Whole cities have been reduced to rubble. Some monumental number of the 2.2 million people who lived in Gaza are dead. And the survivors of this carnage live in tents, and walk kilometres to line up for food, ever fearful of gunshots from the soldiers above. Where does it stop? What is the objective? How does this end any other way than with the radicalisation of an entire new generation of Palestinians, and more decades of violence, and more despicable anti-Semitism rising across the world in a backlash to Israel's actions, and any prospect of a lasting peace being killed off for another lifetime? If you are genuinely angry, and genuinely horrified, by those words from Bob Vylan, then I ask this of you: as you read these quotes below, imagine the roles are reversed. Assess how you would react if a Palestinian said these things about the Israeli people. First is Nissim Vaturi, Deputy Speaker in Israel's Knesset and a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's party. He described the Palestinians as 'subhumans'. And he called for all men in Gaza to be killed. 'Who is innocent in Gaza? 'Civilians' went out and slaughtered people in cold blood,' Mr Vaturi told the radio station Kol BaRama. Air quotes there implied by him, not me. 'They are outcasts, and no one in the world wants them.' He argued that Israel should 'separate the children and women and kill the adults in Gaza', and said the IDF was being 'too considerate'. 'The international community understands the residents of Gaza are not welcome anywhere.' Too considerate! One truly does shudder at the thought of an inconsiderate IDF. Here is Defence Minister Yoav Gallant. 'The humanitarian aid currently entering Gaza is an absolute disgrace,' Mr Gallant said just last week. 'What is needed in Gaza is not a temporary halt of the 'humanitarian' aid, but a complete cessation of it. 'Stopping the aid will quickly advance us toward victory.' That would be the aid which is currently the only thing feeding children who might otherwise starve to death. Give Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich some marks, at least, for brevity: 'Gaza will be entirely destroyed.' Heritage Minister Amichay Eliyahu said there were 'no uninvolved civilians' in Gaza. None. Among a population of more than two million. All of them are complicit, apparently. Moshe Feiglin, leader of the Zehut party in the Knesset, is mercifully not a government minister. He is, however, a man of questionable opinions. 'Every child, every baby in Gaza is an enemy,' said Mr Feiglin. 'The enemy is not Hamas, nor is it the military wing of Hamas. 'We need to occupy Gaza and settle it, and not a single Gazan child will be left there. There is no other victory.' Look, I could keep going here. There is no shortage of material. And given the time, I could draw up a list of stunningly bloodthirsty language from Arab leaders as well. It's not all Israelis, nor is it all Arabs, nor is it all Palestinians, and that is part of the damn point here. Everywhere you look in this conflict, there's a refusal to recognise the humanity in other people. From the anti-Semites, you get a failure to distinguish between the actions of Israel's government and those of the Jewish people. And in the other direction, a failure to tell the difference between Hamas militants and the civilians, many of them small children for goodness' sake, whose bodies lie crushed amid the ruins. Perpetuating those attitudes will give us nothing more than pain and death, forever. Someone in a position of leadership needs to grow beyond them. Or you will be back here in 20 years reading the same rant, and I'll be back here in 40 years writing it again. After October 7, I made a point of watching the footage responsible news organisations would never publish. To call it harrowing would be a mockery of the word. Now the images that you, as a reader, will never see, are of Palestinian kids with their limbs blown off. Among other horrors. If you can muster fury for one, but not the other, then for the love of whatever god you believe in, do consider waking up. Consider the fact that everyone involved here is a human being, with the same inherent dignity. Consider the fact that, were you born in Tel Aviv, or Jerusalem, or Gaza, or the West Bank, you might be a victim, not a witness. The entire conflict is a catastrophe. It's repugnant. Every day it degrades us. So yes. Condemn the rappers. Cancel their shows. Prosecute them, if laws have been broken. But the next time a government official speaks of children as enemies, not from the stage at a music festival but from a place of real, substantive power, I expect your indignation to burn no less brightly.
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy discuss US weapons for Ukrainian defence
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has discussed air defences with his US counterpart, agreeing to work on increasing Kyiv's capability to "defend the sky" as Russian attacks escalate. He said in a message on Telegram he discussed joint defence production, as well as joint purchases and investments, with Donald Trump on Friday. Ukraine has been asking Washington to sell it more Patriot missiles and systems that it sees as key to defending its cities from intensifying Russian air strikes. Kyiv had warned that a decision by Washington to halt some shipments of weapons to Ukraine would weaken its ability to defend against Russia's strikes and battlefield advances. Germany said it was in talks to buy Patriot air defence systems to bridge the gap. One source briefed on the call said they were optimistic that supplies of Patriot missiles could resume after what they called a "very good" conversation between the presidents. US outlet Axios, citing unnamed sources, reported the call lasted about 40 minutes, and that Mr Trump told Mr Zelenskyy he would check what US weapons due to be sent to Ukraine, if any, had been put on hold. Mr Zelenskyy, speaking later in his nightly video address, said he and Mr Trump agreed to "arrange a meeting between our teams to strengthen air defences". "We had a very detailed discussion on joint production. We need it, America needs it," he said. The conversation came a day after Mr Trump said he had a disappointing call with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russia pummelled Kyiv with the largest drone attack of the war hours after Mr Trump's conversation with Mr Putin on Thursday. Mr Zelenskyy called the attack "deliberately massive and cynical". Mr Trump spoke with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Thursday, according to Spiegel magazine, citing government sources on Friday. The two leaders discussed the situation in Ukraine, including strengthening its air defences, as well as trade issues, Spiegel reported. Kyiv previously received Patriot batteries and ammunition from the US in the form of aid under former president Joe Biden. Mr Trump criticised Mr Biden for sending weapons to Ukraine without getting anything in return. Since taking office, he has overseen a dramatic shake-up of relations with Kyiv. Reuters
ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
Trump celebrates 'big beautiful bill' as Ukraine pleas for help
As US president Donald Trump celebrates signing his huge term-defining tax and spending bill into law, he is under pressure from Ukraine to keep lending air defence assistance to combat Russia's invasion.
