logo
Animated ‘Eyes of Wakanda' is a worthy, but too short, addition to the MCU

Animated ‘Eyes of Wakanda' is a worthy, but too short, addition to the MCU

Marvel Studios has always prided itself on being a universe of interlocking stories, but one of the quieter strengths of Disney's superhero factory has been the ability to pivot into new and different genres while keeping the connective tissue intact. That was true when 'Guardians of the Galaxy' introduced space opera into the mix and again when 'WandaVision' flirted with sitcom surrealism in the aftermath of 'Avengers: Endgame.'
With 'Eyes of Wakanda,' Marvel has a new animated anthology of four half-hour episodes that feels both impressively expansive and disappointingly fleeting, even as it spans millennia. It's a lavishly realized glimpse into a corner of the MCU, executive-produced by 'Black Panther' director (and Oakland native) Ryan Coogler and developed by veteran Marvel storyboard artist Todd Harris, but each episode's brevity works against the whole.
While the Dora Milaje — the warrior bodyguards led by Danai Gurira's Okoye — have become mainstays of Wakanda's onscreen mythology, the spotlight here is on the War Dogs: deep-cover operatives tasked with recovering stolen artifacts and safeguarding Wakanda's secrets. The series uses these missions as narrative waypoints, jumping from 1260 B.C. to the 19th century to lend new context to important historical and mythological moments.
If that sounds like a setup rife with possibilities, it is. And therein lies both the show's appeal and its frustration. Each episode introduces new characters, establishes the mission at hand and then wraps before the audience has had time to form much of a connection. This isn't entirely the fault of the storytelling, of course. A show spanning thousands of years is bound to rely on thematic rather than character continuity. Still, the result is an experience that's rich in scope but emotionally thin.
What's on offer, however, is undeniably striking. The animation eschews the cel-shaded hybrid look of the recently concluded 'What If…?' in favor of lush backgrounds, painterly compositions and action sequences that often resemble moving concept art. Harris' history as a visual artist shows in every frame. From windswept battlefields to shadowy palaces, the rich visual palette grounds the fantasy in Coogler's live-action films while still establishing its own aesthetic identity.
The voice cast also rises to the occasion, including Cress Williams as the Lion — a rogue War Dog whose betrayal sets the series' central conflict and mission into motion — and Winnie Harlow as Noni, a former Dora Milajae tasked with stopping him. Throughout the season, we also hear strong work from Larry Herron, Lynn Whitfield and Gary Anthony Williams, among others.
Of course, for MCU obsessives, the ties to the broader Marvel mythology are always half the fun. Without giving too much away, the series introduces a new iteration of Iron Fist (Jona Xiao) bound to overshadow the execrable Netflix version. At the same time, the finale neatly lays out plot threads that reframe aspects of the 'Black Panther' mythology. In that respect, 'Eyes of Wakanda' mirrors the best of Marvel's one-shots: supplemental material enriching the story's larger world while carving out its own identity. In this instance, the scale and ambition hint at a series that could and should be much larger.
Ultimately, that's the paradox of 'Eyes of Wakanda.' In an era where Marvel projects are routinely dinged for being too long, here's one that's not long enough — that's over just as it feels like it's finding its rhythm. That may not be the worst problem, but it does mean this debut season plays more like a prologue than the next great chapter of the MCU.
Zaki Hasan is a freelance writer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Original "Freaky Friday" Cast: Then Vs. Now Photos
Original "Freaky Friday" Cast: Then Vs. Now Photos

Buzz Feed

time7 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Original "Freaky Friday" Cast: Then Vs. Now Photos

Freaky Friday, starring Lindsay Lohan and Jamie Lee Curtis, was released almost 22 years ago on August 6, 2003. Freaky Friday cemented itself as an iconic film not only in my heart, but in the hearts of an entire generation. As a 2000's teenager I was OBSESSED with this movie. (I still remember every song lyric from the song "Take me awayyyyyyyy.") From the perfect Y2K fashion, to the absolutely catchy bops, and the '90s heart about this movie is still *chef's kiss*. So, I was thrilled and delighted when Disney announced the sequel, Freakier Friday, comes out this Friday, August 8 (how fitting!). "I look like the crypt keeper!" The nostalgia factor started kicking in and it really got me wondering, what does the original cast from 22 years ago look like now? So, I took a bit of a trip down memory lane! I'll give you their younger version photo first from the original Freaky Friday and then the more recent photo. I'm telling you, some of this cast looks like they haven't aged a day. Here we go: Here's Lindsay Lohan as Anna. And here's Lindsay now. Here's Jamie Lee Curtis as Tess. And here's Jamie now. Here's Chad Michael Murray as Jake. And here's Chad now. Here is Mark Harmon as Ryan. And here's Mark in 2024. Here's Christina Vidal as Maddie. And here's Haley Hudson as Peg. Here they are now, Christina Vidal on the left and Haley Hudson on the right. Here is Julie Gonzalo as Stacey. And here's Julie now. Here is Stephen Tobolowsky as Mr. Bates. And here's Stephen in 2024. Here is Rosalind Chao as Pei Pei. And here's Rosalind now. Here's Lucille Soong as Pei Pei's mom. And here's Lucille now. Here's Ryan Malgarini as Harry: And here's Ryan now. Here's Harold Gould as Grandpa: And here's Harold in 2008. Harold passed away in 2010. Freakier Friday is in theaters on Friday, August 8th and watch the original on Disney+ now! And if you like what you see, check out BuzzFeed Canada's Instagram and TikTok!🎥🎥

'Winnie The Pooh' Voice Actor Slams R-Rated Horror Movie Adaptation
'Winnie The Pooh' Voice Actor Slams R-Rated Horror Movie Adaptation

Screen Geek

time42 minutes ago

  • Screen Geek

'Winnie The Pooh' Voice Actor Slams R-Rated Horror Movie Adaptation

The classic Winnie the Pooh character is one of the most beloved storybook and animated characters of all-time. However, after slipping into the public domain, the character was reimagined as a horror movie villain in Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey . It started a trend that's led to other public domain characters to become similarly reimagined, and now classic Winnie the Pooh voice actor Jim Cummings has opened up to slam the R-rated adaptation of the character. Cummings went into detail about this new string of R-rated Winnie the Pooh horror movies while speaking in a recent interview at San Diego Comic-Con 2025. While he admitted to having only seen 'about 10 seconds of it,' Cummings still had strong feelings about the project and the trend it's started. Naturally as someone associated with the classic version, it's not something he believes should have 'much credit.' Here's what Cummings shared while talking to The Direct: 'It's… I don't really have an opinion of it. I saw about 10 seconds of it. And I think somebody always enjoys tearing down and stepping on somebody else's dreams and something that they love. And there's a… You know, it's kind of like the art movement out there. You've seen certain disgusting displays of things that people are calling art. And, I don't know, you know… I don't give it much credence. I don't give it much credit. It's easier to throw rocks than it is to carve out the 'pietà.'' Interestingly, while Cummings might not approve, that hasn't stopped the Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey films from being a success with other audiences. In fact, the films have not only done so well to launch their own film series, but they also prompted the creation of the Twisted Childhood Universe which includes other reimagined public domain stories including Peter Pan's Neverland Nightmare and Bambi: The Reckoning . As such, there are still plenty of other projects on the way, so we'll have to see what comes next from this particular series. Whether you like it or have strong criticisms like traditional Winnie the Pooh voice actor Jim Cummings, the Blood and Honey franchise is here to stay. Stay tuned to ScreenGeek for any additional updates regarding the Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey horror film series and any other titles from the Twisted Childhood Universe as we have them.

Hideo Kojima is a Fan of THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS – Calls It a 'Truly ‘Fantastic'' Reboot — GeekTyrant
Hideo Kojima is a Fan of THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS – Calls It a 'Truly ‘Fantastic'' Reboot — GeekTyrant

Geek Tyrant

timean hour ago

  • Geek Tyrant

Hideo Kojima is a Fan of THE FANTASTIC FOUR: FIRST STEPS – Calls It a 'Truly ‘Fantastic'' Reboot — GeekTyrant

Legendary game creator and storyteller Hideo Kojima is continuing his superhero movie streak this summer, and it looks like Marvel's The Fantastic Four: First Steps has officially won him over. After recently watching Superman , Kojima followed it up with Marvel's newest entry into the MCU and dropped a lengthy, passionate review on X. It's safe to say he's vibing with Fantastic Four 's unique retro-futuristic aesthetic and bold stylistic choices. 'Watched 'Fantastic Four: First Steps,' From the fashion, color palette, design, cityscape, TV and cartoon shows, to the costumes, spacesuits, rockets, cars—not to mention company names, food items (cereal, soda), and storage media (magnetic tapes, discs)—everything is crafted with a thorough commitment to a 1960s aesthetic blended with a sense of futurism.' Kojima also praised the movie's nostalgic vibe, likening it to watching Bewitched as a kid and even calling it 'a live-action version of The Incredibles .' He also took the opportunity to note a shift in post-COVID superhero filmmaking, observing that things are finally moving away from the darker, grittier tone we've come to expect. 'One thing the film does well is how it opens with a TV show that efficiently summarizes the Fantastic Four's feats, role, and current standing. If it had taken the time to carefully depict how they became superhuman from the very start, it would've come off as overly explanatory and slow-paced. 'Superman skipped that part too. Here, the plot is designed so that viewers are drawn in from the point where 'they' gain a new family—marking the beginning of turmoil and crisis. As a 'first step' to reboot the series, it's truly 'fantastic.'' He seemed to like First Steps more than Superman . While he didn't bash the movie, he definitely seemed less impressed. 'It was neither dark nor stylish, cool or even 'super.' The perspective of the audience – the distance and elevation – is different from the 'Superman' we used to LOOK UP (into the sky) to,' he wrote. Fantastic Four: First Steps introduces the MCU's version of Marvel's First Family, starring Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Joseph Quinn, and Ebon Moss-Bachrach. Meanwhile, Superman features David Corenswet stepping into the iconic role and marks the beginning of James Gunn's new vision for the DCU. The Fantastic Four: First Steps is now playing in theaters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store