Supreme Court stays Mumbai blasts case verdict; says convicts need not surrender
Appearing for a Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Maharashtra, pushed for a stay of the judgment primarily on the ground that it contained observations which would affect pending trials under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA).
2006 Mumbai Train Blasts: Why 12 men were acquitted after 18 years
The Bench ordered that the High Court judgment would not be treated as precedent by trial courts hearing MCOCA cases.
The apex court further issued notice to the former convicts on the State's appeal against the acquittal.
Justice Sundresh pointed out that some of the persons involved seemed to be Pakistan nationals. The State said they had committed the deed and left India. 'They were not arrested,' a State counsel informed.
In a brief mentioning of the case by Maharashtra on June 23 regarding a technical hitch in the case records, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai had remarked that a stay of a judgment of acquittal was 'rarest of rare'.
The Bombay High Court had concluded that the prosecution 'utterly failed' to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. It had set aside the 2025 judgment of the Special Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) court, which had awarded death penalty to five and life imprisonment to seven others.
On July 11, 2006, a series of seven bomb blasts occurred in the first-class compartments of seven suburban local trains of Mumbai between 6:23 p.m. and 6:29 p.m. The coordinated explosions led to the tragic loss of 187 lives and left approximately 824 people injured. eom
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
Colombian ex-President Alvaro Uribe sentenced to 12 years house arrest for bribery
Alvaro Uribe, the former President of Colombia, received a 12-year house arrest sentence. The conviction relates to witness tampering and bribery charges. The court also imposed a fine and a ban from holding public office. Uribe plans to appeal the decision. The case has sparked varied reactions in Colombia. Some people support Uribe, while others celebrate the sentence. Opponents of former President Alvaro Uribe gather outside the court on the day he was sentenced to 12 years under house arrest for witness tampering and bribery in Bogota, Colombia, Friday, Aug. 1, 2025. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe was sentenced Friday to 12 years of house arrest for witness tampering and bribery in a historic case that gripped the South American nation and tarnished the conservative strongman's sentence, which Uribe said will be appealed, followed a nearly six-month trial in which prosecutors presented evidence that he attempted to influence witnesses who accused the law-and-order leader of having links to a paramilitary group in the 1990s."Politics prevailed over the law in sentencing," Uribe said after Friday's 73, has denied any wrongdoing. He faced up to 12 years in prison after being convicted attorney had asked the court to allow Uribe to remain free while he appeals the verdict. Judge Sandra Heredia on Friday said she did not grant the defense's request because it would be "easy" for the former president to leave the country to "evade the imposed sanction."Heredia also banned Uribe from holding public office for eight years and fined him about $776, of Friday's sentencing, Uribe posted on X that he was preparing arguments to support his appeal. He added that one must "think much more about the solution than the problem" during personal appeals court will have until early October to issue a ruling, which either party could then challenge before Colombia's Supreme former president governed from 2002 to 2010 with strong support from the United States. He is a polarizing figure in Colombia, where many credit him for saving the country from becoming a failed state, while others associate him with human rights violations and the rise of paramilitary groups in the on Monday said she had seen enough evidence to determine that Uribe conspired with a lawyer to coax three former paramilitary group members, who were in prison, into changing testimony they had provided to Ivan Cepeda, a leftist senator who had launched an investigation into Uribe's alleged ties to a paramilitary in 2012 filed a libel suit against Cepeda in the Supreme Court. But in a twist, the high court in 2018 dismissed the accusations against Cepeda and began investigating Penuela Rosales, a supporter of Uribe's party in the capital, Bogota, said she wept and prayed after hearing of the sentence. "It's an unjust sentence. He deserves to be free," she Sergio Andres Parra, who protested against Uribe outside the courthouse, said the 12-year sentence "is enough" and, even if the former president appeals, "history has already condemned him."During Uribe's presidency, Colombia's military attained some of its biggest battlefield victories against Latin America's oldest leftist insurgency, pushing the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia into remote pockets and forcing the group's leadership into peace talks that led to the disarmament of more than 13,000 fighters in 2016.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Waris Punjab De chief Amritpal Singh willing to take dope test amid drug abuse allegations: Lawyer
Chandigarh: Waris Punjab De chief and Khadoor Sahib MP Amritpal Singh , currently lodged in Dibrugarh jail under the National Security Act (NSA), is willing to undergo a dope test , his lawyer said. The statement comes in response to allegations of drug abuse levelled by his own associates, as mentioned in a Punjab Police chargesheet filed in the Ajnala court last month. Advocate Imaan Singh Khara, who serves as the legal advisor and chief spokesperson of Akali Dal Waris Punjab De recently met Amritpal in Dibrugarh jail. He told the TOI, "Bhai Sahib (Amritpal Singh) has said that instead of levelling false allegations, Punjab Police may get his dope test done. He has said if Punjab police want, they can come to Dibrugarh to get the test done." Khara added that Amritpal has demanded that once he undergoes a dope test, the political leaders accusing him of drug abuse should also be made to take the test. As per the police chargesheet, Amritpal's two associates, Bhagwant Singh alias and Varinder Singh Fauji, in their disclosure statements recorded before the police, claimed that Amritpal was "hooked on drugs" in Punjab and "consumed them in Assam's Dibrugarh jail too". Khara and advocate Ritu Raj Singh Sandhu, the counsel representing the associates of Amritpal, have dismissed the disclosure statements, accusing the police of trying to "defame" Amritpal. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hi Tabbola Undo Khara alleged that "police got the signatures on blank papers". On Thursday, when brought to a court in Amritsar in connection with the Feb 2023 Ajnala police station attack case, Bhagwant Singh 'Pradhan Mantri Bajeke' was heard shouting and denying that he made any statement on Amritpal taking drugs. As he saw the media persons, Bajeke, who was escorted by policemen, alleged that "we were beaten up and made to sign thousands of papers and recorded on video." Khara said he met Amritpal in Dibrugarh jail on July 24 in connection with "a writ petition we will file in the Supreme Court to challenge the NSA" under which Amritpal is detained in Dibrugarh jail for the third consecutive year now. Khara said, "It took two suitcases of documents weighing around 25 kg, which I brought from Dibrugarh jail, to prepare the grounds for the writ petition to challenge the NSA in the Supreme Court. The documents include challan papers in Hari Nau (Gurpreet Singh) murder case, papers of grounds of detention of NSA, order of detention, and others. The documents are very voluminous and are in both English and Punjabi language. These are single-size printed legal size papers." Khara said Amritpal was very upbeat about "Mission 2027" to prepare for the 2027 Punjab elections "to safeguard the interests of Punjab" and to "make Punjab drug-free." Khara added that Amritpal told him that "search was on for a party candidate for Tarn Taran by-poll and a good person would be brought forward." Ends MSID:: 123046954 413 |
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC pulls up Delhi Police for failing to trace missing Russian woman
The Supreme Court on Friday blamed the Delhi Police of sheer negligence and adopting a casual approach in tracing the missing Russian woman accused of leaving the country with her minor son in defiance of court orders. The court noted that no FIR was lodged even when the case also involves removing the child from custody of court and forging the child's Indian passport. (ANI) The apex court pulled up the police for being equally guilty of neglecting its order of May 22 by which they were directed to keep a close watch on the woman while granting her shared custody of the child. However, she left the country on July 8. Even on being told by the child's father on July 7 that the woman was missing, the court noted a 'lack of sensitivity and responsibility' on part of the police to take immediate efforts to trace her. The bench of justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said, 'The Delhi Police is equally a partner in violation of this court's child has been snatched from the custody of the Supreme Court of India. The police and ministry officials are taking it lightly, thinking that a child has been taken away by the mother in a matrimonial dispute.' The investigation report submitted by the police in court detailed how the woman, Viktoria Basu, travelled in a taxi from Delhi on July 7 and reached Bihar on July 8. The same day, she crossed over to Nepal, and remained there for four days till she boarded a flight to Sharjah on July 12 and onwards to Russia by an Air Arabia flight. The court noted that till date, no first information report (FIR) has been lodged even when the case also involves removing the child from custody of court and forging the child's Indian passport, when the original is lying deposited with the court. Indicating stern steps may follow on the next date, the bench said, 'Before we take any harsh action, the authorities are well advised to establish contact with the Indian Embassy in Russia and with Interpol and apprise this court of the process they intend to adopt for producing the child before this court.' The matter has been kept for further hearing after 10 days. The court said it had exercised its parens patriae (parent of the country) right, as nobody, neither the father nor mother of the child, was granted full custody by the May 22 order. It also questioned why police did not probe the forgery of the child's passport. Additional solicitor general (ASG) Aishwarya Bhati, representing the Centre, told the court that the police, and the ministries of external affairs and home affairs have established contact with authorities in Nepal, Sharjah and Russia through diplomatic channels to get details of the woman and the child. The court said 'this is hardly of any consequence now,' as authorities have confirmed information that she has travelled to Russia. Bhati said that there is no confirmation that she is still in Russia. The court enquired why the Indian Embassy in Russia has not been asked to verify this information using local contacts. 'Between July 7 (complaint of woman's disappearance) and July 14 (confirmation of her escape from India) what have you done? It is we who have been suggesting you to go through Nepal. What has the Delhi Police done except giving an impression they were hobnobbing. Is this not a case where the Delhi Police clearly failed in their duty?' the court asked Bhati. The ASG told the court that till July 18, even the police did not know the woman's whereabouts. The court responded: 'That is because you did not make any effort.' It also questioned why the CCTV footage outside her house from the day she was reported missing was not checked. 'There is a complete lack of sense of responsibility, sensitivity and sheer criminal negligence on part of the police,' the bench observed, adding, 'We are not going to spare the station house officer and the deputy commissioner of police (south district). They have not shown due care to implement our orders.' The incident even raised concerns over the plan of action available with the Centre on how to respond in such a situation, the court remarked. Besides the police, the MHA and MEA also submitted their reports to the court. ASG Bhati said that contact was established with the airline which Basu took from Sharjah to Russia. However, citing privacy issues, the airline authorities have not shared details. The court said it was willing to issue any orders to facilitate response from the airline. 'Even the UAE will cooperate in such matters. No airline can claim privacy in a matter where a crime has been committed,' the bench said. Basu in 2023 approached the court seeking custody of her son following a matrimonial dispute. But when several attempts of reconciliation failed, the court in May this year allowed shared custody of the minor son to the parents for three days in a week. Basu had come to India in 2019 and her visa was extended by the top court while passing the custody order.
