The Fed is just as confused as the rest of us
At its policy decision on Wednesday (Jun 18), the US Federal Reserve's rate-setting committee held rates at 4.25 to 4.5 per cent, but Chair Jerome Powell and his colleagues essentially acknowledged that they had no idea what would come next.
They couldn't precisely project where US President Donald Trump's tariff rates would end up, much less how they would impact consumer inflation and the labour market. Nor could they confidently handicap jarring changes to immigration and fiscal policies and the evolving war between Israel and Iran. The big risk, of course, is that the uncertainty and indecision will make the Fed late to arrest a potential increase in unemployment.
In the Summary of Economic Projections, the median member of the Federal Open Market Committee pencilled in two rate cuts this year. But that 'base case' constitutes a massive oversimplification of the outlook, and some investors may be underestimating just how fat the tails are in the distribution of potential outcomes, even over just the next three or four months.
Of the 19 respondents, 14 policymakers thought the risks to their inflation forecasts were weighted to the upside — the same number that thought as much about the risks to their unemployment projections. In a nutshell, they don't pretend to know what's coming, but Powell thinks we may find out relatively soon.
At his post-decision press conference, Powell said: 'We feel like we're going to learn a great deal more over the summer on tariffs. We hadn't expected them to show up much by now, and they haven't. And we will see the extent to which they do over coming months. And I think that's going to inform our thinking for one thing. In addition, we'll see how the labour market progresses.'
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Given all the uncertainty, Powell is right to stay in wait-and-see mode, but he can't linger there too long once the data breaks. Meanwhile, those of us on the sidelines should prepare for the policy outlook to shift quite quickly, potentially as soon as the Fed's Sep 16-17 meeting. Maybe we really will get two rate cuts this year, but it's also perfectly plausible that we'll get 150 basis points worth – or none. It's a great environment for high-stakes gamblers – but not so much for American households.
As Powell alluded to, it's largely trade policy that has put us all in this bind. In recent months, the disinflationary trends in housing and non-housing services have the core personal consumption expenditures deflator – the Fed's preferred inflation gauge – up around 2.6 per cent in May from a year earlier.
That's not at all terrible, and it would probably be poised to converge on the Fed's 2 per cent target if not for Trump's extremely ill-timed and pointless trade wars. Without tariffs, the Fed would probably be cutting right now, providing ballast to a wobbly labour market and a housing market that's already seeing year-over-year price drops in some parts of the country.
Unfortunately, the central bank has to play the hand it's dealt. In the immediate term, we still don't know if companies will pass on higher prices to consumers, accept narrower margins or manage their way to stable prices by laying off parts of their workforce – and maybe it will be a combination of all three. The risks to both the Fed's stable prices and maximum employment mandates are substantial, and that's causing paralysis among policymakers – a weird 'calm before the storm' effect both at the Fed and in financial markets.
But at some point before autumn, we are very likely to see something shatter that calm. An alarming jump in initial jobless claims could lead to rate cuts above and beyond any policymaker's base case. A jarring CPI report or two could keep the Fed on hold for longer and prompt a selloff in bonds. And a jump in realised inflation coupled with signs of unanchored inflation expectations could even put hikes back on the table.
If they're late to mitigate the damage, Fed policymakers can take cover in blaming Trump's self-sabotaging trade policy. But they must prepare to act immediately and convincingly once the signals break in a particular direction. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Dollar pares losses against euro and Swiss franc after better-than-expected US jobs data
NEW YORK :The U.S. dollar gained ground against major currencies including the yen and the Swiss franc on Tuesday after data showed a better-than-expected increase in labor market demand, indicating the Federal Reserve will likely take its time to cut interest rates. The Republican-controlled U.S. Senate passed President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill, approving a massive package that would enshrine many of his top priorities into law and add $3.3 trillion to the national debt. The bill will move to the House for final approval. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell had reiterated that the central bank plans to wait for more data before it starts monetary policy easing, but he did not rule out a July cut. Powell spoke at a central banking conference in Portugal. The dollar pared losses against the Japanese yen and against the Swiss franc after Labor Department data showed job openings rose 374,000 to 7.769 million in May. It pared losses further against the yen and extended gains against the franc after the U.S. Senate cleared the spending bill. The dollar weakened 0.29 per cent to 143.58 against the yen and was down 0.16 per cent to 0.79175 versus the Swiss franc, compared with a drop of 0.46 per cent and 0.28 per cent respectively before the data. "It was the worst first half of the year for the U.S. dollar index since 1973 with a lot of that weakness being driven by concerns about trade policy and concerns about a slowing economy," said Matthew Weller, global head of market research at StoneX. "But I think on a very short-term basis we might be seeing the market get a little bit stretched here and I think there might be a case for a U.S. dollar bounce as we move through July." The dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies including the yen and the euro, reversed earlier gains and was down 0.08 per cent at 96.682 after being down 0.05 per cent to 96.71. U.S. Treasury yields advanced after the job openings data. The yield on benchmark U.S. 10-year notes rose 2.3 basis points to 4.25 per cent. "Two or three iterations of concern around the Fed or potential policy from the Fed all weigh against the dollar," said Marvin Loh, senior global market strategist at State Street in Boston. "If the Fed cuts, that closes interest rate differentials ... We've seen July expectations for a cut get a little more aggressive at 20 per cent; it was 0 per cent just a couple of weeks ago. It's certainly firming they're going to cut in September and there's a bit of a change in thesis." British Prime Minister Keir Starmer cleared the first hurdle in his quest to reform the welfare system, defeating an attempt by lawmakers opposed to the proposed law to halt its progress. The proposed reforms are designed to reduce the cost of Britain's growing welfare bill of 65 billion pounds, which the government has described as economically indefensible and morally wrong. The euro was down 0.13 per cent at $1.18020 after being up 0.05 per cent earlier in the day. The pound sterling reversed earlier declines and rose following the vote. It was last up 0.07 per cent to $1.374 against the dollar, on track for two straight sessions of gains.
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Powell reiterates US Fed will wait for more data before cutting rates
SINTRA: US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Tuesday (July 1) reiterated the US central bank's plans to "wait and learn more" about the impact of tariffs on inflation before lowering interest rates, again setting aside President Donald Trump's demands for immediate and deep rate cuts. "We're simply taking some time," Powell said at a central bank gathering in Portugal a day after Trump sent him a handwritten missive noting how low other central banks had cut rates and suggesting the US needed to move. "As long as the US economy is in solid shape, we think that the prudent thing to do is to wait and learn more and see what those effects might be." Yet Powell also declined to rule out a possible rate cut at the Fed's upcoming July 29-30 meeting, prompting investors to slightly boost the possibility of a reduction at that session and shifting focus to a jobs report to be issued on Thursday and new inflation data coming in two weeks, both covering the month of June. Powell noted that a majority of Fed officials in recent projections do expect to lower the benchmark interest rate later this year, and are closely attuned to whether inflation increases this summer, as policymakers and many economists expect. "It's going to depend on the are going meeting by meeting," Powell said. "I wouldn't take any meeting off the table or put it directly on the table. It's going to depend on how the data evolve.' The Fed is facing a complicated moment, weighing sometimes conflicting data that could leave officials faced with both rising unemployment and rising inflation, the worst of both worlds for a central bank tasked with maintaining both stable prices and maximum employment. Uncertainty over trade and other administration policies has left businesses also unsure of what to do, and the Fed's decision-making has been under virtually daily assault from a president eager to install his chair when Powell leaves the Fed's top job next May. At the Sintra gathering, an annual forum sponsored by the European Central Bank and akin to the Fed's yearly gathering at Jackson Hole, Wyoming, Powell got at least a momentary reprieve. FED IS FOCUSED "100%" ON INFLATION AND JOBS TARGET Asked about Trump's barrage of insults, Powell's comment that the Fed was focused "100%" on its inflation and jobs target drew applause from the audience and from the heads of the ECB, the Bank of England and other central banks who joined him onstage for a panel discussion. Central bank independence from the lobbying of elected officials, at least in the setting of interest rates, is considered key to keeping inflation under control. Powell said his message to whomever Trump chooses to succeed him in a little over 10 months would be "we're trying to deliver macro stability, financial stability, economic stability for the benefit of all the people. If we're going to do that successfully, we need to do it in a completely non-political way, which means we don't take sides. We don't play one side against the other." It remains unclear how long the Fed may have to wait to gain the clarity it needs to resume reducing interest rates. The central bank cut steadily last year, beginning in September - something Trump alleges was politically motivated - but stopped in December after lowering the benchmark rate a full percentage point to the current 4.25% to 4.5% range. Powell has made no secret of why. "In effect, we went on hold when we saw the size of the essentially all inflation forecasts for the United States went up materially as a consequence," Powell said. The central bank targets inflation of 2%, and recent readings remain above that level now for the fourth year running following a spike in prices during the COVID-19 pandemic. While officials are open to lowering rates if inflation proves lower than expected or the job market weakens, Powell said there is nothing in the data so far indicating a need to move fast or soon.
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
As USAID stops foreign aid, Rubio says future US assistance will be limited
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: A security guard is stationed in the former offices of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), where black tape covers the signage on the windows, in the Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 24, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo WASHINGTON - The U.S. Agency for International Development will on Tuesday officially stop implementing foreign aid, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, adding that America's assistance in the future will be targeted and limited. In a statement marking the transfer of USAID to the State Department as part of President Donald Trump's unprecedented push to shrink the federal government, Rubio said the U.S. was abandoning what he called a charity-based model and would focus on empowering countries to grow sustainably. "We will favor those nations that have demonstrated both the ability and willingness to help themselves and will target our resources to areas where they can have a multiplier effect and catalyze durable private sector, including American companies, and global investment," the top U.S. diplomat wrote. This new model, he wrote, would prioritize trade over aid and investment over assistance, adding it would put Washington in a stronger place to counter Beijing. The Trump administration has frozen and then cut back billions of dollars of foreign aid since taking office, saying it wants to ensure U.S. taxpayer money goes only to programs that are aligned with Trump's "America First" policies. The cutbacks have effectively shut down USAID, leading to the firing of thousands of its employees and contractors. That jeopardized the delivery of life-saving food and medical aid and has thrown global humanitarian relief operations into chaos. According to research published in The Lancet medical journal, deep funding cuts to USAID and its dismantling could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by 2030. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Seniors can claim $800 SG60 vouchers from July 1; adults to get $600 in vouchers from July 22 Singapore NSman, 30, dies in hospital after collapsing outside Maju Camp Asia Thai PM's suspension could spell end of Shinawatra clan's era of political dominance Singapore Judge rejects woman's claim that she owns 99% of Bukit Timah condo mostly paid for by ex-boyfriend Singapore 'He fought till the end': Man who survived acid attack as a baby dies of cancer at 26 Singapore Trial opens for 3 women who allegedly organised procession outside Istana Business Do not overcommit to a single solution in a multi-polar world, says ex-foreign minister George Yeo Singapore 1MDB saga: Standard Chartered Bank disputes $3.4 billion claim by liquidators in Singapore Human rights experts and advocates have warned against the cuts. USAID funding has had a crucial role in improving global health, primarily directed toward low- and middle-income countries, particularly African nations, according to the study. Reuters reported on Tuesday that the administration canceled a major contract to supply emergency kits for rape survivors in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo as violence surged there this year, leaving thousands without access to life-saving medication, the United Nations and aid groups said. INVESTMENT AND TRADE DEALS USAID was established in 1961 by Democratic President John F. Kennedy at the height of the Cold War with the aim of better coordinating foreign assistance, already a key platform of U.S. foreign policy in countering Soviet influence. Washington has been the world's largest humanitarian aid donor, amounting to at least 38% of all contributions recorded by the United Nations. It disbursed $61 billion in foreign assistance last year, just over half of that via USAID, according to government data. Among the programs affected by the cuts is the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the world's leading HIV/AIDS initiative. Sub-Saharan Africa remains the epicenter of the AIDS pandemic. Trump's cuts have restricted the availability of drugs that millions of Africans have taken to prevent infection - particularly vulnerable communities such as gay men and sex workers - as aid groups and public health systems in Africa strove to roll back the disease. Trump has said the U.S. pays disproportionately for foreign aid and he wants other countries to shoulder more of the burden. A senior State Department official briefing reporters on the condition of anonymity described the USAID model as "failed engagement" that did not reduce the dependency of foreign countries on the United States, and he said other nations will need to step up. "We want to see more investment from our partners, co-investment," the official said. "We want to see trade deals, compacts, agreements to work together on stuff." The shuttering of USAID drew a rare rebuke from former presidents George Bush and Barack Obama who joined a closed video conference event with the USAID community, the Associated Press reported on Monday. "Gutting USAID is a travesty and it's a tragedy. Because it's some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world," Obama was quoted as saying. REUTERS
