logo
Labour's endless red tape is killing off the Welsh holiday

Labour's endless red tape is killing off the Welsh holiday

Telegrapha day ago
Has your holiday let business been affected by anti-tourist policies? Email money@telegraph.co.uk
After a 37-year career in the Royal Navy, Ian Pattinson is tougher than most. But there's one thing that keeps the former captain awake at night and it's nothing to do with his military service – it's his Welsh holiday home.
'Every single day I worry about whether I'm going to make 182,' he says. Pattinson is referring to the number of days his two cottages have to be let each year to qualify for business rates following a change by the Welsh government two years ago.
If he fails to hit the target, the properties will be subject to council tax leaving Pattinson with a £2,000 bill. For some Welsh holiday let owners, the bill can come close to £10,000 because their properties are subject to paying a 200pc second home premium.
The 182-night rule is just one of a raft of measures brought in by the Welsh government in the past five years that has seen overnight tourist numbers plummet and holiday let owners exit the business.
The Professional Association of Self-Caterers (Pasc) has identified 17 government interventions from both the Senedd and Westminster that it says are negatively impacting the sector in Wales.
Pattinson, 66, moved to the outskirts of Newport in Pembrokeshire with his wife 10 years ago so the two could enjoy a comfortable retirement. The stone cottages are nestled against the slopes of the ancient Preseli Mountains, in the heart of Pembrokeshire Coast National Park.
'For 10 years, we were living the dream. It was excellent. We only had to hit 70 days a year [to qualify for business rates] which we could easily manage. My wife and I both made £7,500 each per cottage and it helped boost our retirement income.
'But the onslaught of policies flooding through the industry at the moment is unbelievable.'
On top of a daily worry about whether he'll be landed with a council tax bill, he expects it will cost him £15,000 to upgrade the former farm building to achieve an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rating of C, thanks to Ed Miliband's net zero drive.
It all comes as the Welsh government has given the green light for councils to pass an overnight visitor levy, which will leave a family of four spending an extra £72.80 in tax for a two-week stay.
Fewer families and shorter stays
The problem is fewer families are going on holiday in Wales and those that do aren't staying for long.
Of the nearly 70 million people who visit Wales each year, around 90pc are day trips. Since 2022, there has been a 29pc decline in overnight stays, according to data from the Welsh government. Holiday spending is also down by 10pc in the same period.
Although Pattinson has in recent years managed to reach the 182-night benchmark, he says the stress of the job and the diminishing returns means he will have to give up one of the cottages.
'We are able to make between 185 and 190 days, but what that means is I can never take my eye off the ball. I can never sit back and relax. My accountant tells me each one of those cottages provides £35,000 spin-off benefits to the local economy. Now I've shut one of them down, that's £35,000 gone straight away. If you multiply that out over what's happening in the rest of Wales, that number starts to build up.'
It appears Pattinson's thesis is correct. Although the number of holiday let owners exiting the market is difficult to measure, the Welsh government's recent survey of tourism businesses found 39pc said they had fewer visitors in the last year compared with a year earlier.
Tourism provides one in 10 jobs in Wales, contributing £3.8bn to the economy each year.
According to Pasc, there are around 22,000 self-catering businesses in Wales. A recent survey of Welsh members found that almost half (47pc) of properties that pay council tax because they don't meet the 182-day requirement were operating at a loss.
Pattinson believes the biggest mistake the Welsh government has made is to take a one-size-fits-all all approach to its policies. 'It's lazy policy-making. If I lived in Newport or Tenby, I probably wouldn't have to get out of bed to make 182 days, but I'm only four miles out of Newport and the numbers fall off almost like a cliff when you are not in those hotspots.'
'It's harming the Welsh economy'
Julian Barnes, a retired glass manufacturer from Bodfari in Denbighshire, north Wales, is far away from the traditional tourism hotspots. 'The best we've ever managed was 127 days in the year after Covid.' He says the idea that his end-of-terrace cottage in the rural village home to 500 people will be let for 182 nights is a fantasy.
'They want to introduce a visitor levy, an EPC requirement, there's registration, employment rights, statutory licencing – a whole pile of things that are growing to make it more and more difficult to run what was a simple business that brought in a lot of trade to the village.'
It means Barnes has resigned himself to paying double council tax on the property, which recently rose to a 150pc premium in April. 'The total bill is £4,956 for 42 sq m. The council tax premium for us means we are paying £118 a sq m in tax.'
He says last year the cottage brought in £10,000 in revenue which left him and his wife, a retired midwife, with a £3,000 profit. This year, he expects they'll be lucky if they end up with £2,000 after their fixed costs rose by 25pc.
He adds: 'That assumes we do all the cleaning, gardening and maintenance for free. We take at least five hours to turn the cottage around. If it was paid per hour, it would be around £1 an hour – you can forget your minimum wage. The Government talks about working people, well we are working people except we are working for basically nothing.'
Barnes and his wife are planning to sell the cottage. He says: 'There are groups of us all over the country in dire straits with these businesses and it's harming the Welsh economy.
'One of the big attractions of our cottage is you can walk to the village pub. We reckon we bring about £10,000 worth of business to the pub each year. There are four of us in the village who have holiday lets. If we go, that's an awful lot of money for a rural business to lose.'
'I am absolutely trapped'
But while some holiday let owners are deciding to get out, others who rely on it as their main source of income feel trapped.
Nicki Robinson, 61, a former cattle farmer from Carmarthenshire, turned her old dairy into a holiday cottage in 2006 after her farming business was no longer financially viable.
Almost 20 years later, she can see the same process happening again as her holiday let business struggles to stay afloat. 'I am absolutely trapped.
'If I don't achieve 182 days, the daft thing is you are not earning as much but you've then got to suddenly find an extra £3,000 to pay council tax.
'It's not because you are not trying. The cottages are up 365 days a year but we just can't achieve that level of occupancy because we are not near beaches, castles or other tourist attractions. It's simply clean accommodation with a rural outlook.'
Robinson says it's not just government policy that has harmed the industry. 'When I started, I got so many of my bookings direct through the tourism office and I would have families come and stay for up to 10 days at a time.
'Now bookings come through online sites that take 25pc of the revenue and the stays are so much shorter. I recently had a run of stays where I did five changeovers in seven days.
'Rather than getting families, we are seen as an alternative to a budget hotel. Bookings come in at the last minute and people want to stay for one or two nights.
'In effect, I am working every day of the year for a job that pays less than minimum wage.'
The Welsh government has said its policies against holiday let owners are designed to help local people get on the housing ladder but Robinson says this is completely misguided.
'I've got a 26-year-old son who is desperately trying to get on the property ladder. But you don't fix the lack of affordable social housing by trying to destroy the livelihoods of those who rely on tourism.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK needs new regulations to fix broken water industry, review says
UK needs new regulations to fix broken water industry, review says

Reuters

time9 minutes ago

  • Reuters

UK needs new regulations to fix broken water industry, review says

LONDON, July 21 (Reuters) - Britain should overhaul its water regulatory system to create a single, powerful body, and replace current regulator Ofwat, to better protect consumers and the environment, an official report said on Monday. The Labour government ordered a review of the privatised water industry in England and Wales after record sewage spills in rivers and lakes sparked widespread anger. The sector's biggest company, Thames Water, is battling to avoid collapse under its debt pile, and has said it is likely to face 1.4 billion pounds in pollution fines and penalties over the next five years. Former Bank of England Deputy Governor Jon Cunliffe, who led the review, said the current, separate financial and environmental regulation of the sector had failed, and financial regulator Ofwat should be replaced. The review considered the creation of a new regulatory system where water companies can raise enough money through bills to rebuild their assets, investors can get long-term, steady returns, and the impact on the environment can start to improve. "Fully joined-up regulation is essential for the system to meet the demands of the future and ensure that private water companies act in the public as well as the private interest," the report said. Britain's water infrastructure needs more than 100 billion pounds ($134.18 billion) of investment in the next five years to cope with population growth and climate change, with consumers set to face bill rises of an average 36% over the period. Investors were waiting for the report for signs of how the government could reset the regulation for Thames Water, which has been fighting for survival for the last 18 months, if it is to avoid being temporarily nationalised. Environment Minister Steve Reed, who on Sunday promised to halve sewage pollution by 2030, is due to announce "root and branch" reform of the sector's regulation in a speech later on Monday, his office said. Under Cunliffe's recommendations, the new single regulator would set "minimum capital" requirements for investors and it would also be able to block changes in water ownership if they were not deemed to be in the long-term interests of the company. In order to attract investment, the report said the government should offer the regulator direction to support stability and predictability - a reference to expected returns, and potential handling of fines for sewage leaks. The review also recommended the creation of nine new regional system planning bodies responsible for developing water investment plans and directing funding, with the power to streamline existing planning processes. ($1 = 0.7460 pounds)

New ‘powerful' water regulator to replace ‘failed' Ofwat in drive to ‘reset' sector
New ‘powerful' water regulator to replace ‘failed' Ofwat in drive to ‘reset' sector

The Guardian

time39 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

New ‘powerful' water regulator to replace ‘failed' Ofwat in drive to ‘reset' sector

A new, 'powerful' water regulator should replace Ofwat, the Drinking Water Inspectorate and the Environment Agency to 'reset' a sector tarnished by scandals over sewage spills and financial mismanagement, a major review has recommended. The government is expected to adopt the recommendation for England and Wales made in the review it commissioned from Sir Jon Cunliffe, a former deputy governor of the Bank of England, which was released on Monday. Critics have said Ofwat has presided over a culture of underinvestment in infrastructure and financial mismanagement by water companies since its creation as the industry was privatised in 1989. Thames Water, the most troubling case for the government and the UK's largest water company, is loaded with £20bn in debt and struggling to stave off financial collapse into a special administration, a form of temporary nationalisation. Cunliffe's review suggested a new regulator, with powers to 'direct', or take control of, failing water firms. Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today Programme, Cunliffe said Ofwat has 'failed' because 'for many years it didn't have the powers'. He added: 'To be blunt about it, it was directed by government to take a light touch to regulation.' The environment secretary, Steve Reed, also announced on Monday he would be taking up the recommendation in the report to create an ombudsman with legal powers to compensate consumers who are failed by the water industry, for example with taps running dry due to burst pipes and sewage leaks in gardens. The report found that there are just 58 members of staff charged with protecting the safety of the country's drinking water, because of civil service rules on headcount and pay. This means, the commission said, the Drinking Water Inspectorate in its current form may not be able to meet the 'challenges of the future'. The report also said the country is not protected from pollutants in water such as PFAs, or 'forever chemicals' and microplastic, and recommends legislative changes to address these and remove them from the water supply. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion It also recommends that bills are not raised dramatically, as they were in April and will be until the end of the decade, with the new regulator prioritising consistent investment in infrastructure so companies do not have to 'play catch up' and have to increase bills to urgently build or repair sewers and reservoirs.

Overhaul water regulators into one single body, landmark review recommends
Overhaul water regulators into one single body, landmark review recommends

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Overhaul water regulators into one single body, landmark review recommends

The system for regulating water companies should be overhauled and replaced with one body for England and one body for Wales, a landmark review of the sector has advised. The much-anticipated final report from the Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, outlined 88 recommendations to the UK and Welsh governments to turn around the ailing industry. The government-commissioned review was tasked by the UK and Welsh governments to carry out the largest review of the sector since privatisation in the face of widespread public anger over pollution, bills and bosses' bonuses although ministers ruled out nationalising water companies. The report, published on Monday morning, recommended abolishing Ofwat, which oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, as well as the Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI), which ensures that public water supplies are safe. It also advised removing the regulatory roles of the Environment Agency and Natural England, which monitor the sector's impact on nature, such as companies illegally dumping sewage into waterways. Instead, the review said a single integrated water regulator in England and a single water regulator in Wales should be established. The current system of regulation has faced intense criticism for overseeing water companies during the years they paid out shareholders and accrued large debts while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed. Other recommendations from the commission include stronger consumer advocacy, nine new regional water authorities to deliver on local priorities, significant improvements to environmental regulation and tighter oversight of company ownership and government. It comes after nearly nine months of the commission analysing, researching and engaging with more than 50,000 responses to its call for evidence. In the review, it has covered how the system is regulated, how to manage the competing demands on water, how water companies are governed and how critical water infrastructure is kept resilient into the future. Sir Jon said: 'Restoring trust has been central to our work. Trust that bills are fair, that regulation is effective, that water companies will act in the public interest and that investors can get a fair return. 'Our recommendations to achieve this are significant. They include the management of the whole water system, regulation of the water industry, the governance and financial resilience of water companies and a stronger voice for local communities and water customers. 'In this report I have considered what is best for the long-term future of water. 'This is a complex sector with a highly integrated system, responsible for the second-largest infrastructure programme in the UK. 'Resetting this sector and restoring pride in the future of our waterways matters to us all. 'In countless conversations in the last nine months I have been struck by the urgent need and passion for change. 'Doing this will require hard work, strong leadership and sustained commitment. But it can and must be done.' The report also shares recommendations on implementation, including which reforms can be delivered in the short-term and which require new primary legislation. In a speech responding to Sir Jon's report later on Monday, Environment Secretary Steve Reed is set to welcome the commission's recommendations to ensure 'the failures of the past can never happen again'. He is also widely reported to be preparing to abolish Ofwat but is unlikely to commit to expanding social tariffs that could help households struggling with bills at the cost of higher charges for wealthier families. The Environment Secretary will also pledge to setting up the creation of a new, legally binding water ombudsman, expanding the role of the voluntary Consumer Council for Water and bringing the sector into line with other utilities. And prior to Monday's announcement, Mr Reed committed to halving sewage pollution in England's rivers by 2030 thanks to a £104 billion investment from the sector in upgrading infrastructure. Both the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats have agreed that water regulation needs to change. Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey called for the creation of a Clean Water Authority that could 'hold these water companies to account' and 'fine them when they fail'. Tory shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins urged the Government to be 'transparent' about what would replace Ofwat but also accused Labour of copying the policies of the previous government.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store