logo
Shashi Tharoor's Kerala Dream Fades as Congress Looks Elsewhere

Shashi Tharoor's Kerala Dream Fades as Congress Looks Elsewhere

The Wire11-07-2025
Ahead of last month's Nilambur assembly by-election, a narrative had gained ground – mostly outside Kerala – that Shashi Tharoor, four-time MP from Thiruvananthapuram, would be the best prospect to lead the Congress back to power in the 2026 state elections.
That hope now seems misplaced.
In its four-decade history, the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) has never been out of power for two consecutive terms. The CPI(M)-led Left Democratic Front (LDF) broke that pattern in 2021, when Pinarayi Vijayan secured a rare second consecutive term. With nine years in office, the LDF appeared confident of securing a third.
But the Congress's by-election victory in Nilambur last month has changed the political mood. Wresting the seat from the CPM just eight months before the next assembly polls has infused the Congress with fresh energy and elevated V.D. Satheesan, the Leader of the Opposition, as the man who could lead the party to power.
A praise-driven disconnect
By contrast, Tharoor's stock within the party has fallen. His praise for Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the aftermath of 'Operation Sindoor' and his enthusiastic participation in an MPs' delegation sent abroad has alienated him from both the central and state leadership – and from grassroots workers in Kerala. His explanation that 'nation comes before party' has only deepened that disconnect.
Once seen as a possible CM candidate – either through his own ambition or the encouragement of supporters – Tharoor now finds himself sidelined. Indeed, his recent actions have made it clear he is out of the reckoning.
None of this comes as a surprise to the party's Kerala unit. They are familiar with Tharoor's lone-wolf approach. Back in 2022, he undertook a solo tour across the state – meeting writers, religious leaders and cultural figures – without consulting state party leaders. His outreach gave the impression he would skip the 2024 Lok Sabha elections and instead build a base ahead of 2026. But he abandoned that effort and chose to contest from Thiruvananthapuram for the fourth time.
Tharoor has long projected himself as larger than the Congress in Kerala. But despite his wins, many within the party see him as a Delhi imposition – lacking roots in the state. His entry into politics was circumstantial: in 2009, after his unsuccessful bid to head the UN, the Congress offered him a safe seat. Had he lost that first election, his political career might have ended there.
Another leadership style
In fact, Tharoor's trajectory mirrors that of only one other politician in Kerala's history, K.P. Unnikrishnan – another outsider who won from Vadakara in 1971. But unlike Tharoor, Unnikrishnan had local roots. Tharoor remained an outsider both within the party and in Kerala society. Though he won four times, he never built a genuine political base.
Tharoor's victory over the BJP's Rajeev Chandrasekhar in 2024 was narrow. But he appeared to believe it was a personal triumph. Many in Congress disagree, insisting he wouldn't have won without the party's backing – and wouldn't again. Some don't rule out the possibility of Tharoor contesting from Thiruvananthapuram in future with CPM support, a scenario unthinkable just a few years ago.
The Nilambur by-election, by contrast, showcased a very different leadership style. Satheesan, credited with crafting the UDF's strategy, kept out P.V. Anvar – a known disrupter and former aide of Vijayan. Even the Indian Union Muslim League (IUML), the UDF's second-largest partner, accepted the decision reluctantly. Tharoor did not campaign in Nilambur, later claiming he wasn't invited. One Congress MP quipped: 'It wasn't a wedding that Tharoor needed a formal invite.'
Also read: Five Reasons Why Shashi Tharoor's Praise of Narendra Modi Could Not Have Been Worse Timed
'Team UDF' was how Satheesan described the win. Tharoor is rarely seen as a team player—more often, a loner. In Parliament, he seldom joins protests or mingles with Kerala MPs. 'He's ornamental—good for visibility, not one who rubs shoulders with the common man,' says poet and activist Kalpatta Narayanan. 'Has he ever praised Rahul Gandhi? But he found time to praise Modi.'
'Tharoor can no longer be trusted,' says MN Karassery, academic and Gandhian, who once admired him. 'Even the title of his book, Why I Am a Hindu, is provocative. It's a pointer to where he's headed.' Karassery, like many others, sees Tharoor's ideological moorings as shallow.
Satheesan is now the natural CM candidate if the UDF returns to power. Unlike Tharoor, he has risen through the ranks. So too has Ramesh Chennithala, another likely contender. Tharoor, in contrast, remains an alien presence – a bit like VK Krishna Menon, who also represented Thiruvananthapuram but never quite belonged. 'He's one of us, but you know…' is the typical refrain in Kerala.
Marooned
Tharoor's recent praise for Modi has also cost him Muslim support. His criticism of Hamas did not sit well with the IUML or the community more broadly. Once welcomed by the Nair Service Society – the organisation which 'represents' his caste – his ties there too have cooled. In Kerala, he is politically marooned.
There may have been a time when the Congress saw value in projecting Tharoor as its CM face. That moment has passed. As political analyst Rammohan KT notes, 'Tharoor's credibility has taken a beating. He's seen as a self-seeker. The Congress no longer needs him. In fact, it's doubtful whether he can win another election on his own.'
For now, Tharoor's political future seems increasingly tied to New Delhi, not Kerala.
Santosh Kumar is a Kerala-based journalist.
click here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

PM Modi unable to reject Trump's claims as US president will ‘lay bare the truth': Rahul Gandhi
PM Modi unable to reject Trump's claims as US president will ‘lay bare the truth': Rahul Gandhi

Scroll.in

time2 minutes ago

  • Scroll.in

PM Modi unable to reject Trump's claims as US president will ‘lay bare the truth': Rahul Gandhi

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Wednesday said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi cannot outrightly state that United States President Donald Trump has been lying about brokering a ceasefire deal between India and Pakistan, as that would prompt the American leader to 'lay bare the truth', reported ANI. Speaking to reporters outside Parliament, the leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha said: 'The prime minister has not said that Trump is lying. It is obvious what has happened. Everyone knows, he is not able to say it. That is the reality.' Trump has repeatedly claimed that he helped India and Pakistan settle the border tensions in May. The US president has also claimed that he pressured both countries into accepting the ceasefire by threatening to stop trade with them. New Delhi has rejected Trump's assertions. Gandhi said on Wednesday that Trump was repeating his claims to pressure New Delhi on a trade deal that is in the works. 'Just watch how the trade deal turns out,' he added. On Tuesday, speaking during a debate on the Pahalgam terror attack and the subsequent Operation Sindoor, Gandhi asked the prime minister to ' show courage ' and clarify if Trump was lying about mediating the ceasefire deal. 'Donald Trump has said 29 times that he brought about the ceasefire,' Gandhi said. 'If he is lying… let the prime minister say he is lying. If he has the courage of Indira Gandhi, let him say here that Donald Trump is a liar.' Modi told the Lok Sabha later that no country told India to halt its military operation against terror bases in Pakistan. A day earlier, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar told Parliament that there was no call between Modi and Trump during the Indian military strikes – codenamed Operation Sindoor – on what it claimed were terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. #WATCH | Delhi: On US President Donald Trump's statement on ceasefire and tariffs, Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "It is obvious, Prime Minister has not said that Trump is lying. Everyone knows that he is not able to speak. That is the reality. If PM Modi… — ANI (@ANI) July 30, 2025 The strikes were in response to the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam, which killed 26 persons on April 22. The Pakistan Army retaliated to Indian strikes by repeatedly shelling Indian villages along the Line of Control in Jammu and Kashmir. At least 22 Indian civilians and eight defence personnel were killed. India and Pakistan on May 10 reached an 'understanding' to halt firing following the four-day conflict. On Tuesday, Trump said that the trade deal with India had not been finalised and New Delhi could be hit with a tariff rate of 20% to 25%. Trump added that the final rate of levy had also not been finalised as India and the US were negotiating the agreement ahead of the August 1 deadline. The US president made the comments while responding to reporters' questions about the so-called reciprocal tariffs Washington plans to reimpose on dozens of countries that have not negotiated separate trade agreements with the US by August 1. Trump announced higher levies in April, before pausing those tariffs at a reduced 10% rate to allow time for negotiations. Despite an extended deadline, he has only secured a handful of deals.

In Parliament, Jaishankar Celebrated UNSC's Acceptance of TRF as a Terrorist Entity. But Did it?
In Parliament, Jaishankar Celebrated UNSC's Acceptance of TRF as a Terrorist Entity. But Did it?

The Wire

time2 minutes ago

  • The Wire

In Parliament, Jaishankar Celebrated UNSC's Acceptance of TRF as a Terrorist Entity. But Did it?

New Delhi: External affairs minister S. Jaishankar told the Rajya Sabha on July 30 that the United Nations had, for the first time, recognised The Resistance Front (TRF) as a proxy of the Lashkar-e-Tayyaba (LeT) in a recent report by the UN Security Council's monitoring team. However, a review of the report shows that it only cites the views of member states and does not offer any conclusion of its own. Referring to the latest report of the UN Security Council 1267 sanctions committee's Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team, Jaishankar said during the debate on Operation Sindoor the document had named TRF and accepted its links to LeT. 'We were able to get into the UN a recognition that TRF today is a proxy for the LeT and is responsible for Pahalgam,' he said, referring to the April 22 terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir in which 26 civilians were killed. He described this as the 'first time' such a reference had appeared in a public UN document and said India had succeeded 'in getting the UN Security Council monitoring team to accept that TRF today is a terrorist entity.' However, the report's language is measured, as it does not independently endorse any of positions, nor does it characterise TRF in its own words. Paragraph 84, which covers developments in Central and South Asia, notes that the Pahalgam attack was initially claimed by The Resistance Front (TRF), which 'later retracted its claim.' It then outlines differing assessments from UN member states. 'One Member State said the attack could not have happened without Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) support, and that there was a relationship between LeT and TRF,' the report states. Another country is quoted as saying 'the attack was carried out by TRF, which is synonymous with LeT.' A third member state, however, 'rejected both views and said LeT was defunct.' The report does not independently endorse any of these positions, nor does it characterise TRF in its own words. Jaishankar expressed satisfaction that India, despite not being a member of the UN Security Council, had obtained a press statement condemning the Pahalgam terror attack. 'In terms of the global response, I think most noteworthy was the UN Security Council statement was very noteworthy because Pakistan is a member'. He claimed that 'our diplomacy was able to get the UN Security Council to issue a statement underlying the need to hold the perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of the Pahalgam Act of Terrorism accountable and bring them to justice'. No reference to the Indian government In a key departure from its 2019 statement after the Pulwama terror attack, the UN Security Council's press statement on the Jammu and Kashmir attack drops a direct reference to the government of India. While the 2019 statement had urged all states to 'cooperate actively with the Government of India and all other relevant authorities' to bring the perpetrators to justice, the April 2025 statement does not call for cooperation with the Indian government. Instead, it refers more broadly to 'all relevant authorities.' By contrast, the Council's March 2025 statement on the attack of Pakistan's Jafar Express had explicitly called for member states to cooperate with the government of Pakistan. UNSC press statements are only issued with the consensus of all 15 Council members, including the US, Russia, France and the UK, indicating no objections were raised to the final language. In other part of the speech, he also claimed that India had inserted paragraphs on combating terrorism in all statement in multilateral forums. 'Today, if terrorism is on the global agenda, it is due to the efforts of the Modi government.' Elsewhere in his remarks, Jaishankar claimed that India had ensured that counter-terrorism references were included in the statements of all multilateral forums. 'Today, if terrorism is on the global agenda, it is due to the efforts of the Modi government,' he said. The foreign minister said that he is often asked whether such declarations matter. 'They matter, sir, because they shape global opinion.' Despite Jaishankar's assertion that India had shaped the global narrative on terrorism, Pakistan, whom India has often described as epicentre of global terrorism, is currently serving as a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council. As Council member Pakistan now chairs the Council's 1988 Sanctions Committee, which monitors measures against the Taliban, and has also been appointed vice-chair of the 1373 Counter-Terrorism Committee. .'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store