
Whatever you call it, it's warm and woolly
It's the kind of question to prompt knitted brows, and the answers are just a bit woolly.
Civis fears the creeping invasion of the United States and Canadian sweater, although internet searching suggested jersey is holding its own in New Zealand. For Civis, jersey remains the go-to.
Sweater is also a broader term, pulling in cardigans (open at the front), pullovers and sweater vests (sleeveless). According to one blog, sweaters can be casual or dressy, and span sporty styles to luxury contexts.
Pullover is said to be a globally recognised term, especially common in European fashion.
Jumper sounds more British, and it's a term Civis thought was losing its bounce in New Zealand, until The Warehouse site was checked.
There, 14 different men's "jumpers" were displayed — and not a single jersey in sight. There are also plenty of women's "jumpers", plus a handful of sweatshirts.
It being July, let's not sweat over that last term, or over hoodies, for that matter.
The blog identified jumper as the standard word in the United Kingdom and Ireland, evoking cosy knitwear for cooler seasons. Disconcertingly, jumper was also listed as the primary word for Australia and New Zealand.
Adding to the confusion: in American English, a "jumper" is a sleeveless dress worn over a blouse. Civis had no idea.
Jersey is thought to originate from Jersey in the Channel Islands. Jersey was renowned for high-quality knitted wool garments, and the name became associated first with the fabric, then with the garments themselves.
In the 19th century, woollen jerseys were a natural choice for sport. The word "jersey" soon shifted to describe the entire garment.
Regulations at the 1908 London Olympics even required competitors to wear a "sleeved jersey". Thus, jersey embedded itself in the sporting lexicon.
Today, the leader of the Tour de France wears the yellow jersey. The All Blacks "play for the jersey", even if it's made from some fancy synthetic material.
The garment called a guernsey emerged from another Channel Island, Guernsey. It was a tightly knitted, rugged top worn by fishermen, later adopted by the British Navy. Guernsey is now often considered a particular style of woollen jersey.
In the 1870s, Australian rules footballers began wearing guernseys — robust, navy woollen tops. These evolved into today's sleeveless AFL guernseys.
The Collins Dictionary notes that jersey, as a knitted upper-body garment, is "old-fashioned". How dare it!
★★★
Language acquisition and the integration of grammar rules into mother tongues are fascinating.
Pre-schoolers, through repetition, begin to understand that "-ed" turns verbs into the past tense. That works fine for climb/climbed and kick/kicked. But English is riddled with irregular verbs, so you'll often hear little ones say eated, sleeped or fighted.
Or perhaps even "I runned so fast my shoes flyed off".
However, what really caught Civis' ear was a girl of nearly 3 using both forms together: she not just "seed" something — she "sawed" it.
And what about this gem from a pre-teen? She's just learned that the small pieces in chess are called pawns and not prawns.
civis@odt.co.nz
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
2 days ago
- 1News
Fuel to Air India plane was cut moments before crash, report says
Fuel control switches for the engines of an Air India flight that crashed last month were moved from the "run" to the "cutoff" position moments before impact, starving both engines of fuel, a preliminary investigation report said early Saturday. The report, issued by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, also indicated that both pilots were confused over the change to the switch setting, which caused a loss of engine thrust shortly after takeoff. The Air India flight — a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner — crashed on June 12 and killed at least 260 people, including 19 on the ground, in the northwestern city of Ahmedabad. Only one passenger survived the crash, which is one of India's worst aviation disasters. The plane was carrying 230 passengers — 169 Indians, 53 British, seven Portuguese and a Canadian — along with 12 crew members. According to the report, the flight lasted around 30 seconds between takeoff and crash. It said that once the aircraft achieved its top recorded speed, 'the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another" within a second. The report did not say how the switches could have flipped to the cutoff position during the flight. ADVERTISEMENT The movement of the fuel control switches allow and cut fuel flow to the plane's engines. The switches were flipped back into the run position, the report said, but the plane could not gain power quickly enough to stop its descent after the aircraft had begun to lose altitude. "One of the pilots transmitted 'MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY',' the report said. It also indicated confusion in the cockpit moments before the crash. In the flight's final moment, one pilot was heard on the cockpit voice recorder asking the other why he cut off the fuel. 'The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' the report said. The preliminary report did not recommend any actions to the Boeing. Air India in a statement said it is fully cooperating with authorities investigating the crash. ADVERTISEMENT 'Air India is working closely with stakeholders, including regulators. We continue to fully cooperate with the AAIB and other authorities as their investigation progresses,' it said. The plane's black boxes — combined cockpit voice recorders and flight data recorders — were recovered in the days following the crash and later downloaded in India. Indian authorities had also ordered deeper checks of Air India's entire fleet of Boeing 787 Dreamliner to prevent future incidents. Air India has 33 Dreamliners in its fleet.


Otago Daily Times
3 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Whatever you call it, it's warm and woolly
Civis won't pull the wool over your eyes with this winter query: are those knitted upper-body garments called jerseys, pullovers, jumpers or sweaters? Maybe even guernseys? It's the kind of question to prompt knitted brows, and the answers are just a bit woolly. Civis fears the creeping invasion of the United States and Canadian sweater, although internet searching suggested jersey is holding its own in New Zealand. For Civis, jersey remains the go-to. Sweater is also a broader term, pulling in cardigans (open at the front), pullovers and sweater vests (sleeveless). According to one blog, sweaters can be casual or dressy, and span sporty styles to luxury contexts. Pullover is said to be a globally recognised term, especially common in European fashion. Jumper sounds more British, and it's a term Civis thought was losing its bounce in New Zealand, until The Warehouse site was checked. There, 14 different men's "jumpers" were displayed — and not a single jersey in sight. There are also plenty of women's "jumpers", plus a handful of sweatshirts. It being July, let's not sweat over that last term, or over hoodies, for that matter. The blog identified jumper as the standard word in the United Kingdom and Ireland, evoking cosy knitwear for cooler seasons. Disconcertingly, jumper was also listed as the primary word for Australia and New Zealand. Adding to the confusion: in American English, a "jumper" is a sleeveless dress worn over a blouse. Civis had no idea. Jersey is thought to originate from Jersey in the Channel Islands. Jersey was renowned for high-quality knitted wool garments, and the name became associated first with the fabric, then with the garments themselves. In the 19th century, woollen jerseys were a natural choice for sport. The word "jersey" soon shifted to describe the entire garment. Regulations at the 1908 London Olympics even required competitors to wear a "sleeved jersey". Thus, jersey embedded itself in the sporting lexicon. Today, the leader of the Tour de France wears the yellow jersey. The All Blacks "play for the jersey", even if it's made from some fancy synthetic material. The garment called a guernsey emerged from another Channel Island, Guernsey. It was a tightly knitted, rugged top worn by fishermen, later adopted by the British Navy. Guernsey is now often considered a particular style of woollen jersey. In the 1870s, Australian rules footballers began wearing guernseys — robust, navy woollen tops. These evolved into today's sleeveless AFL guernseys. The Collins Dictionary notes that jersey, as a knitted upper-body garment, is "old-fashioned". How dare it! ★★★ Language acquisition and the integration of grammar rules into mother tongues are fascinating. Pre-schoolers, through repetition, begin to understand that "-ed" turns verbs into the past tense. That works fine for climb/climbed and kick/kicked. But English is riddled with irregular verbs, so you'll often hear little ones say eated, sleeped or fighted. Or perhaps even "I runned so fast my shoes flyed off". However, what really caught Civis' ear was a girl of nearly 3 using both forms together: she not just "seed" something — she "sawed" it. And what about this gem from a pre-teen? She's just learned that the small pieces in chess are called pawns and not prawns. civis@


Newsroom
4 days ago
- Newsroom
An unseemly hatred for one building
Comment: Heritage buildings can be controversial. The targeting of New Zealand's heritage-listed Gordon Wilson Flats with special government legislation clearly demonstrates this. In what must be a first for New Zealand, the Government will pass this Act to overrule the agreed definition of heritage and its associated decision-making processes – just for one building. Such decisions are normally made by local councils. Heritage listing (or de-listing) a building requires evaluation of heritage significance, while consent to demolish a listed building also assesses other factors. In contrast, using a government bill departs from the convention that heritage legislation provides consistent rules against which specific cases are tested. But no one is challenging this. Instead, it seems that hatred for the building is overriding values that people would normally cherish. Gordon Wilson Flats are located on a hillside overlooking the capital city. This 10-storey, 64m-wide building is heritage architecture that is hard to miss. It is the only remaining post-war, high-rise, state-housing block in New Zealand and is arguably the country's first brutalist building. Its design is indebted to the historic relationship between the Ministry of Works and the London County Council. Its maisonette plan adapts the 1959 Alton West plan, which was influenced by Le Corbusier's 1952 Unité d'Habitation. The flats were heralded in 1958 by British architectural historian Nicholas Pevsner in the Architectural Review as 'exciting in appearance'. Its use in seismic design research gained the attention of Japanese building engineers, because it was an internationally rare instance of a 10-storey post-war building with seismic data. It memorialises government architect Gordon Wilson (1900-59), who died as the building was completed. In May 2012, the tenants were given seven days to leave their homes following a report finding that panels on the façade might fall off in an earthquake or strong wind. Rather than repair these, Housing New Zealand sold the flats to nearby Victoria University, which planned to demolish them to create a university gateway. Attempts to remove the building's heritage protection have failed. Its heritage status was instead reconfirmed in the Environment Court in 2017 and further strengthened with Heritage New Zealand category I status in 2021. The university still wants to replace the flats but now with new student housing. The legislation to enable the building's demolition is the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill. Chris Bishop, the minister responsible, has justified this special treatment because: 'The building is owned by a public institution – Victoria University – and because that owner, the council and the community all want it gone.' However, the public ownership of the building brings with it more, not fewer, heritage obligations. Government policy requires that state sector organisations, including universities, take 'a leadership role in being good stewards of the heritage places in its care'. The conflict with this policy, the bypassing of council processes, and the role of the Green Party in this unprecedented move have raised no public reaction. It was in the Environment Select Committee report on the bill that the Green Party advocated that the bill: 'Should go further to enable more effective and democratic management of perpetually derelict heritage protected structures, such as the hazardous Gordon Wilson Apartments in Wellington Central.' Green parties fashion themselves as protectors of the environment and climate-change activists. The Green Party of Aotearoa is no different. But nowhere did its response to the bill recognise The Gordon Wilson Flat's high embodied energy. Embodied energy is the energy needed to make something. For buildings, this includes energy to make concrete and steel and to transport materials to the site and remove excavated soil from it. Being enormous, the flats' embodied energy will not be environmentally insignificant and is important not to discard. As Professor Rebecca Lunn, a co-author of the Royal Academy of Engineering's Decarbonising construction report, has said: 'Our biggest failure is that we build buildings, then we knock them down and throw them away. We must stop doing this.' The flats were also built as a model of high-density inner-city housing, close to employment and transportation routes – the sort of buildings we need in the face of climate change. Its heritage is thus important, not only as social housing, but because of its historic role in contributing to our current understanding of how to build a sustainable city. This proposed sidelining of established heritage processes is extraordinary and it acknowledges that normal planning methods cannot avoid the magnitude of the apartments' heritage significance. But the lack of discomfort with the Government's planned use of special legislation also shows how feelings towards a building can override and contradict fundamental values, including the very idea of heritage. As Janet, a reader of Wellington Scoop, put it: 'I like heritage buildings but not those flats.'