Jamie Laboucane leaves runner-up status in rearview by winning Night 3 of Rangeland Derby
After finishing in a tie with Chanse Vigen on Saturday — just 1/100ths of a second behind Obrey Motowylo — Laboucane did one better on Sunday and was rewarded as the Hottest Heat of the Night winner.
Off barrel No. 2 in the ninth heat aboard his Panorama Advisory Group chuckwagon, Laboucane completed the figure-eight pattern around the barrels cleanly and raced around the GMC Stadium track in Sunday's quickest clocking of 1:13.79.
'I've just got to try to drive clean,' said Laboucane, who beat Vigen and his VisitLethbridge.com outfit by 44/100ths of a second for the quickest clocking of the evening. 'I know the horses are going to run for me. Honestly, I probably cut 'er a little bit too tight. I rolled that top barrel, but I got away lucky. Some other drivers didn't. It's a long 10 days, and sometimes you need a little luck to win.'
The other drivers who weren't so lucky were defending Calgary Stampede champion Jason Glass, who crunched a barrel in the seventh heat as did Kurt Bensmiller — a four-time winner of the coveted chuckwagon championship — one race later.
'I think (the track) was a little bit heavier, as I found out as well,' said Laboucane in regards to the afternoon rains that made track conditions slower than the first two nights. 'Guys probably just cut 'er a little bit too tight. I can't judge them because I came darn close, as well.'
One night after edging Laboucane and Vigen for the fastest time, Obrey Motowylo and his Len T Wong & Associates Real Estate outfit had another strong showing, this time finishing third in 1:14.76.
As far as the aggregate standings go, Vigen maintained his spot atop the leaderboard with a three-night time of 3:38.79.
'Chanse Vigen, he's rocking it,' said Laboucane, who's sitting in second spot just 23/100ths of a second behind his rival.
Rae Croteau Jr. (Bar L5 Ranch) is currently holding down the third spot in the cumulative standings followed closely by Kris Molle (Graf Mechanical Ltd.), Evan Salmond (De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Ltd.) and Chad Fike (Steelhaus Trayton).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
What I'm hearing about the Canucks' free-agent bargain bin plans and more
It may be the dog days of the NHL offseason, but the Vancouver Canucks are hardly satisfied with the state of their roster. Based on what I'm hearing from senior club sources, in fact, despite trading goaltender Artūrs Šilovs over the weekend and inking first-round pick Braeden Cootes and second-round pick Alexei Medvedev to entry-level contracts last week, the club is eyeing further reinforcements over the balance of the offseason. Advertisement There are multiple players still available on the unrestricted free-agent market that the club is considering and tracking with varying levels of interest. Players that Canucks brass believes are capable of helping them win, at the right price point. The problem? Vancouver is basically capped out. In order to make a competitive bid, and dip back into a market — UFAs that have fallen through the cracks in the first wave of the free-agent frenzy — from which the club has successfully identified key contributors like Pius Suter and Kevin Lankinen out of over the past two seasons, the Canucks will first have to send money out and off their cap sheet. Now this isn't to say that there's another shoe that's set to drop imminently, but from what The Athletic understands about the club's priorities here in mid-July, Canucks brass is actively exploring avenues to free up cap space. The club would love to enter next season with some additional flexibility, but is also motivated to turn around and sign a value late-summer free agent target if it were able to clear up the space to do so. We've had our eyes on veteran centre Teddy Blueger ($1.85 million cap hit on an expiring contract) and hard-nosed winger Dakota Joshua ($3.25 million cap hit with three years remaining) as potential candidates to be dealt for the purpose of freeing up cap space throughout this offseason. A late summer cap-shedding trade of that variety could give Vancouver the requisite space to add one of the remaining forwards on the open market, and at the very least, it seems that the club is exploring its options this summer. Let's get into a few more Canucks items that we're hearing or thinking about as the offseason begins to drag on. The Canucks understood that selling Šilovs for a fourth-round pick and 2021 first-round pick Chase Stillman would be received emotionally by the passionate fan base in this market. We're only 15 months removed from when Šilovs recorded a shutout to seal the only playoff series victory the Canucks have managed since 2011 (aside from the bubble). We're only a month removed from Šilovs delivering an MVP performance to deliver the franchise their first professional championship, the 2025 Calder Cup, in 56 years. Advertisement Šilovs wanted an opportunity to be a full-time NHL goaltender, and he'd earned that. He was also going to get it one way or another, whether because the Canucks moved proactively to trade him or because he was claimed on waivers in September or October during training camp. The logic of Šilovs' Canucks future was sealed when the club signed both Lankinen and Thatcher Demko to multiyear extensions. There simply wasn't room for Šilovs at the NHL level, and he was no longer going to be waiver-exempt next season. The Canucks had to manage the asset, and there was some meaningful interest in his services. Now, that statement should be qualified. While we'd heard that there were teams that would've been interested in packages built around Šilovs and the No. 15 pick ahead of the NHL Draft, in mid-July, with the game of goaltender musical chairs largely settled, it's not as if Vancouver had multiple bidders driving up the price of Šilovs on the trade market. The club, however, felt that the reigning AHL playoff MVP was worth a fourth-round pick (or thereabouts) and held firm to that price. Despite a soft market for goaltenders in this tier — Cayden Primeau netted the Montreal Canadiens a seventh-round pick, and Daniil Tarasov netted the Columbus Blue Jackets a fifth-round pick despite both players having better NHL track records than Šilovs — there was enough interest in Šilovs for Vancouver to net some modest value from Pittsburgh. The full price was a fourth-round pick and a forward in Stillman, who is coming off a down season, but in whom the Canucks have some real interest in. At the very least, Stillman has a high motor, and there's a feeling that Abbotsford is likely to need some forwards, given some anticipated graduations to the NHL level and how quickly the Calder Cup championship team evaporated this offseason. Advertisement Yes, the Penguins wanted to send out a contract in paying for Šilovs, but Vancouver doesn't view Stillman as solely a standard player contract to level out the Šilovs deal. There's some interest in seeing what Stillman can be in Abbotsford's system, and with an opportunity to work with Vancouver's development staff. In the end, this is what asset management looks like. It's not always pretty, and at first blush, the return can feel underwhelming. Vancouver decided to roll with a tandem of Demko and Lankinen, however, and invested heavily in order to do so. That meant that a Šilovs trade was an inevitability. It was a trade that Vancouver was able to execute while bringing back an above-market rate return. It's not fun and it's not sexy, but this is what baseline competence looks like sometimes at the NHL level. A lot can change between now and the end of training camp, but the Canucks' roster is currently shaping up to include 11 forwards that will carry cap hits of $1.5 million or greater, five defenders that will carry cap hits of $2 million or greater and two high-priced goalies. Sometimes it's just simple math. When you look at Vancouver's projected 23-man roster, it's readily apparent that the club has 18 spots already spoken for. And we can pretty safely make that 20, given that the Canucks are planning for both Tom Willander and Elias Pettersson, the defenceman, to be on the team to open the 2025-26 season. If the club plans to roster eight defenders, which is typically the organization's preference, that means that we're looking at recent free-agent signing Pierre-Olivier Joseph (who is on a one-way contract), Victor Mancini and some dark horse candidates to battle it out at training camp for one remaining blue-line spot. Advertisement And it means we're looking at two available NHL-level forward jobs for Aatu Räty, Max Sasson, Arshdeep Bains, Nils Åman, Jonathan Lekkerimäki and Linus Karlsson, and any dark horse candidates like organizational favourite Ty Mueller or Cootes, to scramble for at training camp. Barring a deal to create more room up front, this is shaping up to be a wildly competitive battle for the final few remaining roster spots at Canucks training camp. It sounds like the club is open to slow-cooking Lekkerimäki in the AHL to begin next season. The gifted scoring winger is waiver exempt, and the club wants to be cautious about managing his development and not rushing him. Åman has previously cleared waivers, and has some real ceiling limitations despite his length, speed and penalty killing prowess. Sasson is lightning quick, but is viewed internally as more of a winger than a centre at the NHL level and is waiver exempt to begin next season. A strong summer and training camp can change this logic, but those players will open the race in the outside lanes. The club's needs down the middle will make Räty a heavy favourite to break camp with the NHL team, but don't sleep on Bains and Karlsson as real candidates to earn full-time NHL jobs this upcoming season. The battle will be fierce and closely contested, but among the club's primary contenders to earn the final few available forward spots on the 23-man roster, Räty, Karlsson and Bains will have the inside track, as it stands, at this point in the offseason. Did anyone else spend their Saturday evening reading over the NHL and the NHLPA's new Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), which will supplant the 2020 MOU and functionally extend the 2013 collective bargaining agreement, ensuring NHL labour peace through the balance of this decade? Just me? The landmark agreement, the second consecutive CBA extension without a labour stoppage, will have massive implications on the league as a whole. The major changes have been well reported by this point — specifically, the regular season will extend to 84 games, and the term of standard player contracts will be limited to six years (seven, if a team is extending its own player) — but there are a few Canucks-centric angles that I wanted to unpack at greater length. Advertisement The first one applies to the AHL, and the possibility that prospects will be permitted to join their NHL team's top farm team at an accelerated timeline going forward. '(The) NHL will reopen its agreement' with the CHL 'to seek to eliminate the mandatory return rule for 19-year-old Players,' reads the MOU. '(The) NHL will seek to limit NHL Clubs to Loaning no more than one (1) 19-year-old Player per year to the AHL without the requirement of first offering such Player to his junior club.' Previously, prospects drafted as first-time eligible players out of the CHL have been unable to participate in AHL games until their draft-plus-two (usually their age-20) campaign. This has meant that, sometimes, even top prospects spend an additional year absolutely dominating the CHL, in lieu of being challenged at a higher level of hockey in the professional ranks as younger players. It's also meant that these CHL-drafted players aren't readily available to be NHL call-ups, and get NHL experience. Once the new CBA kicks in, in September 2026, however, the intention is for teams to be able to get their top CHL-drafted players up and running at the professional level more quickly. And this may also accelerate how quickly they make their NHL debuts or, at least, become NHL options for their clubs. Now it's a bit complicated, of course, because players on entry-level contracts will earn far less at the AHL level than they will if they play for top NCAA programs in the NIL era. That's a complication that could limit the impact of this rule change. For the Canucks and a player like Braeden Cootes, however, it could significantly impact his future development and his estimated time of arrival at the NHL level. The second applies to the imposition of a playoff salary cap and the elimination of the paper transactions, which the Canucks heavily utilized this past season, which made it simpler for teams to toll daily cap space. In general, the MOU is trying to close various rules that, as previously written, permitted teams to step on the line of cap circumvention without really going over it in any material way. That applies to long-term injured reserve (LTI), which is going to be far more limited going forward, but it also applies to teams that were tolling cap space the good old-fashioned, and honourable way, and netting a cap benefit as a result. Advertisement Without wading too far into the minutiae on this matter, it's just very Canucks that right at the moment that Vancouver escaped LTI — and paid to do so, attaching a pick to Tucker Poolman to send the final year of his contract to Colorado — and began to take proper cap advantage of the edge that having a local AHL affiliate can provide, the rule has now changed to limit the effectiveness of doing so. Finally, and this is the big one, the new CBA — and the further term restrictions added to standard player contracts — could not come at a better time for Vancouver. This new MOU and the timing of it are an absolute gift to the franchise on the Quinn Hughes file. Next summer, for example, when Hughes becomes extension eligible, initial contract talks between the club and his camp will be governed by the previous (current) CBA. Until mid-September 2026, effectively, Vancouver will be able to offer Hughes an eight-year extension. Once that deadline passes, however, Hughes' next deal will be governed by the rules of the next CBA, limiting him to just a seven-year max term. When you're talking about a player of Hughes' calibre, right off the bat, we should understand that we're probably talking about a $13-$15 million difference. That's additional leverage that the club will be able to wield in Hughes extension talks next summer, which didn't previously exist. The edge that Vancouver has been given, however, by the new MOU is even sharper than that. Now, even if Hughes were dead set on testing the market in 2027, he'd be looking at entering an environment where a six-year max-term deal is all that would be available to him on July 1, 2027, when he hits unrestricted free agency. Now we're talking about a $26-$30 million difference. That's big money. The timing of this new pact between the NHL and the NHLPA, and the contents therein, effectively, have significantly enhanced the quality of the cards in Vancouver's hand. Both in terms of giving the Canucks more levers to appeal to their player, but also, in terms of giving the club more leverage. Advertisement Before I read the MOU, for example, and really processed the implications of it, I could see the argument for why, for example, the New Jersey Devils would be reluctant to part with significant assets in order to acquire the third Hughes brother in a trade. 'Why pay a significant price when we think we'll have the inside track to sign him anyway,' and all that. Now, however, given the leverage dynamics of how much more Vancouver can offer next summer, versus what a rival club would be able to offer in the summer of 2027 were Hughes to hit the market, the case for a team like the Devils being far more aggressive in seeking to trade for Hughes is far more compelling. 'We have to pay a retail price because otherwise we're at risk of not landing a transformative piece to our lineup, given that they can offer him $30 million more today than we'll be able to in 12 months.' So what's the biggest short-term impact of the new MOU on Vancouver, then? It's that the club has additional levers to pull in attempting to retain its franchise player next summer, and, even if that fails, the contents of the new MOU and the business logic that it's likely to create should give the Canucks significant additional trade leverage. (Photo of Artūrs Šilovs: Derek Cain / Getty Images)
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
McTavish an offer sheet candidate, Canes should let Ehlers cook: NHL offseason notebook
The threat of an offer sheet didn't carry much weight in recent years, until last summer. Aside from some sparks between the Canadiens and Hurricanes, first over Sebastian Aho (whose offer sheet was matched by Carolina) and then Jesperi Kotkanemi (who left Montreal for Carolina), there hasn't been much traction on that front in the last 10 years. Advertisement And then the Blues disrupted the norm last summer, with not one but two offer sheets targeting the Oilers. Dylan Holloway and Philip Broberg emerged as key players in St. Louis and helped fuel their turnaround. Their success was a reminder of the power of an offer sheet. It's a mechanism that can give a team with draft capital and cap space a competitive advantage if general managers are willing to rattle their opponents. Many wondered if the Blues would inspire a new trend and willingness to shake up the restricted free agent class. Whether it was the threat of an offer sheet or general managers wanting a better salary cap picture ahead of free agency, teams got to work earlier on RFA extensions this summer. The Maple Leafs locked up Matthew Knies early. Edmonton extended Evan Bouchard, and the Rangers re-signed Will Cuylle. JJ Peterka, Noah Dobson, and K'Andre Miller have all been traded and extended by their respective new teams. And then more names, including Lukas Dostal, Bowen Byram, and Gabriel Vilardi, came off the board when players (and teams) elected for arbitration. Before general managers start daydreaming early about a stacked 2026 class of RFAs, there are still a few offer sheet-eligible players worth keeping an eye on this summer. That list starts with Mason McTavish. Unlike Edmonton last summer, the Ducks have a ton of cap space at their disposal to easily match any offer thrown McTavish's way. So a mid-tier deal won't fly. An offer has to have some oomph behind it — at least to a tune of a $7.02 million cap hit — to stump Anaheim. Via Puckpedia The Ducks don't need the draft pick compensation associated with the higher tiers. Their pipeline is stocked, and eventually Anaheim needs to turn those picks and young up-and-comers into actual NHLers to turn the corner. That's why keeping McTavish makes the most sense, especially after moving on from Trevor Zegras. But on the flip side, the Ducks may not want to make a commitment of that magnitude just yet. McTavish hasn't established himself as a true top-six center yet, and some of his comps, like Max Comtois, Max Domi, and Casey Mittelstadt, add some question marks on just how much substance there is in his game. As much as the Ducks have short- and long-term financial flexibility, management still may not want to clog up the books too early with a hefty McTavish extension. Anyone willing to roll the dice on McTavish has to see a little Dylan Strome in him — a late-bloomer who needs the right opportunity. For some eligible teams, like the Canadiens, Bruins, Flames, and Red Wings, it's worth throwing a dart this summer. At worst, it rattles Pat Verbeek in Anaheim, who easily matches an offer. At best, it lands a team a 22-year-old center who could thrive in a new environment. Advertisement Speaking of unsigned RFAs, there's Luke Hughes in New Jersey. Unlike McTavish, he isn't offer sheet eligible, so there isn't that same pressure on the Devils to get a deal done sooner rather than later. But his extension could have a domino effect on the Devils' roster, depending on what he signs for. Evolving-Hockey projects a six-year deal worth $7.52 million a year. It's a contract that projects to age well, if he follows the path of comps Seth Jones and Noah Hanifin (and not Tyson Barrie or Dmitry Kulikov). A contract of that value could lead to some subtractions to balance the books. The easy answer is flipping the last two years of Ondrej Palat's contract. But management could consider a bolder change on the blue line, too. If Seamus Casey or Simon Nemec look ready for a full-time NHL role, their entry-level contracts would help offset Hughes' extension. But someone would have to step out of the starting six. That's why Dougie Hamilton's name has surfaced this summer; as of July 1, he officially has a modified no-trade clause (instead of a full NMC), which could help facilitate a change. Hughes proved in Hamilton's absence that he could quarterback the top power play unit and be a two-way difference in key minutes. It just depends on whether there is a market for the last three years of Hamilton's contract. A potential Hamilton trade is easier said than done because the defense market has been in a bit of a standstill, hinging on Bowen Byram. The Sabres were prepared to match any offer sheets for Byram, but took away that option after filing for arbitration. Then on Monday night, Buffalo extended the RFA for two years, at $6.25 million a year.. Evolving-Hockey projected a longer-term extension — an eight-year deal worth almost $8 million a year on average. While a contract of that length could have opened the door to long-term savings, it was a risky play. As is, a $6.25 million cap hit is pricey relative to two-year projections and his market value. Byram showed in Colorado that he can crush third pair minutes. In Buffalo, he looks like somewhat of a passenger in a top-four capacity. While he isn't expected to be the driver of a pair with Rasmus Dahlin, his struggles away from the Sabres' number one sparked some concern. Maybe he just looked that exposed due to who he paired up with, otherwise. Until there is clarity on his true ability, the team can't afford to potentially overpay Byram, not with lefties Dahlin and Owen Power already locked up long-term. A short-term contract lets Byram show exactly what he is capable of — and whether he can follow the path of comps like Brandon Montour, Ryan Pulock, and Travis Sanheim, or if he is destined to be the next Jamie McBain or Zach Bogosian. But it's far from a perfect solution for either side because Byram's value could tank over the next two years. The Sabres could also lose him for nothing, since this contract walks him to unrestricted free agency. So while this contract can quiet some trade buzz, it won't outright silence it. Because if the Sabres decide he isn't a long-term fit, management is officially on the clock to find a trade partner to ensure he doesn't leave for nothing. The team could take a more aggressive approach and use this contract as cost certainty for interested teams. A potential match like the Blues, who have an opening after waiving Nick Leddy, no longer has to worry about acquiring Byram and signing him for maximum value this summer. Advertisement After trading Cody Ceci last year at the deadline, trading Henry Thrun, and buying out Marc-Edouard Vlasic, the Sharks needed two things: bodies on the backend and more salary to reach the cap floor. Two free agent signings (Dmitry Orlov, John Klingberg) and a waiver claim (Leddy) brought in three NHL-caliber defensemen and $12.5 million in cap space. With those additions and Shakir Mukhamadullin pushing for a mainstay role at the NHL level, the Sharks can consider a Mario Ferraro trade. Ferraro has a year left on his contract and could also be packaged as a deadline rental in March. But teams would likely jump at the chance to add a 26-year-old with a $3.25 million cap hit, especially after defensive prices spiked this summer. That cap hit comes in clutch for an acquiring team and San Jose; the Sharks should be able to save their last retention slot for the deadline to get maximum value on one of those newly-added veteran defensemen. The Rangers could still use help on the left behind free agent signing Vladislav Gavrikov. If Byram is off the trade block, the Blues should be in the market for a lefty, too. The Jets may want a third-pair upgrade. The Red Wings' depth is far from perfect. The demand should be there, as long as teams are willing to gamble on a Ferraro glow-up outside of a challenging environment in San Jose, similar to Hampus Lindholm when he left Anaheim for Boston. As much demand as there could be for a lefty like Ferraro, the right side is a coveted position. That could benefit the Devils if Hamilton officially goes on the trade block and the Penguins, who could flip the last two years of Erik Karlsson's contract. But Rasmus Andersson doesn't come with that same baggage, since he only takes up $4.55 million on the cap for another year. As the offseason market has evolved, the number of landing spots for Andersson has dwindled. But there are still teams seeking right-handed reinforcements. If the Stars or Lightning can clear space, Andersson could be a solid fit for either team. The Red Wings need a lot more help on the right than on the left. The Bruins' depth is still suspect. But the Golden Knights still look like the strongest fit, considering the Alex Pietrangelo situation and Andersson's chemistry with Noah Hanifin. Add in Andersson's willingness to extend there, which can help juice the Flames return, and it could all click — if Vegas can clear space for this year, and beyond. After Andersson's current contract expires, he is in for a raise. Evolving-Hockey projects something in the $8 million range. Even if the Golden Knights can get him to something more team-friendly, it will still take some maneuvering for Vegas, as it coincides with Jack Eichel and Pavel Dorofeyev also needing new deals. Advertisement The Penguins recently absorbed Matt Dumba's cap hit from Dallas and can afford to take on more. So can the Blackhawks, Flames, Blue Jackets, and Kraken. The Ducks and Sharks outright need to add more salary. There should be a handful of buyers with space, because teams outside of the playoff picture were a bit less active in free agency this year. So the Golden Knights, and other contenders looking to shed contracts, should be able to move salary out if necessary. The goalie market seriously underwhelmed this summer, which added some intrigue to a potential trade candidate in Arturs Silovs. Between his waiver-exemption ending and the Canucks extending Thatcher Demko a year early, it seemed like his time in the organization was coming to an end. Over the last couple of seasons, he put in the work to raise his stock, between his experience at the NHL level and in the 2024 playoffs and his recent MVP honors after winning the Calder Cup with Abbotsford. The Penguins, before acquiring Silovs on Sunday, didn't need a third goalie. Joel Blomqvist looks poised to play more, plus Tristan Jarry has another three years on his contract. With Silovs, Pittsburgh has a less-than-desirable three-goalie situation to navigate — unless another skate is about to drop. Pittsburgh has all three salary retention slots open, so management can afford to commit one to Jarry for the next three years in the right trade. The problem is that he is incredibly streaky, so that multi-year commitment could still be dicey. Just take his swing from saving 12.4 goals above expected in 51 games in 2023-24, to last year's lows that saw him spending time in the AHL. And he doesn't have much pedigree, either. So while the Oilers seem like an obvious target considering their unstable crease, Jarry might only add to that volatility. The Hurricanes' system is both a blessing and a curse, in some ways. Few teams have managed to turn a playing style into an outright identity and maintain it despite roster turnover. But sometimes, that system can also bite the Canes when there isn't a willingness to depart from it. As much as the Canes have a knack for maximizing players within their system, not everyone fits perfectly. Mikko Rantanen didn't. Neither did Marty Necas. So when those situations arise, the question is whether the player should change their game to blend in more or if the coaches should let those players color outside the lines. The answer can be somewhere in the middle, as long as it doesn't suppress what someone like Nikolaj Ehlers can bring to the lineup. Do your thing, Ehlers 👀 📺: Jets vs. Panthers on SNW📲: Stream on Sportsnet+ — Sportsnet (@Sportsnet) November 17, 2024 Ehlers is a dynamic and creative forward who can electrify a team's offense. It's exactly what a team like the Hurricanes needs, around staples like Sebastian Aho, Seth Jarvis, and Logan Stankoven, who are perfect stylistic fits. But Ehlers' game does carry some risk, which could be why he was rarely deployed like a true top-line talent in Winnipeg. So will Rod Brind'Amour and the Canes' staff embrace all that Ehlers brings, and allow him to go against the grain from the standard that's been set? It could be the key to adding some dimension to Carolina's quintessential style. Data via Evolving-Hockey, HockeyViz, HockeyStatCards, All Three Zones, TheStanleyCap, and Natural Stat Trick. This story relies on shot-based metrics; here is a primer on these numbers. (Top photo of Mason McTavish: Gary A. Vasquez / Imagn Images)
CNN
3 hours ago
- CNN
Reflecting on the new format of the expanded FIFA Club World Cup
Chelsea have been crowned champions of the world after beating PSG in Sunday's Club World Cup final. The new-look tournament featured 32 teams with matches played across 11 cities in the United States. The month long competition left fans, organizers, and players with plenty to reflect on ahead of the 2026 World Cup in the U.S., as well as Canada and Mexico. Ahead of the final, World Sport's Patrick Snell caught up with former Major League Soccer player and TNT Sports analysts Brian Dunseth, and Mo Adams, for their thoughts on the tournament.
