
Mohamed Fayed paid spies to discover ‘truth' about Diana's death
The former Harrods owner spent a decade before his death channelling cash to his native country's agents in London, via a secret network of companies.
The billionaire businessman – who has been accused by numerous women of rape and sexual assault while boss of Harrods – was desperate to obtain secret intelligence about the death of his eldest son Dodi and the Princess in Paris in August 1997.
Sources say he hoped to receive confirmation from Egyptian secret service operatives of his belief that the British intelligence services had a hand in the fatal crash in the Alma tunnel.
Fayed had grown convinced that the British establishment feared the idea of Dodi, an Egyptian, as a possible stepfather to the future King.
At one stage, he told an Egyptian secret service agent that he knew the British intelligence services had killed the pair because they feared the possibility of the couple having a child who would be 'a Muslim brother to the future King'.
His claims were discredited, along with other conspiracy theories about the Princess's death, following the three-year Operation Paget investigation by Sir John Stevens, the former Metropolitan Police commissioner.
Sir John concluded in December 2006 that the pair had died as a result of an accident. Two years later, a jury inquest delivered a verdict of 'unlawful killing' due to the 'gross negligence' of Henri Paul, the driver, who was three times over the limit, as well as the speed of paparazzi photographers chasing them.
Fayed, who died aged 94 in August 2023, is suspected of raping and sexually assaulting more than 100 women, dating back to the 1970s.
More than 100 alleged victims have contacted police to say they were sexually abused by the tycoon. The youngest is thought to have been 13 at the time.
A number of allegations were made against Fayed while he was still alive. Investigators twice sent files for a charging decision to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) – in 2008, relating to three victims and in 2015 linked to one other.
On another three occasions – in 2018, 2021 and 2023 – the CPS was asked for what is called early investigative advice, but the matters were not pursued further by police.
The Telegraph has been told that over the decade before his death, Fayed channelled 'some millions of pounds' through a network of holding companies and commercial businesses to fund agents and informants run by the Egyptian general intelligence service, known as the Mukhabarat, in London.
One source with knowledge of the payments said: 'Over a ten-year period, sums amounting to some millions of pounds were paid in cash or Bitcoin from Fayed through various companies to the Egyptian intelligence services for their operations in the UK and some in Ireland. The money was eventually paid to agents and officers.
'In return, he would get sensitive information about business rivals in Qatar and Brunei.'
The source added: 'Fayed also wanted information about the death of Dodi and Diana. The Egyptian secret services told him the British establishment had not liked her relationship with Dodi, but they said to him that they had no information to offer him about the way Dodi and Diana had died.
'In fact, agents warned Fayed about his behaviour in continuing to make loud claims about MI5 and MI6 having a role in their deaths.'
Sources have told The Telegraph: 'Al-Fayed's manner after the killing of his son Dodi was completely unbalanced, and he was always shouting when speaking to the Egyptian intelligence officers, which made them not pay much attention to his requests.'
Fayed's youngest son, Omar, has told The Telegraph that for several years he had been aware of shadowy individuals in his father's circle who he suspected were linked to the Egyptian intelligence services.
Responding to the claims that his father paid Egyptian secret agents hoping for information about the Princess, Omar said: 'My father was a very generous man and he was an information addict. '
Following the tycoon's death, Fayed's widow, the Finnish socialite Heini Wathen-Fayed, and their children fell out over the dispersal of his estate, which is estimated at £1.3 billion.
The Egyptian intelligence services are understood to have become concerned that an important funding stream for their intelligence work in the UK would be cut off as a result.
It is understood that business intermediaries tried unsuccessfully to seek a meeting with Mrs Wathen-Fayed, to persuade her to 'continue her late husband's work' and carry on providing funding from his assets.
Another Cairo-based source, who works for one of Fayed's institutions, said: 'One of the guards who works [here] and was recruited from the Egyptian general intelligence service informed me that some of the most prominent leaders of the service are very interested in determining the amount of money and wealth left by Al-Fayed and are seeking to continue its work as it was in the past.'
Fayed rose from an impoverished childhood in Alexandria to build a multi-billion-dollar business empire. At the time of his death, he still owned the Paris Ritz, which he bought in 1979, though he sold Harrods in 2010 to the investment arm of Qatar's sovereign wealth fund for a reported £1.5 billion.
Mrs Wathen-Fayed, his second wife, whom he married in 1985, was tasked with splitting an inherited property empire, which includes apartment buildings overlooking Hyde Park, a Scottish castle and apartments in New York, between his four children.
Omar Fayed, now 36, said that his father's desire to discover what he was convinced was 'the truth' behind the death of Dodi and the Princess would have motivated any relationship he had with the Egyptian secret intelligence services.
The environmentalist and publisher said: 'He always wanted a competitive advantage over his business rivals and he always wanted to know what had happened to Dodi and Diana, even if he had, towards the end, reconciled himself to what he said was 'letting God sort it out'.
'His papers and documents on the subject of Dodi and Diana were so huge they crossed continents, and any information the Egyptian SIS could have provided would have been very welcome to him.'
Mr Fayed said that it was highly unlikely his mother would be prepared to agree to any request from Egyptian secret services to carry on her late husband's arrangement.
He added: 'I certainly wouldn't be surprised if they [Egyptian SIS] would want to approach us to carry on getting funding.
'I have been approached by one Egyptian national who ran a private security firm about money owed to him by my father to 'look after' his [Fayed's] family. He wants the money to continue.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Sig Sauer must face ICE officer's lawsuit over accidental gun firing
Aug 1 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Friday revived a lawsuit seeking to hold firearms maker Sig Sauer liable to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer who was injured when his P320 gun went off accidentally during a training drill. The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia said a trial judge erred by dismissing Keith Slatowski's lawsuit after excluding testimony from two experts about whether the gun's design could cause injury. Sig Sauer and its lawyer did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The company has faced several lawsuits over alleged unintentional P320 firings. Slatowski's gun discharged from within its holster after his hand hit the grip in September 2020 at a New Castle, Delaware firing range. A bullet went through his upper right hip and out his thigh. While unsure whether debris or the holster itself caused the trigger to depress, the former Marine said the lack of an external safety to prevent unexpected firings made his gun unsafe. Slatowski sought $10 million in damages. Writing for a three-judge appeals court panel, Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas said the trial judge properly excluded testimony from the two experts about whether Slatowski's gun caused his injury, because they hadn't done testing. But the appeals court said testimony about possible design flaws should have been admitted. It returned the case to U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick in Philadelphia for a possible trial. "The P320's design is technical and probably needs explaining," Bibas wrote. "From there, ... Slatowski must rely on his lay eyewitness testimony. It may not prove persuasive. But that is up to the jury, not the judge." Slatowski's wife is also a plaintiff. Their lawyer Robert Zimmerman said in an email: "Our clients are thankful for the opportunity to present their case to a jury." The case is Slatowski et al v Sig Sauer Inc, 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-1639.


The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
Alleged leader of Mexican kidnapping ring released after nearly 20 years in prison
The alleged leader of an infamous Mexican kidnapping ring walked out of a maximum security prison after nearly 20 years Friday, hours after a judge said there wasn't sufficient evidence to support the charges holding him. Interior Secretary Rosa Icela Rodríguez on Friday rattled off a list of appeals, injunctions and complaints filed over the years of Israel Vallarta's imprisonment in a case that never arrived at a verdict. Vallarta had been charged with organized crime and kidnapping, but a judge tossed those out Thursday. The Attorney General's Office did not immediately respond as to whether it would appeal. Vallarta was arrested in 2005, along with his girlfriend French citizen Florence Cassez. Cassez was eventually convicted and sentenced to 60 years on charges of aiding a kidnapping ring, in a case that soured relations between Paris and Mexico City. She acknowledged living with Vallarta at a ranch where kidnap victims were being held, but professed her innocence, saying she was unaware of their presence. One victim identified her as a kidnapper, but by voice only rather than by sight. A day after Cassez was arrested, police had forced her to take part in a staged raid on the ranch purportedly to rescue hostages and arrest suspects. It was covered by the media and broadcast on television. In January 2013 the Supreme Court overturned Cassez's conviction due to procedural and rights violations. She was released and became a cause celebre in France.


The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
PSG star Achraf Hakimi facing rape charge after ‘inviting woman he met on Instagram back to family home'
PSG star Achraf Hakimi is reportedly facing trial for rape after allegedly inviting a woman over to his home near Paris. Prosecutors have signed a final indictment requesting the 26-year-old to be charged in criminal court. 2 If convicted, the Moroccan national faces up to 15 years in prison. The case stems from an alleged incident on February 25, 2023. According to Le Parisien, a 24-year-old woman told police she met Hakimi on Instagram in January of that year. After a month of exchanges, he reportedly ordered her an Uber to his home in Boulogne-Billancourt while his wife and children were away on holiday. Once inside, the woman claims Hakimi kissed her mouth and breasts through her clothes, despite her protests. She alleged he then assaulted her without consent. According to her account, she managed to push him away with her foot before fleeing and texting a friend to pick her up. She went to a police station the same day to 'make a statement of rape,' though she initially declined to file a formal complaint. Messages she later provided to investigators reportedly showed her distress following the encounter. Achraf Hakimi shows what he is made of at PSG training On March 3, 2023, Hakimi was charged with rape by an investigating judge and placed under judicial supervision after being held in custody. He has consistently denied the allegations. The footballer, currently holidaying in Puerto Rico with former teammate Kylian Mbappé, previously claimed the case was a plot against him. 'The truth is that when you are successful and things are going well, you become an easy target for certain people and that taught me that you can't trust many people around you,' Hakimi said this January in a interview. 'They wanted to blackmail me and that's why we filed a complaint and it's going well. The justice system handled things rather well.' His lawyer, Fanny Colin, slammed the prosecution's latest move. 'These requisitions are incomprehensible and senseless in light of the evidence in the case,' she told Le Parisien. 'It establishes the plaintiff's lies, particularly through the psychological assessments conducted on her. 'Achraf Hakimi and I remain as calm as when the proceedings began. 'If these requests were to be followed, we would obviously pursue all avenues of appeal.'