
Usha Vance Opens Up About Family Life in Rare Interview
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
In a rare interview from the Naval Observatory, second lady Usha Vance spoke with conservative commentator Meghan McCain about adjusting to public life and the realities of raising three young children while in the high-profile political role.
The conversation also offered a glimpse into the Vance family's world, from their love of Ohio to the vice president's talent as an "excellent, amazing baker," and Usha's reliance on a group chat of friends for style advice.
Why It Matters
Second lady Usha Vance has largely kept a low speaking profile while in office, with Wednesday's Citizen McCain with Meghan McCain podcast episode offering insight into the couple and family as a whole.
McCain, who praised Usha Vance several times during the interview and used the conversation to announce her pregnancy and seek parenting advice, did not vote for the Republican ticket led by Donald Trump and JD Vance in November 2024. Instead, she wrote in her late father, Senator John McCain, who was the previous Republican nominee for president in 2008.
What To Know
Usha, 39, is a legal scholar and academic powerhouse, having earned degrees from Yale College and Yale Law School, where she met JD Vance, as well as a master's from Cambridge. She holds an extensive list of legal accomplishments and fellowships, including a clerkship with Chief Justice John Roberts on the U.S. Supreme Court—a role she told McCain she began just seven weeks after giving birth.
Usha was raised in San Diego, California, by Indian immigrants who came to the area in pursuit of higher education, she told McCain.
Up until Vance was nominated as President Donald Trump's running mate in July 2024, she was working as a trial lawyer at Munger, Tolles, and Olson.
The couple has three children: two sons, Ewan and Vivek, who are 8 and 5, and a daughter, Mirabel, who is 3.
Second Lady Usha Vance on a June 25, 2025 interview on Citizen McCain with Meghan McCain podcast.
Second Lady Usha Vance on a June 25, 2025 interview on Citizen McCain with Meghan McCain podcast.
Citizen McCain with Meghan McCain podcast/YouTube
Raising A Multi-Faith Family
When Vance converted to Catholicism, "we had to have a lot of real conversations," Usha, who is Hindu, and told McCain that she is "not intending to convert," she said.
When asked how the couple manages both faiths and presents them to their children, Usha said they offer their children the opportunities to explore both religions and make their own decisions.
"We send our kids to Catholic school and have given them each the choice," she noted. Their oldest child, Ewan, has decided to be baptized Catholic.
Usha says going to church is "a family experience," even though her kids know she is not Catholic.
"They have plenty of access to Hindu tradition - from books that we give them to things that we show them to the visit recently to India and some of the religious elements of that visit."
The family travelled together to India in April, visiting historic sites such as the Taj Mahal among others.
In addition, Usha says the children have access to learning about Hinduism through their relatives, telling McCain, "My grandmother is a particularly devout Hindu."
The family doesn't necessarily celebrate Hindu holidays at home, but the second lady floated the idea of a Holi party next year.
She told McCain that all three of her children eat meat, unlike her. Vegetarianism is a common diet among Hindus.
US Vice President JD Vance (2R) and his wife Usha Vance (2L), along with their children Ewan (C), Vivek (R) and Mirabel, pose for a photo in front of the Akshardham Temple in New Delhi...
US Vice President JD Vance (2R) and his wife Usha Vance (2L), along with their children Ewan (C), Vivek (R) and Mirabel, pose for a photo in front of the Akshardham Temple in New Delhi on April 21, 2025. More
KENNY HOLSTON/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
Transitioning to the Public Eye and Maintaining Normalcy
Throughout the interview, Usha Vance emphasized her efforts to maintain a sense of normalcy for her family—a priority that influences many of their decisions, including whether to bring their children to public events.
"Almost every decision is directed at making it as much like what it would have been like if they had been growing up in Cincinnati as we planned," she told McCain.
"So sometimes that means they are at public events because if there were a cool military parade or something like that they'd want to go see it, and if their dad was going to go be doing something that they're interested in they want to be with him and experience it as a family of five and not just dad's off doing this other thing," she explained.
However, the couple "also make a lot of decisions that keep them out of the public eye and make them have to do pretty normal prosaic things" such as handling everyday chores like putting away laundry or cleaning up spills—despite having staff members nearby who offer to help.
Beyond parenting, Usha Vance acknowledged that "one of the things that's kind of difficult about this life is that you are constantly set apart," citing differences in security and social interactions compared with their life before Vance took up such a high-profile post.
She noted that there's "all of these ways in which you're just sort of pulled out of everyday life and the pressure that I feel is how to reinsert myself in it at every possible turn and actually just be a millennial person living in the world as opposed to some sort of like figure on television."
Her way of doing that, she says, is partaking in regular activities like not always getting her hair styled or leaving the house with a ton of makeup on, or "going out to the gym and coming out sweaty and walking down the street and getting coffee."
"I try to do that every day, just have a normal life that is in public and ignore that people are watching it," she said.
By doing these regular activities, she hopes it shows that "you can be in a position of some prominence in the public eye but still sort of be a part of this generation and do the same things that everyone else does."
She echoed a similar sentiment with her wardrobe, noting that she tries not to always purchase a new outfit for certain events, but works to try and mix and match various items already in her closet.
Second Lady Life
Usha says she's undertaken a handful of "self-improvement projects" now that she's second lady, which include restarting German language lessons, reading a "backlog" of books, gym classes, and "personal projects that are fundamentally unrelated to anything in politics."
She still spends time with her friends despite her busy schedule, noting that a few of them are going white water rafting, hiking, and visiting some breweries in the near future.
While Usha and Vance's lives have drastically changed over the past six months, with her remarking that they miss road trips, and Vance specifically drives, they have shared many fond memories in the new role and have befriended many of the staff at their new residence in the Naval Observatory.
The couple still tries to have dates sometimes, with Usha noting that being on a discrete date in Cincinnati, "that sense of being anonymous in public is honestly the best of all dates for us."
In her political role, she is seeking to encourage young kids to read more and draw attention away from their phones and other technology, and she launched the Summer Reading Challenge, in which children read 12 books between June and September. They can then write or draw a reflection and submit it to the White House.
She told McCain that while literacy is "going to be a major issue" for her, it's not the only one she is seeking to tackle.
When asked about her political future and the possibility of becoming first lady soon, Usha replied, "Four years ago, I had absolutely no intention of leading any sort of life in politics," later adding, "I'm not plotting out next steps or really trying for anything after this."
"In a dream world, eventually I'll be able to live in my home and kind of continue my career and all those sorts of things," she said, noting that right now she is "along for the ride and enjoying while I can."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Revised Senate bill includes updated Lee language to sell public lands
The 940-page bill Senate Republican leaders unveiled Friday night to implement President Trump's agenda includes a section pushed by Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) to sell public lands, although a smaller amount of land than was in a provision rejected earlier in the week by Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough. The updated language in the bill directs the secretary of the Interior Department to select for sale not less than 0.25 percent and not more than 0.50 percent of the Bureau of Land Management's land with certain restrictions. The Interior secretary would be directed to 'dispose' of land that has the 'highest value,' is nominated for sale by state and local governments, is adjacent to existing developed areas, has access to existing infrastructure and is suitable for residential housing. Any land sold by the Interior Department must be used solely for the development of housing or to build infrastructure to support housing. Federally protected land including national monuments, national recreation areas, components of national wilderness and components of national wild and scenic rivers would be excluded from sale. Interior would not be allowed to sell public lands located more than five miles from the border of a population center of at least 1,000 people. The revised language reduces the amount of land the Interior Department would be allowed to sell compared to legislation Lee unveiled earlier this month. The earlier text directed the Interior secretary to select between 0.5 percent and 0.75 percent of Bureau of Land Management land for sale. The Senate parliamentarian on Monday ruled that the original language mandating the sale of millions of acres of public land from both the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service violated the Byrd Rule. The Byrd Rule determines what legislation is eligible to be protected from a filibuster and allowed to pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote. Provisions must be primarily budgetary in nature to comply with the Byrd Rule. The provisions would apply to public lands in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. The issue is controversial, even among Republicans. Five House Republicans this week said they would vote against the bill if the provision remained in it when it came back to the lower chamber. Senate Republicans are racing to pass the Trump agenda megabill this weekend despite a number of uncertainties. Leadership had hoped to hold a vote Saturday but the timing remains fluid.


Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
What's next for birthright citizenship after the Supreme Court's ruling? Here's what to know.
WASHINGTON — The legal battle over President Donald Trump's move to end birthright citizenship is far from over despite the Republican administration's major victory Friday limiting nationwide injunctions. Immigrant advocates are vowing to fight to ensure birthright citizenship remains the law as the Republican president tries to do away with more than a century of precedent. The high court's ruling sends cases challenging the president's birthright citizenship executive order back to the lower courts. But the ultimate fate of the president's policy remains uncertain. Here's what to know about birthright citizenship, the Supreme Court's ruling and what happens next. Birthright citizenship makes anyone born in the United States an American citizen, including children born to mothers in the country illegally. The practice goes back to soon after the Civil War, when Congress ratified the Constitution's 14th Amendment, in part to ensure that Black people, including former slaves, had citizenship. 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States,' the amendment states. Thirty years later, Wong Kim Ark, a man born in the U.S. to Chinese parents, was refused re-entry into the U.S. after traveling overseas. His suit led to the Supreme Court explicitly ruling that the amendment gives citizenship to anyone born in the U.S., no matter their parents' legal status. It has been seen since then as an intrinsic part of U.S. law, with only a handful of exceptions, such as for children born in the U.S. to foreign diplomats. Trump's executive order, signed in January, seeks to deny citizenship to children who are born to people who are living in the U.S. illegally or temporarily. It's part of the hardline immigration agenda of the president, who has called birthright citizenship a 'magnet for illegal immigration.' Trump and his supporters focus on one phrase in the amendment — 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' – saying it means the U.S. can deny citizenship to babies born to women in the country illegally. A series of federal judges have said that's not true, and issued nationwide injunctions stopping his order from taking effect. 'I've been on the bench for over four decades. I can't remember another case where the question presented was as clear as this one is. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order,' U.S. District Judge John Coughenour said at a hearing earlier this year in his Seattle courtroom. In Greenbelt, Maryland, a Washington suburb, U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman wrote that 'the Supreme Court has resoundingly rejected and no court in the country has ever endorsed' Trump's interpretation of birthright citizenship. The high court's ruling was a major victory for the Trump administration in that it limited an individual judge's authority in granting nationwide injunctions. The administration hailed the ruling as a monumental check on the powers of individual district court judges, whom Trump supporters have argued want to usurp the president's authority with rulings blocking his priorities around immigration and other matters. But the Supreme Court did not address the merits of Trump's bid to enforce his birthright citizenship executive order. 'The Trump administration made a strategic decision, which I think quite clearly paid off, that they were going to challenge not the judges' decisions on the merits, but on the scope of relief,' said Jessica Levinson, a Loyola Law School professor. Attorney General Pam Bondi told reporters at the White House that the administration is 'very confident' that the high court will ultimately side with the administration on the merits of the case. The justices kicked the cases challenging the birthright citizenship policy back down to the lower courts, where judges will have to decide how to tailor their orders to comply with the new ruling. The executive order remains blocked for at least 30 days, giving lower courts and the parties time to sort out the next steps. The Supreme Court's ruling leaves open the possibility that groups challenging the policy could still get nationwide relief through class-action lawsuits and seek certification as a nationwide class. Within hours after the ruling, two class-action suits had been filed in Maryland and New Hampshire seeking to block Trump's order. But obtaining nationwide relief through a class action is difficult as courts have put up hurdles to doing so over the years, said Suzette Malveaux, a Washington and Lee University law school professor. 'It's not the case that a class action is a sort of easy, breezy way of getting around this problem of not having nationwide relief,' said Malveaux, who had urged the high court not to eliminate the nationwide injunctions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who penned the court's dissenting opinion, urged the lower courts to 'act swiftly on such requests for relief and to adjudicate the cases as quickly as they can so as to enable this Court's prompt review' in cases 'challenging policies as blatantly unlawful and harmful as the Citizenship Order.' Opponents of Trump's order warned there would be a patchwork of polices across the states, leading to chaos and confusion without nationwide relief. 'Birthright citizenship has been settled constitutional law for more than a century,' said Krish O'Mara Vignarajah, president and CEO of Global Refuge, a nonprofit that supports refugees and migrants. 'By denying lower courts the ability to enforce that right uniformly, the Court has invited chaos, inequality, and fear.'


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Man Born on Army Base to US Soldier Deported to Jamaica
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Jermaine Thomas, who was born in 1986 on a U.S. Army base in Germany to a father who had become a naturalized U.S. citizen, was deported to Jamaica last month, according to The Austin Chronicle. Newsweek has reached out to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and several immigration legal experts for comment via email on Saturday. Why It Matters Thomas' deportation comes amid an immigration crackdown by the Trump administration. President Donald Trump has pledged to launch the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history, with people residing in the country illegally as well as immigrants with valid documentation, including green cards and visas, having been detained, and many deported. The Trump administration has deported multiple individuals to countries where they did not hold citizenship, despite family ties in those nations. Ending automatic birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment has been a focus for the Trump administration. The president signed an executive order restricting birthright citizenship, but the policy was initially blocked by a nationwide injunction. On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal judges cannot issue national injunctions, clearing the way for some states to move forward with measures limiting birthright citizenship. The ruling did not address the legality of the executive order itself. What To Know Thomas' citizenship status has been in question for decades, with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) having issued a "Notice to Appear and Additional Charges of Inadmissibility/Deportability" in 2013, according to court documents reviewed by Newsweek. He was born to an active-duty member of the U.S. Army stationed on a U.S. base in Frankfurt, Germany, in 1986. Court documents from 2015 state that "Thomas's father first entered the United States in September 1977, enlisted in the United States Army in 1979, and became a United States citizen in May 1984." Thomas' mother, who was married to his father at the time of birth, was a citizen of Kenya. Margaret Stock, a lawyer who specializes in immigration and military law, told Newsweek in a phone interview Saturday that citizenship status for babies born on overseas military bases can be "really complicated" and depend on a range of factors including marriage status, parental citizenship status and length of residency, paperwork, and more. Children born on U.S. military bases overseas do not get automatic citizenship, but they typically acquire citizenship through their parents if eligibility requirements are met and proper paperwork is filed. Stock said typically they have to go to the State Department and file certain applications to obtain a "Consular Report of Birth Abroad." "Thomas was admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident in July 1989. His visa form listed his nationality as Jamaican," the 2015 court filing noted. Thomas moved around the U.S. a bit from bases and ended up settling in Texas when he was older. The Fifth Circuit ruled against Thomas, finding that he was not born "in the United States" and therefore the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause did not apply to his case. The Supreme Court declined to review the decision, leaving the deportation order in place. The court documents also note that "Petitioner has been convicted of several crimes in the United States, including theft and domestic assault causing bodily injury." The filing notes that due to his criminal background, the DHS initiated removal proceedings. Thomas does not hold citizenship in Germany or Jamaica, The Austin Chronicle reported. With the U.S. also denying his claim to citizenship, he is effectively stateless. "There's going to be a lot of people getting deported who are stateless, and a lot of people born on military bases overseas," Stock told Newsweek. Thomas told The Austin Chronicle that he was arrested earlier this year after he was evicted from his apartment and moving stuff onto the lawn with his dog. Killeen police said he was arrested for suspected trespassing. He says he spent a month in jail and then was transferred to ICE detention centers. He told The Austin Chronicle he was deported to Jamaica in late May. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, right, ERO Regional Attaché Guadalupe "Lupita" Serna and U.S. Ambassador to Guatemala Tobin Bradley watch people deported from the United States disembark a repatriation flight, at La Aurora International Airport... Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, right, ERO Regional Attaché Guadalupe "Lupita" Serna and U.S. Ambassador to Guatemala Tobin Bradley watch people deported from the United States disembark a repatriation flight, at La Aurora International Airport in Guatemala City on June 26. More nna Moneymaker/Pool Photo via AP Images) What People Are Saying Jermaine Thomas told The Austin Chronicle: "If you're in the U.S. Army, and the Army deploys you somewhere, and you've gotta have your child over there, and your child makes a mistake after you pass away, and you put your life on the line for this country, are you going to be okay with them just kicking your child out of the country?" U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Coming to America and receiving a visa or green card is a privilege. Our laws and values must be respected. If you advocate for violence, endorse or support terrorist activity, or encourage others to do so, you are no longer eligible to stay in the U.S." What Happens Next? It is unclear if there will be any other legal proceedings in Thomas' case, which brings birthright citizenship to the forefront. The Court's ruling allows the Trump administration to issue guidance on how the executive order on birthright citizenship can be implemented, which can now happen in 30 days. The executive order could still face challenges, with at least two attempts at class action lawsuits filed later Friday.