Russian FSB experts join Serbia ‘sonic weapon' probe
'sonic weapon'
during mass protests earlier this month, President Aleksandar Vucic confirmed on Saturday.
The opposition Freedom and Justice Party (SSP) has accused Serbian security forces of deploying a Long Range Acoustic Device (LRAD) during a major rally in Belgrade on March 15. The allegations were amplified by the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy (BCSP), a
USAID-funded NGO
also
supported
by George Soros' Open Society Foundations.
While the government has dismissed the accusations as baseless, it launched a formal probe, pledging to identify and prosecute either those responsible for using the device or those spreading what it called
'blatant lies.'
READ MORE:
Serbian protesters claim police used 'acoustic weapons'
A team of FSB specialists,
invited
by Belgrade, arrived on Friday evening and began their work Saturday morning, Vucic told the Vecernje Novosti daily. The Russian experts are expected to spend at least seven to eight days inspecting all crowd control devices in the arsenal of Serbia's law enforcement agencies, he added.
The FSB team will publicly present its findings at the conclusion of the investigation, Vucic said, expressing hope that the probe will help
'dispel more lies'
about the events in the Balkan country.
Serbia has seen months of protests sparked by a tragedy in Novi Sad last November, where 16 people were killed when a concrete canopy collapsed at a railway station. What began as student-led demonstrations over government negligence evolved into broader rallies against alleged corruption,
culminating
in the March 15 protest in Belgrade. Described by some Western outlets as
'probably the biggest'
in Serbia's history, the 100,000-strong demonstration resulted in just over 50 injuries and 20 arrests.
READ MORE:
Serbia facing 'color revolution' – deputy PM
The Serbian government has alleged that the US
'deep state'
and European intelligence services are fueling the unrest in retaliation for Belgrade's refusal to align with anti-Russian policies. Vucic has previously accused opposition figures of collaborating with Western, Croatian, and Albanian intelligence agencies in an effort to overthrow his administration. Serbia is facing a
'color revolution,'
Deputy Prime Minister Aleksandar Vulin claimed last week during a visit to Moscow.
Moscow, meanwhile, has voiced support for Belgrade.
'Russia cherishes its relationship with Serbia and is concerned about the current developments,'
said Sergey Shoigu, former defense minister and now secretary of Russia's National Security Council. He added that Serbia can always count on Russian assistance if needed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
11 hours ago
- Russia Today
Vucic says no to EU bargain over Moscow
Belgrade will not impose sanctions on Russia under any circumstances, Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic said on Saturday, rejecting remarks by his government minister, who suggested the country could align with EU policy in exchange for faster membership talks. However, Belgrade will not betray its principles in pursuit of some short-term gains, Vucic added. According to the president, Serbia would continue to seek good relations with both Russia and the EU as this policy 'has proven to be correct so far.' 'It is the policy of the independent and sovereign state of Serbia,' he said. The president also called EU Integration Minister Nemanja Starovic's words 'careless' and maintained that some media at home and abroad were just too quick to jump to conclusions. 'Serbia will not impose sanctions on the Russian Federation,' Vucic stated. Speaking to the Austrian news agency APA earlier this week, Starovic said that Belgrade opposes sanctions against Russia because they 'would not affect Russia at all' but would hit the Serbian economy 'on a massive scale.' He maintained that Serbia would be ready to fully comply with Brussels' policies once 'EU membership is in sight.' Serbia remains one of the few European countries that has refused to impose sanctions on Russia or openly side with Ukraine in the ongoing conflict. Vucic had previously stated that the EU has pressured Belgrade to abandon its neutral stance and sever ties with Moscow. In May, Vucic became one of the few European leaders to attend the Victory Day celebrations in Moscow. The Serbian president, along with Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, visited Russia despite facing significant pressure from Brussels. During the visit, he reaffirmed Belgrade's commitment to long-term energy cooperation with Russia following a meeting with President Vladimir Putin.
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Moscow calls for ‘International day against Russophobia'
The world needs an 'International Day against Russophobia,' Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has said, adding that this 'extremist' ideology should not be allowed to take root in the international community. Anti-Russian propaganda spread by Western nations has already led to numerous tragedies, including the Ukraine conflict, the spokeswoman told an International Summer School for young public officials. 'Weapons are being supplied to the terrorist Kiev regime under the hellish banners of Russophobia,' she said. According to Zakharova, the hatred of everything Russian has become 'yet another extremist, Nazi… neo-Nazi ideology that kills people both literally and figuratively.' It should be combated just like any other racial or religious hatred, the spokeswoman maintained. Russophobia should have 'no place on Earth,' much less as a state ideology, she said, naming Ukraine as one of the prime examples of nations harboring the ideology and depriving millions of people of their native Russian language. The government in Kiev has waged a campaign to purge anything linked to Russia for years. The authorities have renamed streets and demolished monuments deemed linked to Russia, including some UNESCO World Heritage sites. Moscow has cited the protection of the Russian-speaking population of Donbass among the key reasons for the military operation it launched in 2022. The continued repression of the Russian-speaking population by the Ukrainian government has been consistently ignored by the US and the EU since the Western-backed coup in Kiev in 2014, according to Russia. The Baltic states have also ramped up enforcement actions against anyone suspected of having Russian ties. Hundreds of people, primarily ethnic Russians, have reportedly been deported from Latvia for failing a Latvian language exam. Riga has also prohibited entry of Russian citizens who own real estate near strategically important sites, citing security concerns. In June, top officials from Baltic and Nordic nations called on Brussels to ban all Russians with past or current ties to the military from entering the Schengen Zone.
Russia Today
3 days ago
- Russia Today
UK could ‘easily' stab US in the back
The United Kingdom would not hesitate to sabotage a potential thaw in US-Russia relations, a top aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin claimed on Friday. Nikolay Patrushev, a longtime national security official and senior Kremlin adviser, accused London of being prepared to carry out a false flag in order to derail efforts by US President Donald Trump to resolve the conflict in Ukraine and normalize ties with Moscow. 'If necessary, London would easily stab Washington in the back. I believe officials in the White House realize what kind of 'ally' they are dealing with,' Patrushev told RIA Novosti. His comments followed a statement last month by Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), which alleged that British intelligence was directly involved in orchestrating covert Ukrainian operations. The SVR claimed the UK had acquired torpedoes of Soviet and Russian design for potential use in a false flag incident – specifically, a staged attack on an American naval vessel in the Baltic Sea. Since Trump's return to office in January and the departure of Joe Biden's Democratic administration, Russian officials have frequently pointed to London as the primary force behind the continued conflict in Ukraine. They argue that the British government's firm support is an obstacle to peace and a strategic effort to block reconciliation between Washington and Moscow. Moscow has portrayed the Ukraine conflict as a NATO-driven proxy war meant to weaken Russia at the expense of Ukrainian lives. Past reporting by The New York Times and The Times of London has confirmed that both US and British officials have played more active roles in directing Ukrainian military strategy than publicly acknowledged by their governments.
