logo
Could Pop-Up Headlights Make a Comeback?

Could Pop-Up Headlights Make a Comeback?

Motor 112 hours ago

They say everything is cyclical—fashion, music, pop culture. The same is true with car design. Hyundai popularized the retro-fantastic '
8-bit
' styling on its modern EVs, while Honda is on a mission to revive the
long-lost wedge
.
One thing we haven't seen return, though, are pop-up headlights. The once-ubiquitous design element quickly faded into the background as automakers moved to sleeker, simpler light fixtures focused more on aerodynamic efficiency. What a shame.
With so many other retro elements returning to modern cars, though, why can't pop-up headlights also make a comeback?
First, some history.
The first pop-up headlights date back to 1935. Cord debuted the 810 prototype at the New York Auto Show, touting a technology never before seen. Hidden on either of the exterior fenders were headlight fixtures that "popped up" with a few vigorous twists of a dashboard-mounted crank.
Alfa Romeo would introduce pop-up headlights on the production 8C 2900A Berlinetta just a year later in 1936, and the Buick Y-Job concept would follow in 1938. But it wasn't until 1962 that pop-up headlights made their way into the mainstream on the Lotus Elan, which ditched the manually operated crank for the first vacuum-operated pop-ups.
The 1938 Buick Y-Job Concept
Photo by: Buick
Automakers would adopt the technology quickly thereafter, and pop-up headlights boomed in popularity in the US throughout the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s. Sadly, the last production cars to have pop-up headlights in the US were the Lotus Esprit, ironically enough, and the Chevrolet C5 Corvette. Both of which ended production in 2005, taking pop-ups with them.
As with anything good and fun, government regulations all but put a stop to pop-ups. But they weren't necessarily banned.
Instead, regulators approved more aerodynamic headlight designs as opposed to the classic round, sealed beams, which meant automakers could save time and money by affixing sleeker, smaller fixtures to the front ends of their vehicles as opposed to fussy, often-complex pop-up units. Pedestrian protection laws globally also meant that anything protruding from the top of a vehicle's hood was a big no-no.
Chevrolet Corvette C5 Z06
Photo by: Chevrolet
But in the US, at least, pop-up headlights aren't explicitly banned. So why don't we see more of them? Especially if there's a burgeoning demand for the good ol' days of car design.
Audi
has been at the forefront of lighting technology for more than a decade. They pioneered the adaptive Matrix LED headlight for Europe in 2013 and continue to evolve the technology.
Just recently, Audi debuted the new Q3 SUV with updated Digital Matrix LED headlights featuring micro-LEDs with semiconductors that are thinner than a hair. The man behind the implementation of that technology is Dr. Michael Kruppa, who's been the head of headlight development at Audi for a number of years.
Even though Audi has never made a single production car with pop-up headlights (almost unbelievably), Kruppa knows as much as anyone about modern lighting technology.
2026 Audi Q3
Photo by: Audi
"The most important point to understand is that everything we do is function-driven," Kruppa tells me. "[The headlights] always come from a very emotional perspective. They want to give the whole car a unique appearance, even if the light isn't illuminated."
At Audi, engineers work hand-in-hand with designers to create light fixtures that are as functional as they are beautiful, he says. But with innovation comes roadblocks; getting some specific lighting elements to market is no easy task.
It took years for regulators to approve Audi's use of adaptive matrix lighting technology in Europe and other markets. In the US, meanwhile, similar technology is only now hitting the road. Rivian is among the first automakers to get its adaptive lighting technology approved.
"[We] had to prove that [matrix LEDs] were robust enough," Kruppa says of regulators. "It was very important to convince the regulators that there is no glare for upcoming traffic… We went for test drives with them to show how the systems worked on the road. Based on this feedback, we were also able to understand their fears, because regulation is quite old-fashioned."
Photo by: Audi
That's all to say: lighting technology is extremely complicated. Pop-up headlights would undoubtedly further complicate the matter.
"If you really want to make [the headlights] disappear completely, it's quite difficult," Kruppa says. "Because in the end, you need them to have a free, open perspective for use at night. At the moment, the big problem is the mechanics and all the additional parts you would have to integrate. So you make the headlamps even bigger, you make them heavier, and our focus, really… is not really having additional mechanical movements."
It makes sense. Adding a mechanical function to a feature that doesn't already require one would be a step backward. Not to mention the added costs associated with slapping a piece of sheet metal or carbon fiber to the front of a bumper, and the potential interference with the many safety systems required on modern cars. Plus, there isn't even much room for a pop-up function at all.
"The space in front of the car is really limited," he says, "so you don't have a lot of empty space where you can move a lid or where you can put a mechanical part that completely disappears. So that's the reason why we are not focusing on that at the moment."
'If you really want to make [the headlights] disappear completely, it's quite difficult.'
But that's not to say companies haven't tried hiding their headlights. We just haven't noticed.
A big, modern trend is the split headlight—that is, a two-piece light fixture with an LED running light near the hood line and a larger headlight lower down on the bumper. The new Q3 has it, as do so many modern SUVs. As Kruppa notes, the split headlight was developed, in large part, as a way of 'hiding' the main headlight housing so that the focus is drawn to the upper LED. And you can see that on the latest Q3.
"The main focus [with split headlights] really is aesthetics," he says. "Designers focus on the daytime conditions; You're only using the daytime running light… You still have to fulfill legal requirements, though, which means you need a low-beam and a high-beam."
"The bezels and polymer pieces surrounding the lower headlights were created so that if they're not on, you don't see them, because you're attracted to the daytime running light."
Mazda Iconic SP Concept
Love them or hate them, split headlights are, largely, an evolution of the pop-up.
But for the most part, the dream of a new car with pop-up headlights is largely dashed. There are some outliers, like the coachbuilt
Ares Panther
and the
Mazda Iconic SP concept
. Unfortunately, it's unlikely that we'll ever see another mass-produced modern vehicle with old-school light fixtures.
For Audi specifically, the distinct lighting signature of its Matrix LEDs does offer shades of nostalgia. The shape and function harken back, in some ways, to the original R8 and TT. But for Kruppa, he's more focused on the future of lighting design, not necessarily the past.
"I think the biggest contribution we will see in the future from lighting is taking over more responsibilities in terms of communication," he says, pointing specifically to things like autonomous driving and pedestrian safety.
"Light will create some kind of touch point from the exterior… creating a sense of safety. This is what we strongly believe will happen in the future, whether we need 10 years, I don't know. But this is definitely the outlook."
More Design Trends
Chrysler Has Its Own Design Studio. That Could Be a Game-Changer
America's Beautiful, Forgotten Hypercars
Share this Story
Facebook
X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Reddit
WhatsApp
E-Mail
Got a tip for us? Email:
tips@motor1.com
Join the conversation
(
)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Renault to Book $11 Billion Hit From Changes in Accounting Treatment of Nissan Stake
Renault to Book $11 Billion Hit From Changes in Accounting Treatment of Nissan Stake

Wall Street Journal

time16 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Renault to Book $11 Billion Hit From Changes in Accounting Treatment of Nissan Stake

Renault RNO -2.39%decrease; red down pointing triangle Group said it would book a 9.5 billion euro ($11.20 billion) non-cash loss in the first half as a result of changes in the way it accounts for its stake in Nissan. The French carmaker on Tuesday said that the financial hit from the change has no impact on its cash nor on the calculation of its dividend and will be recognized in the income statement mostly in operating income and expenses as of June 30.

Renault Takes $11 Billion Non-Cash Loss in Nissan Account Change
Renault Takes $11 Billion Non-Cash Loss in Nissan Account Change

Bloomberg

time41 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Renault Takes $11 Billion Non-Cash Loss in Nissan Account Change

Renault SA will recognize an estimated €9.5 billion ($11.2 billion) non-cash loss after changing the way it accounts for its stake in ailing Japanese carmaker Nissan Motor Co. The new accounting method — which will align the value of the stake with Nissan's share price — has no cash impact and won't affect the calculation of Renault's dividend, the French automaker said Tuesday. Nissan's shares have slumped 38% in the 12 months.

Elon Musk is ripping the GOP and Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' again. Here's how it all went down.
Elon Musk is ripping the GOP and Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' again. Here's how it all went down.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk is ripping the GOP and Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' again. Here's how it all went down.

Elon Musk reignited his criticism of Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" over the weekend. Musk had sharply criticized the bill on June 5 but backed away from his attacks just days later. Musk has since resumed his attacks and said he will form his own political party if the bill passes. Elon Musk is not done slamming President Donald Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" just yet. Musk started criticizing Trump's spending bill on June 5 but walked back the attacks just days later. Musk said in an X post on June 11 that some of his remarks on Trump had gone "too far." But the detente did not last long. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO reignited his attacks on the bill over the weekend and hasn't stopped since. On Saturday, Musk wrote on X that the president's signature tax bill "will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country." "Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future," he continued. GOP lawmakers hope to send the bill, which is pending a vote in the Senate, to Trump's desk by July 4. Musk, however, said he would defeat politicians who voted for the bill if it passed and form his own political party. "It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country — the PORKY PIG PARTY!!" Musk wrote in an X post on Monday. "Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," he said. Musk said in a follow-up post, published just an hour later, that any politician who voted for the bill despite campaigning on cutting government spending should "hang their head in shame." "And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," he added. Musk said later that a new party, the "America Party," will be formed the day after the "insane spending bill passes." "Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE," Musk added. Musk had long opposed Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill." In an interview with CBS that aired last month, Musk said he was "disappointed to see the massive spending bill." Musk said the bill "undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing," the government cost-cutting outfit he led when he was a part of the Trump administration. Musk announced his departure from the White House DOGE office on May 28. "I think a bill can be big, or it could be beautiful. I don't know if it could be both," Musk told CBS. Musk's disagreement with Trump over the bill marks a rare break between the two men. Musk had been a prominent backer of Trump's presidential campaign last year, where he spent at least $277 million backing Trump and other GOP candidates in the 2024 elections. When Musk criticized Trump's bill earlier in June, he took credit for Trump and the GOP's electoral victories in 2024. That was also when he first floated the possibility of forming his own political party. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk wrote on X on June 5. "Such ingratitude," he continued. Musk said in an interview with Bloomberg on May 20 that he had "done enough" political spending and planned to "do a lot less in the future." "Well, if I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it," he added. Trump initially expressed disappointment at Musk's behavior but has since taken a more conciliatory tone with Musk. Trump said last week that he still views Musk positively but has not spoken to him much. "He's a smart guy. And he actually went and campaigned with me and this and that," Trump said in an interview with Fox News' Maria Bartiromo that aired Sunday. "But he got a little bit upset, and that wasn't appropriate," he added. Musk and the White House did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider. Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store