Syria's unity should be off Israel's gambling table
In the aftermath of Israel's recent strikes on Damascus and destabilizing actions in Sweida, former British spy chief Sir John Sawers offered a sobering assessment: 'What Israel is looking for, I think, is a fragmented Syria — one which is weak and divided. That's a miscalculation … I don't think Israeli actions were at all helpful.' His words, delivered to CNN, cut through the fog of war and exposed a dangerous regional gamble.
Sawers is right. The notion that Syria's internal tensions — particularly those involving various sects and tribal factions — are marginal or containable is a delusion. The breakup of Syria would be far more catastrophic than the disintegration of Yugoslavia. But the solution surely is for regional and international players to promote and enable national unity and cohesion; not bomb or attack the newly formed government as it tries to contain a situation.
Syria is not just a country; it is a geopolitical keystone. Its collapse would send tremors through Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan and even the Gulf. The region cannot afford another failed state, especially one that borders Israel, Turkiye and Iraq.
This is precisely why moderate and reasonable actors in the region — led by Saudi Arabia — have stepped in swiftly and decisively. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's phone call to Syrian President Ahmad Al-Sharaa was more than a diplomatic gesture; it was a signal of strategic alignment. Riyadh followed up by sending a delegation of high-ranking Saudi businessmen to Damascus, underscoring its commitment to Syria's reconstruction and reintegration into the Arab fold. The Saudi steps are aligned with its longstanding tradition of supporting the reigning government regardless of its religious leadership, be it Sunni-led in Syria, a Maronite one in Lebanon or even a Shiite one in Iran when Israel illegally violated its territorial sovereignty.
Turkiye and the US also moved quickly — and rightly — to support the new Syrian government, recognizing that stability in Damascus is a prerequisite for regional peace. Washington, in particular, played a key role in brokering a ceasefire between militias and tribal factions in Sweida, helping to contain what could have spiraled into a full-blown civil war.
The best antidote to Israel's destabilizing provocations is not retaliation — it is to go on with the reforms. Syria's new leadership understands this. Since taking office in December, President Al-Sharaa has made all the right moves: dissolving extremist factions, launching a national dialogue conference, and initiating constitutional reforms. But no one said rebuilding a country after 50 years of brutal dictatorship would be easy.
Gambling with Syria's unity is not blackjack. It is Russian roulette. And the bullet does not just threaten Syria — it threatens the entire region.
Faisal J. Abbas | Editor-in-Chief
Spoilers — those who thrived under the old regime — are beginning to push back. Mistakes by enforcers of the government will naturally be made, and they will be costly. But legitimacy is not built on perfection; it is built on accountability. The Syrian government must continue to acknowledge its missteps, especially in Sweida, where the conflict was not sectarian but a localized rift that required careful containment.
Israel's claim that its strikes on Damascus and Sweida were to 'protect the Druze' is taken with a pinch of salt by most observers. If Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government were truly concerned about minority rights, it might have reconsidered its actions in Gaza, where over 50,000 Palestinians have been killed since October 2023. The same government that called Palestinians 'human animals' and floated the idea of nuking Gaza now wants us to believe it is acting out of humanitarian concern.
Let us be clear: Israel sees opportunity, not altruism. The infancy of Syria's new government presents a strategic vacuum. Tel Aviv is playing a zero-sum game — grab land, accumulate leverage, and walk into future negotiations with a stacked deck.
Of course, given Israel's recent military successes — from Gaza to Iran — one might understand Netanyahu's audacity. But gambling with Syria's unity is not blackjack. It is Russian roulette. And the bullet does not just threaten Syria — it threatens the entire region.
The international community, especially the US, must curb Israel's appetite for chaos. Washington has leverage, and it must use it — not just to protect Syria, but to preserve the fragile architecture of Middle Eastern stability.
Syria's new government is not perfect, but it is legitimate. It is trying to do what few regimes in the region have dared: reform from within. That effort must be protected — not just by Syrians, but by their neighbors and allies. Because if Syria falls, the region does not just lose a country — it loses its compass.
And in a region already navigating storms, losing your compass is not a risk worth taking.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Israeli evacuation order in central Gaza ‘devastating' to aid efforts: UN
UNITED NATIONS, United States: An Israeli military order for residents and displaced people in Gaza's Deir el-Balah area to move south dealt 'another devastating blow' to humanitarian efforts in the war-ravaged territory, the UN's OCHA aid agency said on Sunday. The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs 'warns that today's mass displacement order issued by the Israeli military has dealt yet another devastating blow to the already fragile lifelines keeping people alive across the Gaza Strip,' it said in a statement.
Arab News
8 hours ago
- Arab News
Recognized, independent Palestinian state could unlock disputed gas wealth, expert says
LONDON: Official recognition of a Palestinian state would end legal ambiguities over the Gaza Marine gas field and secure the Palestinian Authority's right to develop its most valuable natural resource, according to energy expert Michael Barron. Barron, author of 'The Gaza Marine Story,' estimates the field could generate $4 billion in revenue at current prices, with the PA reasonably earning $100 million annually for 15 years, The Guardian reported on Sunday. 'The revenues would not turn the Palestinians into the next Qataris or Singaporeans, but it would be their own revenue and not aid, on which the Palestinian economy remains dependent,' he said. Gas was discovered in 2000 in the Gaza Marine field, a joint venture between BG Gas and the Palestinian Consolidated Contractors Co. Despite initial hopes of ending energy shortages in the Gaza Strip, the project has been repeatedly stalled over ownership disputes, lack of sovereignty, and political instability. 'The Oslo Accords agreed in 1993 clearly give the Palestinian National Authority jurisdiction over territorial waters, the subsoil, power to legislate over oil and gas exploration and to award licenses to do so,' Barron said. 'Control over natural resources was an important element of (the) state-building agenda of the Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat. Israeli exploitation of Palestinian resources was and remains a central part of the conflict,' he added. Israel has historically blocked development over concerns that revenue could reach Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip. An Israeli court once ruled the waters a 'no-man's water' due to the PA's lack of sovereignty, and Israel has long claimed any license 20 miles off the Gaza coast should be seen as a gift, not a right. Barron said that if Palestine were recognized as a state, particularly by countries where major oil firms are based, it would 'effectively end the legal ambiguity' and allow the PA to develop the field and achieve energy independence from Israel. A separate controversy has emerged over Israeli-issued gas licenses in a disputed area known as Zone G. Lawyers acting for Palestinian human rights groups recently warned Italian energy firm Eni not to proceed with exploration, saying 'Israel cannot have validly awarded you any exploration rights and you cannot validly have acquired any such rights.' Eni has since told Italian campaigners that 'licenses have not yet been issued and no exploratory activities are in progress.' Activist group Global Witness also argues the East Mediterranean Gas pipeline, which passes through waters claimed by Palestine, is unlawful and does not provide any revenue to the PA. The 56-mile pipeline transports gas from Ashkelon in Israel to Arish in Egypt for export. The issue has gained new attention following a UN report by Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese. She warned corporations of their potential legal liability for supporting Israel's occupation of Palestinian territory, citing international court rulings. Her report concluded companies have a 'prima facie responsibility 'to not engage and/or to withdraw totally and unconditionally from any associated dealings with Israel, and to ensure that any engagement with Palestinians enables their self-determination.'' Israel has rejected the report in full. Barron argues that, with Israel now self-sufficient in gas, 'so long as a Palestinian state with unified governance is recognized, Israel will have no motive or legal right to block Palestine exploiting its single greatest natural resource.'
Arab News
10 hours ago
- Arab News
Syria's unity should be off Israel's gambling table
In the aftermath of Israel's recent strikes on Damascus and destabilizing actions in Sweida, former British spy chief Sir John Sawers offered a sobering assessment: 'What Israel is looking for, I think, is a fragmented Syria — one which is weak and divided. That's a miscalculation … I don't think Israeli actions were at all helpful.' His words, delivered to CNN, cut through the fog of war and exposed a dangerous regional gamble. Sawers is right. The notion that Syria's internal tensions — particularly those involving various sects and tribal factions — are marginal or containable is a delusion. The breakup of Syria would be far more catastrophic than the disintegration of Yugoslavia. But the solution surely is for regional and international players to promote and enable national unity and cohesion; not bomb or attack the newly formed government as it tries to contain a situation. Syria is not just a country; it is a geopolitical keystone. Its collapse would send tremors through Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan and even the Gulf. The region cannot afford another failed state, especially one that borders Israel, Turkiye and Iraq. This is precisely why moderate and reasonable actors in the region — led by Saudi Arabia — have stepped in swiftly and decisively. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's phone call to Syrian President Ahmad Al-Sharaa was more than a diplomatic gesture; it was a signal of strategic alignment. Riyadh followed up by sending a delegation of high-ranking Saudi businessmen to Damascus, underscoring its commitment to Syria's reconstruction and reintegration into the Arab fold. The Saudi steps are aligned with its longstanding tradition of supporting the reigning government regardless of its religious leadership, be it Sunni-led in Syria, a Maronite one in Lebanon or even a Shiite one in Iran when Israel illegally violated its territorial sovereignty. Turkiye and the US also moved quickly — and rightly — to support the new Syrian government, recognizing that stability in Damascus is a prerequisite for regional peace. Washington, in particular, played a key role in brokering a ceasefire between militias and tribal factions in Sweida, helping to contain what could have spiraled into a full-blown civil war. The best antidote to Israel's destabilizing provocations is not retaliation — it is to go on with the reforms. Syria's new leadership understands this. Since taking office in December, President Al-Sharaa has made all the right moves: dissolving extremist factions, launching a national dialogue conference, and initiating constitutional reforms. But no one said rebuilding a country after 50 years of brutal dictatorship would be easy. Gambling with Syria's unity is not blackjack. It is Russian roulette. And the bullet does not just threaten Syria — it threatens the entire region. Faisal J. Abbas | Editor-in-Chief Spoilers — those who thrived under the old regime — are beginning to push back. Mistakes by enforcers of the government will naturally be made, and they will be costly. But legitimacy is not built on perfection; it is built on accountability. The Syrian government must continue to acknowledge its missteps, especially in Sweida, where the conflict was not sectarian but a localized rift that required careful containment. Israel's claim that its strikes on Damascus and Sweida were to 'protect the Druze' is taken with a pinch of salt by most observers. If Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government were truly concerned about minority rights, it might have reconsidered its actions in Gaza, where over 50,000 Palestinians have been killed since October 2023. The same government that called Palestinians 'human animals' and floated the idea of nuking Gaza now wants us to believe it is acting out of humanitarian concern. Let us be clear: Israel sees opportunity, not altruism. The infancy of Syria's new government presents a strategic vacuum. Tel Aviv is playing a zero-sum game — grab land, accumulate leverage, and walk into future negotiations with a stacked deck. Of course, given Israel's recent military successes — from Gaza to Iran — one might understand Netanyahu's audacity. But gambling with Syria's unity is not blackjack. It is Russian roulette. And the bullet does not just threaten Syria — it threatens the entire region. The international community, especially the US, must curb Israel's appetite for chaos. Washington has leverage, and it must use it — not just to protect Syria, but to preserve the fragile architecture of Middle Eastern stability. Syria's new government is not perfect, but it is legitimate. It is trying to do what few regimes in the region have dared: reform from within. That effort must be protected — not just by Syrians, but by their neighbors and allies. Because if Syria falls, the region does not just lose a country — it loses its compass. And in a region already navigating storms, losing your compass is not a risk worth taking.
