
Ministers face fresh challenge to welfare reforms in Wednesday votes
The Bill, if agreed to, would roll out two different rates of benefit for claimants who cannot currently work.
It would also freeze the limited capability for work and work-related activity (LCW and LCWRA) elements of the benefit until 2030.
The PA news agency understands that a 'substantial number' of Labour rebels have agreed to vote to gut the Bill of these reforms, if they can trigger a division.
When MPs debated the reforms last week, Government frontbenchers rolled back on their plan to reform the separate personal independence payment (Pip) benefit, vowing to revisit any proposed changes only after a review by social security minister Sir Stephen Timms.
'The Government for all the goodwill of pulling clause five on Pip, they've lost it over being so stubborn and obstinate over clauses two and three,' Labour MP for York Central Rachael Maskell said.
Clause two of the Bill includes a framework for two rates of LCWRA, with claimants who are eligible for the benefit before April 2026 able to claim a higher rate than later applicants.
Claimants who are terminally ill or who have severe symptoms of an illness which 'constantly' apply would also be eligible for the higher rate, regardless of when they become eligible.
Ms Maskell has proposed a change to the reforms, so that someone who has slipped out of and then back into the LCWRA eligibility criteria either side of April 2026 would still be able to claim the higher rate.
Approving this change would be like 'gathering up the crumbs rather than getting the full course meal', she said.
Asked what the Government should do to tackle welfare costs, Ms Maskell told the PA news agency: 'We've got to put the early interventions in to take people off this path of ill health.
'We've got quite a sick society at the moment for all the reasons that we know, a broken NHS, you know, social care not being where it should be, and of course long-term Covid.
'All of that is having its impact, and the endemic mental health challenges that people are facing.
'But to then have the confidence that your programme is so good that it's going to get loads of these people into work and employers are going to have to fulfil their obligations in the future hopefully after the Charlie Mayfield report (the Keep Britain Working review) will make those recommendations – all of that, great, as far as it goes.
'But what we can't do is leave those people that can't work in poverty, because they would love to work and earn money, but they can't, so we have to pay for it.
'And therefore the people who've got the good fortune of earning money, whether it's through income or assets, they're the people that are going to have to support a wider society.'
Labour MP for Poole Neil Duncan-Jordan proposed gutting the Bill through a series of draft amendments, to strike clause two and cancel the freeze in clause three.
He and Ms Maskell were two of 49 MPs who unsuccessfully tried to block the Bill at second reading, when it cleared its first Commons hurdle by 335 votes to 260, majority 75.
Amid fears the Bill had been rushed through Parliament, and referring to the Liberal reformer William Beveridge who published a post-war blueprint for the welfare state in 1942, Mr Duncan-Jordan asked: 'Beveridge didn't design the welfare state on the back of a postage stamp, did he?'
Beyond changes to parts of the benefit specifically for people who cannot currently work, the Bill would demand an above-inflation rise to the universal credit standard allowance each year until 2030.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economist
3 minutes ago
- Economist
British stocks and bonds look like a bargain
Putting money into an emerging market always carries a frisson of danger. Governments might make sudden, erratic decisions, sending investments plummeting. That risk also makes those assets cheaper, to draw in willing buyers. British assets, too, have started to look cheap in recent years, at least compared with those of other rich countries. Last week's spectacle in the House of Commons, where the Labour government was cowed by its own backbenchers into withdrawing a fairly minor cut to disability benefits, then briefly pummelled by the bond market as a result, helps explain why.


North Wales Chronicle
18 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
UK Government must explain how it aims to cut energy bills, says minister
Energy Secretary Ed Miliband announced on Thursday that the Government would not segment the UK into zones where bills would depend on local supply and demand. Such an initiative was expected to benefit Scots due to the high level of power generation in the country. Instead, Mr Miliband promised a 'reformed system of national pricing', which he said was 'the best way to deliver an electricity system that is fairer, more affordable, and more secure, at less risk to vital investment in clean energy than other alternatives'. Zonal pricing had been opposed by major energy firms – excluding Octopus Energy, whose boss was in favour of the move – which raised concerns about the impact on investment in renewable energy. Responding to the announcement, Scotland's Energy Secretary, Gillian Martin, urged the UK Government to urgently lay out plans to cut bills, citing a Labour manifesto pledge from last year's general election. 'The UK Government promised to cut bills – instead, they have increased,' she said. 'They need to set out immediately how they will sort out the high energy bills faced by the people of Scotland – in an energy-rich country like Scotland, people should not be struggling to pay their bills. 'They promised that bills would fall by £300, but bills are higher than they were this time last year. 'The UK Government have set out what they will not do; they now need to set out what they will do to bring bills down. 'Given the significance of Scotland's renewables sector, the Scottish Government must be fully involved in decisions on reforming the national energy market in a way that brings down bills and delivers a level playing field for renewables in Scotland.' But Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the announcement was 'great news' for Scottish jobs. 'We have listened to Scottish industry and made a positive decision to reform our energy market, ensuring consumers feel the benefit of our clean energy mission,' he said. 'Bills are already falling in Scotland and we'll bring them down for good by getting off the rollercoaster of foreign gas, and winning the race to clean power. 'This decision will safeguard the investment required to win that race and secure thousands of good Scottish jobs for decades to come. 'This package of measures will create a predictable climate for Scottish industry and ensure the whole of Scotland benefits from our clean energy future.'

Rhyl Journal
21 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Reform UK supports ‘one in, one out' among its ranks, Commons leader claims
Lucy Powell said she did not expect Nigel Farage's party to 'welcome' efforts to set up a one in, one out English Channel migration deal with France during Emmanuel Macron's state visit to the UK. 'But when it comes to their own party, they're already really enthusiastically implementing a policy of one in, one out,' Ms Powell told the Commons. Mr McMurdock left Reform UK after the Sunday Times published a story on Saturday which alleged two businesses connected to the South Basildon and East Thurrock MP took out Covid-19 loans totalling £70,000 during the pandemic, one of which had no employees. The now-independent MP has insisted that all of his business dealings 'had always been conducted fully within the law and in compliance with all regulations and that appropriately qualified professionals had reviewed all activity confirming the same'. Since last year's general election, Reform has also lost Great Yarmouth MP Rupert Lowe from among its ranks but gained Runcorn and Helsby constituency from Labour in a by-election. Ms Powell, who did not name Mr McMurdock, told the Commons: 'Even though they've only got a group of a handful of MPs, their chief whip seems to have had a busier week than ours. I mean, that's kind of saying something.' Turning to the wider party, she said: 'The bigger story for Reform this week is they really are becoming the party of sleaze and scandal, and dud and dodgy personnel. 'It's not really the right moment, I don't think, to start ditching your vetting procedures, don't you think?' The Cabinet minister also criticised Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, who is set to outline her party's welfare policy on Thursday. 'I did notice, though, that the leader of the Opposition today is giving a speech, talking about the ticking time bomb that's been left,' Ms Powell said. 'Too right it's a ticking time bomb – it's their ticking time bomb and we all know that they left mines all over the place, and we're coming along having to sweep them out.' Conservative shadow Commons leader Jesse Norman had earlier said Labour had lost the backing on 'even supportive British newspapers', and told MPs: 'For this Government, of course, the past week marks an anniversary of a somewhat less glorious and happy kind – its first full year in office.' Referring to a resident doctors walkout led by the British Medical Association (BMA) over a bid for 'pay restoration', he told MPs: 'As the wildly overrated Aneurin Bevan said he had done in 1948, the present Secretary of State (Wes Streeting) – and I'm quoting Bevan's words in relation to the GPs in 1948 – that he had 'stuffed their mouths with gold and they are already coming back for more'.' Ms Powell said the Government had already 'delivered a very generous pay settlement', but warned plans for a walkout were 'of course extremely disappointing and strike action that we don't think is at all necessary, because when the NHS is finally moving in the right direction, these strikes will put that recovery at risk, affecting patients and letting down our collective obligations to those that we're here to serve'.