The Irish Times view on the Srebrernica anniversary: learning the lessons of history
first UN-recognised genocide in Europe
since the Holocaust, carried out as politically- hobbled UN peacekeepers stood idly by, though it tipped the US into leading a forceful intervention that brought an end to the brutal war in which 100,000 died and the former Yugoslavia was torn apart.
Three decades on
, the fragile peace agreed then, the Dayton Accord, is more precarious than ever. It is a state made up of two bitterly hostile, devolved entities that nominally report to a central government: the federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, for areas dominated by Bosnian Muslims and Croats, and Republika Srpska (RS), for areas dominated by Bosnian Serbs, including a beleaguered Srebrenica. An international peacekeeping contingent and an EU high representative struggle to keep the agreement on course.
While Dayton may have provided
an agreed peace framework
in which violence ceased, like Northern Ireland's Belfast Agreement, it was premised on a form of mandatory power sharing and in Bosnia's case cantonisation of the state that preserved local ethnic fiefdoms, perpetuating the divisions between communities rather than breaking them down. While undoing the treaty constraints may appear a rational way towards normalisation, consent from the minority Serb community will not be forthcoming.
Republika Srpska is led by autocratic Serb nationalist and Putin admirer, Milorad Dodik, who was sentenced in February to a six-year ban from politics and a year in prison for his defiance of the high representative. His aim is independence, though he denies it, and he is now planning a referendum on a draft new RS constitution whose provisions would be tantamount to secession.
READ MORE
Bosnia Herzegovina's disintegration would be a disastrous recipe for a resumption of violence. Standing up to Dodik is an imperative, but sending him to jail will not help.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
16 hours ago
- The Journal
'Humanitarian city' for Palestinians would be a 'concentration camp', says former Israeli PM
AN ISRAELI PROPOSAL to move Gazans into a so-called 'humanitarian city' has been severely criticised, slammed by critics as a costly distraction at best, and at worst a potential step towards forcing Palestinians off of their land. Israel's former prime minister Ehud Olmert said that the plans constitute a 'concentration camp' and would result in the ethnic cleaning of Palestinians, in an interview with The Guardian . Defence Minister Israel Katz unveiled the plan during a briefing with reporters last Monday. It envisions building from scratch a closed zone in southern Gaza during a potential 60-day ceasefire in Israel's war with Hamas, currently under negotiation in Qatar. According to Katz, the area would initially house around 600,000 displaced people from southern Gaza and include four aid distribution sites managed by international organisations. The entire civilian population of Gaza – more than two million people – would eventually be relocated there. Critics, however, have questioned both the feasibility and ethics of the plan, with Israel's opposition leader citing its astronomical cost, and one expert pointing to lack of infrastructure in the area necessary to accommodate so many people. 'It is a concentration camp. I am sorry,' Olmert said, when asked about the plans laid out by Katz last week. 'If they [Palestinians] will be deported into the new 'humanitarian city', then you can say that this is part of an ethnic cleansing. It hasn't yet happened,' he said. The UN agency for Palestinian refugees has described the proposed facility as a 'concentration camp', while Britain's minister for the Middle East and North Africa has said he is 'appalled' by the idea 'Palestinian territory must not be reduced,' the UK's Hamish Falconer said on X. 'Civilians must be able to return to their communities.' 'Extremist delusions' Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Nearly 21 months of war have devastated much of the Gaza Strip, displacing most of its population, creating dire shortages of food and other essentials, and killing 58,026 people, most of them civilians, according to the territory's health ministry. New arrivals to the proposed facility would undergo security screening to ensure they are not affiliated with Hamas, and once admitted, they would not be permitted to leave. The Israeli military would provide security 'from a distance', Katz has said. However, the criticism of the plan reportedly extends even to Israel's own security establishment. Local media reported that army chief Eyal Zamir lambasted the proposal at a cabinet meeting, arguing it would divert focus from the military's two core objectives: defeating Hamas and securing the return of hostages taken on 7 October. The broadcaster Channel 12 reported that unnamed security officials viewed the plan as little more than a 'gigantic tent city', and warned it could pave the way for a return to Israeli military rule in Gaza. Advertisement Such a move aligns with the long-standing goals of far-right Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben Gvir, key coalition partners of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Both Smotrich and Ben Gvir advocate the re-establishment of Jewish settlements in Gaza, from which Israel unilaterally withdrew in 2005, and have repeatedly called for the voluntary expatriation of Palestinians from Gaza. The projected expense of the initiative – estimated between 10 and 20 billion shekels (€2.56 billion to €5.13 billion) – has further fuelled domestic outrage as the cost of nearly two years of war mounts. 'That money is not coming back,' opposition leader Yair Lapid said on X yesterday.. 'Netanyahu is letting Smotrich and Ben Gvir run wild with extremist delusions just to preserve his coalition. Instead of plundering the middle class's money, end the war and bring back the hostages.' Olmert also told The Guardian: 'In the United States there is more and more and more expanding expressions of hatred to Israel. We make a discount to ourselves saying: 'They are antisemites.' I don't think that they are only antisemites, I think many of them are anti-Israel because of what they watch on television, what they watch on social networks. 'This is a painful but normal reaction of people who say: 'Hey, you guys have crossed every possible line.'' 'Fantasies' The Palestinian Authority was scathing in appraisal of the proposed facility, with its foreign ministry saying: 'The humanitarian city has nothing to do with humanity.' That view was echoed by UNRWA, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, which said the 'plan would de-facto create massive concentration camps at the border with Egypt'. A Palestinian official with knowledge of the ongoing ceasefire talks in Qatar told AFP that Hamas rejected plans to concentrate Palestinians in a small part of the south, viewing it as 'preparation for forcibly displacing them to Egypt or other countries'. Amnesty International, which has accused Israel of genocide, warned that relocating Gazans within the territory or 'deporting them outside against their will would amount to the war crime of unlawful transfer'. On Friday, 16 Israeli scholars of international law sent a letter to Katz and Zamir also warning the scheme could amount to a war crime. Michael Milshtein, an Israeli former military intelligence officer, called the plan one of many 'fantasies' floated by Israel's leadership amid mounting public frustration with the war's trajectory and lack of a political solution. He also noted there was no existing infrastructure in the proposed zone, raising questions about provision of electricity and water. 'There is only sand and fields, nothing,' said Milshtein, who heads the Palestinian studies programme at Tel Aviv University. 'Nobody tells the Israeli public what is the price and what are the consequences of reoccupying Gaza, from the economic, political and security points of view,' he told news agency AFP. 'I really think that if people understand that the purpose of the war is the reoccupation of Gaza, there is going to be a lot of social unrest in Israel.' Additional reporting by Emma Hickey
Sunday World
18 hours ago
- Sunday World
Future of Unifil mission in Lebanon in doubt ahead of UN decision
An Irish soldier at Camp Shamrock near the border with Lebanon and Israel where Irish Defence Forces troops are serving with the Unifil peacekeeping mission amid escalating clashes between the IDF and Hezbollah. Picture date: Wednesday March 26, 2025. (Pho The future of Irish troops in Lebanon will be dependent on a decision by the UN Security Council, Simon Harris will inform the Cabinet today as he confirms national support for the mission. The Tánaiste will explain the mission going ahead is down to the UN Security Council mandate on August 31. However, this decision is understood to be viewed as challenging and complex. Last month, concern was expressed within the Government the UN's peacekeeping operation in southern Lebanon may not have its mission renewed. The Irish Defence Forces currently has around 340 personnel deployed at Camp Shamrock in Lebanon. The Tánaiste visited the camp in March, where he paid tribute to the personnel deployed with the 125th infantry battalion. Mr Harris, who is also the Defence Minister, will confirm Ireland's support for Unifil's mandate remaining firmly within Chapter VI of the UN charter. The Government also remains fully supportive of the Defence Forces' continued participation in the mission. The Government also remains fully supportive of the Defence Forces' continued participation However, Mr Harris will also acknowledge factors presenting particular challenges in the negotiations ahead of any decision on the renewal of the mandate. In May this year, Irish soldiers of the 126th Infantry Battalion, patrolling with the Lebanese Armed Forces near the village of Yaroun in southern Lebanon were fired on by the Israel Defence Forces (IDF). The incident lasted for around half an hour, with 30 shots reportedly fired. The Irish soldiers didn't return fire. They followed protocol and returned to their base. Tánaiste Simon Harris in his Government Buildings office. Photo: Steve Humphreys Mr Harris, at the time, paid tribute to the troops and described the environment as 'increasingly volatile and tense'. Last October, Israeli troops clashed with Hezbollah in southern Lebanon where Irish peacekeepers operate. In a government memo, Mr Harris will identify a number of different scenarios facing Unifil and Ireland's role in the mission itself. The Tánaiste will stress the Defence Forces has the longest unbroken UN peacekeeping record in the world and that it is key to maintaining security and stability in the region. Mr Harris will set out his intention to engage with counterparts from the US, France, Lebanon and the UK and to reinforce the Irish position that the mandate should be renewed. There is concern the US could withdraw financial support for the operation while Israel has also been critical.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
Ireland to intensify efforts to safeguard UN mission in Lebanon where 340 troops are serving
The Government is to intensify diplomatic efforts to secure the continuation of UN peacekeeping mission in Lebanon , where more than 300 Irish troops are serving. There are concerns the Trump administration in Washington could seek to block or change the mission, known as Unifil , when the United Nations Security Council decides on the future of the operation in August. Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Defence Simon Harris will tell the Cabinet on Tuesday that Ireland believes the Unifil mission is key to maintaining stability in the region. He is expected to say the State firmly supports the Unifil mission remaining as a peacekeeping operation under Chapter VI of the UN Charter, which deals with the peaceful settlements of disputes. READ MORE Mr Harris's Cabinet memo will identify different scenarios that could play out in the weeks ahead, including that the mission could shrink with a reduced budget. About 340 Irish Defence Forces personnel are deployed in Lebanon. A similar number of Irish troops are scheduled to travel to Lebanon in November as part of the next rotation of UN personnel. It is understood the Tánaiste will acknowledge at Cabinet that there will be challenging factors to the negotiations ahead of any decision on the renewal of the Unifil mandate. Mr Harris will tell colleagues he intends to engage with counterparts from the US, France, Lebanon and the UK and will reinforce the Irish position that the mandate should be renewed. There are concerns internationally that the US will vote against its extension or will move to scale it back through reduced funding. The Israeli media has reported that authorities there believe Israel's strikes on Lebanon last year weakened Hizbullah, meaning Lebanese armed forces are capable of suppressing the group without the need for the 10,500-strong Unifil force in the region.
