
Democratic Governors: What's the GOP Budget Bill? A Big Betrayal of the Middle Class
That's why we don't like what we're seeing coming out of Washington, D.C., right now. When President Donald Trump said this bill would be "big," he was right in one sense: this bill will be a big problem for Americans across the country. The whole point of the legislation is to give massive tax handouts to the very wealthy. To do this, the GOP is willing to cut necessities like Medicaid and food assistance that their own constituents rely on. And because those handouts to billionaires are so big, this bill will also explode the national deficit.
People in every corner of America will feel the effects of Trump and congressional Republicans' disastrous budget now that it is law. You deserve to know exactly what's in it.
President Donald Trump talks to members of the media outside the court room at the New York State Supreme Court on the first day of his civil fraud trial, in New York City, on October...
President Donald Trump talks to members of the media outside the court room at the New York State Supreme Court on the first day of his civil fraud trial, in New York City, on October 2, 2023. More
KENA BETANCUR/AFP via Getty Images
Let's start with health care. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, this bill would hurt working families most. It will terminate health care coverage for an estimated 16 million Americans, including 8 million children on Medicaid. This will be a disaster for our most vulnerable citizens: those fighting cancer and other life-threatening conditions, along with seniors, pregnant women, and people with disabilities. It will jack up health care premiums and out-of-pocket costs for everybody else. Americans already pay more for health care than they should. Why make working families pay more just so billionaires can get a massive tax break?
The Republican budget bill also jeopardizes food assistance for millions of Americans and will make it harder for working moms and dads to feed themselves and their kids. No one should be forced to go to bed hungry—42 million people in our country rely on SNAP assistance to get by. It's an essential program that saves people money so they can pay their rent and keep the lights on.
This bill will force families to choose between feeding their children, making sure they have reliable child care to go to work, and paying their other bills. That's a choice no American should have to make.
Not only does this bill greenlight massive health care and food assistance cuts, but it will pose massive threats to rural communities. Rural hospitals in red and blue states, already struggling to keep their doors open and provide care, will be at a greater risk of shutting down. Farmers who provide the food that SNAP helps people buy will have fewer buyers for their products.
The GOP is claiming states will be able to backfill the huge funding gaps we've just listed out. As governors who have to balance budgets every single year, we'll give it to you straight: that's ridiculous. There's just no way state budgets can make up the difference.
Each of us goes to bed each night and wakes up each morning thinking about how to best serve the people of our states—fixing the roads, bringing in more good-paying jobs to make life more affordable, and funding our public schools.
In other words, we put the people we serve first. If politicians in D.C. did the same, they wouldn't have let this big betrayal of American families become law.
Gretchen Whitmer is the governor of Michigan.
Laura Kelly is the governor of Kansas.
Michelle Lujan Grisham is the governor of New Mexico.
The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
33 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Hitting Trump With Major $6.8 Billion Lawsuit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Nearly half of the country's states and the District of Columbia (DC) sued the Trump administration on Monday for $6.8 billion over education funding being withheld. The coalition of 24 states and DC launched the suit against President Donald Trump, Linda McMahon in her capacity as secretary of education, the Education Department, Russ Vought as the director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the OMB. The suit alleges that the Trump administration has "unlawfully frozen over $6 billion in education funding for K-12 schools and adult education." The states say the freeze is unlawful because the funds were appropriated by Congress to be given to the states on July 1 and are currently being withheld by the president for a "review." The Education Department and OMB have been contacted via email for comment. Why It Matters The states suing the Trump administration allege these funds are vital for several key educational programs and needs, including those for people learning English, technology in the classroom lessons, and extracurricular programs. The plaintiffs have said that withholding these funds "will irreparably harm the Plaintiff States, their schools, and the students and families they serve." This is one of several suits faced by the White House over withholding congressionally approved funds. What To Know Education Secretary Linda McMahon speaks during a Senate Appropriations hearing, Tuesday, June 3, 2025, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Education Secretary Linda McMahon speaks during a Senate Appropriations hearing, Tuesday, June 3, 2025, on Capitol Hill in Washington. Julia Demaree Nikhinson, File/AP Photo The suit alleges that the Trump administration is withholding these funds "without any statutory or constitutional authority," as Congress has already earmarked this money and the White House has no legal right to prevent congressional funds from being used. The plaintiffs said they are eligible for the funding due to compliance with the conditions set out by the Education Department, and have submitted state plans which were approved by the Education Department. They have been receiving these funds for decades without incident until this year. According to the plaintiffs, they received the following letter from the Education Department on June 30, the day before they were set to receive their funds: "Given the change in Administrations, the Department is reviewing the FY 2025 funding for the [Title I-C, II-A, III-A, IV-A, IV-B] grant program(s), and decisions have not yet been made concerning submissions and awards for this upcoming academic year. Accordingly, the Department will not be issuing Grant Award Notifications obligating funds for these programs on July 1 prior to completing that review. The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities." This suit was launched by attorneys general from 22 states with the governors of Pennsylvania and Kentucky, all Democrats. It comes as the Supreme Court ruled Trump can lay off nearly 1,400 workers from the Education Department, overruling a previous judge's ruling to reinstate the workers. Discussing that suit, Secretary McMahon said: "The U.S. Department of Education will now deliver on its mandate to restore excellence in American education. We will carry out the reduction in force to promote efficiency and accountability and to ensure resources are directed where they matter most—to students, parents, and teachers." The Department of Education has not released a statement yet on this lawsuit. What People Are Saying Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell in a press release: "The President does not have the authority to decline spending funds appropriated by Congress, and as long as this Administration continues to violate our laws, I will continue to hold him accountable." Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul in a press release: "With the start of the school year only a month away for many Illinois students, the Trump administration's illegal funding freeze is wreaking havoc on school budgets, suspending programs and causing stress and anxiety for families who depend on them." Education Secretary Linda McMahon on the Supreme Court's ruling in a press release: "Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious: the President of the United States, as the head of the Executive Branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies." What Happens Next The states are suing for injunctive relief, meaning they want the freeze to end and the funds allocated to them away of the upcoming academic year. This case, like many others against the Trump administration, will likely find itself in court.


Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump's New Russia Policy Is A Turning Point But Will It Be Enough?
Trump announced a new policy towards Russia and supporting Ukraine on July 14th, 2025.(Photo by Anna ...) On July 14, in an announcement that caught both allies and critics off guard, former President Donald J. Trump issued his strongest rebuke yet of Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine. Trump's new Russia policy gave a 50-day deadline to the Russian leader: start peace negotiations or face a 100% tariff on all Russian exports, along with sanctions on third-party nations that continue to buy Russian oil. He also announced the sale of Patriot missile systems to NATO allies—though not directly to Ukraine—and restated his opposition to Ukraine joining NATO, sending troops, or invoking the Budapest Memorandum. Although these steps don't amount to a full strategic shift, they mark an important change: for the first time, Trump seems to recognize the threat posed by Putin not only to Europe but to global peace—and eventually, to American leadership. A Tentative Step in the Right Direction. This new stance warrants recognition. It embodies a growing realism that Moscow's aggression in Ukraine cannot be ignored, minimized, or postponed. But if this truly marks the start of a renewed American approach to international order, it will require more than tariffs and arms sales. It will need moral clarity, sustained commitment, and global leadership. (In the spirit of full disclosure, the writer is a past President of the Canada Ukraine Foundation and a senior advisor to the Centre for Eastern European Democracy in Toronto). There are compelling reasons why helping Ukraine is not only consistent with American interests—it is essential to preserving them. While Trump's new measures are a step forward, they also expose the limits of his policy: These omissions create critical gaps. A containment strategy that delays decisive support risks prolonging the war and emboldening other autocratic regimes. A Time to Lead, Not Hesitate President Trump's New Tone on Ukraine Is Appreciated, but It Cannot Mark the End of the Discussion. The stakes are too high. China is observing. Iran is too. America's allies are watching as well. Ukraine has earned our support not just through shared ideals but through action, sacrifice, and resilience. The cost of peace must not lead to abandoning those who have stood with us. America's legacy is built on resolve, not retreat. If we are to remain leaders of the free world, let this Trump's new Russia policy be the start of a broader strategy —one that balances strength and stands firm when freedom itself is at stake.


Bloomberg
38 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Asked Zelenskiy If Ukraine Could Hit Moscow, FT Says
US President Donald Trump asked Volodymyr Zelenskiy whether Ukraine could strike Moscow if provided with US long-range weapons, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing people briefed about a call the two leaders held on July 4. Details of the alleged conversation emerged a day after Trump pledged fresh weapons supplies to Kyiv that would be paid for by European allies. He also threatened to impose stiff economic penalties on Russia if it doesn't end the war on Ukraine within 50 days.