The Top 10 Most Inspirational Women of All Time According to AI
Throughout history, countless women have shattered societal barriers, defied expectations, and left an indelible mark on the world. These women have inspired generations through their courage, achievements, and unwavering commitment to their beliefs. From groundbreaking scientists to trailblazing activists, their legacies continue to empower others to reach their full potential.
Their stories remind us that change often begins with bold visionaries willing to challenge the status quo. Whether it's championing human rights, advancing science, or creating masterpieces of art and literature, these women exemplify resilience, brilliance, and strength. They have not only made history but have shaped the future.
This article highlights the top 10 most inspirational women of all time, with research assistance and insights from AI, chosen for their extraordinary contributions and enduring influence. While their fields of expertise vary, their impact is universal, transcending borders and inspiring people of all ages and backgrounds.
1. Marie Curie
Marie Curie was a pioneering scientist whose discoveries in radioactivity revolutionized the field of physics and chemistry. She was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize and remains the only person to win Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields. Her groundbreaking work paved the way for advancements in cancer treatment and modern medicine.
Date of Birth and Death: November 7, 1867 – July 4, 1934
Profession: Physicist and chemist
Key Achievements: Discovered polonium and radium
Nobel Prizes: Physics (1903) and Chemistry (1911)
Legacy: The first woman to teach at the University of Paris
Impact: Advanced cancer research with the use of radiotherapy
2. Rosa Parks
Rosa Parks, known as the 'Mother of the Civil Rights Movement,' made history in 1955 when she refused to give up her bus seat to a white man in Montgomery, Alabama. Her brave act of defiance sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a pivotal moment in the fight against racial segregation in the United States.
3. Malala Yousafzai
Malala Yousafzai became a global symbol of resilience and advocacy for girls' education after surviving an assassination attempt by the Taliban in 2012. Despite facing life-threatening adversity, she continued her fight for education rights and became the youngest Nobel Peace Prize laureate.
Date of Birth: July 12, 1997
Profession: Education activist
Key Achievement: Co-founded the Malala Fund to support education worldwide
Awards: Nobel Peace Prize (2014)
Legacy: A global advocate for girls' education
Impact: Inspired educational reforms in developing nations
4. Eleanor Roosevelt
Eleanor Roosevelt was one of the most influential First Ladies in U.S. history, evolving the role into a platform for social advocacy. A staunch supporter of human rights, she chaired the committee that drafted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and worked tirelessly for equality and justice.
Date of Birth and Death: October 11, 1884 – November 7, 1962
Profession: Diplomat and human rights activist
Key Role: First Lady of the United States (1933–1945)
Legacy: Chairperson of the UN Human Rights Commission
Impact: Helped draft the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
Inspiration: Advocated for women's and minority rights
5. Mother Teresa
Mother Teresa devoted her life to serving the poorest of the poor. Through her missionary work, she founded the Missionaries of Charity in India, which provides care to the sick, homeless, and dying.
She helped millions of people across the globe, primarily those living in poverty, sickness, and destitution, providing care to thousands of the sick and dying, and supporting countless children through orphanages and other initiatives.
Date of Birth and Death: August 26, 1910 – September 5, 1997 (age 87)
Profession: Catholic nun and humanitarian
Key Achievement: Founded the Missionaries of Charity in 1950
Awards: Nobel Peace Prize (1979)
Legacy: Known as a global symbol of compassion
Impact: Provided aid in over 130 countries and millions of people
6. Frida Kahlo
Frida Kahlo was a Mexican artist renowned for her powerful self-portraits and unique style that explored themes of identity, pain, and resilience. Despite living with debilitating physical ailments, her work broke cultural barriers and inspired movements for feminism and individuality.
Date of Birth and Death: July 6, 1907 – July 13, 1954
Profession: Painter
Key Works: The Two Fridas and Self-Portrait with Thorn Necklace and Hummingbird
Legacy: A feminist icon and pioneer of surrealism in art
Impact: Advocated for Mexican culture and women's rights
Famous Quote: 'I paint myself because I am so often alone and because I am the subject I know best.'
7. Amelia Earhart
Amelia Earhart was a pioneering aviator and the first woman to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean. Her achievements and adventurous spirit made her an enduring symbol of determination and courage, inspiring countless women to break barriers in male-dominated fields.
Date of Birth and Disappearance: July 24, 1897 – Disappeared July 2, 1937 (Declared dead January 5, 1939)
Profession: Aviator
Key Achievement: First woman to fly solo across the Atlantic (1932)
Legacy: Opened doors for women in aviation
Impact: Advocated for gender equality in aviation
8. Oprah Winfrey
Oprah Winfrey rose from poverty to become one of the most influential media moguls in the world. Her talk show, The Oprah Winfrey Show, inspired millions, and her philanthropy and advocacy for education continue to make a difference globally.
9. Harriet Tubman
Harriet Tubman was an abolitionist and freedom fighter who escaped slavery and helped hundreds of others gain their freedom through the Underground Railroad. Her bravery and leadership made her a symbol of resilience and justice.
Date of Birth and Death: March 1822 – March 10, 1913
Profession: Abolitionist and activist
Key Achievement: Led over 70 enslaved people to freedom
Legacy: Served as a Union spy during the Civil War
Impact: Paved the way for abolition and civil rights movements
10. Jane Goodall
Jane Goodall is a renowned primatologist and conservationist whose groundbreaking work with chimpanzees, primarily in Tanzania, redefined humanity's understanding of animal behavior. Her advocacy for wildlife conservation and sustainability continues to inspire global action.
Summary of the Most Inspirational Women
The women featured on this list have forever altered the course of history, embodying the strength, innovation, and compassion that define humanity's potential. Through their achievements in science, human rights, art, and culture, they have confronted adversity and transformed challenges into milestones that inspire generations. These trailblazers remind us of the extraordinary heights individuals can achieve when guided by purpose and determination.
Each story is a testament to the power of resilience and vision, illustrating how one person's courage can spark movements, shift paradigms, and redefine what is possible. From Harriet Tubman's unwavering quest for freedom to Jane Goodall's lifelong commitment to conservation, these women have not only made significant contributions but have reshaped the world in their image.
Their legacies challenge us to uphold their values, continuing their work in championing justice, equality, and progress. They encourage us to persist in our own aspirations and to recognize the profound impact that every individual has the power to make. By remembering their accomplishments, we are reminded that true inspiration comes from many different paths of life, leaving an indelible mark on the future.
Related Articles:
About the Authors:
Richard D. Harroch is a Senior Advisor to CEOs, management teams, and Boards of Directors. He is an expert on M&A, venture capital, startups, and business contracts. He was the Managing Director and Global Head of M&A at VantagePoint Capital Partners, a venture capital fund in the San Francisco area. His focus is on internet, digital media, AI and technology companies. He was the founder of several Internet companies. His articles have appeared online in Forbes, Fortune, MSN, Yahoo, Fox Business and AllBusiness.com. Richard is the author of several books on startups and entrepreneurship as well as the co-author of Poker for Dummies and a Wall Street Journal-bestselling book on small business. He is the co-author of a 1,500-page book published by Bloomberg on mergers and acquisitions of privately held companies. He was also a corporate and M&A partner at the international law firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe. He has been involved in over 200 M&A transactions and 250 startup financings. He can be reached through LinkedIn.
Dominique Harroch is the Chief of Staff at AllBusiness.com. She has acted as a Chief of Staff or Operations Leader for multiple companies where she leveraged her extensive experience in operations management, strategic planning, and team leadership to drive organizational success. With a background that spans over two decades in operations leadership, event planning at her own start-up and marketing at various financial and retail companies. Dominique is known for her ability to optimize processes, manage complex projects and lead high-performing teams. She holds a BA in English and Psychology from U.C. Berkeley and an MBA from the University of San Francisco. She can be reached via LinkedIn.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
We must lead AI revolution or be damned, says Muslim leader
Muslims must take charge of artificial intelligence or 'be damned' as a marginalised community, the head of the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) has said in a leaked video. Dr Wajid Akhter, the general secretary of the MCB, said Muslims and their children risked missing the AI revolution in the same way as they had been left behind in the computer and social media revolutions. He added that while Muslims had historically been at the forefront of civilisation and were credited with some of the greatest scientific advances, they had ended up as the butt' of jokes in the modern world after failing to play a part in the latest technological revolutions. 'We already missed the industrial revolution. We missed the computer revolution. We missed the social media revolution. We will be damned and our children will damn us if we miss the AI revolution. We must take a lead,' said Dr Akther. Speaking at the MCB's AI and the Muslim Community conference on July 19, he added: 'AI needs Islam, it needs Muslims to step up.' Scientists 'made fun of' faith at computer launch Dr Akther recalled how at the launch of one of the world's earliest computers, the Mark II , US scientists brought out a prayer mat aligned towards Mecca. 'They were making fun of all religions because they felt that they had now achieved the age of reason and science and technology and we don't need that superstition any more,' he said. 'And so to show that they had achieved mastery over religion, they decided to make fun and they chose our faith. 'How did we go from a people who gave the world the most beautiful buildings, science, technology, medicine, arts to being a joke? 'I'll tell you one thing – the next time that the world is going through a revolution, the next time they go to flip that switch, they will also pull out a prayer mat and they will also line it towards the Qibla [the direction towards Mecca] and they will also pray, but this time, not to make fun of us, they will do so because they are us.' Government eases stance on MCB Dr Akther also told his audience: 'We lost each other. And ever since we lost each other, we've been falling. We've been falling ever since. We are people now who are forced, we are forced by Allah to watch the genocide of our brothers and sisters in Gaza. 'This is a punishment for us if we know it. We are people who are forced to beg the ones who are doing the killing to stop it. We are people who are two billion strong but cannot even get one bottle of water into Gaza.' Dr Akhter said Gaza had 'woken' Muslims up and showed they needed to unite. 'We will continue to fall until the day we realise that only when we are united will we be able to reverse this. Until the day we realise that we need to sacrifice for this unity,' he added. British governments have maintained a policy of 'non-engagement' with the MCB since 2009 based on claims, disputed by the council, that some of its officials have previously made extremist comments. However, Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, is drawing up a new official definition of Islamophobia, and last week it emerged the consultation has been thrown open to all groups including the MCB. Earlier this year, Sir Stephen Timms, a minister in the Department for Work and Pensions, was one of four Labour MPs to attend an MCB event. The MCB has been approached for comment. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Meta chief AI scientist Yann LeCun says Elon Musk risks 'killing breakthrough innovation' at xAI. Here's why.
Meta's Yann LeCun disagrees with Elon Musk about the role of researchers at AI companies. Musk earlier said xAI is ditching the "researcher" job title in favor of "engineers." LeCun said ignoring the distinction between them could risk "killing breakthrough innovation." Meta's chief AI scientist, Yann LeCun, doesn't agree with Elon Musk's latest take on AI development. Like, at all. Musk sparked a conversation about the roles of researchers and engineers at tech companies on Tuesday in an X post. Musk said his AI startup, xAI, would ditch the "researcher" job title in favor of "engineer." "This false nomenclature of 'researcher' and 'engineer', which is a thinly-masked way of describing a two-tier engineering system, is being deleted from @xAI today," Musk said. "There are only engineers. Researcher is a relic term from academia." Two days later, LeCun shared a screenshot of Musk's X post on LinkedIn with a multi-paragraph response. "If you make no distinction between the two activities, if you don't evaluate researchers and engineers with different criteria, you run the risk of killing breakthrough innovation," LeCun said. "True breakthroughs require teams with a long horizon and minimal constraints from product development and management." Musk isn't the first person to question the distinction between AI researchers and engineers. Other leading AI companies have, too. In a 2023 X post, OpenAI President Greg Brockman said that the company didn't want to put its workers into such defined buckets. Instead, the ChatGPT-maker settled on the phrase "Member of Technical Staff." Anthropic, which makes Claude, also uses "Member of Technical Staff" as a job title. "While there's historically been a division between engineering and research in machine learning, we think that boundary has dissolved with the advent of large models," Anthropic says on its careers page. LeCun, however, says the research labs that shaped what the science and tech industries have become were all separate from engineering divisions. "The industry research labs of yore that have left an indelible mark on scientific and technological progress (Bell Labs Area 11, IBM Research, Xerox PARC, etc) were all research divisions that were clearly separate from engineering divisions," LeCun said. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Artificial stupidity' made AI trading bots spontaneously form cartels when left unsupervised, Wharton study reveals
A study from University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology found that when placed in simulated markets, AI trading bots did not compete with one another, but rather began colluding in price-fixing behaviors. According to the study authors, research on how AI behaves in market environments can help regulators understand gaps in existing rules and statutes. Artificial intelligence is just smart—and stupid—enough to pervasively form price-fixing cartels in financial market conditions if left to their own devices. A working paper posted this month on the National Bureau of Economic Research website from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology found when AI-powered trading agents were released into simulated markets, the bots colluded with one another, engaging in price fixing to make a collective profit. In the study, researchers let bots loose in market models, essentially a computer program designed to simulate real market conditions and train AI to interpret market-pricing data, with virtual market makers setting prices based on different variables in the model. These markets can have various levels of 'noise,' referring to the amount of conflicting information and price fluctuation in the various market contexts. While some bots were trained to behave like retail investors and others like hedge funds, in many cases, the machines engaged in 'pervasive' price-fixing behaviors by collectively refusing to trade aggressively—without being explicitly told to do so. In one algorithmic model looking at price-trigger strategy, AI agents traded conservatively on signals until a large enough market swing triggered them to trade very aggressively. The bots, trained through reinforcement learning, were sophisticated enough to implicitly understand that widespread aggressive trading could create more market volatility. In another model, AI bots had over-pruned biases and were trained to internalize that if any risky trade led to a negative outcome, they should not pursue that strategy again. The bots traded conservatively in a 'dogmatic' manner, even when more aggressive trades were seen as more profitable, collectively acting in a way the study called 'artificial stupidity.' 'In both mechanisms, they basically converge to this pattern where they are not acting aggressively, and in the long run, it's good for them,' study co-author and Wharton finance professor Itay Goldstein told Fortune. Financial regulators have long worked to address anti-competitive practices like collusion and price fixing in markets. But in retail, AI has taken the spotlight, particularly as legislators call on companies to address algorithmic pricing. For example, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) called Delta's practice of using AI to set individual airfare prices 'predatory pricing,' though the airline previously told Fortune its fares are 'publicly filed and based solely on trip-related factors.' 'For the [Securities and Exchange Commission] and those regulators in financial markets, their primary goal is to not only preserve this kind of stability, but also ensure competitiveness of the market and market efficiency,' Winston Wei Dou, Wharton professor of finance and one of the study's authors, told Fortune. With that in mind, Dou and two colleagues set out to identify how AI would behave in a financial market by putting trading agent bots into various simulated markets based on high or low levels of 'noise.' The bots ultimately earned 'supra-competitive profits' by collectively and spontaneously deciding to avoid aggressive trading behaviors. 'They just believed sub-optimal trading behavior as optimal,' Dou said. 'But it turns out, if all the machines in the environment are trading in a 'sub-optimal' way, actually everyone can make profits because they don't want to take advantage of each other.' Simply put, the bots didn't question their conservative trading behaviors because they were all making money and therefore stopped engaging in competitive behaviors with one another, forming de-facto cartels. Fears of AI in financial services With the ability to increase consumer inclusion in financial markets and save investors time and money on advisory services, AI tools for financial services, like trading agent bots, have become increasingly appealing. Nearly one third of U.S. investors said they felt comfortable accepting financial planning advice from a generative AI-powered tool, according to a 2023 survey from financial planning nonprofit CFP Board. A report last week from cryptocurrency exchange MEXC found that among 78,000 Gen Z users, 67% of those traders activated at least one AI-powered trading bot in the previous fiscal quarter. But for all their benefits, AI trading agents aren't without risks, according to Michael Clements, director of financial markets and community at the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Beyond cybersecurity concerns and potentially biased decision-making, these trading bots can have a real impact on markets. 'A lot of AI models are trained on the same data,' Clements told Fortune. 'If there is consolidation within AI so there's only a few major providers of these platforms, you could get herding behavior—that large numbers of individuals and entities are buying at the same time or selling at the same time, which can cause some price dislocations.' Jonathan Hall, an external official on the Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee, warned last year of AI bots encouraging this 'herd-like behavior' that could weaken the resilience of markets. He advocated for a 'kill switch' for the technology, as well as increased human oversight. Exposing regulatory gaps Clements explained many financial regulators have so far been able to apply well-established rules and statutes to AI, saying for example, 'Whether a lending decision is made with AI or with a paper and pencil, rules still apply equally.' Some agencies, such as the SEC, are even opting to fight fire with fire, developing AI tools to detect anomalous trading behaviors. 'On the one hand, you might have an environment where AI is causing anomalous trading,' Clements said. 'On the other hand, you would have the regulators in a little better position to be able to detect it as well.' According to Dou and Goldstein, regulators have expressed interest in their research, which the authors said has helped expose gaps in current regulation around AI in financial services. When regulators have previously looked for instances of collusion, they've looked for evidence of communication between individuals, with the belief that humans can't really sustain price-fixing behaviors unless they're corresponding with one another. But in Dou and Goldstein's study, the bots had no explicit forms of communication. 'With the machines, when you have reinforcement learning algorithms, it really doesn't apply, because they're clearly not communicating or coordinating,' Goldstein said. 'We coded them and programmed them, and we know exactly what's going into the code, and there is nothing there that is talking explicitly about collusion. Yet they learn over time that this is the way to move forward.' The differences in how human and bot traders communicate behind the scenes is one of the 'most fundamental issues' where regulators can learn to adapt to rapidly developing AI technologies, Goldstein argued. 'If you use it to think about collusion as emerging as a result of communication and coordination,' he said, 'this is clearly not the way to think about it when you're dealing with algorithms.' This story was originally featured on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
