Rayner to back plan to build 180,000 social homes in next decade
It forms part of a drive to build 300,000 new social and affordable properties by 2035, backed by a £39 billion investment announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in last month's spending review.
Calling on the social housing sector to 'work together to turn the tide on the housing crisis together', the Deputy Prime Minister said the investment was 'the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation'.
She said: 'We are seizing this golden opportunity with both hands to transform this country by building the social and affordable homes we need, so we create a brighter future where families aren't trapped in temporary accommodation and young people are no longer locked out of a secure home.'
But even the 180,000 new social homes set to be promised on Wednesday may not be enough to solve Britain's housing crisis.
Housing charity Shelter has argued that the Government needs to build 90,000 new social homes a year for the next decade – five times the figure Ms Rayner has committed to.
According to Shelter, building 90,000 social homes a year would clear waiting lists, which currently stand at around 1.3 million households, and end the use of temporary accommodation.
Mairi MacRae, Shelter's director of campaigns, said the focus on social housing was 'a vital step in tackling the housing emergency and getting homelessness under control', but urged the Government to do more.
She said: 'Now they must go further and ramp up building to 90,000 social rent homes a year – this means getting tough on developers, supporting councils to get building and having a clear, overall social rent target for all delivery.'
Ms Rayner's target for social and affordable housing forms part of a wider long-term plan also due to be published on Wednesday, setting out how the Government both build more houses and improve housing standards.
It is expected to include a commitment to implement minimum energy efficiency standards in the social housing sector for the first time and extend the decent homes standard to the private rental sector.
The decent homes standard currently only applies to social homes, and includes requirements to keep properties in a reasonable state of repair, have reasonably modern facilities and be free of major hazards such as mould or asbestos.
Currently, around a fifth of privately rented homes are thought not to meet the standard.
Wednesday's plan will also include further reforms of the right to buy system intended to limit the amount of social housing that is sold off.
Last year, the Government cut the discount available to social tenants looking to buy their homes under right to buy, and ministers have been consulting on further changes.
Shadow housing secretary Kevin Hollinrake said: 'Conservatives actually delivered 700,000 new affordable homes when in office, but Angela Rayner can only manage a promise of 300,000.
'By slashing support for affordable home ownership and demanding more expensive social rent, Labour's approach will mean fewer new affordable homes can be delivered overall – and working people will suffer the consequences.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
42 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Labour MP reintroduces bid for Hillsborough Law after campaign stalls
A Labour MP who was at the Hillsborough disaster has renewed the efforts of campaigners to introduce a 'Hillsborough Law' which would aim to prevent cover-ups after major disasters, as he accused the Prime Minister of inaction. Ian Byrne (Liverpool West Derby) was at the disaster aged 16 in 1989, which led to the deaths of 97 football fans during the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest at the football ground in Sheffield. The MP introduced a Public Authority (Accountability) Bill centred around a duty of candour which would force public bodies to co-operate with official inquiries and tell the truth after major disasters – or face criminal sanctions. The Government had introduced a similar Bill which was criticised by campaigners and legal experts for not having a legally binding duty of candour. It was pulled over concerns related to who the duty of candour would apply to. Campaigners fear another Bill could be reintroduced that would still be insufficient as it would not be shared with families beforehand. Mr Byrne said: 'Little did I, or anybody there that day, know that we were walking into a national disaster that would leave 97 men, women and children dead, hundreds more injured and countless families devastated for generations. 'What unfolded that day was not a tragic accident. It was a disaster caused by police failures, and compounded by one of the most shameful state cover-ups this country has ever seen.' Sir Keir Starmer was accused by Mr Byrne of breaking a pledge he had made twice on the issue. Labour had said the Bill would be passed before the latest anniversary of the tragedy in April, but that was missed. Mr Byrne said: 'In 2022, Keir Starmer stood before the people of Liverpool at the Labour Party conference and pledged, and I quote, 'One of my first acts as prime minister will be to put the Hillsborough Law on the statue book'. 'He said the same again as Prime Minister in September 2024, not a Hillsborough law, the Hillsborough Law. That pledge filled our hearts with hope, it promised an end to the culture of denial and delay and decades of deceit. And make no mistake, this today is the Hillsborough Law.' Sir Keir was asked about the issue at Prime Minister's Questions, before Mr Byrne spoke in Parliament. Labour MP for Liverpool Riverside Kim Johnson and Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey accused the Government of planning to table a 'watered-down' Bill. The Prime Minister said he had been speaking to families personally about what would come forward. 'This is a really serious issue, it is important that we get it right,' he said. 'I am fully committed to introducing a Hillsborough Law, including a legal duty of candour for public servants and criminal sanctions for those that refuse to comply. 'We will bring this forward, I just want to take the time to get it right and then put it before the House.' Mr Byrne's father was in the public gallery to see his son's Bill presented, alongside fellow campaigners for a Hillsborough law. He was seriously injured in the disaster and had to crowdfund in pubs near Anfield to raise money for the campaign. His son, who has been an MP in Liverpool since 2019, said: 'The law cannot bring back the 97, it cannot erase the decades of pain, nor undo the trauma inflicted by callous lies and institutional neglect. 'But it can stop this from ever happening again, it can give truth, a fight for justice, and restore some of the faith lost, not just in the system but in the very idea of justice. 'So today can I say loud and clear to the Prime Minister, don't let this moment slip away. Don't let your promise made in Liverpool be broken in Westminster. 'Let us honour the 97 and so many others, not just with remembrance, but with change.'
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Has Kemi Badenoch finally shown the killer instinct to save her as Tory leader?
Ever since Kemi Badenoch became Tory leader, her many Conservative critics have claimed she has failed to make any impact. Any number of backbenchers have been only too willing, albeit usually under the cowardly cover of anonymity, to claim she is going nowhere. Principal among their complaints is that she never seems to get the better of her weekly parliamentary jousts with Keir Starmer. Time and again, she asks the wrong question, chooses the wrong topic, and lacks the wit to seize on any missteps by the Prime Minister, they moan. Why can't she give Starmer and co both barrels – just like showman Nigel Farage does on a regular basis? It is not a criticism likely to be made of her again anytime soon. Not after her comprehensive filleting of Starmer over his defeat by Labour welfare rebels. Initially, Starmer fended off Badenoch's barbs at him. It looked as though she would be repulsed yet again. You could imagine her Tory detractors already licking their lips, muttering, 'She can't even score an open goal.' But Badenoch wasn't finished. Starmer was merely the hors d'oeuvres. She took her knife to the person sitting behind Starmer, Rachel Reeves, asking him to guarantee she was safe in her job. Starmer the lawyer should have seen it coming a mile off. It's the oldest trick in the political book: he could have answered with a categorical yes. But he didn't. In political terms, he left Reeves drifting in the wind. The chancellor's emotional and distraught response signalled that Badenoch had scored a direct hit. A rare moment in such parliamentary exchanges, which, for the most part, have nothing to do with democracy or debate and are all about posturing, platitudes and pantomime politics. Knockout blows are about as common as someone scoring in the Eton Wall Game – about one per decade. Badenoch didn't just score, she smashed the ball through the back of the net. The most important consequence of today's events is how, indeed whether, Reeves can survive such a harrowing and humbling public ordeal. And whether Starmer can re-establish his and his administration's personal and political authority. That is all in the balance. But there can be no doubt that eight months after becoming opposition leader, Badenoch has arrived on the big stage. Her stock reply to complaints that she has not made her mark as a leader has been that it took heroine Margaret Thatcher years to do so. Thatcher became a formidable parliamentary performer, but it took her a long time. In her early years as opposition leader, she was frequently outwitted by Labour Prime Minister Harold Wilson. Thatcher's Tory critics said it showed she wasn't up to it. Just like Badenoch's Conservative critics. They won't be making the same criticism again anytime soon. In blasting open the fault line between Starmer and Reeves with a lethal precision, a skill most thought was not in her armoury, Badenoch has at long last given demoralised Conservatives reasons to be cheerful.
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Letter of the week: Labour's sorry stories
Photo by Nicola Margaret / Getty Images Andrew Marr is right about external shocks remaking countries (Cover Story, 27 June). But gifted politicians show countries how to adapt and survive them. Lloyd George in the First World War, Churchill in the Second, and Bevin and Bevan in 1945 all explained problems and solutions in simple, memorable terms. Not everyone agreed with them, but everyone knew what they were trying to do. Labour must urgently learn from their example. The Prime Minister and the Chancellor are hard-working managers, but colourless and cardboard communicators. Neither seems to have (or be capable of conveying) a clear and compelling vision of where our country is going and how we get there. Consequently, they come over as making piecemeal administrative decisions (winter fuel allowance and benefits cuts, then partial and ill-planned U-turns) without explaining how any of it fits into an overall plan for Britain. This government must start evoking a consistent policy narrative and vision. If it can't tell a joined-up story of hope, supported by logically connected policies, it will inevitably lose its battle with Farage's opportunistic but far more fluent storytelling. Robert Dear, Enfield Time to unionise As someone who reads the New Statesman in order, Politics followed by the Encounter (27 June) gave me the idea that, in an 'era of personality politics', Mick Lynch could lead a new leftist party set up by Corbyn. The problem was not Corbyn's policies but his personality, whereas Lynch excelled at 'put downs of… junior ministers' and 'eviscerations of… television presenters'. Moira Sykes, Manchester Eddie Dempsey's understandable desire to see a trade union revival needs to be earthed in a humble understanding of why so many working-class people turned against unions in the 1980s, and kept the Conservatives in power. Closed shops, block votes at conferences, hostility to innovation and continual strikes, all lost the unions credibility. On the other hand, a friend of mine in rail network management always valued the contributions of his union reps, because they knew the business better than he did and wanted to make things work better. So… a little less class warfare, perhaps? Chris Hudson, Morpeth, Northumberland Book smarts I enjoyed Simon Winder's excellent piece (Diary, 27 June) on the trepidations of authorship and the pre-publication fear of others pipping his prized book to the post. I recently had a historical novel published, The Poet Laurie Ate, and share his pain. Congratulations to Winder on his effectiveness in bringing his book's title so readily to the attention of the New Statesman readership – something a retiring debutant author such as myself would never dream of doing… Ash James, Stourbridge Movement but no progress Mindful of the fact that 2026 will be the centenary of the General Strike, I was prompted to ask, on reading Anoosh Chakelian's article on overcrowded housing (Bursting the Bubble, 27 June) just how much progress has been made at resolving many of the issues that led to it. Certainly poor and insufficient housing was one. Arthur Griffith-Boscawen, one-time minister of health after the First World War, charged with doing something about the housing problem, apparently chose to tell 'young couples to continue sharing their parents' cottages and tenements, rather than seeking a home of their own'. Boscawen lasted one month in office, supposedly. Plus ça change. Derek Evans, Stafford Doctored statistics I am puzzled by Phil Whitaker's report from Canada (Health Matters, 27 June). He says one in five Canadians have no GP, so new patients come to him are already suffering serious illnesses. He then says Canadian GPs are finding a 'sweet spot' where 'it is possible to provide high-quality primary care in the present era'. So, first-class service for 80 per cent, no service for 20 per cent? I really don't think this is the sort of statistic the NHS should be aiming for. Peter Norton, London N6 Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe None the wiser Andrew Jefford (Drink, 27 June) addresses the idea that wines can somehow possess 'minerality'. An even shakier claim is that a particular wine shows 'class'. I once dared ask the tutor at a tasting what this meant. My neighbour (pink jacket, blue-spotted bow tie) interjected with the hackneyed, but no less insulting: 'If you have to ask, you will never know.' I still don't. Alan Conn, Newcastle upon Tyne We reserve the right to edit letters [See also: Labour's rebel MPs are rubbish at maths] Related
