logo
Authoritarian leader of Belarus is sworn for 7th term and tells critics ‘you have no future'

Authoritarian leader of Belarus is sworn for 7th term and tells critics ‘you have no future'

TALLINN, Estonia — Belarus' authoritarian President Alexander Lukashenko was sworn in Tuesday to a seventh term, and he mocked those who derided him as 'Europe's last dictator' by saying his country has more democracy 'than those who cast themselves as its models.'
'Half of the world is dreaming about our 'dictatorship,' the dictatorship of real business and interests of our people,' Lukashenko, 70, said in his inauguration speech at the Independence Palace in the capital of Minsk.
Hundreds of opposition supporters living abroad held anti-Lukashenko rallies Tuesday to mark the anniversary of Belarus' short-lived independence in 1918 following the collapse of the Russian Empire.
Lukashenko marked three decades in power last year, and his political opponents have denounced the tightly orchestrated Jan. 26 election as a farce. The Belarus Central Election Commission declared he won with nearly 87% of the vote after a campaign in which four token challengers on the ballot all praised his rule.
Opposition members have been imprisoned or exiled abroad by Lukashenko's unrelenting crackdown on dissent and free speech.
Months of massive protests that were unprecedented in the history of the country of 9 million people followed the 2020 election and brought on the harsh crackdown. Over 65,000 people were arrested, thousands were beaten by police and independent media outlets and nongovernmental organizations were closed and outlawed, bringing condemnation and sanctions from the West.
Thousands of Lukashenko supporters attended Tuesday's inauguration ceremony, where he denounced his critics as foreign stooges who were at odds with the people.
'You don't and won't have public support, you have no future,' he declared. 'We have more democracy than those who cast themselves as its models.'
Belarusian activists say it holds more than 1,200 political prisoners, including Nobel Peace Prize laureate Ales Bialiatski, founder of the Viasna Human Rights Center.
'The election was held amid a deep human rights crisis, in the atmosphere of total fear caused by repressions against civil society, independent media, opposition and dissent,' according to a statement released Tuesday by Viasna and 10 other Belarusian human rights groups. They said Lukashenko's hold on power is illegitimate.
Lukashenko has ruled the country with an iron fist since 1994, relying on subsidies and political support from Russian President Vladimir Putin, himself in office for a quarter-century, an alliance that helped the Belarusian leader survive the 2020 protests.
Lukashenko allowed Moscow to use the country's territory to invade Ukraine in February 2022 and later hosted some of Russia's tactical nuclear weapons.
Opposition leader-in-exile Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, who fled Belarus under government pressure after running against Lukashenko in 2020, vowed to keep fighting for the country's freedom.
'Our goal is to break away from the Russian occupation and Lukashenko's tyranny, and to return Belarus into the European family of nations,' Tsikhanouskaya said in a speech at the Lithuanian parliament,
Some observers say Lukashenko could now try to mend ties with the West.
'Lukashenko already has been sending signals to the West about his readiness to start a dialogue and his desire to normalize ties in order to ease the total dependence on the Kremlin and soften Western sanctions during his seventh term,' said Valery Karbalevich, an independent political analyst.
Karmanau writes for the Associated Press.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Marjorie Taylor Greene Just Dropped A Truth Bomb About The Republican Party
Marjorie Taylor Greene Just Dropped A Truth Bomb About The Republican Party

Buzz Feed

time26 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

Marjorie Taylor Greene Just Dropped A Truth Bomb About The Republican Party

Marjorie Taylor Greene is NOT happy with the Republican Party. She was pissed about the attack on Iran. She broke ranks with Republicans and called the crisis in Gaza a "genocide." And she won't stop talking about how Republicans won't deal with the national debt. Now, she's talking about breaking up with the Republican Party. In an interview with the Daily Mail, the Congress member said: "I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me, or if I'm kind of not relating to Republican Party as much anymore. I don't know which one it is." She also said: "I think the Republican Party has turned its back on America First and the workers and just regular Americans." And finally, she criticized the way Republicans treat women: "I think there's other women in our party that are really sick and tired of the way men treat Republican women." Those anti-GOP quotes are going viral in a tweet by Brian Tyler Cohen: People in the replies are, like, duh: "What if she switches parties and becomes a normie dem," one person asked. "I really never thought i'd see that day she was saying shit like this and uttering the word 'genocide'…" another person said in disbelief. And then the Lincoln Project invited her to the party: "Welcome to the resistance, Marge." As this person said, "Trumps presidency is so goddamn bad that it wokeified marjorie taylor green."

Trump's odds of winning or losing his multitude of battles
Trump's odds of winning or losing his multitude of battles

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Trump's odds of winning or losing his multitude of battles

In picking fights and waging wars on multiple fronts, President Trump should heed the advice of Britain's greatest sailor and naval hero Lord Horatio Nelson: Only a fool or a stupid ship's captain would ever fight a fort. While immobile, unlike ships, forts were better defended and protected. And forts were more easily reinforced, rearmed and resupplied by land than ships at sea, which then had to find suitable ports. Trump is not at sea except in the minds of his many critics, yet he has joined several simultaneous battles against forts. He has given Russia no more time beyond Monday's 10-day deadline to end the war in Ukraine. Former Russian President and Prime Minister Dimitri Medvedev has threatened nuclear war if Trump is not careful. In that regard, Russia is a formidable fort armed with nuclear weapons equal to America's. Trump started a global trade war with his announcement Friday of new tariffs, having struck a deal with the European Union while still negotiating with China. He seems to have picked a fight with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over relieving extreme starvation in Gaza, after having turned a Nelsonian blind eye toward an estimated 61,000 Palestinian deaths. And he surely is at war at home against so-called woke law firms and universities and, remarkably, a more than significant part of his MAGA base over refusing to come clean about his relationship with the deceased sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein. Whether Trump will prevail or fail in all, some or none of these battles will largely determine his administration's future and will almost certainly impact congressional elections in 2026 and the presidential vote in 2028, for which he is legally prevented from running. For most mere mortals, bookies would set the odds of failing or losing at least one of these battles as very low. Running the deck, however, would recoup a fortune in bets. Yet Trump's history has reversed all the odds against him. This makes any seemingly rational bet to the contrary exceedingly dumb. In this ability to overcome setbacks that would crush most people, Trump made Bill Clinton's reign as the ' The Comeback Kid ' seem both short and trivial. Will that luck hold out? War with Russia will not happen. Putin, however, will not be impressed or moved by the threat to force negotiations by imposing new sanctions or deploying two American nuclear submarines that somehow will annoy or worry Russia sufficiently to abandon its efforts. At the moment, while the war in Ukraine will not be fought to the last Russian, there are no compelling facts or arguments to convince Putin he is losing or needs to withdraw his forces. Quite the contrary. Similarly, in Gaza, Netanyahu's actions will determine America's. The relationship with Israel has grown so close over the decades since the 1956 and 1967 Arab-Israeli wars that the U.S. no longer tries or considers not giving Israel basically what it needs or demands. What could happen in these conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza, as with the Houthis, is that the U.S. withdraws and the situation reverts back to the pre-war days. The global trade war is different. The administration asserts that tariffs will not raise inflation and will generate greater economic growth. This argument is the equivalent of the ship commanded by Nelson's dim witted captain. Other states will react. The World Trade Organization and its agreed upon principles will become cannon fodder. Even though imports comprise only about 11 percent of U.S. total GDP, the effects of tariffs will be much greater. Unlike Gaza and Ukraine, of which Trump can wash his hands, the economy is not something that can be discarded like a used tissue. Trump will have to do something to explain or cover up any misjudgments. The only way for that to happen comes from the Trump playbook: Call the bad data 'fake news,' dissemble and stall — or cling to the belief that tariffs are working, despite all the contradictory evidence. Ironically, Epstein may be the problem that simply will not disappear — the fort that ultimately wins. Trump is trapped by his promise to release all the Epstein files. Suppose there are none and nothing more to release? Or suppose the files contain truly damaging revelations about Trump or his circle? There may be no way out. One conclusion is clear: The fewer fights picked, the better. And the chances of winning many are not odds most people would accept. Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., is UPI's Arnaud deBorchgrave Distinguished Columnist, a senior advisor at the Atlantic Council, the chairman of two private companies and the principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. He and former United Kingdom Defense Chief David Richards are the authors of a forthcoming book on preventing strategic catastrophe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store