Today's housing market is a mirror of the times we're living in, new study shows
The American dream of homeownership is feeling increasingly like a fantasy for some.
Gallup's annual housing market survey, released Wednesday, paints a pessimistic picture of the real estate market. Most Americans view current market conditions as decidedly unfavorable, the survey concluded, and they are bracing for further price increases in the coming year.
The responses of more than 1,000 American adults were included in Gallup's sample for its annual Economy and Personal Finance survey. The survey measures housing market perceptions and home-buying intentions across the country.
5 Americans are increasingly pessimistic about the prospect of homeownership.
Getty Images/iStockphoto
5 A home advertises an open house, hoping to attract uncertain buyers.
moodboard – stock.adobe.com
5 Americans across the country reported the cost of homeownership as their greatest barrier.
Mangostar – stock.adobe.com
Roughly one third of respondents reported renting their homes.
Of that cohort, the percentage for that plan to buy a home within five or 10 years was just 53% — the lowest ever recorded by Gallup. Also, 45% of respondents don't expect to buy a home in the foreseeable future. More than half said they expect home prices to increase this year.
The results come at the same time as widespread economic uncertainty and lackluster spring sales reported by the National Association of Realtors. Home sales in March declined by the most since November 2022.
There are plenty of reasons why a renter may not want to become a homeowner — like convenience, bad credit, an unstable job or just simple timing. But the cost of homeownership, including the down payment, is a bigger home-buying barrier for renters than it has been in the past, the survey revealed.
Only 11% of renters cited convenience as their reason for renting, suggesting not renting today is largely an economic choice, rather than a preferential one.
5 For sale signs are piling up across US metros. Home sales nationwide significantly slowed this spring.
Hernan Schmidt – stock.adobe.com
5 High prices, elevated mortgage rates and an uncertain economy are dampening the hopes of prospective homebuyers.
fizkes – stock.adobe.com
Among US adults who currently rent their home, 68% say they do so because they can't afford to buy or do not have enough money for a down payment. When Gallup asked this question in 2013, just 45% gave this reason.
Americans remain broadly skeptical about the housing market, as they have been since 2022, with a majority — 72% — answering that it's a bad time to buy a house. But the Gallup data found real divides in perceptions when sorted by region and politics.
East Coasters, the survey found, are more likely to expect home prices to rise than other regions. Republicans answered the survey with significantly more optimism than their counterparts — 33% of Republicans surveyed said that now is a good time to buy a home, compared to just 18% last year. This cohort's expectations for rising home prices also dropped dramatically, from 69% in 2024 to 48% this year.
Despite declines from their 2022 highs, home prices remain head and shoulders above levels from a decade ago. The financial squeeze of high prices, elevated mortgage rates and an uncertain economy has effectively locked out a segment of Americans from looking forward to homeownership.
Despite this pessimism, a large proportion of Americans — 37% — still believe that real estate is the best long-term investment a person can make.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
36 minutes ago
- New York Post
‘Big beautiful' AI rule means feds must act NOW to stop Big Tech's abuses
Deep within President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act — the major spending legislation he wants to see by July 4 — is a rule that holds enormous implications for the rapidly developing artificial intelligence sector. The Senate is debating a provision that would prevent state governments from regulating the AI industry for years. Supporters claim this moratorium would stop a patchwork of conflicting state laws from slowing AI's rocketing development. But without subsequent federal action, a moratorium on state regulation risks making the AI industry a law-free zone, where Big Tech companies can essentially do whatever they want with an untested, sometimes exploitative new technology. We've needed federal regulation on AI companies for some time, but if this new moratorium passes, it will become even more urgent for Congress to act. If the AI industry is going to grow sustainably and responsibly, we need legislation to provide guardrails and clear rules about how to protect the creators of content that AI tools use — publishers, authors, journalists, artists, musicians and creatives of all types. Right now, those content creators are AI's victims. Big Tech and AI companies scrape vast amounts of content to build and operate their generative AI products, which turn content into GenAI outputs for users. Sometimes they just reproduce content creators' passages word for word — without credit or compensation. AI companies admit these unfair and un-American tactics are fundamental to their businesses, but they refuse to pay because it's cheaper to steal. Even worse, this predatory behavior lets AI models act as information gatekeepers. If Big Tech is left to its own devices, Americans will have less access to accurate information, and certainly no one to hold accountable for errors and mistakes. Reporting on stories that Americans need to know will dwindle as the AI companies undermine the business models of publishers, opening the door to viewpoint suppression and creating opportunities for foreign propagandists. How dire these problems will become is a matter of guesswork — because AI development is currently a black box. Developers do not share information on whether or how they are obtaining consent for using publisher content. (News reports suggest that when they do share information about these methods, it is sometimes misleading.) Publishers must hire experts to reverse-engineer how their content has been taken, a costly process that overburdens small publishers and can't always identify all works that were used in training the models. This lack of transparency hinders the enforcement of intellectual property rights and distorts regulatory decisions, business development and more. Federal legislation could address these issues by requiring recordkeeping and full disclosure. AI companies must let publishers know whether a generative AI model was trained on their work — and must also explain whether certain publications have been specifically excluded from AI models, so that the public can judge any bias. Further, AI companies must disclose the sources they use to keep their models' responses current. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Simple rules such as these will prompt commercial GenAI developers to enter agreements with publishers to use their content — agreements that will likely block AI companies and foreign actors from distorting the news that the public receives. The benefits will be widespread. These rules would strengthen America's position in the AI race by making its products more trustworthy and preserving the journalism that lies at its foundation. Protecting intellectual property and homegrown content is what gives American AI companies an international competitive edge. Strong federal rules will also keep many small media businesses viable, and protecting thousands of workers and their communities. The White House blueprint for AI wisely recognizes that AI development must be responsible and aligned with American values, including respect for intellectual property and the rule of law. If Congress is going to act, as it appears it might, to limit the ability of states to enact these important regulations, then it's up to the House and Senate to fill that gap — and set this growing but potentially dangerous industry on a solid foundation. Danielle Coffey is president and CEO of the News/Media Alliance, which represents more than 2,200 publishers nationwide.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wall Street could see big moves with Trump's new bill
Wall Street could see big moves with Trump's new bill originally appeared on TheStreet. Senate Republicans are advancing a broad-based tax package to extend the 2017 Trump-era tax cuts by deploying a controversial 'current policy' accounting gimmick that waives the $3.8 trillion price tag from the official estimate. Republicans are employing a controversial accounting method to erase the $3.8 trillion cost of extending Trump-era tax cuts, trying to sell the bill to fiscal conservatives despite warnings that it will exacerbate the national debt. Democrats are referring to it as "magic math," while others believe it sets a precedent for hiding future costs and dragging the United States into record deficits, as per a June 30 Bloomberg report. Republicans, however, have another plan! GOPs say that embracing this accounting system would let them add further tax cuts to Trump's "One Big, Beautiful Bill." Especially, John Thune has been leading the efforts to pass the bill. The move allows the GOP to get around budget rules and make an appeal to deficit hawks. The bill includes a section (Section 899) that would give the Treasury the ability to retaliate against unfair foreign tax measures affecting U.S. individuals or firms, in line with President Trump's trade deals. This could be reflected as a measure to push forward President Trump's crypto-forward movement. A new amendment from Senator Cynthia Lummis aims to address this gap with significant upgrades to the taxation of digital assets. The bill will also protect foreign investors who utilize U.S. staking services and clarify that crypto loans are not subject to taxation. The bill could be more precise definitions, especially those related to staking, stablecoins, NFTs, and borrowing fees, to work well in practice, as per experts. Many analysts believe that the One Big, Beautiful Bill (OBBB) could have significant positive consequences for financial markets and push Bitcoin to the forefront. Bitcoin has surged by nearly 75% in the past year, which some view as a response to accelerating deficits and the adoption of aggressive fiscal policies. Gold, an equally conventional hedge, is up 41% over the same time frame — and, even with the higher yields on bonds, that suggests nervousness about monetary stability is getting more, not less acute. Join the discussion with CryptoWendyO on. For its part, the dollar is down to three-year lows with the DXY Index gapping down at the open on Monday, a sign that confidence in the greenback's long-term prospects is slowly eroding. Yields on long-term government debt are also up, steepening the yield curve and sending a signal that bond markets continue to be skeptical that the Federal Reserve will join Trump in pushing for rate cuts. The rise in borrowing costs reflects investor unease about both persistent inflation and the sustainability of U.S. fiscal policy. Wall Street could see big moves with Trump's new bill first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 30, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 30, 2025, where it first appeared.
41 minutes ago
Trump policy bill includes tax cuts for the wealthy and sweeping cuts to Medicaid
Days before the Fourth of July holiday, Senate Republicans are scrambling to push through the massive tax cuts and spending bill at the heart of Pres. Trump's agenda. June 30, 2025
