‘This is not Edinburgh': South Ayrshire council set to abandon plans for visitor levy after pushback
A local Scottish council is set to abandon its plans to introduce a tourist tax despite other towns and cities jumping at the chance to put a levy on visitors.
South Ayrshire Council, covering an area of western Scotland under Glasgow, is likely to drop plans to introduce a visitor levy after negative feedback at a public consultation.
The local authority proposed the plans to implement a visitor levy in the area on overnight stays to try and boost the economy.
Accommodation providers, groups representing tourism businesses and residents were asked to give their feedback during the 12-week consultation.
The plans received criticism from the public, with only 15 per cent of respondents supporting the proposal compared to 79 per cent against it.
The negativity towards the levy largely focused on doubts that Ayrshire was a popular enough location for the levy to work.
The area attracts people to its miles of stunning coastline, backed by a series of world-renowned golf courses, including the Trump-owned Turnberry course, and is home to attractions such as the Robert Burns Birthplace Museum, which celebrates the life of Scotland's national poet.
One respondent said: 'I don't believe that Ayrshire is attractive enough as a destination to warrant a tourist tax /levy.
'I can see how this works in very popular places like Barcelona or Athens. If this was inevitable, I would look to delay it until [the] surrounding areas have introduced the tax.'
Another person said that the levy could even deter tourists from visiting the area.
'I think we need to encourage visitors rather than penalise them… This is not Edinburgh, where they have huge numbers of visitors... we need to make things more attractive to visitors and this sends completely the wrong message,' they said.
Meanwhile, the minority who support the tourist tax said that they hope it will 'generate income for the area and hopefully keep council tax lower for residents'.
It has been recommended that the plan be abandoned for two years, with the council agreeing with this during a meeting on Tuesday. Other councillors have 48 hours to object to this decision before it is finalised.
The local council says that the visitor economy is highly important to South Ayrshire and supports thousands of jobs in the area.
It said it wanted to investigate the visitor levy as an option to support services and infrastructure for both residents and tourists to enjoy.
It said it could raise £400,000 to £500,000 per year based on a five per cent visitor levy charge after administration costs are accounted for.
The visitor levy is not completely off the table for Ayrshire, but it will not be prioritised by the council until August 2027, when it will be reconsidered.
The Visitor Levy Act became law in September 2024, which allows councils in Scotland to tax overnight accommodation if they wish to do so.
The Highland Council and Glasgow City Council have established consultations on visitor levies in their area, while Edinburgh spearheaded the tax in January, when it voted to introduce a five per cent surcharge on overnight stays in the city.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Shankland to exit Hearts as contract talks break down
Lawrence Shankland looks set to leave Hearts after talks over a new contract broke down. Shankland's deal at Tynecastle had expired at the end of last season but the club had been hopeful of keeping their star striker. Indeed, given the positive talks between new boss Derek McInnes and the player himself, there was optimism of Shankland extending his stay. McInnes made no secret of his desire to keep the former PFA Scotland Player of the Year and had held more discussions with the 29-year-old earlier this week. But Mail Sport understands those talks have now broken down, with Shankland not travelling with Hearts to their pre-season camp in Spain yesterday. Whilst keen to keep hold of the striker, McInnes made it clear that Hearts couldn't wait forever in terms of a decision being made. Mail Sport understands the difference between what Shankland wanted and what the board were willing to offer was minimal, but Hearts have been unwilling to budge. A source close to Shankland said: 'Lawrence wanted to continue at Hearts but unfortunately the chief executive Andrew McKinlay doesn't share the same ambitions that he has for the club.' McKinlay, who publicly admitted making the mistake of appointing doomed previous manager Neil Critchley without meeting him in person, is eager to make amends with new manager McInnes. But it now looks likely that the club will have to move forward and start afresh without their main goalscorer. It is expected that Hearts and McInnes will now ramp up their search for a new No 9 over the coming weeks.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
As Sir Rod Stewart prepares to play Glasto, the veteran rocker says the country is 'fed up' with Labour and the Tories and should 'give Nigel Farage a chance'
He didn't quite say he'd found a Reason To Believe in Nigel Farage. But when Sir Rod Stewart steps on to Glastonbury 's Pyramid Stage tomorrow afternoon, fans may ponder his plea to 'give Farage a chance'. The 80-year-old singer's teatime set comes the day after he claimed the country was 'fed up' with the Tories and that Labour was trying to ditch Brexit. He accused Prime Minister Keir Starmer of giving Scottish fishing rights 'back to the EU', although the Government insists it has simply renewed an existing deal for European boats. His views represent a second volte-face given that he appeared to support Labour at last year's election – despite previously backing the Conservatives. Asked where Britain's political future now lay, he told The Times: 'It's hard for me because I'm extremely wealthy, and I deserve to be, so a lot of it doesn't really touch me. 'But that doesn't mean I'm out of touch. For instance, I've read about Starmer cutting off the fishing in Scotland and giving it back to the EU. That hasn't made him popular. 'We're fed up with the Tories. We've got to give Farage a chance. He's coming across well. What options have we got? I know some of his family, I know his brother, and I quite like him.' Asked what Mr Farage stands for aside from Brexit, tighter immigration and controversial economic promises he replied: 'Yeah, yeah. But Starmer's all about getting us out of Brexit and I don't know how he's going to do that. 'Still, the country will survive. It could be worse. We could be in the Gaza Strip.' Sir Rod also seemed unconvinced that Sir Keir was going to fully address one of his personal pet hates. Three years ago, the singer donned a hi-vis jacket and rang around friends asking for help filling in potholes outside his Essex house. 'I took me Ferrari out. Nearly lost the f***ing wheel,' he said. 'And before I did in the Ferrari, I saw an ambulance that couldn't move, the wheel stuck right in there. 'So I took me mates out, and we knew what to do because I had builders in the house. 'We filled in a considerable length of the road, actually.' He added that potholes were still present 'all over Britain' in contrast to Europe.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Two profoundly deaf children refused access to vital help by Labour-run local authority because they are privately educated... their outraged mother calls the move 'divisive' and 'discriminatory'
An outraged mother has revealed how her two profoundly deaf children have been refused access to vital help because they are privately educated. She was astonished to be told by her local council who fund specialist help for deaf children that private schoolchildren had 'opted out' of it because of their choice of school. The Labour-run council even went on to admit it would also refuse services to blind children if they went to private schools. The mum from Edinburgh was later told her daughters could only receive help if she paid £120 an hour for it or if their school funded it. She said both children needed extra support from a teacher of the deaf because otherwise 'general development and academic progress really suffers'. This was provided free to her first daughter, now 8, when she was at her current private school's nursery but, two years later, when her second daughter started the same nursery, the support was denied. At the same time Edinburgh City Council, who the family pay council tax to, also refused to continue the service on their eldest daughter as she moved into primary. Complaining to the council last summer and asking them why their policy had clearly changed, the mother was told by the council Head of Education (Inclusion) Lynne Binnie, in an email seen by The Mail on Sunday, that the council's service was now only provided to children in state schools. Ms Binnie said: 'Essentially, when a parent makes a decision to educate their child in an independent school, they opt out of central education resources such as the Deaf Support Team.' She also admitted the council would not provide services for blind and visually impaired children or children who needed educational psychology services if they went to private schools. The mum told the Mail on Sunday: 'Obviously, a child has a right to receive appropriate interventions irrespective of which school they are at! To be told this is not the case is shocking. 'It felt very discriminatory to direct resources to a specific subset of the overall population of children while withdrawing it entirely for the other group.' The mum says she was later tipped off that even the option to pay for the service had only been opened up because of 'parental pressure'. 'I was told it would cost £120 an hour which is outrageous.' The mum said she expected her children to have ongoing support with school as well as technical support with their cochlear implants, all of which she had been told by the NHS would be provided by the council's deaf service. She added: 'It makes me so angry that that is the situation. I hate the divisive behaviour that is going on where councils can withdraw services that children need. It is just not fair.' Criticising the council's policy as discriminatory, Lorraine Davidson from the Scottish Council of Independent Schools said: 'Support for deaf children should be a universal service and there should be no discrimination based on a child's school.' Craig Hoy MSP called for 'this shocking discrimination to be urgently addressed by the Scottish Government', adding: 'If councils will not provide these essential lifeline services to all children who need them then ministers must step in to ensure every child, regardless of where they are educated, gets the support they need.' But Councillor James Dalgleish, Education, Children and Families Convener said: 'Independent schools have a responsibility to comply with the Equality Act 2010 and the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 which includes provision of specialist support to children and young people enrolled at their school who require it.' The Mail on Sunday's previous revelations that the same council refused free hospital tuition to sick children on cancer wards if they went to private schools sparked political outrage and ongoing calls to scrap the policy. And last week, the Principal of George Watson's College in Edinburgh, one of the UK's largest private schools, said the city council saved millions a year because so many school children were educated privately. Lisa Kerr, formerly Head of Gordonstoun, famously attended by King Charles, said: 'By educating nearly 2500 pupils in 2024, our school saved the public purse a staggering £18.9m with £15.7m of this directly relating to savings made by City of Edinburgh Council from us educating pupils in this area.'
