What the Antoinette Lattouf decision means for employers and employees
Antoinette Lattouf's victory against the ABC in her unlawful termination case is expected to trigger a flurry of disputes about the scope of workers' protections against being sacked over their political views.
In a decision on Wednesday, Federal Court Justice Darryl Rangiah found the ABC sought to appease pro-Israel lobbyists in 2023 by axing Lattouf's five-day Sydney radio contract after three days because 'she held political opinions opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza'.
This contravened Fair Work Act protections against the termination of employment on grounds including political opinion. Lattouf's opinions had been expressed on social media but not on radio.
Michael Bradley, managing partner of Marque Lawyers, said Rangiah found both 'holding political opinions and expressing them' were protected, 'and he took a pretty wide view of how that protection works'.
Asked if the Lattouf decision would encourage other employees to test the limits of the law, he said: 'Yes, it definitely will. Those conversations are already happening.'
Loading
But the decision did not mean employers could never impose limits on employees' public expression of political opinions.
No direction issued to Lattouf
Bradley said Rangiah did not 'engage with the scenario where an employee has been directed not to … go on social media and make comments on political issues' because he found that in Lattouf's case 'there wasn't a direction at all, just advice'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Activists demand Gaza ceasefire and no war on Iran
Standing in unity, holding signs and waving flags, activists have gathered to demand an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and to oppose the conflict with Iran. Protesters once again turned out in force for the weekly rally in Melbourne's city centre, calling for the recognition of a Palestinian state and condemning the Israeli government's military response to Hamas' attack on Israel. Braving Sunday's rain, the group marched in a loop, starting from the State Library, chanting and carrying banners and signs that read "Sanction Israel," and "Glory to the Martyrs." The protest came amid continued violence in Gaza, which escalated after Hamas, a designated terrorist organisation, launched an attack on Israel, killing about 1200 people and abducting 250 others in October 2023. In response, Israeli military strikes have killed more than 56,400 Palestinians in the besieged territory, according to figures from the Hamas-run health ministry. Free Palestine Melbourne protests are not only demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza but also calling for an end to the attacks on Iran. Tensions between Iran and Israel recently eased after both sides agreed to a ceasefire, following a 12-day conflict during which the US bombed three of Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran launched missiles at a US military base in Qatar in response. Protesters say they will continue to build strong and vibrant rallies throughout July, aiming to engage a broader demographic and push for change at the parliamentary level in Australia. This includes "Converge on Canberra," a three-day event from July 20 designed to send a clear and urgent message to the federal government. "Now is the time to pressure Labor to end its support and complicity in genocide," organisers said. Standing in unity, holding signs and waving flags, activists have gathered to demand an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and to oppose the conflict with Iran. Protesters once again turned out in force for the weekly rally in Melbourne's city centre, calling for the recognition of a Palestinian state and condemning the Israeli government's military response to Hamas' attack on Israel. Braving Sunday's rain, the group marched in a loop, starting from the State Library, chanting and carrying banners and signs that read "Sanction Israel," and "Glory to the Martyrs." The protest came amid continued violence in Gaza, which escalated after Hamas, a designated terrorist organisation, launched an attack on Israel, killing about 1200 people and abducting 250 others in October 2023. In response, Israeli military strikes have killed more than 56,400 Palestinians in the besieged territory, according to figures from the Hamas-run health ministry. Free Palestine Melbourne protests are not only demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza but also calling for an end to the attacks on Iran. Tensions between Iran and Israel recently eased after both sides agreed to a ceasefire, following a 12-day conflict during which the US bombed three of Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran launched missiles at a US military base in Qatar in response. Protesters say they will continue to build strong and vibrant rallies throughout July, aiming to engage a broader demographic and push for change at the parliamentary level in Australia. This includes "Converge on Canberra," a three-day event from July 20 designed to send a clear and urgent message to the federal government. "Now is the time to pressure Labor to end its support and complicity in genocide," organisers said. Standing in unity, holding signs and waving flags, activists have gathered to demand an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and to oppose the conflict with Iran. Protesters once again turned out in force for the weekly rally in Melbourne's city centre, calling for the recognition of a Palestinian state and condemning the Israeli government's military response to Hamas' attack on Israel. Braving Sunday's rain, the group marched in a loop, starting from the State Library, chanting and carrying banners and signs that read "Sanction Israel," and "Glory to the Martyrs." The protest came amid continued violence in Gaza, which escalated after Hamas, a designated terrorist organisation, launched an attack on Israel, killing about 1200 people and abducting 250 others in October 2023. In response, Israeli military strikes have killed more than 56,400 Palestinians in the besieged territory, according to figures from the Hamas-run health ministry. Free Palestine Melbourne protests are not only demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza but also calling for an end to the attacks on Iran. Tensions between Iran and Israel recently eased after both sides agreed to a ceasefire, following a 12-day conflict during which the US bombed three of Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran launched missiles at a US military base in Qatar in response. Protesters say they will continue to build strong and vibrant rallies throughout July, aiming to engage a broader demographic and push for change at the parliamentary level in Australia. This includes "Converge on Canberra," a three-day event from July 20 designed to send a clear and urgent message to the federal government. "Now is the time to pressure Labor to end its support and complicity in genocide," organisers said. Standing in unity, holding signs and waving flags, activists have gathered to demand an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and to oppose the conflict with Iran. Protesters once again turned out in force for the weekly rally in Melbourne's city centre, calling for the recognition of a Palestinian state and condemning the Israeli government's military response to Hamas' attack on Israel. Braving Sunday's rain, the group marched in a loop, starting from the State Library, chanting and carrying banners and signs that read "Sanction Israel," and "Glory to the Martyrs." The protest came amid continued violence in Gaza, which escalated after Hamas, a designated terrorist organisation, launched an attack on Israel, killing about 1200 people and abducting 250 others in October 2023. In response, Israeli military strikes have killed more than 56,400 Palestinians in the besieged territory, according to figures from the Hamas-run health ministry. Free Palestine Melbourne protests are not only demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza but also calling for an end to the attacks on Iran. Tensions between Iran and Israel recently eased after both sides agreed to a ceasefire, following a 12-day conflict during which the US bombed three of Iran's nuclear facilities. Iran launched missiles at a US military base in Qatar in response. Protesters say they will continue to build strong and vibrant rallies throughout July, aiming to engage a broader demographic and push for change at the parliamentary level in Australia. This includes "Converge on Canberra," a three-day event from July 20 designed to send a clear and urgent message to the federal government. "Now is the time to pressure Labor to end its support and complicity in genocide," organisers said.
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Antoinette Lattouf's unlawful sacking exposed the power of lobbying on the Australian media
Last weekend, I wrote a piece about the news-gathering model and media literacy. It mentioned how governments, militaries, and lobby groups try to stop the media telling stories, and it wondered if news audiences would like major media outlets to talk about it more: "They might be shocked to learn about the orchestrated bullying that goes on, which is designed to discourage editors and journalists from reporting on certain topics and framing stories in certain ways, even speaking to certain people," the piece said. "Would it improve media literacy if the media wrote about these issues openly and regularly?" Then, three days later, we heard relevant news. On Wednesday, the Federal Cout ruled that the ABC had unlawfully sacked journalist Antoinette Lattouf, in December 2023, for reasons including that she held political opinions opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza. Justice Darryl Rangiah found external pressure from "pro-Israel lobbyists" had played a role in the ABC's decision. Ms Lattouf had been employed by the ABC on a small five-day contract, as a fill-in summer radio host. But Justice Rangiah found that soon after Ms Lattouf presented her first program that summer, the ABC began to receive complaints from members of the public. "The complaints asserted she had expressed antisemitic views, lacked impartiality and was unsuitable to present any program for the ABC," he wrote. "It became clear that the complaints were an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists to have Ms Lattouf taken off air." For journalism students, it's an important case study. Many of you would have discussed it in class last week. But everyone should read Justice Rangiah's judgement. It details what went on behind the scenes at the ABC when the email campaign against Ms Lattouf began, and how it contributed to a "state of panic" among some senior ABC managers (many of whom have since left the organisation). It also showed how such pressure campaigns work. Not only had pro-Israel lobbyists sent dozens of emails to the ABC calling for Ms Lattouf to be taken off air, but their complaints found their way to News Corp's The Australian newspaper, which then told the ABC it was planning to report on the fact that the ABC had received complaints (which fed the growing panic inside the ABC). That's how the game is played. After the Federal Court's ruling was published on Wednesday, the ABC's new managing director, Hugh Marks, said the ABC had let down its staff and audiences. "Any undue influence or pressure on ABC management or any of its employees must always be guarded against," he said. A large number of articles were also written about the court's ruling. Alan Sunderland, a former editorial director of the ABC, said the public broadcaster had lessons to learn from the saga. "The world these days is filled with those who seek to control, bully and pressure public interest journalism in all its forms," he wrote. "The role of senior managers is to stoutly resist that pressure, and protect journalists from it as much as possible." Paula Kruger, the chief executive of Media Diversity Australia (and a former ABC radio host), made other points. She said news audiences had to trust that news outlets were capable of telling truthful stories, but the impact that that orchestrated pressure campaign had on the ABC had "shaken trust internally and externally". "You break trust with the broader community when an interest group can go to the top of an organisation and get its way. Lobbyists skip the process that everyone else must follow," she wrote. She also raised the topic of media literacy and trust. She said we often talk about ways to improve the public's media literacy, but the decline in trust in the media should not be a problem for audiences to fix; it was the responsibility of news organisations. "Silencing one side of the story isn't success. Shutting down voices isn't 'social cohesion,'" she wrote. "But silencing and shutting down were the preferred responses of senior ABC management under pressure from pro-Israel lobbyists. We need a different approach to our most difficult conversations." That last point is worth thinking about. In last weekend's article, I made a reference to Hannah Arendt's famous 1971 essay on the Pentagon Papers. But she wrote another essay, in 1967, that deserves a reference today. In that earlier essay, Truth and Politics, Arendt famously argued that "objectivity" and "impartiality" were revolutionary concepts that helped to usher in the modern world. In fact, she left her readers with the impression that those concepts were pillars of so-called "western civilisation": "The disinterested pursuit of truth has a long history," she wrote. "I think it can be traced to the moment when Homer chose to sing the deeds of the Trojans no less than those of the Achaeans, and to praise the glory of Hector, the foe and the defeated man, no less than the glory of Achilles, the hero of his kinfolk [...] "Homeric impartiality echoes throughout Greek history, and it inspired the first great teller of factual truth, who became the father of history: Herodotus tells us in the very first sentences of his stories that he set out to prevent 'the great and wondrous deeds of the Greeks and the barbarians from losing their due meed of glory'. "This is the root of all so-called objectivity ... without it no science would ever have come into being." So, according to Arendt's logic, if we allow ourselves to be intimidated into privileging certain voices when reporting on major global conflicts, and silencing other voices, we'll be abandoning a pillar of "western civilisation". And that was the same essay in which Arendt wrote her famous line about the disorienting affect that relentless propaganda can have on the human brain. "It has frequently been noticed that the surest long-term result of brainwashing is a peculiar kind of cynicism — an absolute refusal to believe in the truth of anything, no matter how well this truth may be established," she wrote. "In other words, the result of a consistent and total substitution of lies for factual truth is not that the lies will now be accepted as truth, and the truth be defamed as lies, but that the sense by which we take our bearings in the real world – and the category of truth vs. falsehood is among the mental means to this end – is being destroyed," she said. Arendt said we could try to keep our bearings in the world — and combat such propaganda — by building and protecting "certain public institutions" that revered truth above politics. And she said an independent judiciary, the historical sciences and the humanities, and journalism were among them. But let's wrap things up. It's naive to think "the media" is always and everywhere obsessed with "the truth." There are plenty of players in the media that are motivated by other things. But consider the editors and journalists that really do try to tell the truth. As we discussed last week, there's a global multi-billion-dollar industry dedicated to capturing, controlling, and confusing the "trusted stories" the media tells every day: Different governments, militaries, multi-nationals, and lobby groups are always trying it on. The ABC was involved in a different controversy six years ago when concerns were raised internally about Adani's apparent ability to squash an ABC radio story about the economics of Adani's Carmichael mine. Readers say once they start noticing things like that about the media, it can damage their trust in the media's stories. If you spend any time on social media these days, you may have also noticed how millions of people are now teaching each other about the subtle ways in which media outlets use language and imagery to privilege certain perspectives and diminish others in their daily news reports. The type of critical media analyses you'll get in every journalism and communications degree at university has jumped out of the academy and onto peoples' phones. For example, consider the headlines below and see if you can spot the differences in language: Why is the language in the first headline so passive and vague? Why is the language in the second headline active and precise? Modern audiences are regularly engaging in that kind of media "decoding" in private now, while they're doom-scrolling, so it presents an opportunity for media outlets to start having deeper conversations with their audiences about the way things work, if they choose to. Those conversations could be uncomfortable for some. But they may lead to more truthful storytelling.
West Australian
3 hours ago
- West Australian
‘We are not going to stand for this': Trump lashes out at Israel prosecutors over Netanyahu's corruption trial
US President Donald Trump has lashed out at prosecutors in Israel over Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's corruption trial, saying Washington, having given billions of dollars worth of aid to Israel, was not going to 'stand for this'. Mr Netanyahu was indicted in 2019 in Israel on charges of bribery, fraud and breach of trust - all of which he denies. The trial began in 2020 and involves three criminal cases. 'It is INSANITY doing what the out-of-control prosecutors are doing to Bibi Netanyahu,' Trump said in a Truth Social post, adding that the judicial process was going to interfere with Mr Netanyahu's ability to conduct talks with Palestinian militants Hamas, and with Iran. Mr Trump's second post over the course of a few days defending Mr Netanyahu and calling for the cancellation of the trial went a step further to tie Israel's legal action to US aid. 'The United States of America spends Billions of Dollar (sic) a year, far more than on any other Nation, protecting and supporting Israel. We are not going to stand for this,' Trump said. 'We are not going to stand for this. We just had a Great Victory with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu at the helm — And this greatly tarnishes our Victory. LET BIBI GO, HE'S GOT A BIG JOB TO DO!' Mr Netanyahu 'right now' was in the process of negotiating a deal with Hamas, Trump said, without giving further details. On Friday US time, the Republican president told reporters he believes a ceasefire is close. Hamas has said it is willing to free remaining hostages in Gaza under any deal to end the war, while Israel says it can only end if Hamas is disarmed and dismantled. Hamas refuses to lay down its arms. Interest in resolving the Gaza conflict has heightened in the wake of the US and Israeli bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities. A ceasefire to the 12-day Israel-Iran conflict went into effect early this week.
