logo
Who won the first NYC Democratic mayoral primary debate?

Who won the first NYC Democratic mayoral primary debate?

New York Post05-06-2025
Ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo won Wednesday night's Democratic mayoral primary debate — because his opponents' relentless attacks did more to elevate him than drag him down, a Post panel of veteran campaign strategists said.
The thrice-elected Democrat took some gut punches, but there was no knockout blow or major blunder on his part, the political analysts on both sides of the aisle said.
'I tuned in to see a mayoral debate, not a debate about Andrew Cuomo,' quipped campaign strategist Ken Frydman of the nine-person debate moderated by NBC 4 NY and Politico.
Advertisement
8 Democratic mayoral candidate Andrew Cuomo shakes hands with fellow candidate Zohran Mamdani behind Whitney Tilson at the beginning of the NYC Democratic mayoral primary debate on June 4, 2025.
via REUTERS
'By making Andrew the debate, they elevated him,' said Frydman.
Because Cuomo was constantly under fire, he got more air time to respond to each jab and by default dominated the more than two hour debate, the political experts said.
Advertisement
'Everyone tried to land a punch on Andrew Cuomo, but failed,' said campaign strategist O' Brien 'OB' Murray.
'The first 20 minutes gave Cuomo the center stage, literally and figuratively,' he said, referring to the ex-gov's position in the middle of the group of candidates standing on the dais at 30 Rockefeller Center.
'He handled the attacks and was able to deflect. They actually gave him more airtime than they should have,' Murray said.
8 Former NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo speaks during his spot at the democratic debate.
via REUTERS
Advertisement
Republican campaign strategist Bill O'Reilly said the verbal pummeling Cuomo received from most of his eight primary rivals does not alter his status as the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination.
'It was Andrew Cuomo vs. the Lilliputians, and the Lilliputians fell short. That's the bottom line,' O'Reilly said.
'Someone needed to trip up the former governor to slow his momentum, but it was clear from the jump that wouldn't happen. Cuomo hasn't lost a step since leaving Albany, and the field lacked the skill to crack him.'
Cuomo also counter-attacked, taking shots at his biggest threats in the polls — 33-year-old Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, a state Assembly member from Queens, and City Comptroller Brad Lander.
Advertisement
8 Andrew Cuomo and Adrienne Adams hug onstage after the debate.
via REUTERS
8 The nine NYC Democratic mayoral candidates Adrienne Adams, Brad Lander, Jessica Ramos, Zellnor Myrie, Andrew Cuomo, Whitney Tilson, Zohran Mamdani, Michael Blake and Scott Stringer.
POOL/AFP via Getty Images
The former governor delivered the best line when he said' '[President] Trump would go through Mamdani like a knife through butter,' O'Reilly noted.
Frydman said the candidates and moderators did force Cuomo to squirm to defend his record as governor, including his controversial nursing home policy during the COVID-19 pandemic and his approval of the unpopular 2019 bail reforms.
They also tried to make him answer for the spate of sexual misconduct accusations leveled against him — that he denied, but that forced his resignation in 2021.
Some of the other candidates had 'break out moments' — including former Bronx Assemblyman Michael Blake, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and Mamdani, said political advisor Yvette Buckner.
'That will have voters wanting to learn more about them, their policies and their candidacy,' she said.
Advertisement
Frydman, too, said Adams' performance 'moved the needle' for her campaign, which has been slow to gain momentum despite support from state Attorney General Letitia James.
'She introduced herself to Democratic voters well enough on substance to move up in ranked-choice voting,' he said.
But Cuomo's comfortable lead over second place Mamdani in recent polls should hold, Frydman said.
O'Reilly agreed, but said Mamdani remains Cuomo's 'greatest threat' for the nomination in the June 24 primary.
Advertisement
8 Brad Lander and Michael Blake shake hands after participating in the debate.
via REUTERS
8 Jessica Ramos is spotted leaving the NYC Democratic Mayoral Debate at NBC Studios at 30 Rockefeller Plaza in NY on June 4, 2025.
Christopher Sadowski
Two of the panelists agreed that Lander is competent, but his persona didn't translate on TV.
'He oozes insincerity in a car-salesman-type way,' O'Reilly said.
Advertisement
But he said Brooklyn state Sen. Zellnor Myrie's sincerity came across 'easily,' calling him a rising star in the Democratic Party.
8 NY Gov. Kathy Hochul leaves NBC Studios after the debate.
Christopher Sadowski
8 Zellnor Myrie talks to reporters after leaving the debate stage.
Christopher Sadowski
Murray concurred, saying Lander has a 'stage presence for radio and a delivery for print. He confirmed why he has his wife and daughter on videos, instead of himself.'
Advertisement
Another candidate, former City Comptroller Scott Stringer who previously ran for mayor in 2021, didn't break through, the panelists said.
'Stringer was Stringer — flat and after a second run for mayor still didn't connect to voters,' Murray said.
All but two of the Democratic contenders will debate again on June 12, save for Blake and state Sen. Jessica Ramos, who failed to meet the campaign funding threshold.
Nine days of early voting will precede the primary, beginning on June 14.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prez rips Lara Trump guest, Charlamagne tha God, after he made brash claim about Epstein and the GOP
Prez rips Lara Trump guest, Charlamagne tha God, after he made brash claim about Epstein and the GOP

New York Post

time18 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Prez rips Lara Trump guest, Charlamagne tha God, after he made brash claim about Epstein and the GOP

President Trump unleashed on Charlamagne tha God — calling him a 'sleazebag' and 'Low IQ individual' — after the talk radio star went on Lara Trump's Fox News show to saying he believed the Epstein scandal could end MAGA's hold on the Republican party. Appearing on 'My View' with the president's daughter-in-law on Saturday, Charlamagne — real name Lenard Larry McKelvey — claimed that 'traditional conservatives' were about to take over the GOP again. Trump wasn't having it. Advertisement 'The very wonderful and talented Lara Trump, whose show is a big ratings success, put racist sleazebag Charlamagne 'The God,'' Trump fumed on Truth Social in the wee Sunday morning hours. 'Why is he allowed to use the word 'GOD' when describing himself?' 3 Charlamagne tha God posited that the GOP is going through significant upheaval over the Jeffrey Epstein drama. Getty Images 'He's a Low IQ individual, has no idea what words are coming out of his mouth, and knows nothing about me or what I have done – like just ending 5 Wars, including a 31 year bloodbath between Republic of the Congo and Rwanda.' Advertisement While Trump didn't reveal a specific grievance with what Charlamagne said on Lara's show, it came after 'The Breakfast Club' co-host weighed in on the scandal over the Trump administration's delay in releasing files related to pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. 3 Lara Trump had a spirited exchange with Charlamagne tha God. Getty Images Charlamagne claimed that the Epstein row is a 'political coup going on right now in the Republican Party that people are not paying attention to.' Last month, the MAGA base erupted over a July 6 Justice Department and FBI memo that concluded the evidence suggests Epstein killed himself and did not have an 'incriminating client list.' Advertisement Trump had ripped into elements of the MAGA base for harping on the issue and blamed Democrats for kicking up the 'Epstein Hoax.' 'I think that traditional conservatives are going to take the Republican Party back,' Charlamagne said. 'I think this Epstein thing is going to be a way for traditional conservatives to take their party back, I really do.' He added: 'I think they know this is the issue that has gotten the base riled up. The MAGA base isn't letting this issue go, and for the first time, they know they can probably take the party back and not piss off the MAGA base.' The 'Breakfast Club' host described Trump as a 'once-in-a-lifetime, one-on-one, political juggernaut.' Still, he panned Trump's performance across the board and contended that Americans are still struggling economically under his watch. Advertisement 'Right now people are hurting,' Charlamagne argued. 'He campaigned on immediate change. Day one change.' He also pointed to former US ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley as a Republican he could see himself backing. 3 President Trump did not seem pleased with Charlamagne tha God's appearance on Lara Trump's 'My View' show. Getty Images Trump further dinged Charlamagne and accused him of not knowing about his accomplishments in office. 'He didn't know that, or India and Pakistan or, wiping out Iran's nuclear capabilities, or closing the horrendous open Border, or creating the greatest economy, where prices and Inflation have come way down,' Trump vented, referring to his efforts to end wars overseas. 'But this dope, Charlamagne, would vote for Sleepy Joe or Kamala? Remember, one year ago our Country was DEAD, now it's the 'HOTTEST' Country anywhere in the World. MAGA!!!'

Full List of Democrats Who Voted for New Trump-Pick Confirmations
Full List of Democrats Who Voted for New Trump-Pick Confirmations

Newsweek

time18 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Full List of Democrats Who Voted for New Trump-Pick Confirmations

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Several Democrats voted over the weekend to confirm nominees appointed by President Donald Trump, including for the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice. Newsweek contacted the Democratic National Committee via online form for comment on Sunday. Why It Matters Democrats appear to be divided over how to approach Trump and his administration. While many have been hesitant or slow to confirm his nominees, several Senate Democrats broke with party expectations by voting in favor of his nominees, which ultimately helped advance some of his picks. As reported by Newsweek, the Democrats' bind over how to handle Trump spilled out on the House floor this week when New Jersey Senator Cory Booker delivered an impassioned speech on the Senate floor Tuesday, criticizing his fellow Democrats for what he perceives as "complicity" with Trump's administration. Booker's remarks were instigated by an exchange with other Democratic senators over a package of law-enforcement funding bills. The seal of the U.S. Senate on December 27, 2012, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. The seal of the U.S. Senate on December 27, 2012, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. PAUL J. RICHARDS/AFP viaWhat To Know The official Trump-pick confirmations and the Democrats who voted for them are as follows: Adam Telle: Department of Defense Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Chris Coons (Delaware) Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) Dick Durbin (Illinois) John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Martin Heinrich (New Mexico) John Hickenlooper (Colorado) Tim Kaine (Virginia) Mark Kelly (Arizona) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Gary Peters (Michigan) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Jacky Rosen (Nevada) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Elissa Slotkin (Michigan) Mark Warner (Virginia) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) Jason Reding Quinones: Department of Justice Dick Durbin (Illinois) Andrew Puzder: Department of State Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) John Arrigo: Department of State Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Mark Warner (Virginia) Sean Cairncross: Executive Office of the President Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Chris Coons (Delaware) Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) Dick Durbin (Illinois) John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Martin Heinrich (New Mexico) John Hickenlooper (Colorado) Tim Kaine (Virginia) Mark Kelly (Arizona) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Gary Peters (Michigan) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Jacky Rosen (Nevada) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Elissa Slotkin (Michigan) Mark Warner (Virginia) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut) Lisa Blunt Rochester (Delaware) Cory Booker (New Jersey) Maria Cantwell (Washington) Tammy Duckworth (Illinois) Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) Andy Kim (New Jersey) Ben Ray Luján (New Mexico) Ed Markey (Massachusetts) Jeff Merkley (Oregon) Chris Murphy (Connecticut) Patty Murray (Washington) Jon Ossoff (Georgia) Alex Padilla (California) Brian Schatz (Hawaii) Adam Schiff (California) Chuck Schumer (New York) Tina Smith (Minnesota) Chris Van Hollen (Maryland) Elizabeth Warren (Massachusetts) Ron Wyden (Oregon) Marcus Molinaro: Department of Transportation Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Miriam Cantwell (Washington) Chris Coons (Delaware) Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) Dick Durbin (Illinois) John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) Mark Kelly (Arizona) Andy Kim (New Jersey) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Gary Peters (Michigan) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Jacky Rosen (Nevada) Brian Schatz (Hawaii) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Elissa Slotkin (Michigan) Mark Warner (Virginia) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Luke Lindberg: Department of Agriculture Angela Alsobrooks (Maryland) Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin) Chris Coons (Delaware) Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) Dick Durbin (Illinois) John Fetterman (Pennsylvania) Kirsten Gillibrand (New York) Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) Martin Heinrich (New Mexico) John Hickenlooper (Colorado) Tim Kaine (Virginia) Mark Kelly (Arizona) Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota) Gary Peters (Michigan) Jack Reed (Rhode Island) Jacky Rosen (Nevada) Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire) Elissa Slotkin (Michigan) Mark Warner (Virginia) Raphael Warnock (Georgia) Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) What People Are Saying New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, in a speech on the Senate floor Tuesday regarding specific bills: "This, to me, is a problem with Democrats in America right now, is we're willing to be complicit to Donald Trump…to let this pass through when we have all the leverage right now." "We are standing at a moment where our president is eviscerating the Constitution of the United States of America, and we're willing to go along with it today. No. No. Not on my watch." What Happens Next With more key positions still awaiting confirmation, the spotlight now turns to upcoming Senate hearings, where further bipartisan cooperation—or division—could shape the direction of Trump's agenda.

These states could redraw their House maps before the 2026 elections
These states could redraw their House maps before the 2026 elections

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

These states could redraw their House maps before the 2026 elections

WASHINGTON - Texas Republicans are moving forward with an effort to redraw the state's congressional map to be more favorable for the GOP, prompting states around the country to consider whether they too should revisit their district lines ahead of next year's midterm elections. The White House is encouraging at least one other state - Missouri - to join Texas in redistricting, while Democrats in California, New York and elsewhere are weighing how to respond if Texas lawmakers do finalize a new map. If Texas Republicans meet their own goal, the House GOP could be poised to win up to five additional seats just from the Lone Star State next year, which could be an important buffer as the party seeks to hold on to its slim majority. Some Democratic leaders have argued that they need to respond in kind. "We will fight them politically. We will fight them governmentally. We will fight them in court. We will fight them in terms of winning the hearts and minds of the people of Texas and beyond," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Thursday at a news conference in the Lone Star State, flanked by Texas Democrats. Here's a rundown of the states that are considering redrawing their congressional maps ahead of the 2026 elections or that have been mentioned as potential spots for mid-decade redistricting: Texas Texas Republicans unveiled a draft map Wednesday that would shift several districts currently held by Democrats near the state's major cities and in South Texas. Such changes would bring more Republican-leaning voters into Democratic Rep. Julie Elizabeth Johnson's district northeast of Dallas and condense Democratic-leaning voters into just two districts in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. Democratic Reps. Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez's South Texas districts, which both went for Donald Trump last fall, would become more Republican-leaning. And the map would also dismantle a Democratic-held seat in Houston and another that stretches from Austin to San Antonio. All told, the five redrawn seats would each have backed Trump by at least 10 points in last year's election, according to an analysis by Sabato's Crystal Ball. Under Texas' current map, Republicans hold 25 House seats to 12 for Democrats, with one vacancy following Democrat Sylvester Turner's death in March. Besides legal challenges, Democrats in the Texas Legislature are also weighing a plan to deny their Republican counterparts a quorum to pass a redrawn map by fleeing the state, The Texas Tribune reported. State lawmakers are in special session until Aug. 19, which is essentially their deadline to approve a new map. Missouri The White House has reportedly urged Republicans in Missouri to alter the state's House map, under which the party currently holds six of eight seats. GOP Rep. Eric Burlison told St. Louis Public Radio that Trump wants state lawmakers to target Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver II's seat in the Kansas City area. That would be doable, according to Republican Rep. Jason Smith. "There's some crazy jagged edges - in St. Charles County, in Clay and Jackson County near Kansas City," Smith told Punchbowl News. "And so I think that you could have a more compact map." Gov. Mike Kehoe, who would need to call a special session to redraw the map, has said officials in the state were weighing their options. "I think it's safe to say that in Missouri, along with other states, we're always trying to make sure that we have as much Republican representation because we believe that's who we are," he said, according to Ozarks Public Radio. Florida Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is also among the Republican governors talking up the prospects of mid-decade redistricting, in what could be an effort to squeeze in at least one more GOP-favored district in the Sunshine State. He said Wednesday that redistricting "was something that we're looking at very seriously," though he admitted he hadn't yet talked to any members of the GOP-controlled state Legislature about it. His comments come after the Florida Supreme Court recently upheld the state's current map, which DeSantis had pushed through and that dismantled a Black-majority seat in northern Florida. Republicans currently hold 20 of the state's 28 House seats. Indiana In GOP-controlled Indiana, Republicans currently hold seven of the state's nine House seats, and Punchbowl News reported that Trump's allies are hoping for a mid-decade redraw to pick up at least one of the Democratic seats. Rep. Frank Mrvan's right-trending 1st District in the state's northwest corner could be a target. But to attempt such a redraw, Republican Gov. Mike Braun, a former senator, would need to call the legislature in for a special session, which he hasn't yet said he's planning to do. The state may also need to enact a law to allow mid-decade redistricting, according to The Downballot. Politico Playbook reported this week that there appeared to be "little-to-no appetite for remapping" among Indiana Republicans. California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has spoken openly about the prospects of redrawing his state's congressional lines in an effort to blunt the effects of the new Texas maps on the 2026 landscape. A retaliatory move wouldn't be as simple as what's playing out in Texas. Newsom and California Democrats would likely need to put the issue on the ballot to bypass the state's independent redistricting commission, which drew the current House map. Newsom said Thursday he is eyeing a November special election for voters to weigh in on any redrawn map that could help elect more Democrats in response to the efforts in Texas. "We will go to the people of this state in a transparent way and ask them to consider the new circumstances, to consider these new realities," Newsom said, according to CalMatters. California Attorney General Rob Bonta, a Democrat, told KCRA 3 that such a plan would be defendable in court. The regular session of the California Legislature ends Sept. 12, meaning state Democrats, who hold supermajorities in both chambers, have ample time to come up with a plan without a special session. California Democrats already hold a strong advantage in the state's House delegation under the commission-drawn map, holding 43 seats to Republicans' nine. Some Democratic lawmakers have expressed a willingness to run in more competitive seats if it would mean increasing the party's pickup opportunities under a new map. New York Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul has been open to a redraw of the state's congressional map to favor her party. "I won't sit by while Donald Trump and Texas Republicans try to steal our nation's future," she posted Wednesday on X in response to the release of the draft Texas map. New York Democrats currently hold 19 House seats to seven for the Republicans under a map that was approved by the Democratic-controlled state Legislature after making modest changes to lines drawn by New York's independent redistricting commission. Legislative Democrats unveiled a measure this week that would amend the state constitution to allow New York to redraw its district lines mid-decade if another state did so first. But the legislation has a long path to becoming law, NBC News reported. Lawmakers would need to approve the measure in two consecutive sessions before it went to voters as a ballot measure. That would likely mean that any new map wouldn't take effect until the 2028 elections. Maryland The eight-member House delegation in deep-blue Maryland is, unsurprisingly, dominated by Democrats, with Rep. Andy Harris holding the lone Republican seat on the state's Eastern Shore. Maryland House Majority Leader David Moon has said he is drafting legislation to allow the state to respond to Texas by attempting its own redrawing, The Baltimore Banner reported. But during the last round of redistricting after the 2020 census, a state judge rejected a Democratic effort to make Harris' district more competitive as a "product of extreme partisan gerrymandering" that violated the state constitution. The Maryland legislature isn't expected to meet again until next year, according to the Banner. Illinois Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker met with Texas Democrats last week and suggested a redraw could be in the cards for his state in reaction to what transpires in Austin. "So as far as I'm concerned, everything's on the table in reaction to that. But I'd like them to understand that if they're going to take this drastic action, then we also might take drastic action to respond," Pritzker said, according to WLS. But that could be complicated because the current Illinois map already advantages Democrats, who hold 14 of the state's 17 seats - though Thursday's announcement that longtime Democratic Rep. Danny K. Davis will not seek reelection to his deep-blue Chicago-area seat could give the party an opportunity for some reconfiguration. Ohio Ohio was already set to see its congressional map redrawn this fall before the redistricting conversation went national. The Buckeye State is required under state law to redraw its lines before next year's elections, as its current map was crafted by the GOP-controlled Redistricting Commission without bipartisan support. Ohio Republicans hold major sway over the redistricting process. The GOP-led state legislature and the redistricting commission could each get a shot at redrawing the map with bipartisan support. But if bipartisanship proves elusive, Republicans would be able to pass a map on party lines, subject to certain restrictions. Ohio's House delegation currently includes 10 Republicans and five Democrats. Districts thought to be potential targets for Republicans include the ones represented by Democrats Marcy Kaptur, Emilia Sykes and Greg Landsman. Louisiana The Supreme Court punted on a decision on Louisiana's congressional map earlier this year and is set to rehear a challenge to the lines when it returns for its next term in the fall. That means it is possible there could be a third set of maps in three elections in the Bayou State by 2026. The map that the Supreme Court allowed to be used in 2024 created a second Black opportunity district. Democrat Cleo Fields won the seat and returned to the House nearly 30 years after his previous congressional stint. Wisconsin Opponents of Wisconsin's congressional map have launched more legal challenges since the state Supreme Court's liberal majority declined in June to hear a pair of lawsuits that called for a redrawing of district lines. Wisconsin Republicans hold a 6-2 advantage in House seats despite the state being a perennial battleground that sees some of the closest elections in the country. The current map, approved by the state high court's then-conservative majority in 2022, was submitted by Democratic Gov. Tony Evers under "least change" guidelines set by the court. The guidelines required mapmakers to hew as closely as possible to the previous map, which had been drawn by Republicans. Utah In Utah, there's ongoing litigation over whether the current district lines, put in place after the 2020 census, should have been drawn by an independent commission pursuant to a 2018 ballot initiative. Republicans control all four of the state's House seats after GOP state lawmakers split the Democratic-leaning Salt Lake City area between the four districts. Other states Several other states have earned mentions as places that could redraw their congressional lines, but prospects here appear remote. Kentucky and Kansas have lone Democratic representatives who could be targeted, and Republicans hold legislative supermajorities in both states. But the states' respective Democratic governors would be unlikely to call for a special session this year to redraw the maps. In New Jersey, where Democrats hold a governing trifecta, Gov. Phil Murphy is not ruling out a response to the action in Texas, but there seem to be no immediate plans to pursue efforts to target any of the Garden State's three Republican House members. The state may also be nearly out of time for voters to amend its Constitution and allow for mid-decade redistricting before the 2026 elections. Democrats in Washington state, where they also hold full control, have said mid-decade redistricting is almost certainly unlikely to happen, the Washington State Standard reported. Democrats already dominate the state's House delegation - holding eight of 10 seats, including one that Trump carried - under a map drawn up by a bipartisan redistricting commission. In Democratic-leaning Colorado, an independent redistricting commission, created by voter-approved 2018 constitutional amendments, drew the state's current map. The House delegation is currently evenly split between the parties, with four seats each. Former Rep. Yadira Caraveo, who is seeking a comeback in the competitive 8th District, has called on Gov. Jared Polis to take steps to scrap the redistricting commission in response to Texas. But such a move would face multiple hurdles, as Colorado Pols reported. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store