logo
2020 Delhi riots larger conspiracy case: For how long can a person be kept in jail? asks Delhi HC as accused claims delay in trial

2020 Delhi riots larger conspiracy case: For how long can a person be kept in jail? asks Delhi HC as accused claims delay in trial

Indian Express12 hours ago
For how long can a person be kept in jail? A Delhi High Court bench orally remarked on Tuesday as it heard the bail plea of one of the accused in the 2020 Delhi riots larger conspiracy case. The High Court noted that 'five years have gone by', and yet the arguments on the charge remain to be completed.
The court was hearing the plea by Tasleem Ahmed, the owner of a coaching centre and a resident of South Delhi's Sangam Vihar. He was arrested by the Delhi Police Special Cell in June 2020 under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
A trial court had refused his bail plea last February, even as Ahmed had sought relief on the grounds of parity, given that three other accused in the same case — Natasha Narwal, Devangana Kalita, and Asif Tanha Iqbal — were granted bail.
Taken up by a bench of Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar on Tuesday, advocate Mehmood Pracha, appearing for Ahmed, cited a delay in trial for seeking bail. Ahmed has already spent five years in jail, the counsel highlighted.
After Ahmed's counsel pointed out that he has not delayed the trial and that he also completed his arguments on the charges in 10-15 minutes within a day, the bench, addressing Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad, inquired orally, 'Five years have gone…even arguments on the charge is not completed..With 700 witnesses, (for) how much time can a person be kept inside?'
The court is due to hear the matter further on Wednesday.
Earlier in January, another two-judge division bench of the High Court, while dealing with a bunch of bail pleas of the accused, including student activists Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid, and others, the bench had orally inquired from the prosecution if only setting up a protest site is enough cause for attracting offences under UAPA.
Apart from Ahmed, bail pleas of eight other accused, who have sought bail in the larger conspiracy case, are before the Delhi High Court.
They are facing allegations of a pre-planned conspiracy to allegedly cause riots in Northeast Delhi between February 23 and February 25 in 2020.
The accused have been booked for offences under the Indian Penal Code, Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, Arms Act, and Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, and have been in jail for over five years now.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ship ‘arrested' after Kerala claims damages: How do admiralty suits work?
Ship ‘arrested' after Kerala claims damages: How do admiralty suits work?

Indian Express

time29 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Ship ‘arrested' after Kerala claims damages: How do admiralty suits work?

The Kerala High Court on Monday ordered the conditional 'arrest' of Liberian container ship MSC Akiteta II, currently anchored at Thiruvananthapuram's Vizhinjam port, over compensation claims arising from the sinking of the MSC Elsa III in May. The order came after the Kerala government filed an admiralty suit — a legal proceeding pertaining to maritime law and disputes — in the High Court. The suit named the Mediterranean Shipping Company, one of whose firms operates and manages the MSC Akiteta II. Another company of the same group operated the MSC Elsa III. The government has sought compensation of Rs 9,531 crore for the alleged pollution of Kerala's marine ecosystem due to the sinking of MSC Elsa III on May 25, around 25 km southwest of Alappuzha. The ship went down with more than 600 containers, some of which carried plastic pellets, hazardous substances, and diesel. What law governs maritime disputes? The Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017 governs maritime disputes in India. Under the Act, admiralty suits can be filed for maritime claims such as damage to ships, ownership and agreement disputes, loss of life, wage issues, and environmental damage. The 2017 law replaced the colonial-era Admiralty Court Act, 1861, and Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890. The previous laws gave jurisdiction only to the High Courts of Bombay, Calcutta and Madras, as these were the only major ports in India earlier. Now, the HCs of Kerala, Karnataka, Odisha, Telangana and Andhra Pradesh also have jurisdiction over maritime disputes. The jurisdiction of the courts extends up to the territorial waters of their respective jurisdictions. The limit of territorial waters is up to 12 nautical miles from the nearest point of a low-water line along the coast. This also includes the seabed, subsoil (the layer of soil under the topsoil on the surface), and airspace above it. What does the law say about claims over environmental damages? The Kerala government has sought compensation for environmental damage under Section 4 of the Admiralty Act. This section states that the HC 'may exercise jurisdiction to hear and determine any question on a maritime claim, against any vessel, arising out of…damage… caused by the vessel to the environment…; measures taken to… remove such damage; compensation for such damage,' etc. Apart from the Admiralty Act, other laws too address issues of compensation and accountability in such cases. Under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958, ship owners are liable for oil pollution damage in the event of leaks. The Environment Protection Act, 1986 empowers authorities to take action against polluters. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) can also be approached to seek environmental compensation. In 2016, the Tribunal ordered a Panama-based shipping company to pay Rs 100 crore in damages for an oil spill after its vessel M V Rak sank off the Mumbai coast in 2011. So what does Kerala's admiralty suit say? The Kerala government's admiralty suit sought the arrest of the MSC Akiteta II until compensation was paid to the state. In maritime law, the arrest of a ship refers to a legal procedure where a court or other competent authority detains a vessel to secure a maritime claim against it or its owner. The court found merit in the maritime claims of the Kerala government, it ordered the detention of the MSC Akiteta II until Rs 9,531 crore was deposited or security was furnished by the owners of the vessel. 'It is averred in the plaint that the damage occurred on account of oil pollution caused by the said vessel and pollution caused by the cargo in 643 containers carried in the said vessel. It is averred that the compensation is computed in accordance with the Central Pollution Control Board Guidelines,' the court order said. Of the Rs 9,531 crore claim, Rs 8,626.12 crore has been sought for environmental damage caused due to the sinking of MSC Elsa III, and Rs 378.48 crore for the remediation work to minimise, prevent or remove the damage caused to the environment by the capsized ship. An amount of Rs 526.51 crore has been sought for economic losses caused to fishermen in Kerala. An award-winning journalist with 14 years of experience, Nikhil Ghanekar is an Assistant Editor with the National Bureau [Government] of The Indian Express in New Delhi. He primarily covers environmental policy matters which involve tracking key decisions and inner workings of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. He also covers the functioning of the National Green Tribunal and writes on the impact of environmental policies on wildlife conservation, forestry issues and climate change. Nikhil joined The Indian Express in 2024. Originally from Mumbai, he has worked in publications such as Tehelka, Hindustan Times, DNA Newspaper, News18 and Indiaspend. In the past 14 years, he has written on a range of subjects such as sports, current affairs, civic issues, city centric environment news, central government policies and politics. ... Read More

Three brothers sentenced to life imprisonment for murder in Bhadohi
Three brothers sentenced to life imprisonment for murder in Bhadohi

The Print

time37 minutes ago

  • The Print

Three brothers sentenced to life imprisonment for murder in Bhadohi

According to District Government Counsel Mukesh Upadhyay, the three convicts –“ Qasim, Hashim, and Amin alias Diesel — were found guilty of killing Saudagar Ali in Ghamahapur locality under Kotwali police station limits. The murder, committed on October 13, 2023, was the result of an old rivalry. The court of District and Sessions Judge Akhilesh Dubey also imposed a fine of Rs 27,000 on each of the convicts. Bhadohi (UP), Jul 8 (PTI) A court here on Tuesday sentenced three brothers to life imprisonment in a 2023 murder case. The judge also directed that half of the total fine collected be paid to the victim's mother, Saeedul Nisa. Superintendent of Police Abhimanyu Manglik said the murder was an act of revenge. In June 2021, Saudagar Ali had allegedly murdered the youngest brother of the convicts, Sabir, after offering him alcohol. Saudagar was arrested and later released on bail in August 2023. On the night of October 13, 2023, the three men spotted Saudagar Ali drinking near Faridan pond and attacked him with sharp weapons, killing him on the spot. Following a complaint by the victim's mother, police registered a case under IPC Section 302 (murder) and the Arms Act. The accused were arrested and a chargesheet was filed after investigation. PTI COR KIS KVK KVK This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

Dreaded criminal linked to Khemka murder killed in gunfight with police
Dreaded criminal linked to Khemka murder killed in gunfight with police

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Dreaded criminal linked to Khemka murder killed in gunfight with police

1 2 Patna: A notorious criminal, who was aware of the murder plot of businessman Gopal Khemka, was killed in a police encounter at Damaria Ghat in Patna City area early on Tuesday, police said. The accused, Vikas alias Raja (30), a native of Nalanda district, had several criminal cases registered against him. The encounter occurred around 3.30am when police, acting on intelligence inputs, attempted to arrest Raja for interrogation in connection with the Khemka murder investigation. On spotting the approaching officers, Raja, who had been evading arrest, allegedly opened fire. Police returned fire in self-defence, inflicting multiple gunshot wounds on him. He was initially taken to Guru Gobind Singh Medical College and later referred to Nalanda Medical College and Hospital (NMCH), where he succumbed to his injuries during treatment. His body was sent for post-mortem examination. Senior officials, including Patna senior superintendent of police (SSP) Kartikeya K Sharma, SP (central) Diksha and Patna City SDPO II Gaurav Kumar, reached the encounter site soon after the incident. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Зачем на ночь сжигают лавровый лист? Undo A pistol, a spent cartridge and an unfired bullet were recovered from the site. Patna zonal inspector general (IG) Jitendra Rana said the breakthrough came during the interrogation of Umesh Yadav, the main shooter in the Khemka murder case. "Umesh confessed that he had initially contacted Raja for supplying the weapons needed to execute the crime," the IG said. "Raja, already known for his criminal background and arms supply, had demanded more money. Consequently, trader Ashok Sao provided the firearm used in the murder. " Following this lead, the Malsalami police conducted a raid near a brick kiln where Raja was believed to be hiding. "Acting on the tip-off, the police team reached Damaria Ghat around 2.25am in search of Raja," SSP Sharma said. "Upon seeing the police, he tried to flee and opened fire. The police responded, resulting in his death. None of our personnel were injured," he added. Raja, according to police records, was involved in at least four murder cases, along with six to seven incidents of loot, dacoity and multiple violations of the Arms Act. Police confirmed he sustained three bullet injuries during the encounter. IG Rana, while addressing mediapersons, said, "The shooter and the mastermind of the murder have both been arrested. Raja, who was approached first as an arms supplier, has now been neutralised. This should send a strong message. Those who engage in supplying weapons or similar criminal activities will face severe consequences. The police are fully committed to acting firmly and will not hesitate to respond when attacked. " Following the encounter, Raja's family members rushed to the spot. His father alleged that police in plainclothes came to their home on Monday night and took Raja away under the pretext of questioning. The family said Raja had been living in rented accommodation in Patna City and had two sons — the younger of whom was killed in 2015. Raja's mother also disputed the police's version of events. She claimed her son, despite facing "two to four cases," had been employed in Chennai and had only recently returned home. "He was sitting quietly near the brick kiln when the police shot him," she alleged.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store