The thinking way to win a war
It was supposed to be over by now, a three-day (at the most) blitz by Russia on its many-times smaller neighbour, an ego-boosting win for Vladimir Putin.
But the war is now in its fourth year, with Russia occupying just under a fifth of Ukraine, and some out-of-the-box thinking from Ukrainians boosting morale in the beleaguered country.
Today on The Detail, we talk about Operation Spiderweb, which destroyed planes deep into Russian territory; Russian retaliation; financing a conflict and who's winning, with the Telegraph's associate editor of defence Dom Nicholls.
He reports every weekday for the Telegraph's award-winning podcast Ukraine: The Latest – and he says there's always plenty to say.
'There's so much going on.
'There's always something happening on the battlefield but as we've discovered over the last three years of doing this, there's just a great appetite around the world to learn about Ukraine's history, the culture, the people, the food, the politics. So we come at it from all angles.'
Nicholls is former British Army and the podcast team makes sure they visit Ukraine at least three times a year, so they're not just sitting back and analysing from afar.
So, who is winning?
'In the dark days of February/March 2022, just Ukraine existing as a sovereign entity, with an effective government still in power, a president that's alive, and a society that's supportive of the war effort … I think many people at the time would have said 'right, let's have that, that's what we want'. Well that's kind of where we are now.
'Currently about 19 percent of the country's held by Russia, and President Zelensky's been very clear that they're never just going to accept the loss of [those] eastern regions. So does that mean that they're losing?
'Well look at it the other way. Putin thought that he was going to be in Kyiv in days, weeks at most. By no means has he achieved his aims there. He's almost bankrupted his country, he's wiped out a generation of people who can no longer work in the factories of Russia and generate the income, so the question is about, 'Is this a war or is this the war?'
'Is this the war you break your country over to win? That question is now being pushed in the face of Vladimir Putin.
'If the answer's no … you might want to think twice about what's happening now, three years into this thing.
'You can see both sides are winning, and both sides are losing as well.'
Also on The Detail, Nicholls talks about the differences between the Russian and Ukrainian mindsets when it comes to new ideas and carrying them out, as well as the effect that US President Donald Trump's attitude could have on the outcome of the war.
Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here.
You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
International Criminal Court: Investigate Russian Airstrikes And Drone Attacks On Civilians
(KYIV, June 24, 2025)—The International Criminal Court (ICC) should investigate a pattern of recent Russian missile and drone attacks targeting Ukrainian civilians, following one of the deadliest assaults on civilian areas in recent months, Fortify Rights said today. During the night of June 16 to the morning of June 17, a nearly nine-hour-long assault struck multiple civilian locations in Ukraine, including the cities of Kyiv, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Chernihiv, Kharkiv, Sumy, and Poltava. According to the Ukrainian State Emergency Service, the attack killed at least 28 civilians and injured more than 140 in Kyiv alone and caused damage to civilian buildings in eight districts of the capital. Furthermore, reportedly at least nine more civilians died during Russian drone and missile attacks on Kyiv on the morning of Monday, June 23. 'Russia's egregious violations of the laws of war must not be ignored,' said Aliona Kazanska, Human Rights Associate at Fortify Rights. 'Even though Putin's top military commanders have already been indicted by the International Criminal Court for their massive attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure, such attacks continue unabated, causing many civilian casualties.' Fortify Rights interviewed six survivors and eyewitnesses to recent attacks, including the June 16–17 missile and drone attacks. Fortify Rights also visited the site of a Russian attack and documented the destruction to civilian infrastructure caused by the attacks. Yulia, 40, a Kyiv resident who survived the June 16-17 attack, described to Fortify Rights the moment her apartment building, where she lives with her husband and young daughter, was struck by a Russian missile: [On June 16th] It all started with the [drones], and the air defense shooting them down. When they [drones] started arriving, we went down to the first floor. … Then it became all quiet. We returned to the ninth floor. We still have a small child, so we put her to bed. We heard flying [drones] again. My husband and I went down to the first floor and sat on the floor. It's literally been 15 minutes. … Sitting on the floor in the corridor, in a half-asleep state, I was holding my baby. Then I just saw from the other end of the corridor, from where the shock wave came, the doors flew open, and everything was covered in sand and plaster. It just took a second. In a second, everyone was down. Then I didn't know what to do. … A lot of wounded people were around me. Yulia added: 'You know, we live on the ninth floor, where the missile struck. If we were at home there, we would not be [alive] anymore.' The June 16-17 attack was not an isolated incident. Just days earlier, on June 10, Russian forces launched waves of missile and drone attacks targeting residential areas and civilian infrastructure. Iryna, 53, a resident of Kyiv, told Fortify Rights her experience of the June 10 attack: I did not sleep [because of the incoming attack alerts], and my mother is paralyzed … we had just put her to bed and were about to go to bed. Suddenly, there was a bang! It was deafening, louder than it's ever been. And we also heard the glass shattering. … There was debris almost all over the kitchen. My mother had such thick curtains, and the blinds were also thick. This must have protected her. But we were left without windows. During the early morning hours of April 24 in the Sviatoshynskyi District of Kyiv, Russian forces launched a massive aerial night-time drone and missile attack, which killed 13 people and injured 87, including six children. Fortify Rights spoke with Olena, 64, a survivor of the attack: It was sometime after midnight. I heard the alarm. … I didn't react, I just got up, covered my husband [with a blanket], and went to bed. … Then I heard an explosion that was so loud for us. … I opened the door and was going to sit in the corridor, and then [the shockwave of the explosion] hit me. I didn't hear the second explosion. It was just so dark and warm. … I [lost consciousness] and just remember waking up on the floor a minute later. She continued: My husband was saved. … He was under a heavy carpet and only had small cuts. … Both my arm and leg were injured. … Now, when the air raid alert goes off, I feel paralyzed with fear. I can't hold it back. I want to give up everything and run somewhere. I used to be very calm about all this. According to the U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), on June 16-17, Russia launched 440 long-range drones and 32 missiles into Ukraine, of which 175 drones and 14 missiles were directed at Kyiv. OHCHR also reported that in the first 17 days of June, Russia launched at least 3,340 drones mostly manufactured by Iran and 135 missiles at Ukrainian targets, mostly striking civilian areas. The recent wave of Russian aerial attacks directed against Ukraine fails to distinguish between civilian populations and military targets, and should be considered war crimes, Fortify Rights said. It continues a pattern of attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure since the beginning of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, showing clearly that Russia continues to violate the laws of war to a degree that reaches the level of crimes against humanity. International humanitarian law, also known as the laws of war, governs the conduct of parties to international armed conflicts. Article 43 of Additional Protocol 1 to the Geneva Conventions states that: In order to ensure respect for and protection of the civilian population and civilian objects, the Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives. Further, Article 8 of the Rome Statute of the ICC explicitly categorizes 'Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population' as a war crime. Before Ukraine ratified the Rome Statute of the ICC in 2024, Ukrainian authorities twice accepted the court's jurisdiction. On April 9, 2014, Ukraine accepted the ICC's jurisdiction under Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute pertaining to acts committed in Ukraine from November 21, 2013, to February 22, 2014. On September 8, 2015, Ukraine extended the court's jurisdiction to focus on alleged crimes committed throughout Ukraine from February 20, 2014, onwards. Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute allows non-ICC member states to accept the jurisdiction of the Court. As part of the investigation into war crimes and crimes against humanity during Russian aggression against Ukraine, the ICC has already issued an arrest warrant against Lieutenant General Sergei Kobylash and Admiral Viktor Sokolov for directing attacks at civilian objects and for causing excessive harm to civilians or damage to civilian objects. 'Russia's continuing direct attacks against Ukrainian civilians and civilian infrastructure demand international attention and accountability,' said Aliona Kazanska. 'The International Criminal Court must respond to this pattern of deliberate aerial attacks against civilians, and countries around the world must intensify their efforts to block the Russian military from continuing its attacks against Ukrainian civilians by strengthening sanctions and blocking its access to weapons technology.'
Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
UN Rights Mission Condemns Civilian Toll In Deadly Missile Strikes On Ukraine
25 June 2025 At least 24 people were reported killed and over 300 injured – including 32 children – when ballistic missiles struck Ukraine's Dnipro and Odesa regions on Monday and Tuesday, the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) said on Wednesday. The attacks destroyed homes, schools, hospitals, and other civilian infrastructure, and left hundreds wounded. 'The attacks struck during the day when civilians were at work, on trains, or at school,' said Danielle Bell, head of HRMMU. 'The timing alone made the high number of civilian casualties entirely foreseeable.' On 23 June, two ballistic missiles launched by Russian forces hit Lyceum No. 1, a middle school in Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi, Odesa region. Although the school year had ended, staff and students were present for administrative work. The strike killed three educators and injured 14 others, including two boys. The school, which served over 700 students, sustained critical damage. No military objective HRMMU, which visited the attacks sites, reported no evidence of military presence at the school, and people confirmed that no military presence had been stationed there. 'The school in Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi was not a military objective,' Ms. Bell said. 'Yet it was hit by two ballistic missiles, killing educators and injuring children.' The following day, 24 June, missiles struck an industrial area of Dnipro city at around 11 AM local time. The blast shattered windows in nearby schools, hospitals and residential buildings. HRMMU confirmed that two dormitories were hit, injuring numerous residents. A nearby passenger train was also impacted – windows blown out by the shockwave – injuring more than 20 travellers, according to a UN monitor onboard. A troubling trend These strikes followed a series of other attacks in June that have resulted in significant civilian harm, including in Kyiv city on 17 and 23 June, according to the human rights mission. Civilian casualties in the first five months of 2025 were nearly 50 percent higher than during the same period last year, with increases typically seen during the summer months. 'Ballistic missiles, when used in densely populated areas, cause predictable and widespread harm to civilians, as demonstrated by these recent attacks,' Ms. Bell said. 'The rising civilian casualties reflect the severity of that risk.'
Newsroom
4 days ago
- Newsroom
Iran's nuclear weapons dash hits a hurdle, but race far from over
It's a long time since we've been on the edge of our seats wondering if a full-blown nuclear war is about to happen. But many had that sensation when the US President said last weekend that Iran's nuclear facilities had been 'completely and totally obliterated'. Trump's bullseye claim is now in question but the bombing had many experts talking about the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 at the height of the Cold War between the US and the Soviet Union. 'They were very real fears and there were some very close calls, in particular during the Cuban Missile Crisis we now know the world came incredibly close to nuclear conflict,' international law and nuclear weapons expert Anna Hood of Auckland University says. People feared then that the 'Cold War would turn hot'. Since then we have had volatile moments and right now the risk is heightened, she says. 'There were higher numbers of weapons during the Cold War. We have seen some level of disarmament since then but we haven't seen enough movement in the last few years. The numbers are still very high.' Not only have the numbers stayed high, but countries are trying to upgrade and enhance the weapons they do have, she says. 'I would like to hope that most states, all states, wouldn't go there [nuclear war] or even if they've got nuclear weapons that that's not what they'll use but I think there are very serious risks in terms of what happens in the heat of a conflict, in terms of accidents.' Hood focuses much of her time on the numerous nuclear issues afflicting the world today and how to work towards a nuclear-free world. 'We are a long way unfortunately from that,' she admits, pointing to the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists' annual Doomsday Clock showing we are closer than ever – 89 seconds to midnight, and catastrophe. Hood tells The Detail why the US strike on Iran is a violation of international law and the possible consequences. While the impact of the B2 stealth bomber attacks is still not clear, senior physics lecturer at Auckland University David Krofcheck says it does not end Iran's nuclear ambitions. 'Israel has had a go at assassinating their nuclear weapons scientists there but you can't destroy knowledge, and that's the critical thing. It can be rebuilt, you just start from scratch,' he says. Iran insists it is not developing weapons, but Krofcheck says he can't think of another reason it would need to enrich uranium to 60 percent, as confirmed by the International Atomic Energy Agency. But even with 60 percent enriched uranium, there's more to the process and it would have been months before it had a weapon ready. 'That nuclear device that's built might be gigantic, the size of a house. It's not something you can pick up and put on a missile and shoot at another country.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
