Welsh Government's £250K grant to 'count moths on the Great Orme is crazy'
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
A Llandudno councillor described the spending of £250,000 of taxpayers' money on 'counting the number of moths on the Great Orme' as 'crazy'. Speaking at a Conservative Party conference in Llangollen last week, Cllr Louise Emery raised the issue of a grant paid by Welsh Government to Conwy County Council.
The 'Cryptic Creatures of the Creuddyn' is a two-year project focussing on invertebrates associated with limestone habitats on the Creuddyn peninsula.
Delivered by the Heritage Fund, on behalf of the Welsh Government, the project is funded by the Nature Networks Programme and involves working with schools and the community for the benefit of invertebrates.
Cllr Emery, though, believed Welsh Government money could be better allocated to councils at a time when many local authorities are struggling to make ends meet and cutting front-line services.
"We are seeing a lack of investment in roads, and it is priorities. The worst one I've heard of is £250,000 counting the number of moths on the Great Orme – crazy!' she said at the conference.
'So there is money. It is always about priorities. So we need to say as the Welsh Conservatives, who will be in power in 2027, that we need to focus on the absolute basics of what we do at local authorities: collect the bins, educate your children, and look after your vulnerable, and fix your highways, essentially."
Speaking later, Cllr Emery elaborated on the comments made at the political conference, explaining it was Welsh Government who allocated the funds spent on the project.
'My point I was making at the Conservative conference was about priorities and that there is money available from Welsh Government but only for certain things, so whilst local authority budgets are really being squeezed, Welsh Government finds money for projects such as the Cryptic Creatures of the Creuddyn,' she said.
'On its own merit, in its own little world, I can see some benefit to that, but in the grand financial picture of what local authorities are facing, I find it incredulous that they can find money for a project like this, but we can't find money for basic public amenities such as toilets or looking after our parks and gardens or highways.
"So it's not that I'm against the project in itself, but it is a priority where you allocate money to. This is not Conwy revenue money. I was saying there is grant money available, which I think should be prioritised, supporting local authorities properly.'
A Welsh Government spokesperson said: 'The Cryptic Creatures of the Creuddyn project was awarded £248,348 as part of the Nature Networks Fund in February 2024. It is a collaborative initiative led by Conwy County Borough Council in partnership with Natural Resources Wales and Butterfly Conservation.
'The project is carrying out surveys and protecting rare and at-risk invertebrate such as the micro-moth, measuring about 2cm across which has been found in abundance in its only known Welsh Habitat. This work will inform future habitat management and conservation strategies."
Cllr Charlie McCoubrey, council leader said: 'This is a grant-funded project. It's important to note that grant funding is for specific projects and cannot be spent on other services. Whilst grant funding is available, we will continue to apply for it.' Sign up for the North Wales Live newslettersent twice daily to your inbox.
Public notices in your area
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
MOD concerned over Powys wind farm affecting RAF training
Concerns have been raised about potential dangers to RAF planes that could be caused by a planned wind farm in Powys. The Banc Y Ceylin Wind Farm would border the Sennybridge Training area near Builth Wells and the plans on the site for 26 wind turbines with a maximum tip height of 200 metres have raised worries with the armed forces. It is understood the MOD has raised concerns over the impact of the windfarm on low flying military aircraft, which was now been highlighted by constituency MP David Chadwick. The Tactical Training Area known as "Low Flying Area 7(T)' sees military aircraft operate down to 100 ft above ground level – which is well below the 500 ft tip height of the planned turbines. The MOD can raise objections to plans which may affect national security and defence when it may affect defence sites such as the training area. The planned wind farm is a joint venture between Wind2 and companies managed by Octopus Energy Generation. The plans in a scoping report submitted to the Welsh Government noted a potential impact on the low flying area. MP for Brecon, Radnor and Cwm Tawe David Chadwick raised concerns after learning that the wind farm may impact the low-flying training zone. Mr Chadwick wrote to the MOD regarding concerns raised by local residents about the potential impact of the development. Help support trusted local news Sign up for a digital subscription now: As a digital subscriber you will get Unlimited access to the County Times website Advert-light access Reader rewards Full access to our app Attending a low-flying aircraft briefing last week, he said he was told that the proposed turbines could force low-flying aircraft to divert from key training areas. 'Low-flying training in mid Wales plays a vital role in keeping our armed forces prepared and ready,' said Mr Chadwick. "It is vital that all relevant information is now put on the table, that the MOD and RAF are fully aligned, and that local communities such as Merthyr Cynnog are kept properly informed. "We must strike the right balance between delivering clean energy and protecting the operational needs of our armed forces. I will continue to press for full transparency on this matter.' A spokesperson for Wind2 said: "From the outset, Wind2 has recognised the significance of SENTA and the associated safeguarding considerations. "We've been in ongoing discussions with the Ministry of Defence (MoD) as part of our early development work, and that dialogue continues to ensure any potential concerns are fully understood and addressed. "In March 2025, we submitted a formal scoping request to Planning and Environment Decisions Wales (PEDW), with the scoping direction being issued on June 20. "We've also been in regular contact with Powys County Council as part of our broader engagement. We are fully committed to continue to work with all stakeholders. "It's also important to note that no planning application has been submitted.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
How Denmark's ghetto laws caught the eye of Kemi Badenoch
Half an hour's drive from Copenhagen, white concrete tower blocks loom over a graffitied subway entrance. It feels a world away from the bustling capital of one of the world's richest countries. This is Askerød, an estate branded a 'parallel society' under Denmark's controversial ghetto laws. Today, its population is 54 per cent 'non-Western' – above the 50 per cent threshold that can compel councils to demolish, vacate or sell off social housing. Supporters say the ghetto laws have helped integration in neighbourhoods across the country. However, they are facing an EU legal challenge from people affected who argue that the measures are racist. The laws are now being considered as a template by Kemi Badenoch, leader of the Conservative Party, who said last week that she had thought about proposals 'along the lines' of the Danish policy. Speak to people on the streets of Askerød and there is concern about integration of non-Western nationals. Alice Dalsø, 72, who lives on the estate with her dogs Karla and Nana, said: 'I think it is a problem because some of the children don't speak Danish. 'They will go to school at five-years-old unable to speak the language and it's because the adults don't speak Danish with them.' Referring to the minority of Danish nationals, she said: 'I don't understand why so many [non-Western] nationals have been put in Askerød – it's not good for them and it's not good for us as they are less likely to integrate.' Ms Dalsø stressed that the younger people from non-Western backgrounds were more likely to learn the language and speak to their neighbours, however, older residents were not.' Another student, who did not wish to give her name, said: 'There is a kind of segregation – it's not imposed by anyone, but there is a large ethnic minority population here.' The 24-year-old added: 'There is some truth to not everybody subscribing to Danish values, but I think the government forgets not [everyone came] here because they wanted to emigrate. They came here because they were escaping war. 'A lot of them will miss their home countries and people speaking their language but a lot of them are mentally traumatised – so it's easier for them to talk to others from their own communities.' Both residents did not agree that tearing down or selling off social housing was the right way to deal with the problem. Ms Dalsø pointed out that her own home could be at risk if a block was removed or emptied, while the student described such measures as 'harsh'. Speaking at a Policy Exchange event on Monday, Ms Badenoch said she had 'looked at' the Danish ghetto policy and added: 'We need to do what works for the UK, it's not exactly the same situation, we have a much bigger population, and so many other things that would require adjustments, but that sort of thing, yes.' Pernille Beckmann, mayor of the Danish municipality Greve, which includes includes Askerød, said improvements had been made since 2010, when the housing development was first placed on the 'vulnerable residential area' list, which it has been on and off for the past 15 years. The Danish government no longer uses the word 'ghetto' to describe such areas, referring to them instead as places where there is a 'parallel society'. As well as having more than 50 per cent non-Western people living there, parallel society areas must also meet two of four other criteria for houses to be demolished – such as having unemployment levels above 40 per cent, or crime rates of at least three times the national average. Those living in the affected properties are then re-housed in other areas, with the hope that this will improve integration and reduce crime. There are currently eight areas on the parallel society list. Ms Beckmann, a member of the Liberal Party, said a big change came when the municipality was granted full authority to decide who can move into Askerød and the nearby Gersagerparken estate. New residents must now meet certain criteria: they must be employed or in education, have no criminal record, and hold EU citizenship. She said a survey on the housing estate found that residents in the development reported feeling safer. Ms Beckmann said: 'In close collaboration with local housing associations, we've agreed to distribute residents who fall under the criteria for parallel societies more evenly across the municipality. 'It's about creating balance and not just shifting the problem from one place to another... The profile of new residents is already changing thanks to the new criteria, and that's a promising sign. 'Hopefully, this will help us come off the list again and continue building safer, more stable neighbourhoods.' A supporter of the parallel societies laws, Ms Beckmann described them as 'overall good and effective'. 'We simply cannot allow the existence of parallel societies where children and young people grow up under social control, religious indoctrination, crime, gangs, and with poor prospects for education and employment,' she said. 'When we ensure a diverse resident mix, we break down under-resourced areas. 'Places where people feel unsafe, lose faith in the future, and where children see no other possibilities than what they encounter at home or next door.' The widespread political mainstream support for strict immigration measures is a sign of how much the debate in Denmark has changed. During the 1960s and early 1970s, the country welcomed large numbers of immigrants on guest worker status amid surging demand for labour. But concern grew for decades over how well newcomers were able to integrate. In 2015, the European migration and refugee crisis marked a turning point, when well over a million migrants came to Europe – mostly heading to wealthier northern countries such as Denmark, Sweden and Germany. That year, the anti-immigration Danish People's Party (DPP), became the second biggest power in the country's parliament. After losing the 2015 election, the Social Democrats made a public break from its previous past reputation of openness to migration. 'My party should have listened,' new leader Mette Frederiksen said at the time. Since then the country has tightened rules dramatically and introduced a litany of restrictions. Its 'anti-ghetto law' was introduced in 2018, and Ms Frederiksen, who became prime minister the following year, has since pursued a 'zero refugee' policy. Successful asylum bids had almost halved by her second year in office, from 85 per cent in 2015 to 44 per cent in 2020. Last year just 860 asylum requests were granted in Denmark, the lowest figure apart from 2020, when Covid halted new arrivals. While Denmark continues to tackle new immigration, the ghetto rules are also intended to promote integration among non-Danes already living in the country. The Muhammad cartoons controversy of 2005 – in which Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten sparked protests and uproar across the world by publishing twelve editorial cartoons depicting the founder of Islam – is often cited by those who say non-Westerners must embrace 'Danish values'. Muhammad Aslam, then a Copenhagen councillor, was among a delegation who travelled to Egypt on the Danish government's behalf in an effort to ease tensions at a time when Danish flags were being burned in the street. However, he has since been moved from the home he lived in for over 30 years – an apartment in a low-rise public housing estate in the neighbourhood of Nørrebro, Copenhagen. The 58-year-old, who came to Denmark from Pakistan with his father as a seven-year-old and gained citizenship in the 1980s, is one of a dozen tenants who has taken the Danish government to court over the ghetto laws. The case is before the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg, with a ruling expected later this year. Speaking with the help of a translator, Mr Aslam, said: 'I don't think that [Denmark] should take everyone in and that can't be done in the UK either. 'But we definitely should care for the people who are here. 'Everybody who lives in Denmark should be perceived as Danish and I perceive everyone here as Danish – and everyone should have the same rights.' Mr Aslam said that being part of a community is not necessarily about 'socialising with people born or raised here' but about 'doing things the Danish way of doing things and having the same values like free speech'. He added: 'You see all of these people where maybe their grandparents and parents have come to Denmark years beforehand and now they are graduating university – it would be hard to say that's a bad example of integration.' Meanwhile, some Right-wing politicians also believe that removing social housing from affected areas is not the solution. Anders Vistisen, Danish People's Party MEP and chief whip of Patriots for Europe group in European Parliament, said: 'We are not massively in favour of that part of that part of the legislation as we think it has often become a massive waste of money and it's not solving the problem.' He added: 'I think that if I was a UK politician, I would adopt other parts of the Danish laws before I came to the ghetto question. 'I think if the will was there it wouldn't be harmful, but I think it's a very marginal part of the Danish laws which is on the most expensive and least effective end of the scale.' The ghetto policy's effectiveness remains a matter for debate in Denmark. But across Europe, the country's stance on migration is winning it many admirers. Mrs Badenoch is unlikely to be the last.
ITV News
2 hours ago
- ITV News
Starmer says he was 'heavily focused' on international affairs before welfare u-turn
Sir Keir Starmer has said he did not get to grips with the growing rebellion over welfare reforms earlier as he was focused on international affairs. He also said he took ownership for his decisions and believed as leader he should 'carry the can' when things do not go well. The prime minister said he was occupied with the G7 and Nato summits and the escalating tensions in the Middle East for much of the past two weeks. He said he was 'heavily focused' on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend and that his 'full attention really bore down' on the welfare bill on Thursday. He defended the eventual U-turn, which came after more than 100 MPs launched a bid to kill the legislation with an amendment. On Sunday, Wes Streeting said he is confident the government will win a crunch vote on welfare next week. The Health Secretary told Sky News Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips the changes 'have put us in a much better position'. 'As a result of the changes, it means anyone watching this morning who's in receipt of personal independence payments now has the peace of mind of knowing that their situation is protected,' he said. Speaking to the Sunday Times, Starmer said: 'Getting it right is more important than ploughing on with a package which doesn't necessarily achieve the desired outcome.' He said all the decisions were his and that 'I take ownership of them'. There have been reports that rebel MPs blamed Starmer's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney for the government's approach. Starmer said: 'My rule of leadership is, when things go well you get the plaudits; when things don't go well you carry the can. 'I take responsibility for all the decisions made by this government. I do not talk about staff and I'd much prefer it if everybody else didn't.' Ministers had hoped the reforms would get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year, but the concessions made leave Chancellor Rachel Reeves needing to find money elsewhere and point to possible tax rises in the autumn. On Saturday, the prime minister told the Welsh Labour conference the 'broken' welfare system must be fixed 'in a Labour way'. He said: 'We cannot take away the safety net that vulnerable people rely on, and we won't, but we also can't let it become a snare for those who can and want to work.' Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch will hit out at Starmer as 'incapable of sticking to a decision' after he backed down on his plans. The reforms would only have made 'modest reductions to the ballooning welfare bill', but the prime minister was 'too weak to hold the line', the Conservative Party leader is expected to say in a speech next week. The government's original welfare package had restricted eligibility for Pip, the main disability payment in England, as well as cutting the health-related element of universal credit. Existing recipients were to be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support in an earlier move that was seen as a bid to head off opposition. Now, the changes to Pip will be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only, while all existing recipients of the health element of universal credit will have their incomes protected in real terms. The concessions on Pip alone protect some 370,000 people currently receiving the allowance who were set to lose out following reassessment. As a year in office nears, more than half of voters think Labour has underperformed in that time, polling released on Saturday showed. The Opinium survey showed 54% think Labour has done a worse job than expected, while 18% think the party has exceeded expectations. From Westminster to Washington DC - our political experts are across all the latest key talking points. Listen to the latest episode below...
