Bung, wife denied leave to review decision ordering them to enter defence
Published on: Thu, May 22, 2025
By: V Anbalagan, FMT Text Size: Bung Moktar Radin and Zizie Izette Abdul Samad were ordered to enter their defence last November on charges of corruption and abetment over a RM150 million Felcra investment. PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has dismissed a leave application by Kinabatangan MP Bung Moktar Radin and his wife, Zizie Izette Abdul Samad, for a review of another bench's ruling ordering them to enter their defence on charges of corruption. A three-member bench chaired by Justice Che Ruzima Ghazali said the threshold for a review of the earlier appeals court decision had not been met. 'The threshold for review is high, and as the apex court (for subordinate courts), we are cautious in exercising such power as it goes against the principle of finality. 'Such power can only be exercised in exceptional cases. Applicants must show there was injustice and that they have no alternative remedy,' he said. He said the applicants in this case had alternative remedies, as the points raised could be argued during an appeal in the High Court if the sessions court convicts them. Also hearing the application were Justices Azizul Azmi Adnan and Ahmad Kamal Shahid.
Advertisement Sessions court judge Rosli Ahmad had fixed a nine-day hearing from Aug 18. The couple was ordered to enter their defence last November on charges of corruption and abetment over a RM150 million Felcra investment. A three-member Court of Appeal bench had overturned Bung and Zizie's acquittal by the High Court. Justice Zaini Mazlan, who delivered the decision, said the revision application the couple had filed in the High Court was improper as it was akin to an appeal. The couple filed an application in March seeking leave for review under Rule 105 of the Rules of the Court of Appeal 1994, contending that the previous bench lacked the jurisdiction to hear the prosecution's appeal. Bung, the non-executive chairman of Felcra at the time, is charged with two counts of receiving bribes of RM2.2 million and RM262,500 as an inducement to obtain Felcra's approval to invest RM150 million in Public Mutual unit trusts. He is alleged to have accepted the bribes from Norhaili Madhi, a Public Mutual investment agent, through Zizie at Public Bank's Taman Melawati branch between 12.30pm and 5pm on June 12, 2015. He is also charged with receiving a bribe of RM337,500 from Norhaili under Zizie's name at the same location on June 19, 2015. Zizie faces three charges of abetting Bung in the commission of the alleged offences. On Sept 2, 2022, the sessions court ordered the couple to enter their defence after ruling that the prosecution had established a prima facie case against them. On Sept 7, 2023, the High Court, which heard a revision application brought under Section 323 of the Criminal Procedure Code, acquitted the duo. However, that decision was set aside on appeal. Lawyer M Athimulan appeared for Bung and K Kumaraendran for Zizie, while deputy public prosecutors Law Chin How and Fadhly Zamry represented the prosecution. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
41 minutes ago
- The Star
Anwar, govt succeed in removing names from Mukhriz's tax lawsuit
KUALA LUMPUR: Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and the government have successfully struck out their names in an application to initiate judicial review filed by Datuk Seri Mukhriz Mahathir linked to an Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) additional tax assessment amounting to more than RM5mil. Mukhriz, 60, filed the application on Dec 20 last year. He named the LHDN CEO or director-general, Anwar in his capacity as the Finance Minister and the government as the first, second and third respondents, respectively. During yesterday's proceedings, Justice Amarjeet Singh allowed the application by Anwar and the government to strike out their names after hearing submissions from both parties. However, Justice Amarjeet dismissed Anwar and the government's application to strike out several paragraphs in Mukhriz's affidavit that mentioned them. Senior Federal Counsel Irmawatie Daud appeared for the applicants, while lawyer Syed Afiq Syed Albakri represented Mukhriz. On Jan 2, the High Court granted Mukhriz leave to challenge the tax notices by LHDN on grounds that there were issues. The court fixed Dec 16 to hear the application on its merits. In Mukhriz's judicial review application, he is seeking a court order to quash the first respondent's additional tax assessment notice for 2017, 2018 and 2019, amounting to RM5,020,707.18, on grounds that the action is illegal and unreasonable. The notices were for additional tax assessment for 2017 (RM2,558,875.90), 2018 (RM2,445,004.91) and 2019 (RM16,826.37). He is also seeking a declaration that the decision to impose the penalty on him under Section 113(2) of the Income Tax Act is void and beyond legal authority. Mukhriz contends that LHDN wrongfully considered his disposal of shares in Opcom Holdings Bhd and dividends received from M Ocean Capital Sdn Bhd as taxable income, although they were not taxable. He is also seeking general and exemplary damages against the respondents. In March, Anwar and the government had applied to strike out their names as they contended that there was no need to list them as respondents in the judicial review. They said the action of naming them in the lawsuit was 'clearly frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of court process that is obviously unsustainable'.
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Abdul Rahman Sebli retires as Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak: A look at his judicial legacy, artistic flair and wildlife protection advocacy
KUALA LUMPUR, July 25 — Tan Sri Abdul Rahman Sebli has retired as the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak, after over 41 years of serving the nation — including 17 years at the High Court, Court of Appeal and Federal Court. This is because he has reached the age of 66 years and six months today. The Sarawakian had reached the mandatory retirement age for judges when he turned 66 years old on January 25, but was granted a six-month extension. Yesterday was his last day as a judge. Beyond serving as a judge who had heard high-profile cases, including a former prime minister's conviction challenge, Abdul Rahman was also quite the artist and a firm advocate of better laws to protect animals and wildlife. A Sarawakian's long career in law and courts Born in Sibu, Sarawak and a Universiti Malaya (UM) law graduate, Abdul Rahman started serving in Malaysia's judicial and legal service in December 1983. The positions that he had held included being a deputy public prosecutor for Sarawak, Pahang, Kelantan and Kuala Lumpur; a senior federal counsel at the Sarawak State Attorney General's Chambers; and as a Sessions Court judge in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah and Miri, Sarawak. He had also been Pahang's state legal adviser, and director of the Royal Malaysian Customs Department's legal division. Abdul Rahman then became a judicial commissioner at the High Court in September 2008, and was elevated to be a High Court judge on August 9, 2010. He served at the High Court in Kota Kinabalu, Shah Alam and Johor Bahru. He was later appointed as a Court of Appeal judge on September 12, 2014, as a Federal Court judge on August 8, 2019, and served for about three years and five months before becoming Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak. Since his January 17, 2023 appointment until his retirement today, Abdul Rahman has served for two-and-a-half years as the top judge overseeing administrative duties for the High Court of Sabah and Sarawak. Datuk Abdul Rahman Sebli is pictured during the swearing-in ceremony as the new Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak at Palace of Justice in Putrajaya January 17, 2023. — Picture by Yusof Mat Isa Notable court decisions Abdul Rahman is perhaps best known for being the only dissenting judge in a case involving former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's bid to challenge his conviction over SRC International Sdn Bhd's misappropriated RM42 million. Just two days after becoming Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak, Abdul Rahman on January 19, 2023 chaired a five-judge panel hearing Najib's application to ask the Federal Court to either overturn his conviction or order a retrial. On March 31, 2023, while the four other judges rejected Najib's review bid, Abdul Rahman was the only judge to say that the former prime minister was deprived of a fair hearing and should be acquitted in the SRC case. On February 9, 2024, Abdul Rahman was the only dissenting judge in a Federal Court case, with the eight other judges deciding that 16 provisions on Shariah criminal offences in a Kelantan state law were unconstitutional and invalid as Parliament is the one with powers to make laws on such crimes. Screenshot of Tan Sri Abdul Rahman Sebli's sketch 'Clock Tower at the Old Court House', depicting the iconic Sultan Abdul Samad Building in Kuala Lumpur, from The Malaysian Judiciary's Yearbook 2017. A talented artist Apart from carrying out his duties as a judge, Abdul Rahman also displayed his 'surprise' artistic skills when his detailed black-and-white drawings were twice featured as the cover artwork for the Malaysian judiciary's annual yearbook. For the 2017 yearbook, Abdul Rahman's sketch titled Clock Tower at the Old Court House depicted the iconic Sultan Abdul Samad Building in Kuala Lumpur — a heritage landmark located opposite Dataran Merdeka that once housed Malaysia's superior courts, namely the Federal Court, Court of Appeal and High Court. In the 2018 yearbook, his drawing titled The Eye-Catching Facade of the Kuching Court Complex received praise from the yearbook's editor, then Federal Court judge Tan Sri Idrus Harun. 'The stunning cover sketch for this publication depicting the beautiful facade of the court house in Kuching, Sarawak is the product of excellent work of Justice Abdul Rahman Sebli who once again demonstrated his pure talent when he volunteered to draw the cover sketch gratis,' Idris wrote in the yearbook when commenting on Abdul Rahman's offer to draw the artwork for free. Screenshot of Tan Sri Abdul Rahman Sebli's sketch 'The Eye-Catching Facade of the Kuching Court Complex' from The Malaysian Judiciary's Yearbook 2018. Advocacy for wildlife and environmental protection On February 26, 2024 at his opening speech for the Borneo Rainforest Law Conference 2024 held in Sabah, Abdul Rahman said efforts should be made to update and strengthen existing environmental laws, and to ensure that these laws are comprehensive and effectively enforced. He said the courts in Sabah and Sarawak had introduced sentencing guidelines for wildlife and forest crimes, but noted that the courts' role in enforcing environmental laws has its limits and that long-term solutions were needed from the executive and legislative branch of government. He called for strict laws to prevent illegal wildlife trade and to protect marine ecosystems, as well as to promote sustainable fishing practices and marine conservation efforts. In the judiciary's 2017 yearbook, Abdul Rahman in a seven-page piece titled 'Animal Cruelty and Wildlife Protection' outlined and compared the three different laws on wildlife crime in Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak. In his article, he spoke out against abuse of pets, saying that the court must make clear that it would not tolerate crimes of cruelty to animals. He also urged for heavier penalties in the law against animal cruelty. Who will succeed Abdul Rahman? On July 18, the Malaysian judiciary issued a statement to announce that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong has assented to appointing Court of Appeal judge Datuk Azizah Nawawi to replace the soon-to-retire Abdul Rahman as the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak. The judiciary also said the Yang di-Pertuan Agong has assented to appointing Court of Appeal judge Datuk Wan Ahmad Farid Wan Salleh as the next Chief Justice of Malaysia and Federal Court judge Datuk Abu Bakar Jais as the next President of the Court of Appeal. The three new top judges will be sworn in on July 28 at Istana Negara. As of now, Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim is temporarily carrying out duties as the acting Chief Justice, while Federal Court judge Datuk Zabariah Mohd Yusof is temporarily carrying out duties as the acting President of the Court of Appeal.
Borneo Post
10 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Datuk denies cheating in alleged 'Dato' title scam
Ling (left) with his counsel Ngui after the proceedings today. KOTA KINABALU (July 24): A businessman pleaded not guilty in a Sessions Court here today to three charges of cheating in connection with the acquisition of an honorary 'Dato'' title. Datuk Ling How Ee, 40, entered his plea before judge Jason Juga, who had the charges read to him in Mandarin. Ling is accused of dishonestly inducing a man to transfer RM2,500, RM500, and RM3,000 into his bank account for the purported purchase of gold accessories for ceremonial attire, and to assist in securing a 'Dato'' title from Pahang, despite having no authority to do so. The alleged offences took place at a bank branch here on April 19, April 20 and May 17, 2023. All the charges fall under Section 420 of the Penal Code, which carries a penalty of imprisonment between one and ten years, whipping, and a fine upon conviction. The court set September 3 for pre-trial case management. Ling was granted bail of RM10,000 with a RM3,000 deposit and one local surety. Additional conditions imposed included reporting to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) once every two months, surrendering his passport to the court (if any), and refraining from contacting or interfering with prosecution witnesses. He was represented by counsel Ngui Kuang Kee @ George Ngui. Ling was arrested on July 2 after giving a statement at the Sabah MACC Office.
