The EU's growing list of online platforms under investigation
The European Commission says that under the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) the Chinese e-commerce platform doesn't properly assess risks arising from illegal products sold on its website, including baby toys and small electronics.
'The Commission has adopted a preliminary decision under the Digital Services Act legislation when it comes to TEMU, where we have announced to that online marketplace that according to us it is in breach of the DSA when it comes to risks on the marketplace relating to the selling and dissemination of illegal products,' Commission spokesperson Thomas Regnier told Euronews.
"The DSA is one of our tools to protect consumers across Europe. To protect them from what, when it comes to online marketplaces? Illegal products that are sold online. Algorithmic content that is thrown at you and that you don't even determine if you want to see it or not. When it comes, for example, to advertisement or gamification of certain systems on these online platforms. These are risks that we need to mitigate. To protect our consumers online," he added.
Not only Temu
The probe comes amid broader concerns that some online marketplaces allow the sale of goods that would not meet EU safety or regulatory standards if sold in physical stores.
So far, including Temu, the Commission has opened 14 proceedings against 10 online platforms. Each case focuses on different aspects of compliance, ranging from product safety to content moderation and the protection of minors.
The ongoing proceedings include X, which has been issued with preliminary findings over its compliance with obligations concerning the 'dissemination and amplification of illegal content.'
There are also ongoing procedures against Tik Tok concerning, among other things, its risk management of addictive design and harmful content. Also under the spot is the protection of minors, on which preliminary findings have been reached, and election integrity. The TikTok Lite case was closed after TikTok offered commitments.
The Commission found AliExpress (AliExpress) was not taking enough measures to counter illegal products. The Chinese company finally offered commitments and the Commission issued preliminary findings on other grievences.
And according to an ongoing file, Meta's services Instagram and Facebook are also under scrutiny in cases related to the protection of minors, as well as on election integrity.
Finally, there is a case open for the websites Stripchat, Pornhub, XNXX, Xvideos related to the protection of minors.
Consumer Groups Call for Action
The wave of investigations comes amid growing pressure from consumer protection groups, who argue that the DSA must be backed by real enforcement to have meaningful impact.
'The preliminary findings of the European Commission on Temu is a positive first step for European consumers. Last year, the European Consumer Organisation (BEUC) launched a complaint against TEMU because they are not doing enough to protect consumers against illegal and unsafe products that can be bought through their website,' Agustín Reyna, director general of European Consumer Organisation BEUC, told Euronews.
'What is at the stake is the safety of consumers. Because when consumers buy something online, they expect it to be safe. They don't wonder whether there are illegal chemicals being used in the production of these goods, or whether a certain product or household appliance might explode, or that a kid might choke with a toy. They expect the product to be safe, regardless of how cheap it might be, but they expect it to be safe. What we have identified with our members of all the national consumer organisations -that they have conducted mystery shopping exercises, testing over these products through Temu - is that you can buy and be exposed to a significant amount of illegal products. And the company today is not doing enough to protect consumers,' he added.
According to the consumer organisation, the challenge now is to try to make the law work in practise. The legislation has been in place for nearly a year and a half, but so far none of the Commission probes have been wrapped up and no sanctions have been imposed yet.
But with these platforms becoming very popular with Europeans the topic is urgent. 'Just to give you an idea, every year the number of parcels that enter into the EU through TEMU doubles. So we're talking about a significant number of products that enter the EU which are not compliant. And consumers do not know about that,' concluded the Director of BEUC.
France Moves to Regulate Ultra Fast Fashion
The investigation into Temu also comes at a time when EU member states are stepping up efforts to rein in ultra-fast fashion — a business model many experts say fuels overconsumption, environmental harm, and the exploitation of legal grey zones.
In May 2024, France proposed groundbreaking legislation targeting ultra-fast fashion platforms. The French government explicitly named companies like TEMU and Shein as examples of platforms disrupting sustainability efforts, using aggressive social media marketing and gamified shopping to encourage impulse buying and throwaway culture.
While the French proposal is still under negotiation, it reflects a growing consensus that ultra fast fashion — especially when delivered through unregulated online platforms — poses not just consumer safety risks, but also serious environmental and social concerns.
It seems that a European Response is needed to a global problem. The convergence of issues — from illegal product sales to environmental destruction — has prompted calls for a more unified EU response. Experts say that relying on fragmented national enforcement is no longer viable in the face of global platforms that operate across borders, largely unchecked.
As the Director General of BEUC put it, 'Europe can't win this battle one country at a time.' The Digital Services Act is a start. But for many, it's just the beginning.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AGCO (AGCO) Declares $0.29 Quarterly Dividend for September 2025
AGCO Corporation (NYSE:AGCO) is one of the best farmland and agriculture stocks to buy according to billionaires. On July 10, the company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share of common stock. The dividend is payable on September 15, 2025, to shareholders of record as of August 15, 2025. Vlad Teodor/ AGCO has consistently paid a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share in recent quarters, including payments on June 16, 2025 (ex-dividend date May 15, 2025), and March 14, 2025 (ex-dividend date February 14, 2025). Except for this recent plateau, the company has increased its dividends for 13 consecutive years, with an average dividend growth rate of 13.19% over the past 36 months, 12.63% over the past 60 months, and 9.93% over the past 120 months. On April 25, 2024, AGCO declared a special variable dividend of $2.50 per share, paid on May 20, 2024. This payment was in addition to the regular quarterly dividend. AGCO Corporation (NYSE:AGCO) is a global manufacturer and distributor of agricultural machinery and precision agriculture technology. Through brands like Fendt, Massey Ferguson, Valtra, and PTx, AGCO provides tractors, combines, grain storage systems, and smart farming solutions that support large-scale crop production. While we acknowledge the potential of AGCO as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and 10 Penny Stocks That Will Skyrocket. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BioNTech price target raised to $185 from $181 at Clear Street
Clear Street raised the firm's price target on BioNTech (BNTX) to $185 from $181 and keeps a Buy rating on the shares after updating the firm's model to a year-end 2026 valuation following the company reporting Q2 results this morning. The company remains on track to report Phase 2 dose optimization results from BNT327 studies in small cell lung cancer and triple negative breast cancer in the second half of 2025, notes the analyst, who calls the company's oncology pipeline 'underappreciated.' Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See the top stocks recommended by analysts >> Read More on BNTX: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue BioNTech SE Reports Strong Financial Results for Mid-2025 BioNTech Reports Q2 2025 Financials and Strategic Collaborations Options Volatility and Implied Earnings Moves Today, August 04, 2025 BioNTech reports Q2 EPS EUR (1.60) vs. EUR (3.36) last year BioNTech backs FY25 revenue view EUR 1.7B-EUR 2.2B Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rathi hits back at claims FCA redress plan is unworkable
FCA chief executive Nikhil Rathi has pushed back against claims from the motor finance industry that the regulator's proposed redress scheme for discretionary commissions is too difficult to implement, saying lenders must stop 'haggling' and focus on delivering fair outcomes for consumers. Speaking to the Financial Times, Rathi directly addressed industry complaints that the Financial Conduct Authority's plans to compensate customers for car loans dating back as far as 2007 were 'completely impractical' due to patchy record-keeping. 'Now is not the time to haggle with us, but to help put things right for consumers,' he said. 'We know it is difficult. But you can't say the law has been broken and it is too difficult to even try to put things right.' His comments follow the FCA's announcement of a six-week consultation on an industry-wide compensation scheme, which could result in payouts totalling between £9 billion and £18 billion. The scheme is intended to address cases where customers were unfairly charged higher interest rates due to discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) — a practice banned by the FCA in 2021 but widely used prior to that. The proposal has prompted concern within the motor finance sector, particularly around how firms will access loan and commission records from as far back as 2007. Stephen Haddrill, director general of the Finance & Leasing Association (FLA), warned earlier in a statement: 'We have concerns about whether it is possible to have a fair redress scheme that goes back to 2007, when firms have not been required to hold such dated information, and the evidence base will be patchy at best.' Legal risk contained, operational risk rises The FCA's move comes on the heels of a Supreme Court judgment on three test cases — Johnson v FirstRand Bank, Wrench v FirstRand Bank, and Hopcraft v Close Brothers. The ruling narrowed the legal basis for many claims by confirming that car dealers did not owe fiduciary duties to customers. However, it upheld findings of unfair treatment in cases where commission payments significantly inflated interest charges and were poorly disclosed. The judgment gave the motor finance sector some legal relief, as it removed the risk of a broader wave of litigation. Shares in lenders such as Lloyds, Close Brothers, and Bank of Ireland rose following the ruling. But the court's backing for the FCA's interpretation of 'unfair relationships' has left the door open to regulatory-led redress, which Rathi is now urging firms to support. 'If industry works with us, then we can get this moving quickly,' Rathi said. 'If, however, people want to continue to litigate this and have cases going through the courts for many, many more years, then of course it is going to take longer.' Redress path unclear and costly The FCA has yet to decide whether the redress scheme will be 'opt-in' — requiring customers to apply for compensation — or 'opt-out,' in which lenders proactively repay customers unless they decline. 'An opt-out scheme might take longer because firms have to go and look for all the addresses and track down customers who may have moved,' Rathi said. 'An opt-in scheme may be quicker, but will be less comprehensive.' The regulator estimates most compensation payouts will be under £950 per agreement, but the overall burden for banks and car finance providers could be significant. Fitch Ratings has estimated that lenders may be on the hook for £5 billion to £11 billion, depending on the final scope of the scheme. The remainder would likely fall to non-bank and captive auto finance firms. "Rathi hits back at claims FCA redress plan is unworkable" was originally created and published by Motor Finance Online, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données