7 IITians Behind the Most Disruptive Startups of the Decade
1. Deepinder Goyal (IIT Delhi) Founder and CEO, Zomato: Deepinder Goyal revolutionized online food delivery in India. His vision transformed a restaurant directory into a leading food tech giant, significantly impacting how millions discover and order food, and expanding Zomato's global footprint. The idea for Zomato originated from his realization about the daily struggle to find restaurant menus while working at Bain & Company, leading him to create Foodiebay.
2. Nandan Nilekani - IIT Bombay - Co-founder, Infosys Nandan Nilekani has truly been a pivotal figure in putting India's software industry on the global stage. He's widely recognized as an exceptional strategist, a brilliant analytical thinker, and an extraordinary communicator, qualities that have clearly driven his remarkable success. He has also served as the Chairman of the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), playing a pivotal role in implementing India's biometric identity program, Aadhaar.
3. Mehul Goyal – IIT Bombay - Co-founder, BoldCharter An IIT Bombay alumnus and former Partner at AlphaGrep Securities, Mehul is building deep learning-based financial systems that are 10x more efficient and adaptive than traditional algorithmic trading models. He aims to build intelligent, autonomous, and evolving AI frameworks that can outperform existing quant strategies. By merging hands-on trading expertise with cutting-edge AI research, Mehul is reimagining the future of financial markets through machine-led innovation.
4. Sundar Pichai - IIT Kharagpur - CEO, Google Sundar Pichai has been instrumental in the development of popular products like Google Chrome and Android, significantly shaping the global technology landscape. His journey from humble beginnings in Chennai to leading one of the world's most influential companies showcases his strategic vision and deep understanding of product development. Under his leadership, Google has focused heavily on AI, cloud computing, and user-centric innovations.
5. Bhavish Aggarwal - IIT Bombay - Co-founder and CEO, Ola Bhavish Aggarwal disrupted India's transportation sector, building a massive ride-hailing and electric vehicle ecosystem. His entrepreneurial drive continues to shape urban mobility and sustainable energy solutions in the country. His journey to founding Ola began after a frustrating personal experience with a taxi driver, sparking his vision for a reliable, tech-driven cab service. He has since expanded into electric vehicles with Ola Electric, aiming to lead India's transition to sustainable mobility.
6. Vivek Raghavan - IIT Delhi - Co-founder, Sarvam AI Dr. Vivek Raghavan is a pioneering technologist and founder of Sarvam AI, focused on building generative AI solutions for India in local languages and contexts. With key roles in Aadhaar, Bhashini, and the Supreme Court's SUVAS, he's contributed to some of India's largest digital public infrastructure. An IIT Delhi and Carnegie Mellon alum, Vivek brings deep expertise in AI, governance, and scalable technology for social impact.
7. Shiva Dhawan - IIT Delhi - Co-founder, Attentive.AI Attentive.AI offers AI-first solutions for estimation in commercial trades like construction and landscaping. By replacing manual takeoffs with intelligent software, it streamlines complex processes, enabling businesses to bid on more projects, minimize errors, and accelerate growth without expanding their teams. Through this automation, founder Shiva is helping transform the construction and field services industries.
(Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with NRDPL and PTI takes no editorial responsibility for the same.). PTI PWR
This is an auto-published feed from PTI with no editorial input from The Wire.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Despite a 48-hour promise, e-khata issues drag Bengaluru homebuyers back to local municipality offices
Despite the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike's (BBMP) promise to issue e-khatas within 48 hours, many Bengaluru property owners say they continue to face delays and bureaucratic hurdles that force them to visit government offices, defeating the purpose of the digital, paperless system. A key issue reported by applicants is the mismatch between full names and initials across documents such as sale deeds, Aadhaar, and passports, a common practice in southern India. This inconsistency often leads to rejections or prolonged delays, they say. Despite BBMP's 48-hour e-khata promise, Bengaluru property owners face delays and must visit offices, defeating the purpose of a digital system. (Representational Image) (Unsplash ) Another major challenge arises in the case of jointly owned properties. Applicants say the e-khata is being issued in the name of only one co-owner, usually the one whose Aadhaar was uploaded first, even though others are mentioned in the registered sale deed. They say that currently, the online system does not allow applicants to correct or update such errors during the application process. They say the system's rigid data-matching protocols and software limitations are forcing many to take time off work, queue up at Assistant Revenue Offices, and manually correct issues that should ideally be handled online. In March, BBMP said that homeowners no longer need to visit the Bengaluru municipal corporation offices to obtain the e-khata, an electronic version of the traditional khata certificate, a digital record that validates the ownership details of a property in Karnataka. The final e-khata will be issued within two days of the application submission, as per a statement from BBMP Special Commissioner (Revenue) Munish Moudgil. Bengaluru citizens within BBMP limits can now obtain their final e-khata within two days of application submission, he had said in June. Also Read: No need to visit BBMP offices: Homeowners can now receive final e-khata within 48 hours of submitting the application Initials vs full names: A digital mismatch One of the most common problems plaguing applicants is the mismatch between full names and initials across different documents, a common way of writing names in southern India. For example, a property owner named E.V. Ramasamy, whose name appears as Erode Venkatappa Ramasamy on his Aadhaar but E.V. Ramasamy on his sale deed, was unable to generate an e-khata online. "This is because the BBMP system attempts to validate all fields across documents, including full names, rather than relying on key identifiers like Aadhaar number and OTP-based verification," said Dhananjaya Padmanabhachar, director of the Karnataka Homebuyers Forum. 'This issue affects many owners who use initials in documents like sale deeds or Aadhaar,' he said. 'The system should be validating against key fields, not every detail. Due to this, people are being forced to physically visit BBMP offices just to validate or correct names, an option that is not even available on the official website.' Joint ownership issues persist Another major bottleneck affects jointly owned properties, where the e-khata system is generating certificates with only one owner's name, typically the person whose Aadhaar was uploaded first, leaving out co-owners despite them being listed in the registered sale deed, point out property owners. One user, Krishna Thatvam, wrote on the social media platform X, "You kept an error for joint owners applying e-khata online. We're forced to visit the ATO office to resolve it like it's the 90s. We have to sacrifice a day off at work! At least give a proper email reply to queries we ask.' According to BBMP Special Commissioner (Revenue) Munish Moudgil, the e-khata system integrates with the Kaveri software, which houses the official sale deed. If names are listed in a single line in the deed, the system only pulls in one name, The Hindu reported. However, he said, there is a feature to correct this. 'There is an option called 'Add Owner' in the BBMP system. Adding names under this option will lead to the generation of e-khata with all names of the property owners,' Moudgil told The Hindu. Also Read: BBMP receives 50,000 e-Khata applications, launches a drive to recover ₹800 crore in dues from 3.75 lakh property owners Digital doesn't always mean hassle-free, say homeowners BBMP had promised a hassle-free digital system that would eliminate the need for repeated visits to government offices. But for many, the e-khata process has only become another tech-enabled bottleneck. 'There's no option to correct or update details while applying for e-khata online,' said Padmanabhachar. 'If there's even a small mismatch in the documents, such as initials versus full names or joint ownership issues, applicants are forced to visit the BBMP office in person. This defeats the very purpose of a digital, citizen-friendly system and adds unnecessary delays and inconvenience for homebuyers.' With technical inconsistencies, a lack of proactive user support, and non-intuitive workflows, homebuyers say they are stuck between a digital promise and an offline reality. 'It's high time the BBMP refined the system to be citizen-centric,' said Padmanabhachar. 'Otherwise, all it's doing is pushing people from one queue to another, this time, just behind a screen.' A list of queries has been sent to BBMP. The story will be updated once a query is received. What is an e-khata? E-khata is an electronic version of the traditional khata certificate, introduced by the BBMP in Bengaluru and other local bodies in October 2024. This digital record is available online, where property owners can apply for, download, and verify their khata without visiting the municipal office. Since launching the digital khata system in October 2024, the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) has processed and issued approximately 2.75 lakh e-khatas, according to official data. As of July, BBMP has received over 50,000 applications for new Khatas, and BBMP chief commissioner Maheshwar Rao has instructed officials to process these as a priority, noting that timely approvals could significantly boost property tax revenue.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Aadhaar: Digital foresight gave India its identity leadership
India's digital identity project has had, throughout the life of the Aadhaar project, more than its fair share of criticism. Almost as soon as it was announced, it had to deal with angry opposition from all quarters, raising concerns about the fact that it was going to invade personal privacy and the surveillance that could result in if its database were to be misused. So widespread was the discomfort with Aadhaar that every time I travelled outside the country, I found myself having to explain why we were building it. This was particularly the case in Europe, where, in the data protection circles I inhabit, no one had any qualms expressing their disapproval with what we were attempting. While I could understand how their lived experience during World War II might have made them nervous about any attempt to establish a citizen ID database, what was disappointing was that so much of their concern came from an imperfect understanding of how Aadhaar had been designed. Also read: Mint Explainer: Would you make Sam Altman's eye scanner your online ID? It has been nearly 15 years since the first Aadhaar number was issued and all the fears that it would lead to mass surveillance have, for the most part, not come to pass. Aadhaar has largely been used to deliver subsidies, provide benefits and ease public access to services. Not only did the technology not 'fail at scale,' as we were warned it might, none of the widespread exclusion we were told would result came to pass. At the time of writing, over 130 billion Aadhaar authentications have taken place, suggesting that, at the very least, the system must have worked 130 billion times. The digital public infrastructure (DPI) revolution that Aadhaar launched dramatically improved financial inclusion in the country. In 2011, just 35% of the population had bank accounts. Today, almost nine-tenths of our population aged 15-plus has a bank account, even if some accounts go unused. Direct benefit transfers now reach millions of beneficiaries across 300-plus schemes, and during the covid lockdowns, Aadhaar enabled 11 million daily micro ATM transactions and took banking to India's remotest villages. But beyond these numbers, perhaps the greatest vindication of Aadhaar is the fact that once-fierce opponents of the very idea of a digital identity are now implementing it in other countries. In what is, for me, perhaps the most dramatic turnaround, the EU last May mandated that all its 27 member states should provide digital identity wallets to their 450 million citizens by December 2026. The eIDAS 2.0 regulation represents one of the most comprehensive digital identity roll-outs in history, with cross-sector interoperability and acceptance by both public and private service providers. Through its ID4D initiative, the World Bank is investing $1.2 billion in national ID projects across more than 30 countries. Paul Romer, a former World Bank chief economist, once described Aadhaar as 'the most sophisticated ID programme in the world" and argued 'it could be good for the world if this became widely adopted." Across the world, 26 countries have implemented identity systems using the MOSIP platform, and over 130 million digital IDs have already been issued globally. The Philippines alone has registered 90 million citizens, while Ethiopia intends to reach 70 million residents through its Fayda ID system. Also read: Digital public infrastructure: A dubious way to foster competition Today, it is widely accepted that a digital identity is essential in an increasingly digital world. Countries without such ID systems risk being left behind, as they would be unable to deliver services efficiently and facilitate the digital transactions that modern economies need. This was clearly evident during the pandemic, when countries with robust digital identity infrastructure could respond three times more effectively than those that had to rely on paper-based systems. As for the debate about privacy being traded off for utility, most countries have voted in favour of the latter, realizing that a robust digital ID system does more to enhance democratic governance than threaten it. According to McKinsey, a digital ID can unlock economic value of up to 4% of a country's GDP by reducing identity fraud and streamlining everything from banking to healthcare access. Today, the question is no longer whether a digital ID programme is necessary, but how quickly the country in question can implement it. The case for one is overwhelming: nations with strong digital ID systems can deliver services more efficiently, respond to crises more effectively and enable financial inclusion. Those without will increasingly find themselves unable to offer their citizens the level and variety of services expected of a modern economy. In under a decade-and-a-half, things have come full circle. Countries that were once critical of India's digital identity system are now implementing identity systems of their own. Its opponents have largely fallen silent, as the dystopia they had predicted would inevitably befall us has not materialized. To be clear, I am not doubting their motivations or questioning their intent, but just pointing out that they failed to appreciate how rapidly the world was digitizing and how essential a digital identity was going to prove in the future that was to come. Also read: DPI integration with AI will elevate the quality of public services as well as risks Ice hockey legend Wayne Gretzky, famously said, 'I skate to where the puck is going to be, not where it has been." India saw where the future was going to be. And built accordingly. The rest of the world is now following suit.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Cloudflare Accuses Perplexity of Bypassing Bot Blocks; AI Firm Denies Claims
A fresh controversy has erupted in the tech world as Cloudflare, a leading internet infrastructure provider, has accused AI startup Perplexity of engaging in deceptive web scraping practices. The company alleges that Perplexity accessed content from websites that had explicitly restricted such activity, drawing attention once again to the murky boundaries of AI, data access, and internet ethics. In a blog post published Monday, Cloudflare claimed it detected Perplexity scraping content from sites that had added rules in their files to block such bots. According to Cloudflare, the AI firm allegedly circumvented these blocks by disguising its crawler's identity, including tactics like changing its user-agent strings and using multiple IP addresses to evade detection. 'This activity was observed across tens of thousands of domains and millions of requests per day,' the blog post stated. Cloudflare said it relied on a combination of machine learning tools and traffic analysis to pinpoint Perplexity as the source of the behavior. It added that some of the requests impersonated legitimate browsers, including Google Chrome on macOS. Cloudflare said the scraping came to its attention after several of its clients reported suspicious traffic coming from Perplexity, despite efforts to block it. In response, Cloudflare has now removed Perplexity's bots from its list of verified crawlers and introduced additional measures to prevent similar activity in the future. Perplexity has strongly denied the accusations, pushing back in a detailed rebuttal. The AI startup dismissed the claims as a 'sales pitch,' arguing that Cloudflare's blog post reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how AI assistant's function. 'When Perplexity fetches a webpage, it's because a user asked a specific question,' the company stated. It emphasized that its AI platform does not engage in traditional web crawling or mass data harvesting. Instead, it claimed its system only retrieves real-time information when prompted by user queries and does not store or use that content to train its AI models. Further defending itself, Perplexity said that Cloudflare had wrongly attributed some of the automated traffic to its systems. It pointed to a third-party service, BrowserBase, suggesting that only a minor portion of the requests in question originated from there. 'This is a basic traffic analysis failure,' Perplexity argued, accusing Cloudflare of presenting misleading data and diagrams. The dispute comes at a time when the lines between helpful AI tools and unauthorized bots are increasingly blurred. As more AI applications rely on real-time data, concerns are growing among website operators over how their content is accessed and used. While Cloudflare has yet to issue a follow-up to Perplexity's rebuttal, the clash has already fueled broader discussions about ethical web scraping, AI transparency, and the urgent need for standardized guidelines on digital content access. With both companies standing firm on their positions, this incident may become a touchstone case in the ongoing struggle between open web advocates and those demanding tighter content controls in the AI era.
