‘The boy's two shoes were found on the driveway': Child allegedly knocked down by neighbour settles for €1.5m
The boy's mother told the court that the settlement brought an end to a six year legal battle which she said had brought her family 'to its knees.'
'We've had to battle a broken legal system, an outdated and unchanging education system, and a health system that seems so confused about its own roles that it leaves families like ours with no hope', she told Mr Justice Paul Coffey.
The mother, who thanked the judge for allowing her voice to be heard, said she has had 'to fill all the gaps left by broken systems'.
READ MORE
'Today, I will continue to rebuild our lives. My ongoing battling of systems has been reduced but it doesn't end. It's an ongoing grief and loss of who and what we were as a family,' she added.
The child − who, through his mother, brought the case against the neighbour − cannot be identified by order of the court. The settlement is without an admission of liability.
The mother's counsel Liam Reidy SC, instructed by McMahon Goldrick solicitors, told the court that the boy, when he was almost five years of age in 2019, was thought to have gone to a neighbour's house.
'The neighbour came holding the child in his arms. He had suffered injuries to the head and abdomen. There were no witnesses to the accident but the boy's two shoes were found on the driveway of the neighbour's house,' counsel told the court.
Counsel said the neighbour had asserted that he did not see the child because the boy allegedly came out from behind a wheelie bin. The boy was later discovered to have an acquired brain injury.
The boy's mother told the court that while she was 'grateful for this token of support' for her son, 'the reality is that this battle will continue for the rest of our lives − constantly challenging our mental health and our resilience'. She said the accident had impacted on her son's life, and the lives of everyone who loves him.
'He is a real character − kind, sensitive, and polite. He's determined not to let his brain injury stop him from living his life. But like anyone fighting a battle this big, sometimes it gets too much,' she said.
She told the judge they had lost the little boy her son used to be.
'He was easy-going, bright, sociable, happy and full of joy. He loved being out with his friends − and then suddenly, that was all gone. The first year was filled with severe headaches and giving his liver time to heal,' she said.
In the proceedings against the neighbour, the now 11-year-old boy suing through his mother claimed there was an alleged failure to keep a proper lookout and an alleged failure to have regard to the residential area where children would regularly be about.
It was also claimed there was an alleged failure to make sure the way was clear before crossing the public footpath and into the driveway.
All of the claims were denied.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Croatian truck driver remanded in custody over €2 million drugs haul in Cork
A truck driver has been remanded in custody charged in connection with a €2 million drugs seizure from a consignment of steel at the Port of Cork . Robert Slivar (59), of no fixed abode but from Ivanic, Croatia , was brought before a special sitting of Cork District Court on Saturday. He was charged with two offences relating to the seizure of 93 packages of cannabis grass, weighing 107kg and worth €2.1 million. Mr Slivar, who arrived in Cork by ferry from Zeebrugge in Belgium , was charged with cannabis possession and possession of cannabis for sale or supply at the Port of Cork, Ringaskiddy, on July 27th, contrary to section 3 and section 15 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977. The alleged discovery was made by a sniffer dog, customs officers and gardaí . READ MORE Det Garda Ryan Dillon, of the Cork city divisional drugs unit, gave evidence of arrest, charge and caution, telling the court Mr Slivar made no reply to either charge when they were put to him after caution outside Togher Garda station. Insp Ray Dunne said gardaí sought for Mr Slivar to be remanded in custody, but defence solicitor Diarmuid Kelleher said his client, who was assisted throughout the proceedings by a Croatian interpreter, was seeking bail. Det Garda Dillon outlined objections to bail, citing the seriousness of the charges, the alleged strength of evidence in the case and fears Mr Slivar poses a flight risk as he has no ties to Ireland. Judge John King refused bail and remanded Mr Slivar in custody to appear again at a special sitting of Cork District Court on Wednesday. The judge also requested a statement of means from the accused before deciding whether to grant free legal aid.
Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
Woman who claims ex-partner records her using Meta smart glasses granted temporary protection order
A woman whose 'threatening' ex-partner sent a recording of her young daughter crying while she was in his care has been granted a temporary protection order until Tusla can investigate the child's welfare. The mother told Dublin District Family Court that she and her ex-partner separated more than a year ago but lived together with their child until earlier this year, from which point she 'couldn't take it any more'. She told Judge William Aylmer 'things got mad, crazy', claiming her ex-partner installed cameras 'all over the house, inside the house'. She alleged he wears Meta Ray-Ban smart glasses which he uses to record video footage 'all the time'. READ MORE 'He's recording me when he comes to drop her off and collect her and he sends me the clips,' she said. Since she and her daughter left, she claimed she has been receiving 'threatening' messages from him. In the messages, she alleges he said 'this won't bode well for you' and 'what's going to happen now are consequences of your actions. Don't say I didn't warn you'. The woman said her daughter, aged under 10, stays with him once a week and that she did not have concerns for her welfare 'up until recently'. She played an audio clip she had received by email from her ex-partner the day prior, in which her upset daughter could be heard crying. 'His behaviour is just so mad,' the woman said while crying at the witness stand on Friday. Asked whether she had considered not letting her daughter visit her ex-partner, she said she does 'not want to do that to her' or affect her routine. Noting he had a concern for the child's welfare after hearing the evidence, Judge Aylmer said he would direct Tusla to carry out a section 20 report, which involves a social worker undertaking an investigation of the child's welfare. This would take some time to prepare, he said as he granted a temporary protection order for the mother and her daughter. He made the order while only the woman was present in court and without hearing the ex-partner's response to her claims. A protection order, which can be granted if a judge believes there is an immediate risk of significant harm, directs a person to stop committing or threatening violence against someone. In a separate case on Friday morning, a woman sought a protection order against the father of her newborn baby. She claimed her ex-partner was emotionally abusive and cannot control his anger. She told the judge she gave birth last month and was afraid of the man from whom she separated in recent months. 'The more the relationship continued, and I was pregnant, the worse his behaviour got. He could not control his anger and would punch and kick the furniture around the house,' she said. 'He would call me names, he would ask where I was, who I was with at all times. I would wake up and he would be going through my phone and my chats,' she said. On several occasions throughout their relationship, her ex-partner would prevent her from exiting rooms during arguments, she claimed. 'The more I look at my daughter, the more I don't feel that it's safe for him to be around her,' she said. Judge Aylmer granted a temporary protection order and limited the man's communication regarding his child to the woman's mother only. The man was not present in court during the woman's application. The judge said that if the man wishes to gain access to his child, and if the woman is not volunteering it, he must come to court to seek it.
Irish Times
17 hours ago
- Irish Times
What will Ireland's costly five-year schools abuse inquiry achieve?
In recent weeks, the Government has announced the establishment of an inquiry into sexual abuse in all schools, primary and second level . Now people who suffered physical abuse are asking, 'what about us?' Four categories of abuse are used in classifying abuse – sexual, physical, emotional, and neglect. In the legal world, a claim of sexual abuse appears to have top billing when it comes to redress, but that should not take from the fact that the effects of any abuse, experienced as a child, can be difficult to measure. When we consider the hurt caused by verbal abuse, mockery, classroom humiliation, exclusion, we realise that these experiences can have lifelong consequences for the individual and society. Social class played a part in the abuse in schools . READ MORE Noted Brazilian educator Paulo Freire, writing about oppressors versus the oppressed, made the point that very few, if any, are capable of overcoming the views and prejudices of the class into which they were born. Teachers in schools, be they religious or secular, tended to come from middle class origins and many took the view that it did not matter if one treated the children of the poor differently from the those whose parents were better off, parents with whom the teachers could more easily identify. This was relevant from the foundation of the primary school system in the 19th century, though it began to change gradually in the 1960s and with the introduction of free education. It is questionable what a five-year, costly Government inquiry, which will divert financial and personnel resources from the educational budget, will achieve. If the net of inquiries of past abuses continues to be widened, will a point of closure ever be reached? We know that abuse happens in families. Will future governments trawl through every family in the land so that every child who was ever abused in any setting is going to have a voice? [ 'I'm angry that my abuse as a child does not count' – State must pay for school sexual abuse Opens in new window ] Minister for Education Helen McEntee said institutions and religious orders involved in historical sex abuse in schools will be "held accountable" for the "awful" crimes. Photograph: Cate McCurry/ PA Wire Presumably the inquiry will identify those who allege abuse. Will it then have the task of assessing the truth of any allegation? Will it presume that all allegations are true? There is the question of natural justice, whereby the accused has the right of reply to his/ her accuser. Having verified whether an allegation is credible (and there is a difference between credibility and truth) there is the question of who will bear the cost of redress. And we need to ask ourselves, and those who represent us in Government, if 'giving a voice' actually brings healing. It may – but being the public voice that represents all those who suffered could also serve to lock one into the hurt. Tánaiste Simon Harris has insisted that the religious organisations will have to pay and the Opposition are adamant that they have 'got away' with not paying. Religious organisations have already paid some money and handed over buildings. There has not been any calculation of the money and salaries that wereploughed back into schools. This might be as immeasurable as the degree of abuse. The reality of child abuse within and without the churches has been revealed and openly debated for the past 30 years. It has shattered the institution of the Catholic Church and, in many ways, has been as transformative as the Reformation was in the 16th century. The credibility of the Church of Rome has been marred, possibly beyond repair. But there may come a point where we are in danger of ignoring present abuses in favour of scrutiny of the past. Finally, questions must be raised about school management. The greater number of our schools are under the management of the Catholic Church. The pay back in terms of church practice and adult belief seem minimal. The passing on of faith is primarily the role of the family. This is the time for the Catholic hierarchy to hand back the schools to the State. Margaret Lee is a retired Principal Social Worker with experience in Child and Family Services, as well as on Child Protection Committee.
